Road Cycling · Public discussion

Zabriski time gap plot

Started by Dan Connelly · · Last activity · 8 posts · 479 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
14 September 2004
Last activity
15 September 2004
Original author
Dan Connelly
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
479
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. He managed his time gap budget very efficiently:

    http://www.djconnel.com/cycling/Zabriski_timegaps.png

  2. Whoops! I spelled his name wrong. The plot is now at:

    http://www.djconnel.com/cycling/Zabriskie_timegaps.png

  3. Dan Connelly said:

    He managed his time gap budget very efficiently:

    http://www.djconnel.com/cycling/Zabriski_timegaps.png

    It's easier now that the riders now to account for relativistic factors.

  4. Dan Connelly said:

    Whoops! I spelled his name wrong. The plot is now at:

    http://www.djconnel.com/cycling/Zabriskie_timegaps.png

    Egad! You actually rely on CyclingNews time gaps?

    Well, I suppose if they're consistently off by a couple kilometers it
    would work, which the plot bears out. I frequently see the gap remain
    large then suddenly lose a chunk inexplicably and put it down to them
    being to busy to keep all the datum correct (like those always fun
    variations in distance 70/130, 80/120, 119/0.99999999999, 100/100...)

    Here I was looking at the subject 'Zabriskie Time Gap Plot' and thought
    this was regarding the

    GREAT ZABRISKIE CONSPIRACY OF '04
    (Brought to you by Killogs Tree Bark Cereal)

    Sooooo why did Zabriskie get away with this long solo effort? Because
    Valverde biffed? He easily could have been chased down, YET, Fassa
    Bortolo gave up. Cofidis could have reeled him in, but didn't. Tmobile
    couldn't do sh!t after the fish salad caper (say, what did Zabel eat?),
    Liberty Seguros and Illes Balears gave it some gas, but they couldn't
    catch up Dave, all weighed down by salt as he was.

    1) Could it be they decided to let him get away with it, thus exhausting
    one of Floyd's remaining team?

    2) Could it be they let him scout the road into town to see if it was
    clear of kids waving yellow bags?

    3) By letting Dave get away all day they could deny Postal of a whole
    team car and Tyler Hamilton could pinch their water bottles while they
    weren't looking? (Play these pictures backwards and they show the true
    story of Tyler pinching water bottles and passing them to his team car.
    Obviously Graham was in on the plot!)

    <http://grahamwatson.com/gw/imagedocs.nsf/updateframesetcall?openform&04vueltaSt11>

    4) They're secretly hoping Lance will be shocked that a USPS team
    member, who was not the leader, won a stage and not recover in time for
    the next TdF.

    5) Got a theory of your own?

    Inquiring minds are nosy and want to know...

  5. Quoted message said:
    Dan Connelly said:

    Whoops! I spelled his name wrong. The plot is now at:
    http://www.djconnel.com/cycling/Zabriskie_timegaps.png

    Richard Adams said:

    Egad! You actually rely on CyclingNews time gaps?

    Well, I suppose if they're consistently off by a couple kilometers it
    would work, which the plot bears out. I frequently see the gap remain
    large then suddenly lose a chunk inexplicably...

    Dumbass,
    You never heard of quantum mechanics ? ;-)

  6. "Richard Adams" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Dan Connelly said:

    Whoops! I spelled his name wrong. The plot is now at:

    http://www.djconnel.com/cycling/Zabriskie_timegaps.png

    Egad! You actually rely on CyclingNews time gaps?


    According to that plot, they're pretty good ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    Well, I suppose if they're consistently off by a couple kilometers it
    would work, which the plot bears out. I frequently see the gap remain
    large then suddenly lose a chunk inexplicably and put it down to them
    being to busy to keep all the datum correct (like those always fun
    variations in distance 70/130, 80/120, 119/0.99999999999, 100/100...)


    It's merely to annoy Eurosport.

    Jeff

  7. Donald Munro said:
    Quoted message said:
    Dan Connelly said:

    Whoops! I spelled his name wrong. The plot is now at:
    http://www.djconnel.com/cycling/Zabriskie_timegaps.png

    Richard Adams said:

    Egad! You actually rely on CyclingNews time gaps?

    Well, I suppose if they're consistently off by a couple kilometers it
    would work, which the plot bears out. I frequently see the gap remain
    large then suddenly lose a chunk inexplicably...

    Dumbass,
    You never heard of quantum mechanics ? ;-)

    They're the only guys who can fix my truck.

  8. Jeff Jones said:

    "Richard Adams" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Dan Connelly said:

    Whoops! I spelled his name wrong. The plot is now at:

    http://www.djconnel.com/cycling/Zabriskie_timegaps.png

    Egad! You actually rely on CyclingNews time gaps?

    According to that plot, they're pretty good ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    Well, I suppose if they're consistently off by a couple kilometers it
    would work, which the plot bears out. I frequently see the gap remain
    large then suddenly lose a chunk inexplicably and put it down to them
    being to busy to keep all the datum correct (like those always fun
    variations in distance 70/130, 80/120, 119/0.99999999999, 100/100...)

    It's merely to annoy Eurosport.

    Jeff

    Ah. Here I was believing you spilled your irish coffee in the keyboard.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.