In article <[email hidden]>,
Scott said:As in Yet Another Bike Death
The local rag this morning discussed the death of a cyclist in Lake
Mills (I think -- I was half awake and getting the kids' lunches put
together). Hit *twice* at 6 AM (when it's dark) and the cyclist was
light-less and wearing dark clothing, although the intersection was lit.
The person who hit him first ("I didn't see him"😉 was charged with
failure to yield, the person who hit him second was not charged.
I not blaming the cyclist for his own death, but damnit, that's really
stupid. I'm a regular bike commuter, and have a cyclist's alertness for
bicycles in the area when driving, and I still get surprised by the
damnedest things: cyclists riding off curbs at speed against
right-of-way, cyclists riding the wrong way at night on busy roads, and
my most recent favourite, a cyclist riding without lights or reflectors
(that I could see) on the Georgia Viaduct, a busy, shoulderless 3 km
elevated ramp leading out of downtown. That last one was especially
spectacular since the rider definitely took the most dangerous possible
route out of town when riding without a tail light.
Because cyclists can see quite well at night (a product of everything
else being lit up, and to a lesser extent, lower speeds), many of them
don't quite get how well a blackout bike fades into the background noise
when seen from a car. Compound that with the usual erratic behaviour
you'll get from cyclists dim enough to ride unlit, and they'll get dead.
Blinkies and some reflective striping go a long way,
--
Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com
Verus de parvis; verus de magnis.