On duty last night I met a cyclist dressed in black with only a rear
flashing LED, not a good one at that and it wasn't turned on. I pointed
out the error of his ways and the fact that having spent something in
the order of £600 on his bike not to even invest £5.00 in a set of
lights was verging on the insane.
Having chatted about bikes, the law and how you need to have a light on
the front as well as turning on the one at the back the silly fellow
proceeded to get back on the bike preparatory to riding off again.
Informed in no uncertain terms, again, that the lack of a front light
meant he could not ride the bike home and would need to push it as "you
crash from both ends if a car (driver) pulls out because it (he/she)
can't see you"
Thirty five minutes later I attended an RTA - cyclist versus motor
vehicle, guess who decided to ride home. He's OK a few scratches, his
new £600 bike is a mangled piece of metal and I can't really blame the
car driver because the cyclist had no light at the front to warn of his
approach. Some people never learn.
Strangely the bike shop had sold him a cycle helmet which was hanging
from its straps on his rucksack. Sigh........
Funny I saw the exact opposite in Hyde Park, this chap had enough lights
at the front to be a fairground, flashers, and continuous beams in
various positions, even on his head. Nothing at the back. Must have
been his brother.
Sniper8052