Hey,
Because of my obvious bias, I'm not going to try to convince you one
way or another. However, just a couple of questions/opinions:
In my opinion, a lot of the "distinctions" between street and trials
unis are pretty artificial. How many top trials riders never want to
put their foot on the frame? How many tech street riders never land
hard off a big drop to flat, or never do a pure trials line? There
are very few riders who are that specialized. Plus, most riders tend
to switch around their styles over time, to keep things interesting.
Also, is there really a difference in strength requirements between
street and trials? In my opinion, rider weight, skill, and agression
level are way, way more important factors. Using strength or weight
to differentiate between a "street" or "trials" uni doesn't take any
account of this.
I'm all for equipment specialization when it makes sense. But you
have to differentiate between a real need for it, and specialty
unicycles dreamed up as marketing niches. Hence why the KH20 is
simply called a trials/street uni.
Kris
--
danger_uni
------------------------------------------------------------------------
danger_uni's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/21
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/56369
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com