UK and Europe · Public discussion

YES!

Started by Jon Martin · · Last activity · 28 posts · 1,102 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
27 August 2003
Last activity
3 September 2003
Original author
Jon Martin
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,102
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–28 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. James Hodson said:

    Presumably this was the legislation used to prosecute Peter Fox, the A12 missionary.

    Except he wasn't prosecuted!

  2. Quoted message said:

    The speed limit applies to all vehicles. The same applies to red traffic lights and one way
    streets. It might be difficult identifying you if you are photographed though.

    Speed limits only apply to *motor* vehicles. Other traffic laws such as traffic lights and one-way
    streets do apply to cyclists unless an explicit exception is made.

    How is a cyclist or horse-rider supposed to know how fast they are going, when there is no legal
    requirement for them to have an accurate speedometer? Impossible. Therefore any law that required
    cyclists or horse-riders to stick to a numerical speed limit would be unenforceable.

    --
    Stevie D \\\\\ ///// Bringing dating agencies to the \\\\\\\__X__///////
    common hedgehog since 2001 - "HedgeHugs" ___\\\\\\\'/
    \'///////_____________________________________________

  3. Quoted message said:

    28. A person who rides a cycle on a road recklessly is guilty of an offence.In this section "road"
    includes a bridleway. Careless, and inconsiderate, cycling.

    29.    If a person rides a cycle on a road without due care and attention, or without
    reasonable consideration for other persons using the road, he is guilty of an offence.In this
    section "road" includes a bridleway.

    Could be used.

    That's correct. And while a police officer might use the speed limit for motor vehicles as a guide
    to whether the cyclist was going dangerously fast, he would need to show more than "the cyclist was
    doing 35mph" to get a prosecution.

    --
    Stevie D \\\\\ ///// Bringing dating agencies to the \\\\\\\__X__///////
    common hedgehog since 2001 - "HedgeHugs" ___\\\\\\\'/
    \'///////_____________________________________________

  4. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by cigarman
    ______29.____If a person rides a cycle on a road without due care and attention, or without
    reasonable consideration for other persons using the road, he is guilty of an offence.In this
    section "road" includes a bridleway.

    Does that mean I shouldn't ride with a walkman on?

  5. 2LAP said:

    Does that mean I shouldn't ride with a walkman on?

    It's generally inadvisable to ride with a walkman on, under any circumstances (exercise bikes
    excluded!).

    --
    Stevie D \\\\\ ///// Bringing dating agencies to the \\\\\\\__X__///////
    common hedgehog since 2001 - "HedgeHugs" ___\\\\\\\'/
    \'///////_____________________________________________

  6. (Marc) said:
    James Hodson said:

    Presumably this was the legislation used to prosecute Peter Fox, the A12 missionary.

    Except he wasn't prosecuted!

    OK. I think I knew that, but thanks for confirming the fact.

    James

    --
    "Sorry mate, I didn't see you" is not a satisfactory excuse.

  7. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Stevie D
    2LAP wrote:
    It's generally inadvisable to ride with a walkman on, under any circumstances (exercise bikes
    excluded!).

    Doesn't everyone do it on those long lonely training rides? But is it illegal?

  8. Stevie D said:
    2LAP said:

    Does that mean I shouldn't ride with a walkman on?

    It's generally inadvisable to ride with a walkman on, under any circumstances (exercise bikes
    excluded!).

    H'mmm... I used to, and you can get a good roll on when listening to something bouncy and jolly like
    the Rolling Stones or the Move. But I wouldn't do it now because your ability to hear approaching
    traffic is, uhhmmmm, compromised.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) jasmine.org.uk~simon ;; Sending your money to
    someone just because they've erected ;; a barrier of obscurity and secrets around the tools you ;;
    need to use your data does not help the economy or spur ;; innovation. - Waffle Iron Slashdot, June
    16th, 2002

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.