Road Cycling · Public discussion

You must be joking!

Started by Dan Gregory · · Last activity · 12 posts · 365 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 March 2008
Last activity
24 March 2008
Original author
Dan Gregory
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
365
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/22/MNU3VOB22.DTL&feed=rss.news
    as if the cyclists were at fault when the dep hit them..

  2. "Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/22/MNU3VOB22.DTL&feed=rss.news
    as if the cyclists were at fault when the dep hit them..

    No one has suggested that cyclists Kristy Gough, 30, of San Leandro and Matt
    Peterson, 29, of San Francisco who were killed in the March 9 accident on
    Stevens Canyon Road in Cupertino, were at fault. Evans, the triathlon
    coach who regularly trains riders in the hills of San Mateo County and was
    Gough's coach, said it is often the serious athletic bikers who take the
    most risks. He said he sees whole clubs of riders zipping through stop signs
    and failing to slow down. You get these guys who think they are Lance
    Armstrong or something, then they turn around and get themselves killed,"
    Evans said.

    = in other words, no one is suggesting, except the author of that article.

    Male cyclists were almost five times more likely to be killed or severely
    injured than women. Fatalities and severe injury accidents affected all age
    groups, but riders in their 30s and 40s faired worse than others. Most
    common fatalities were 48-year-old males.

    = I am guessing, but probably the population of cyclists is around 5x male
    to female

    "The advocates say large numbers of cyclists fail to follow the rules of the
    road, running stop signs and red lights, and drivers are becoming more
    aggressive. ", and "Yet even the most staunch cycling advocates acknowledge
    that some cyclists give others a bad name by failing to obey traffic laws.
    When I see a rider run a red light, I cringe," Shahum said. "Not only is it
    totally unsafe, it makes me and all other cyclists look bad."

    = What I see here in Denver is that it's the weekend warriors and "Ride the
    Rockies" geeks that are far more likely to run red lights, etc. Cyclists
    who ride alot know that a couple minutes stopped at a light does not matter.

    Bicycling advocates said the statistics might in part reflect a bias among
    police officers, who they say often "blame the victims," especially because
    cyclists might not get to tell their side of the story as they are being
    carried off on stretchers.

    = when I was run over 7 years ago, incredibly, I was ticketed for not using
    a light on my bicycle ( I was run over in the afternoon ) I was never asked
    what happened. Also, it is significant that both the driver and the cop are
    Latino. In court, I was aquitted when the cop admitted under oath that she
    had changed the time of the accident to after sunset in order to give me the
    ticket instead of the driver. Later, the driver lost his license for his
    second time, the second time for running me over.

  3. "xzzy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    = when I was run over 7 years ago, incredibly, I was ticketed for not
    using a light on my bicycle ( I was run over in the afternoon ) I was
    never asked what happened. Also, it is significant that both the driver
    and the cop are Latino. In court, I was aquitted when the cop admitted
    under oath that she had changed the time of the accident to after sunset
    in order to give me the ticket instead of the driver. Later, the driver
    lost his license for his second time, the second time for running me over.

    I got hit head on by a nurse who was clearly on the wrong side of the road,
    entirely in my lane as she came around the blind corner. I was launched like
    a guided missile over her car some 30 feet, but luckily I prepared myself at
    the last second for what I knew was going to be a flight to hell. I got my
    shoes unlocked and clear from the pedals just in time and landed in the soft
    dirt. That's what saved me, not even wearing a helmet, just a cycling cap
    that day since it was supposed to be just a short ride close to home. The
    nurse who hit was clearly upset, when she saw I didn't get up right away,
    not because I was injured, but because she was losing time, looking at her
    watch and thinking out loud a bit.

    She called her hubby on her cell phone who was a local Sheriff about what
    she would do, legal implications, nothing to do with an ambulance. As a
    nurse, she never once attended to my needs, but instead continued to talk
    about the legal implications with her hubby since she knew she was in the
    wrong lane. Well, the Sheriff called his buddy the CHP who first came on the
    scene. Then the threesome went into a conference about what her options
    might be and what the legal problems might be since she was clearly in my
    lane. All the while, no one really seems concerned about my injuries.
    Finally the CHP asked me if I needed an Ambulance, and the threesome
    continued to chat and sweat what their problems might be over this, never
    mind that I got hit by some nurse driving on the wrong side of the road, and
    I lost because the laws of physics are not too kind when a car meets a
    bicycle. I was lucky enough to have minor injuries, and I could of sued in
    court, but I didn't. Their insurance company was very quick to try and
    smooth this over by covering the cost of repairs to my MB bike.

    But this just reminds me again, that in an every increasing population, and
    with more cars on the road every year, bicycles have less space. Drivers
    always seem to be in too big a hurry, and life is increasing becoming
    cheaper and cheaper everyday. People just don't seem to be recognizant of
    other people as human beings. We all share this planet together, but what
    still persists, and this seems like a problem that goes back to the days of
    the Roman Empire, is that people still act incredibly crazy behind the wheel
    of a car, even doctors, lawyers, people who otherwise normally are well
    mannered. That sense of empowerment behind the wheel of a car, road rage,
    etc, is the scariest thing to me as a cyclist. Getting run off the road,
    getting flipped off, seems to be part and parcel of the culture of cars
    versus cyclists, not always, but the mentality of someone behind the wheel
    of a car, is much different then someone riding a bike. People driving cars
    often act like two years old, thinking, you get out of my way, or I wil
    knock you out of the way!

    Here in the United States, they don't have the cultural identity or respect
    for cyclists like they do in say Holland, where everyone rides bikes. Over
    there its quite natural to ride an old bike carrying groceries from the
    store, but if you do that here, people think you are too poor to afford a
    car, and that you must be a bum. Here in the states they might knock you
    over spilling your groceries and laugh because they think its funny, as
    where in Holland they would just think its just somebody getting some grub
    for family dinner. No taboo for riding an old bike in Holland, but here the
    car is the status symbol, and bikes are generally only looked up to if they
    are an 12k racing bike. That mentality should change. Also, there is
    probably much less the hostilities between cars and bikes in Holland, and
    probably no need culturally speaking for something like Critical Mass, since
    they already get it. Over here, we just don't get it, and I don't think we
    will ever get it, since the Government gives tax breaks to people who buy
    Hummers. The Government should be giving breaks to people who ride bikes!

    GBMT

  4. "MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Okay, let me point out the problem here before you people in here get your
    panties all wet for no reason.

    This study cites "bicyclists" which is a generic term that includes little
    5 year olds as well as 56 year old immigrants riding their bike back from
    washing dishes at the diner at night on the wrong way down the street.

    Too bad you haven't a single clue about what you're supposedly discussing.

  5. pathetic:

    I'd rather blow through lights and stop signs at 25mph with even a
    semi-exerienced group of racer wannabes than tag along with a wino on
    a late night run for some 8 ball at 4mph

    Joseph.

  6. Too bad you haven't a single clue about what you're supposedly discussing.

    Too bad you haven't a single clue . . . .

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    xzzy said:

    = when I was run over 7 years ago, incredibly, I was ticketed for not using
    a light on my bicycle ( I was run over in the afternoon ) I was never asked
    what happened. Also, it is significant that both the driver and the cop are
    Latino. In court, I was aquitted when the cop admitted under oath that she
    had changed the time of the accident to after sunset in order to give me the
    ticket instead of the driver. Later, the driver lost his license for his
    second time, the second time for running me over.

    That's a [censored] situation but at least some aspects worked out for the good (I
    dubt that's much consolation for any damage to you, of course). Similar sort of thing
    happened in Santa Clara, California (not sure of when, it was at least 15 or more
    years ago) when a cyclist was going to make a left turn on a three lanes in each
    direction road. He got over to the center "beginning and ending left turns" lane and
    was waiting for a gap in traffic to make his turn. A car moved intot he lane (going
    for a turn further up the road) and plowed him from behind. The seriouly injured
    cyclist was cited for "failure to yield the right of way." WTF? No idea how it shook
    out in court.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Whatever happened to
    Leon Trotsky?
    He got an icepick
    That made his ears burn.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  8. xzzy said:

    Too bad you haven't a single clue about what you're supposedly discussing.

    Too bad you haven't a single clue . . . .


    No body else does either unless you quote what you're replying to.

  9. xzzy said:

    pathetic:

    I'd rather blow through lights and stop signs at 25mph with even a
    semi-exerienced group of racer wannabes than tag along with a wino on
    a late night run for some 8 ball at 4mph

    Joseph.

    What's pathetic about that? You think that winos are less likely to
    get hurt?

    Joseph

  10. "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    xzzy said:

    pathetic:

    I'd rather blow through lights and stop signs at 25mph with even a
    semi-exerienced group of racer wannabes than tag along with a wino on
    a late night run for some 8 ball at 4mph

    Joseph.

    What's pathetic about that? You think that winos are less likely to
    get hurt?

    Joseph

    No, they're just more likely to get laid than the racer wannabes.

    --
    Bill Asher

  11. William Asher said:

    "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]> wrote innews:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    xzzy said:

    pathetic:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'd rather blow through lights and stop signs at 25mph with even a
    semi-exerienced group of racer wannabes than tag along with a wino on
    a late night run for some 8 ball at 4mph

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Joseph.

    Quoted message said:

    What's pathetic about that? You think that winos are less likely to
    get hurt?

    Quoted message said:

    Joseph

    No, they're just more likely to get laid than the racer wannabes.

    --
    Bill Asher

    I know a guy who worked in an ER. He told about an indigent who came
    in and among other things had herpes. They did a swab of the usual
    places, but they came up negative. So they swabed where his colostomy
    bag was attached. Positive.

    Did those guys who paid $5 for "access" get laid? Does that count?

    Joseph

  12. xzzy said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    pathetic:

    joseph.santaniello wrote in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What's pathetic about that? You think that winos are less likely to get
    hurt?

    Joseph


    William Asher said:

    No, they're just more likely to get laid than the racer wannabes.

    What about LIVEDRUNK(tm) racer wannabes ?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.