Road Cycling · Public discussion

You are all so gullible

Started by Brian Laffatme · · Last activity · 17 posts · 1,056 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
15 June 2004
Last activity
19 June 2004
Original author
Brian Laffatme
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,056
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. for believing that Lance Armstrong is clean.

    He is clearly the most egregious doper of them all. The
    latest inside allegations by Emma are only the most recent
    proof. Now that she is no longer part of the corrupt USPS
    organization, we can respect what she says.

    What a sham. Other Americans, in contrast, toil in
    obscurity despite great results. Look at how Bobby Julich
    is doing in the Tour de Suisse. Tyler Hamilton has been
    having a fantastic year, much better than Lance Armstrong.
    Who do we hear about? Lance Armstrong. Such a shame. Both
    Julich and Hamilton have been resurrected by Bjarne Riis -
    every rider who passes under his tutelage is a product of
    hard work and focus, not drugs. Riis would never touch a
    performance enhancing product and I'm quite certain his
    riders wouldn't either.

    My inside sources confirm all of the above.

    Ciao,

    Brian Lafferty

  2. just who are your "inside sources?"
    "Brian Laffatme" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    for believing that Lance Armstrong is clean.

    He is clearly the most egregious doper of them all. The
    latest inside allegations by Emma are only the most recent
    proof. Now that she is no longer part of the corrupt USPS
    organization, we can respect what she says.

    What a sham. Other Americans, in contrast, toil in
    obscurity despite great results. Look at how Bobby Julich
    is doing in the Tour de Suisse. Tyler Hamilton has been
    having a fantastic year, much better than Lance Armstrong.
    Who do we hear about? Lance Armstrong. Such a shame. Both
    Julich and Hamilton have been resurrected by Bjarne Riis -
    every rider who passes under his tutelage is a product of
    hard work and focus, not drugs. Riis would never touch a
    performance enhancing product and I'm quite certain his
    riders wouldn't either.

    My inside sources confirm all of the above.

    Ciao,

    Brian Lafferty

  3. dwjones45 said:

    just who are your "inside sources?"

    What part of "gullible" and "laff at me" did you miss?

    The fact is that Lance has the three ingredients required
    for a true champion: 1) genetic gift; 2) relentless will and
    determination; 3) total egocentric narcissism.

    Take out one and you have a good, great or near great
    athlete. All three are necessary for domination.

    Taking dope not necessary. Being a dope presumed.

    --dt

  4. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Brian Laffatme
    Both Julich and Hamilton have been resurrected by Bjarne Riis - every rider who passes under his tutelage is a product of
    hard work and focus, not drugs. Riis would never touch a
    performance enhancing product and I'm quite certain his
    riders wouldn't either.

    Oh, that's rich!!

    I'm not even going to touch that one .......... everyone knows how he broke Indurain's streak ............

  5. Daremo said:

    Oh, that's rich!!

    Dear cyclingforums-luser, please observe the poster's name.

    Then get a real newsreader and stop messing around with

    and 🙄. This is not the web! This is a usenet
    newsgroup, text-based and with its own protocol.

    Get the Thunderbird mail/news client for example (search
    google), and ask your isp what their news server is.

  6. Daremo said:
    Brian Laffatme said:

    Both Julich and Hamilton have been resurrected by
    Bjarne Riis - every rider who passes under his
    tutelage is a product of hard work and focus, not
    drugs. Riis would never touch a performance enhancing
    product and I'm quite certain his riders wouldn't
    either.

    Oh, that's rich!!

    I'm not even going to touch that one .......... everyone
    knows how he broke Indurain's streak ............

    Jeeperz. I'm a real gullible guy.

    For goodness sakes, I believe in Santa Klaus, the Tooth
    Fairy, God and that OJ didn't Whack Nicole and the Guy that
    was Plucking her Goose.

    But you can't get even a dummy like me to believe that Riis
    was Squeaky Clean

    --
    le Vent a Dos Davey Crockett No e-patents, pas de brevets
    logiciels Pétition contre les brevets logiciels :
    petition.eurolinux.orgpetition.eurolinux.org Six-Day site:
    members.rogers.comsixday.html Please address
    all replies to the list

  7. I'll stick to cyclingforums link, thank you. It reads fine for me ......... so what if the rest of you can't register my posts as easily .........

    I know it is a troll post, so what? Everyone can be sarcastic and blast people, but I can't?

    Gotta love the treatment for Americans on this site .........

  8. [email hidden] (Brian Laffatme) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    for believing that Lance Armstrong is clean.

    He is clearly the most egregious doper of them all. The
    latest inside allegations by Emma are only the most recent
    proof. Now that she is no longer part of the corrupt USPS
    organization, we can respect what she says.

    What a sham. Other Americans, in contrast, toil in
    obscurity despite great results. Look at how Bobby Julich
    is doing in the Tour de Suisse. Tyler Hamilton has been
    having a fantastic year, much better than Lance Armstrong.
    Who do we hear about? Lance Armstrong. Such a shame. Both
    Julich and Hamilton have been resurrected by Bjarne Riis -
    every rider who passes under his tutelage is a product of
    hard work and focus, not drugs. Riis would never touch a
    performance enhancing product and I'm quite certain his
    riders wouldn't either.

    My inside sources confirm all of the above.

    TROLL!!! [the giveaway is Riis at 60%]

    Adios, KJP

    Quoted message said:


    Ciao,

    Brian Lafferty

  9. Daremo said:

    Gotta love the treatment for Americans on this site
    .........

    The following site came highly recommended to me:
    isometry.comusahate.html

  10. benjo maso said:

    "TritonRider" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:20040616205656.05710.00000109@mb-
    m14.aol.com...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: Ewoud Dronkert [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    The following site came highly recommended to me:
    isometry.comusahate.html

    Could be Michael Moore It's [censored]

    You have seen the film of Michael More already? Great. So
    could you tell me why it's [censored]? The only American
    reaction I read - very positive, by the way - was on Fox
    News, but I assume that's some left wing channel:
    foxnews.com0,2933,122680,00.html

    Benjo Maso

    Quite a positive review. I was wondering if/when to see
    this, now I'm pretty sure I have to.

    That reference to BFC and criticism of taking a pot shot at
    Heston, IMHO, establishes the writer as one who is likely to
    be less than objective. (Heston, as the spokesman for NRA is
    definitely a person Moore should press and I feel no
    sympathy just because he's a frail looking old man -- make
    your bed, lie in it.)

    Maybe Moore will next take on the dopers and the writers who
    make allegations ... then again, maybe not. Where's the
    Flint, MI angle, after all.

  11. benjo maso said:

    "TritonRider" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:20040616205656.05710.00000109@mb-
    m14.aol.com...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: Ewoud Dronkert [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    The following site came highly recommended to me:
    isometry.comusahate.html

    Could be Michael Moore It's [censored]

    You have seen the film of Michael More already? Great. So
    could you tell me why it's [censored]? The only American
    reaction I read - very positive, by the way - was on Fox
    News, but I assume that's some left wing channel:
    foxnews.com0,2933,122680,00.html

    Fox News is known for leaning far to the right.

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Sonarrat said:
    benjo maso said:

    "TritonRider" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    >From: Ewoud Dronkert [email hidden]

    >The following site came highly recommended to me:
    >isometry.comusahate.html

    Could be Michael Moore It's [censored]

    You have seen the film of Michael More already? Great.
    So could you tell me why it's [censored]? The only American
    reaction I read - very positive, by the way - was on Fox
    News, but I assume that's some left wing channel:
    foxnews.com0,2933,122680,00.html

    Fox News is known for leaning far to the right.

    Which makes the review Benjo referred to all the more
    surprising. Here's a quote: "As much as some might try to
    marginalize this film as a screed against President
    George Bush, "F9/11" -- as we saw last night -- is a
    tribute to patriotism, to the American sense of duty, and
    at the same time a indictment of stupidity and avarice."

    --
    tanx, Howard

    "Copper will never be gold" Shellac

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  13. Ewoud Dronkert said:
    Daremo said:

    Gotta love the treatment for Americans on this site
    .........

    The following site came highly recommended to me:
    isometry.comusahate.html

    84. Kunich

  14. On 16 Jun 2004 21:42:58 EDT, Richard Adams <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    That reference to BFC and criticism of taking a pot shot at
    Heston, IMHO, establishes the writer as one who is likely
    to be less than objective. (Heston, as the spokesman for
    NRA is definitely a person Moore should press and I feel no
    sympathy just because he's a frail looking old man -- make
    your bed, lie in it.)

    If you claim to do a documentary, you don't edit remarks and
    juxtaposition cuts to make things appear to be
    contemporaneous when they are not, and make comments to be
    relevant, when they are in response to a question that
    changes the entire context and meaning.

    And a real documentary would take pains ESPECIALLY when it
    is someone that they disagree with. Otherwise it is a
    polemic and should be known as such. Obviously you feel
    that as long as you disagree with someone, you have every
    right to lie or misrepresent what they say. You must love
    Oliver Stone.

    Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on
    two wheels...

  15. "Curtis L. Russell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Richard Adams said:


    That reference to BFC and criticism of taking a pot shot
    at Heston, IMHO, establishes the writer as one who is
    likely to be less than objective. (Heston, as the
    spokesman for NRA is definitely a person Moore should
    press and I feel no sympathy just because he's a frail
    looking old man -- make your bed, lie in it.)

    If you claim to do a documentary, you don't edit remarks
    and juxtaposition cuts to make things appear to be
    contemporaneous when they are not, and make comments to be
    relevant, when they are in response to a question that
    changes the entire context and meaning.

    And a real documentary would take pains ESPECIALLY when it
    is someone that they disagree with. Otherwise it is a
    polemic and should be known as such. Obviously you feel
    that as long as you disagree with someone, you have every
    right to lie or misrepresent what they say. You must love
    Oliver Stone.

    I agree that Moore is primarily a polemicist. That does not
    mean his work is without value. The viewer has more of a
    responsibility to consider other points of view. As for
    documentary making in general, the maker of the film can
    never be fully neutral. That's just the nature of the
    process. When people agree, it's great documentary work.
    When they diagree its something else.

  16. Quoted message said:

    You have seen the film of Michael More already? Great.

    Michael Moore is a turd floating in the bowl of the media.
    And if you're placing a lot of faith in anything he says,
    you have my sympathies.

    ------
    Dave Casey - Realtor www.LasVegasHomesDirect.com
    [email hidden]

  17. On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 06:51:27 GMT in rec.bicycles.racing, Dave

    Casey said:

    Michael Moore is a turd floating in the bowl of the media.
    And if you're placing a lot of faith in anything he says,
    you have my sympathies.


    can't deal with the truth about that lying AWOL former
    cokehead who has been illegally occupying the white house
    for the past 3
    1/2 years?

    michael moore tells the truth when others won't dare. better
    than those liars on faux news.

    don't worry, the cowboy will go down in flames in
    november, big time.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.