UK and Europe · Public discussion

You crash from both ends !

Started by Sniper8052(L96A1) · · Last activity · 66 posts · 1,758 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
13 November 2004
Last activity
18 November 2004
Original author
Sniper8052(L96A1)
Posts
66
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,758
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 66
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On duty last night I met a cyclist dressed in black with only a rear
    flashing LED, not a good one at that and it wasn't turned on. I pointed
    out the error of his ways and the fact that having spent something in
    the order of £600 on his bike not to even invest £5.00 in a set of
    lights was verging on the insane.
    Having chatted about bikes, the law and how you need to have a light on
    the front as well as turning on the one at the back the silly fellow
    proceeded to get back on the bike preparatory to riding off again.
    Informed in no uncertain terms, again, that the lack of a front light
    meant he could not ride the bike home and would need to push it as "you
    crash from both ends if a car (driver) pulls out because it (he/she)
    can't see you"
    Thirty five minutes later I attended an RTA - cyclist versus motor
    vehicle, guess who decided to ride home. He's OK a few scratches, his
    new £600 bike is a mangled piece of metal and I can't really blame the
    car driver because the cyclist had no light at the front to warn of his
    approach. Some people never learn.
    Strangely the bike shop had sold him a cycle helmet which was hanging
    from its straps on his rucksack. Sigh........

    Funny I saw the exact opposite in Hyde Park, this chap had enough lights
    at the front to be a fairground, flashers, and continuous beams in
    various positions, even on his head. Nothing at the back. Must have
    been his brother.

    Sniper8052

  2. Last night the Unfit Family were out & about (tho' not on the bikes). Driving
    along, saw similar cyclist - all black clothing, single cr*ppy, dirty
    all-but-useless LED at rear. He was *just* sillhouetted by the street light.
    Twit. A few seconds later, saw the opposite. Woman cycling - lights front &
    rear, wearing a reflective jacket - she was very visible from a long distance
    away. Funnily enough, she seemed to be given a far wider berth by traffic than
    the cyclist in stealth mode.

    I know that drivers can be idiots at times, but when we're cycling we do have
    at least some degree of responsibility for our own safety when we are out
    there. It's not exactly difficult to remember to use lights & reflectives.

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

  3. Response to Sniper8052(L96A1):

    Quoted message said:

    On duty last night I met a cyclist dressed in black with only a rear
    flashing LED, not a good one at that and it wasn't turned on.

    A bloody fool, then, who unfortunately paid the price.

    Quoted message said:

    He's OK a few scratches

    Strangely the bike shop had sold him a cycle helmet which was hanging
    from its straps on his rucksack. Sigh........

    I refer the hon. gentleman to my earlier answer:

    "Wouldn't you have been better off wearing this?"
    "Why? I didn't hit my head."
    "Well, you might have done."
    "Yes, but I didn't, and if I'd been wearing it I might have, which could
    have been a Very Bad Thing."
    "All the same..." etc. etc.

    So in other words in this accident the helmet wouldn't have done him any
    good, and might have done him some harm.

    --
    Mark, UK.
    We hope to hear him swear, we love to hear him squeak,
    We like to see him biting fingers in his horny beak.

  4. Sniper8052(L96A1) said:

    Thirty five minutes later I attended an RTA - cyclist versus motor
    vehicle, guess who decided to ride home. He's OK a few scratches, his
    new £600 bike is a mangled piece of metal and I can't really blame the
    car driver because the cyclist had no light at the front to warn of his
    approach. Some people never learn.

    He must have been chuffed to realise it was you dealing with the
    incident.

    Quoted message said:

    Strangely the bike shop had sold him a cycle helmet which was hanging
    from its straps on his rucksack. Sigh........

    Best place for it.

    Shame he hadn't spent that £100 on some lights instead.

  5. On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:03:35 GMT someone who may be
    "Sniper8052(L96A1)" <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Thirty five minutes later I attended an RTA - cyclist versus motor
    vehicle, guess who decided to ride home.

    I do wish people would drop inappropriate terminology. From what you
    said there was nothing accidental about the absence of a light on
    the front of the bike.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E
    I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government
    prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000.

    ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
    ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

  6. [email hidden] (dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers)typed

    Quoted message said:

    It's not exactly difficult to remember to use lights & reflectives.

    <pedant>
    The reflectives I have plastered over my (now David's) bikes don't need
    to be remembered[1]. Once applied they can be forgotten.

    David can't really forget his lights cos his dynamo is bolted in place.

    [1] I suppose someone needs to wipe them clean occasionally.

    --
    Helen D. Vecht: [email hidden]
    Edgware.

  7. Mark McN said:

    Response to Sniper8052(L96A1):

    Quoted message said:

    On duty last night I met a cyclist dressed in black with only a rear
    flashing LED, not a good one at that and it wasn't turned on.

    A bloody fool, then, who unfortunately paid the price.

    Sounds like London to me. Loads of stealth cyclists who are busy hoping for
    the best. After 'seeing' a few of them I upgraded my lights front and back,
    and got a reflective vest. Didn't really want to give anyone the excuse
    that they couldn't see me.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    He's OK a few scratches

    Strangely the bike shop had sold him a cycle helmet which was hanging
    from its straps on his rucksack. Sigh........

    I refer the hon. gentleman to my earlier answer:

    "Wouldn't you have been better off wearing this?"
    "Why? I didn't hit my head."
    "Well, you might have done."
    "Yes, but I didn't, and if I'd been wearing it I might have, which could
    have been a Very Bad Thing."
    "All the same..." etc. etc.

    So in other words in this accident the helmet wouldn't have done him any
    good, and might have done him some harm.

    But the money spent on the unused lid could have been spent on something
    that would have *prevented* the accident, rather than failing to ameliorate
    the damage caused by the accident?

    --
    Chris

  8. Response to Monkey Hanger:

    Quoted message said:

    Sounds like London to me. Loads of stealth cyclists who are busy hoping for
    the best.

    And by no means just London. I was out on the trike last night
    [delivering a letter re a certain matter to my G.P., but that's another
    story], and saw a Ninja cyclist who'd collected the set: black clothes,
    black bike, no lights, on the pavement next to a perfectly good road
    containing nothing but me. He must have been safe, though, because he
    was wearing a black h... h... h... no... must... resist...

    --
    Mark, UK.
    We hope to hear him swear, we love to hear him squeak,
    We like to see him biting fingers in his horny beak.

  9. Monkey Hanger <[email hidden]>typed

    Quoted message said:

    But the money spent on the unused lid could have been spent on something
    that would have *prevented* the accident, rather than failing to ameliorate
    the damage caused by the accident?

    I don't think brain transplants come at any price...

    --
    Helen D. Vecht: [email hidden]
    Edgware.

  10. Sniper8052(L96A1) said:

    Strangely the bike shop had sold him a cycle helmet which was hanging
    from its straps on his rucksack. Sigh.......

    Quite. Safety? Plastic hat, sir, that's the be-all and end all. No
    further action necessary. Ride on!

    --
    Guy

  11. Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers)typed

    Quoted message said:

    It's not exactly difficult to remember to use lights & reflectives.

    <pedant>
    The reflectives I have plastered over my (now David's) bikes don't need
    to be remembered[1]. Once applied they can be forgotten.

    David can't really forget his lights cos his dynamo is bolted in place.

    [1] I suppose someone needs to wipe them clean occasionally.

    <pedant> of course reflectives on self, such as a waistcoat/gilet with
    reflective bands round body & over shoulders does involve remembering to put it
    on. Not that it's a hugely difficult task to remember to do. </pedant>

    Cheers, helen s ;-)

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

  12. Not Responding said:
    Sniper8052(L96A1) said:

    Thirty five minutes later I attended an RTA - cyclist versus motor
    vehicle, guess who decided to ride home. He's OK a few scratches, his
    new £600 bike is a mangled piece of metal and I can't really blame the
    car driver because the cyclist had no light at the front to warn of his
    approach. Some people never learn.

    He must have been chuffed to realise it was you dealing with the
    incident.

    Quoted message said:

    Strangely the bike shop had sold him a cycle helmet which was hanging

    Quoted message said:

    from its straps on his rucksack. Sigh........

    Best place for it.

    Quoted message said:

    Shame he hadn't spent that £100 on some lights instead.

    £100?! My latest helmet cost £35.

    (My lights on the front of Birdy cost £170 - SON + E6 cost
    £170, and those on the front of my Galaxy £230, and that
    excludes the cost of having a wheel built).

    Simon

  13. Simon Proven said:

    £100?! My latest helmet cost £35.

    <cheapskate mode>

    My Giro Mira was £15. But I only wear it when compelled to (velodrome),
    so I wasn't going to waste too much money. It's probably safer than an
    Atmos anyway.

  14. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers wrote:
    Funnily enough, she

    Quoted message said:

    seemed to be given a far wider berth by traffic than the cyclist in
    stealth mode.

    I have noticed now that I am cycling home in the dark, fully chavved[1] up I
    might add, that I get a far wider berth that when it was daylight at home
    time.

    2 Rear lights, reflector, reflective navvy jacket, reflectives on mudguard,
    pedals, shoes, pannier, cranks, headband, gloves

  15. David Hansen said:

    On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:03:35 GMT someone who may be
    "Sniper8052(L96A1)" <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Thirty five minutes later I attended an RTA - cyclist versus motor
    vehicle, guess who decided to ride home.

    I do wish people would drop inappropriate terminology. From what you
    said there was nothing accidental about the absence of a light on
    the front of the bike.

    Nearly all crashes could be avoided, through not drinking or by getting more
    sleep or by slowing down or by using lights etc, etc so they are not
    accidents at all.

  16. MSeries said:

    dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers wrote:
    Funnily enough, she

    Quoted message said:

    seemed to be given a far wider berth by traffic than the cyclist in
    stealth mode.

    I have noticed now that I am cycling home in the dark, fully chavved[1] up I
    might add, that I get a far wider berth that when it was daylight at home
    time.

    I observe the same, which is one reason I like cycling at night.

    --chris

  17. Helen Deborah Vecht said:

    Monkey Hanger <[email hidden]>typed

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    But the money spent on the unused lid could have been spent on something
    that would have *prevented* the accident, rather than failing to ameliorate
    the damage caused by the accident?

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think brain transplants come at any price...

    There could be a thriving black market. We wouldn't hear about it
    because it's illegal and the customers aren't complaining.
    --
    Chris Malcolm [email hidden] +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205
    IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
    [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

  18. [email hidden] (dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers)typed

    Quoted message said:

    <pedant> of course reflectives on self, such as a waistcoat/gilet with
    reflective bands round body & over shoulders does involve remembering
    to put it
    on. Not that it's a hugely difficult task to remember to do. </pedant>

    Our Tchibo jackets have reflectives, other garments do not. Pity David
    doesn't like the 'Halo' neoprene/Scotchlite ankle bands that I thought
    were the best reflective kit to wear.

    --
    Helen D. Vecht: [email hidden]
    Edgware.

  19. Sniper8052(L96A1) wrote:
    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Funny I saw the exact opposite in Hyde Park, this chap had enough lights
    at the front to be a fairground, flashers, and continuous beams in
    various positions, even on his head.

    .... The oncoming vehicle swerved across the road and hit him head on.
    The first thing the driver said on getting out of his vehicle was,
    "Sorry mate, I didn't see you. I was dazzled..."

  20. Mark McN <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Response to Monkey Hanger:

    Quoted message said:

    Sounds like London to me. Loads of stealth cyclists who are busy hoping for
    the best.

    And by no means just London. I was out on the trike last night
    [delivering a letter re a certain matter to my G.P., but that's another
    story], and saw a Ninja cyclist who'd collected the set: black clothes,
    black bike, no lights, on the pavement next to a perfectly good road
    containing nothing but me. He must have been safe, though, because he
    was wearing a black h... h... h... no... must... resist...

    My favourite was the bike rider with a case of 24 beer balanced on his
    handle bars, wearing black, no lights or reflectors and riding on the
    wrong side of the street. Luckily I noticed the glow of his cigarette
    in time to dodge him. Maybe someone's smoking is good for 'my' health
    🙂

    John Kane
    Kingston ON Canada

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.