Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Good Headset

Started by Mark Wolfe · · Last activity · 9 posts · 308 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 October 2004
Last activity
19 October 2004
Original author
Mark Wolfe
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
308
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm piecing a touring bike together and am wondering about the
    quality/durability of the Cane Creek S2 headsets. Looks like a good
    price for them. My other bikes have either shimano, king, or campy.
    This is my first threadless road bike. Google is giving me mixed
    signals on the Cane Creek stuff, however I see quite a few bikes with
    them. This is a Surly LHT btw.

    --
    Mark Wolfe Lakeside, ca http://www.wolfenet.org
    gpg fingerprint = 42B6 EFEB 5414 AA18 01B7 64AC EF46 F7E6 82F6 8C71
    We use Linux for all our mission-critical applications. Having the
    source code
    means that we are not held hostage by anyone's support department.
    (Russell Nelson, President of Crynwr Software)

  2. Quoted message said:

    I'm piecing a touring bike together and am wondering about the
    quality/durability of the Cane Creek S2 headsets. Looks like a good price
    for them. My other bikes have either shimano, king, or campy. This is my
    first threadless road bike. Google is giving me mixed signals on the Cane
    Creek stuff, however I see quite a few bikes with them. This is a Surly
    LHT btw.

    They're inexpensive, boring, and work fine. Not the greatest seals in the
    world, so a good idea to figure on a yearly (more often in wet weather
    riding) cleaning.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  3. Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm piecing a touring bike together and am wondering about the
    quality/durability of the Cane Creek S2 headsets. Looks like a good price
    for them. My other bikes have either shimano, king, or campy. This is my
    first threadless road bike. Google is giving me mixed signals on the Cane
    Creek stuff, however I see quite a few bikes with them. This is a Surly
    LHT btw.

    They're inexpensive, boring, and work fine. Not the greatest seals in the
    world, so a good idea to figure on a yearly (more often in wet weather
    riding) cleaning.

    If it's a *proper* touring bike it will have mudguards/fenders, so the
    headset will be almost zero maintenance :-)

  4. Zog The Undeniable said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm piecing a touring bike together and am wondering about the
    quality/durability of the Cane Creek S2 headsets. Looks like a good
    price for them. My other bikes have either shimano, king, or campy.
    This is my first threadless road bike. Google is giving me mixed
    signals on the Cane Creek stuff, however I see quite a few bikes with
    them. This is a Surly LHT btw.

    They're inexpensive, boring, and work fine. Not the greatest seals in
    the world, so a good idea to figure on a yearly (more often in wet
    weather riding) cleaning.

    If it's a *proper* touring bike it will have mudguards/fenders, so the
    headset will be almost zero maintenance :-)

    It's the Long Haul Trucker, collecting parts for it right now. I'm
    already catching [censored] from my riding buddies for wanting to put fenders
    on it. However, it did rain today, and myself and probably a bunch of
    others avoided today's Vintage bike ride and the unveiling of Brian
    Baylis's latest because of it. If I had this LHT built, I would've been
    there laughing. 🙂

    --
    Mark Wolfe Lakeside, ca http://www.wolfenet.org
    gpg fingerprint = 42B6 EFEB 5414 AA18 01B7 64AC EF46 F7E6 82F6 8C71
    It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon.
    It takes a 486 to run Windows 95.
    Something is wrong here.

  5. Mark Wolfe said:

    I'm piecing a touring bike together and am wondering about the
    quality/durability of the Cane Creek S2 headsets. Looks like a good
    price for them. My other bikes have either shimano, king, or campy.
    This is my first threadless road bike. Google is giving me mixed
    signals on the Cane Creek stuff, however I see quite a few bikes with
    them. This is a Surly LHT btw.

    I haven't used the Cane Creek, but I've had a Stronglight Delta on my
    tandem for going on 20 years now. If it can handle tandem use for that
    long, it ought to be fine on a touring bike.

    --

    -John ([email hidden])

  6. On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:51:35 -0700, Mark Wolfe <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I'm piecing a touring bike together and am wondering about the
    quality/durability of the Cane Creek S2 headsets. Looks like a good
    price for them. My other bikes have either shimano, king, or campy.
    This is my first threadless road bike. Google is giving me mixed
    signals on the Cane Creek stuff, however I see quite a few bikes with
    them. This is a Surly LHT btw.

    It's my experience that many riders who complain about their Cane
    Creek headsets (S2, S6, etc.) binding find the problem is gone after
    the frame and fork are properly faced.

    I like the S2 and S6.

  7. Quoted message said:

    It's my experience that many riders who complain about their Cane
    Creek headsets (S2, S6, etc.) binding find the problem is gone after
    the frame and fork are properly faced.

    Sometimes the problem can be with a stem that's not properly faced. We
    don't see this very often anymore, but it used to be fairly common (and
    rarely diagnosed). We even spent a small fortune on a generally-not-needed
    tool that faces stems.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

    "dianne_1234" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:51:35 -0700, Mark Wolfe <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I'm piecing a touring bike together and am wondering about the
    quality/durability of the Cane Creek S2 headsets. Looks like a good
    price for them. My other bikes have either shimano, king, or campy.
    This is my first threadless road bike. Google is giving me mixed
    signals on the Cane Creek stuff, however I see quite a few bikes with
    them. This is a Surly LHT btw.

    It's my experience that many riders who complain about their Cane
    Creek headsets (S2, S6, etc.) binding find the problem is gone after
    the frame and fork are properly faced.

    I like the S2 and S6.

  8. "Mark Wolfe" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    If it's a *proper* touring bike it will have mudguards/fenders, so the
    headset will be almost zero maintenance :-)

    It's the Long Haul Trucker, collecting parts for it right now. I'm
    already catching [censored] from my riding buddies for wanting to put fenders
    on it. However, it did rain today, and myself and probably a bunch of
    others avoided today's Vintage bike ride and the unveiling of Brian
    Baylis's latest because of it. If I had this LHT built, I would've been
    there laughing. 🙂

    After one 3-day rainy tour a couple of years ago I just left my fenders on.
    I got a few offhand remarks about them, but I noticed on one winter club
    ride last year 4 out of 7 of us were using them. I think a lot of people
    think they slow you down, but riding with the same group, over the same
    course, on a weekly basis for a few years now, my "before & after" says
    they don't. The only downside of fenders is you have to be vigilant about
    riding over any debris that could get picked up & jam them. I now have
    full-time, full-length fenders on 3 bikes, rear fender on a 4th; the only
    bike I don't have them on is my MTB. I hate getting sprayed in the winter,
    the water isn't so bad in the warm months, but the grit really sucks. I
    would often get home covered with it.

  9. In article <IsScd.148804$He1.42122@attbi_s01>,

    Peter Cole said:

    "Mark Wolfe" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    If it's a *proper* touring bike it will have mudguards/fenders, so the
    headset will be almost zero maintenance :-)

    It's the Long Haul Trucker, collecting parts for it right now. I'm
    already catching [censored] from my riding buddies for wanting to put fenders
    on it. However, it did rain today, and myself and probably a bunch of
    others avoided today's Vintage bike ride and the unveiling of Brian
    Baylis's latest because of it. If I had this LHT built, I would've been
    there laughing. 🙂

    After one 3-day rainy tour a couple of years ago I just left my fenders on.
    I got a few offhand remarks about them, but I noticed on one winter club
    ride last year 4 out of 7 of us were using them. I think a lot of people
    think they slow you down, but riding with the same group, over the same
    course, on a weekly basis for a few years now, my "before & after" says
    they don't. The only downside of fenders is you have to be vigilant about
    riding over any debris that could get picked up & jam them. I now have
    full-time, full-length fenders on 3 bikes, rear fender on a 4th; the only
    bike I don't have them on is my MTB. I hate getting sprayed in the winter,
    the water isn't so bad in the warm months, but the grit really sucks. I
    would often get home covered with it.

    My club has a weekly Saturday morning ride in Vancouver. It's
    fenders-mandatory (loosely enforced: no fenders means you ride at the
    back) from when the weather turns wet (about the start of October) until
    the weather turns dry (um, April? May? Never?).

    Not just fenders are expected: a low-hanging mudflap on the rear fender
    is considered part of the standard, and front flaps are just common
    sense. The most popular extension is a halved water bottle.

    Some riders use those funky SKS race fenders, which are quick-on and
    quick-off, a boon for racers with only one road bike. But they don't
    cover ahead of the fork or ahead of the rear seat stays, and that makes
    a difference.

    But our club-run Spring racing Series in April is fenders-forbidden.
    Just one more piece of mess to hurt people is the theory, I suppose.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com
    Verus de parvis; verus de magnis.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.