Yet, another failure of the peer review process!

On 19 Nov 2004 09:21:41 -0800, [email hidden]
(N-H-P) posted:

Quoted message said:

Yet, another failure of the peer review process to prevent frivolous
studies from being published.

Here, is the latest health blog news story.

http://blog.naturalhealthperspective.com/

Article is extensively hyperlinked to documents written by PhDs and
MDs.

Is this supposed to impresss?

The peer review process is not the one that magazines use to decide
what to publish, but the peers replicating the studies and finding
fault or otherwise. Please read up on exactly what science is. You
appear not to have a clue. The silly laughter could well be dropped
for a bit of background study on your part.

Dunne E. Dawe <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

On 19 Nov 2004 09:21:41 -0800, [email hidden]
(N-H-P) posted:

Quoted message said:

Yet, another failure of the peer review process to prevent frivolous
studies from being published.

Here, is the latest health blog news story.

http://blog.naturalhealthperspective.com/

Article is extensively hyperlinked to documents written by PhDs and
MDs.

Is this supposed to impresss?

The peer review process is not the one that magazines use to decide
what to publish, but the peers replicating the studies and finding
fault or otherwise. Please read up on exactly what science is. You
appear not to have a clue. The silly laughter could well be dropped
for a bit of background study on your part.

Is this supposed to impresss?

Please read up on exactly what reality is. Of coures, that is exactly
what the problem is. Too many idiot scientists walking around
thinking that the world owes them a living because they are
scientists. What other occupation thinks that they can fail at their
job over and over again?

Ha, .. Hah, Ha! I know [censored] when I see it.

What you call science does NOT come up to my standards.

Just thought that you might want to know. I am exposing the fraud
called medical scientism for what it is: a Scam!
--
john gohde
http://blog.naturalhealthperspective.com/

"N-H-P" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Ha, .. Hah, Ha! I know [censored] when I see it.

John, your previous posts on sci.med would seem to provide ample evidence to
the contrary. You need to review your posting history more critically.

HMc

On 24 Nov 2004 05:26:02 -0800, [email hidden]
(N-H-P) posted:

Quoted message said:

Dunne E. Dawe <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

On 19 Nov 2004 09:21:41 -0800, [email hidden]
(N-H-P) posted:

Quoted message said:

Yet, another failure of the peer review process to prevent frivolous
studies from being published.

Here, is the latest health blog news story.

http://blog.naturalhealthperspective.com/

Article is extensively hyperlinked to documents written by PhDs and
MDs.

Is this supposed to impresss?

The peer review process is not the one that magazines use to decide
what to publish, but the peers replicating the studies and finding
fault or otherwise. Please read up on exactly what science is. You
appear not to have a clue. The silly laughter could well be dropped
for a bit of background study on your part.

Is this supposed to impresss?

Please read up on exactly what reality is. Of coures, that is exactly
what the problem is. Too many idiot scientists walking around
thinking that the world owes them a living because they are
scientists. What other occupation thinks that they can fail at their
job over and over again?

Ha, .. Hah, Ha! I know [censored] when I see it.

What you call science does NOT come up to my standards.

Just thought that you might want to know. I am exposing the fraud
called medical scientism for what it is: a Scam!

So you have nothing to say other than confirm your ignorance of the
scientific process? Your comment about "failing over and over again"
is very telling of your profound ignorance of the scientific process
and your childish arrogance about that ignorance.

"Howard McCollister" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

"N-H-P" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Ha, .. Hah, Ha! I know [censored] when I see it.

John, your previous posts on sci.med would seem to provide ample evidence to
the contrary. You need to review your posting history more critically.

HMc

No I do not have to!

Just thought that you might want to know. 🙂
--
john gohde
http://gnu-dictionary.naturalhealthperspective.com/

On 24 Nov 2004 19:16:44 -0800, [email hidden]
(N-H-P) posted:

Quoted message said:

"Howard McCollister" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

"N-H-P" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Ha, .. Hah, Ha! I know [censored] when I see it.

John, your previous posts on sci.med would seem to provide ample evidence to
the contrary. You need to review your posting history more critically.

HMc

No I do not have to!

Just thought that you might want to know. 🙂

That sort of tells us your mental age. Bye!

Dunne E. Dawe <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

On 24 Nov 2004 19:16:44 -0800, [email hidden]
(N-H-P) posted:

Quoted message said:

"Howard McCollister" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

"N-H-P" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

>
> Ha, .. Hah, Ha! I know [censored] when I see it.
>

John, your previous posts on sci.med would seem to provide ample evidence to
the contrary. You need to review your posting history more critically.

HMc

No I do not have to!

Just thought that you might want to know. 🙂

That sort of tells us your mental age. Bye!

Nothing substantive comes to your mind?

Why do you bombard this newsgroup with empty nonsense?

Please, ...please, ... please grace us with more of your empty nonsense, 🙁
--
john gohde

"N-H-P" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Nothing substantive comes to your mind?

Why do you bombard this newsgroup with empty nonsense?

Please, ...please, ... please grace us with more of your empty nonsense,

🙁

Quoted message said:

--

Pot -> kettle -> black

HMc