Road Cycling · Public discussion

Wrong way dude

Started by Claire Petersky · · Last activity · 95 posts · 1,343 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
6 June 2006
Last activity
13 June 2006
Original author
Claire Petersky
Posts
95
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,343
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 95
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Earl Bollinger said:

    Well I tend to let them do their own thing. If they aren't good at it then
    they get removed from the gene pool.
    No since bothering with it.

    Like Claire and yourself and everybody, I don't want anyone getting
    hurt or killed or removed from the gene pool. Trouble is, "everybody"'s
    an expert (just like ("everybody"'s the best driver on the road.)
    Tell 'em they're doing something wrongly, and they become intransigent
    and persist all the more in their misconduct; meddling often just makes
    bad things worse.

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    -- Nothing is safe from me.
    Above address is just a spam midden.
    I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

  2. Kevan Smith said:

    "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You want someone to call a cop every time YOU speed or make an /illegal/ (or
    stupid) move

    So, you approve of wrong way cycling?

    Careful - you can rupture a tendon making a leap like that.

    Quoted message said:

    If you don't, what do you do to prevent it?

    Don't have to do much - Darwin takes care of it in short order in most
    cases.

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $795 ti frame

  3. Leo Lichtman said:

    "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Claire, interestingly, shortly after I read this, I found myself waiting
    at a signal behind some cars and a bicycle. So I had a chance to observe
    the effect you are describing. The cyclist was in bright, tight clothes,
    and riding a road bike, so I would not expect him to be a slow starter.
    And he wasn't.


    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Somehow, when I edited the above post, I truncated the second paragraph,
    which contained my main point. The driver and the cyclist were both
    obviously prepared for the light change. The driver began to inch forward
    during the yellow for cross traffic. The cyclist pedalled hard, got maybe
    one length ahead, but fell behind by the time they were reaching the middle
    of the cross street. In my experience, this is more typical than the
    sleepy, sluggish driver you described.

    I'm with you on this, Leo. I beat most cars across most
    intersections, but I have yet to see one take anything close to the
    three million years claimed by Claire. ;-) I try to read the car's
    "body language" (semi-pun) - if the driver is obviously watching the
    light instead of texting into his or her beloved cell phone, I'll tend
    to swing slightly to the right as I leave the light, and will
    soft-pedal if the driver shows signs of actually wanting to
    accelerate. OTOH, if they're not rolling by the time the light turns
    green (and I always am), I'll take the lane across the intersection
    and won't be in their way doing it.

    There are a number of subtle variations on this theme of course, but
    in general it's not a big deal.

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $795 ti frame

  4. "Tom Keats" wrote: (clip) Tell 'em they're doing something wrongly, and
    they become intransigent and persist all the more in their misconduct;
    meddling often just makes bad things worse.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    According to what I see on the news, the medical profession has just
    discovered a "road rage gene" in some people. If that is what caused the
    excessive reaction to Claire's encounter, it makes me think that it may be
    unwise to try to reform strangers on the road.

  5. "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't understand "wrong way" on a sidewalk. Don't pedestrians, joggers,
    wheelchairs, strollers, and all others go both ways on both sides of the
    street on sidewalks (and crosswalks?)

    Yup. Pedestrians belong on the sidewlk, and they can go both ways on it
    without the same level of endangerment.

    --
    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky
    http://www.bicyclemeditations.org/
    See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky

  6. "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm still trying to figure out why Claire is waiting through two long
    light cycles (no pun) in a left turn lane (?). One of the benefits of
    being on a bike is moving right up to the front at stop lights and signs
    (carefully, of course). This actually allows the rider to get OUT of the
    cars' way faster and sooner and /more safely/ than "acting like a car".
    Never once had a problem doing that.

    Some folks mentioned this, and I'll tell you why I don't filter to the front
    in this intersection.

    A. This is Chinatown, so the streets are relatively narrow and there are
    parked cars on both sides of the street. To filter to the front would not
    just mean riding in the door zone (and weren't you doored at one time,
    Bill?), but a very narrow door zone. If the light turns green while I'm
    filtering, I could easily get whacked, and there's no escape.

    B. If I filter to the front, then what do I do when I reach the
    intersection? I want to turn left, but I'm now on the far right.

    C. If I filter to the front, and the light turns green, then I have all
    these right-turning cars to cope with. I run the risk of being whacked.

    D. If I filter to the front, and the light turns green while I'm filtering,
    then because the space is so narrow, cars might side swipe me. And I take
    major responsibility, because I squeezed myself into a space where it is
    hard for them to pass me, rather than just remaining patient and waiting my
    turn. And then when I actually get to the intersection, I have to deal with
    B and C above.

    I will admit that I have filtered to the front at this intersection on the
    *left*. I've done this when there's a line of cars in front of me that
    clearly have their turn signals going indicating their intention is to turn
    right on Dearborn, and there's sufficient room that I feel comfortable doing
    this.

    --
    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky
    http://www.bicyclemeditations.org/
    See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky

    --
    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky
    http://www.bicyclemeditations.org/
    See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky

  7. "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Tom Keats" wrote: (clip) Tell 'em they're doing something wrongly, and
    they become intransigent and persist all the more in their misconduct;
    meddling often just makes bad things worse.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    According to what I see on the news, the medical profession has just
    discovered a "road rage gene" in some people. If that is what caused the
    excessive reaction to Claire's encounter, it makes me think that it may be
    unwise to try to reform strangers on the road.

    Yeah, I should just MMOB. It's my mommy gene, probably, that makes me want
    to protect even the biggest doofusi with my sage advice.

    --
    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky
    http://www.bicyclemeditations.org/
    See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky

  8. Claire Petersky said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't understand "wrong way" on a sidewalk. Don't pedestrians, joggers,
    wheelchairs, strollers, and all others go both ways on both sides of the
    street on sidewalks (and crosswalks?)

    Yup. Pedestrians belong on the sidewlk, and they can go both ways on it
    without the same level of endangerment.

    Where that becomes a PITA is on the bridges that require cyclists to
    use the sidewalk. I dislike meeting other bikes head-on while
    crossing the Knight St. bridge. They had to ride counterflow to get
    there and the sidewalk is too narrow for bikes to pass each other
    above a walking pace.
    --
    zk

  9. Leo Lichtman said:

    According to what I see on the news, the medical profession has just
    discovered a "road rage gene" in some people. If that is what caused the
    excessive reaction to Claire's encounter, it makes me think that it may be
    unwise to try to reform strangers on the road.

    Serotonin my butt!

    Cars suck and car culture itself fosters the sickness.

    That one sounds like the most lame of all excuses if it's going to
    give those asswipes carte blanche to behave violently. It's already
    become epidemic in a sick society. I hope further research de-bunks
    it before it infects every idiot cager.

    Myself, I'll hold to the "de individuation" theory. (the process that
    prevents us relating to the other driver as a person)

    Cars are widely regarded as the measure of a person's worth. Too bad
    that view is promoted by the media because it's profitable for them.
    --
    zk

  10. Claire Petersky said:

    "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm still trying to figure out why Claire is waiting through two long
    light cycles (no pun) in a left turn lane (?). One of the benefits
    of being on a bike is moving right up to the front at stop lights
    and signs (carefully, of course). This actually allows the rider to
    get OUT of the cars' way faster and sooner and /more safely/ than
    "acting like a car". Never once had a problem doing that.

    Some folks mentioned this, and I'll tell you why I don't filter to
    the front in this intersection.

    A. This is Chinatown, so the streets are relatively narrow and there
    are parked cars on both sides of the street. To filter to the front
    would not just mean riding in the door zone (and weren't you doored
    at one time, Bill?)

    No, I was on a ride when someone else (HWNBNBM) was doored.

    Quoted message said:

    , but a very narrow door zone. If the light turns
    green while I'm filtering, I could easily get whacked, and there's no
    escape.
    B. If I filter to the front, then what do I do when I reach the
    intersection? I want to turn left, but I'm now on the far right.

    When I go (not filter) to the front of a left turn lane, I do so on the
    right side of that left turn lane -- slowly and cautiously. I then confirm
    that the lead car is indeed turning left (easier when they /can't/ go
    straight of course) and can see me.

    Still, I understand some situations are too dicey or tricky or outright
    dangerous and accommodations must be made.

    Quoted message said:

    If I filter to the front, and the light turns green, then I have
    all these right-turning cars to cope with. I run the risk of being
    whacked.

    Somewhat, I guess. I sort of ease /in front/ of the lead car and sprint out
    ahead so I can get across the intersection and safely to the bike lane or
    far right ASAP. I make a point to look /right in the eyes/ of the oncoming
    turners, so I at least am pretty darned sure they see me.

    Quoted message said:

    D. If I filter to the front, and the light turns green while I'm
    filtering, then because the space is so narrow, cars might side swipe
    me. And I take major responsibility, because I squeezed myself into a
    space where it is hard for them to pass me, rather than just
    remaining patient and waiting my turn. And then when I actually get
    to the intersection, I have to deal with B and C above.

    True, you have to know the light timing or be ready to try Plan B. I would
    think your way is dangerous because you might be a lot slower than cars
    trying to make the light, and they might try to squeeze around you.

    Quoted message said:


    I will admit that I have filtered to the front at this intersection
    on the *left*. I've done this when there's a line of cars in front of
    me that clearly have their turn signals going indicating their
    intention is to turn right on Dearborn, and there's sufficient room
    that I feel comfortable doing this.

    Now you lost me. I thought this was a left turn only lane.

    Quoted message said:

    Warm Regards,

    Right back at ya

  11. Kevan Smith said:


    If that means letting them place their lives and limbs in peril, I
    disagree. Even if met with hostility, we need to inform people of safer
    ways to ride. I can tolerate most sidewalk riders, but I _always_ make
    it a point to stop and talk to wrong way cyclists on the road. I have
    never gotten in a fight about it, but just laid out some facts in a calm
    and rational manner then let them decide.

    "Letting" them place themselves in peril? You can "tolerate" most
    sidewalk riders? Your arrogance is showing, Kev. If you really *stop*
    people on the street to "educate" them (something I must say I doubt
    you truly do) it's only a matter of time before you get "educated" on
    the inadvisability of doing so.

    Regards,
    Bob Hunt

  12. "Zoot Katz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Leo Lichtman said:

    According to what I see on the news, the medical profession has just
    discovered a "road rage gene" in some people. If that is what caused the
    excessive reaction to Claire's encounter, it makes me think that it may be
    unwise to try to reform strangers on the road.

    Serotonin my butt!

    Cars suck and car culture itself fosters the sickness.

    That one sounds like the most lame of all excuses if it's going to
    give those asswipes carte blanche to behave violently. It's already
    become epidemic in a sick society. I hope further research de-bunks
    it before it infects every idiot cager.

    Myself, I'll hold to the "de individuation" theory. (the process that
    prevents us relating to the other driver as a person)

    Cars are widely regarded as the measure of a person's worth. Too bad
    that view is promoted by the media because it's profitable for them.
    --
    zk

    Yeah I have to go with the "de individuation" theory myself.
    But something does seem to make some people go totally berserk with just a
    little trigger or event firing them off.
    Maybe the car is a catalyst for this "violent gene" they are talking about
    and "de individuation" just allows it to be worse.

  13. "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Claire Petersky wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I will admit that I have filtered to the front at this intersection
    on the *left*. I've done this when there's a line of cars in front of
    me that clearly have their turn signals going indicating their
    intention is to turn right on Dearborn, and there's sufficient room
    that I feel comfortable doing this.

    Now you lost me. I thought this was a left turn only lane.

    One narrow lane, my friend, one narrow lane, from which most go right or
    left, a few go straight.

    --
    Warm Regards,

    Claire Petersky
    http://www.bicyclemeditations.org/
    See the books I've set free at: http://bookcrossing.com/referral/Cpetersky

  14. Claire Petersky said:


    Yeah, I should just MMOB. It's my mommy gene, probably, that makes me want
    to protect even the biggest doofusi with my sage advice.

    Sounds like the Jewish mother thing.[1] I've accused my wife of getting
    secret training some years ago at the hospital, after the birth of our
    eldest, in how to behave like a mommy. She immediately started behaving
    in ways that she never had before.

    [1] Not meaning to sound racist or whatever here. My own Pennsylvania
    Dutch mother accused herself of such behavior with some frequency. As
    an (occasionally) well-behaved son, I never argued with such
    self-assessments.

    Pat

  15. Claire Petersky said:

    "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Claire Petersky wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I will admit that I have filtered to the front at this intersection
    on the *left*. I've done this when there's a line of cars in front
    of me that clearly have their turn signals going indicating their
    intention is to turn right on Dearborn, and there's sufficient room
    that I feel comfortable doing this.

    Now you lost me. I thought this was a left turn only lane.

    One narrow lane, my friend, one narrow lane, from which most go right
    or left, a few go straight.

    Ah, different kettle of gefilte fish.

    If it's a relatively short distance, I'd consider using the sidewalk (if
    there even is one /and/ it's safe to do), or "filter" as you say toward the
    front, recognizing that there could easily be a "tight squeeze" spot where
    I'd have to stop altogether or maybe "Flintsone" my way through. (Still
    need a written affidavit from that lead car that it IS in fact turning left,
    however. I often literally ask the driver to confirm it.)

    All things considered, I'd find a different route! :-P

  16. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Pat Lamb said:
    Claire Petersky said:


    Yeah, I should just MMOB. It's my mommy gene, probably, that makes me want
    to protect even the biggest doofusi with my sage advice.

    Sounds like the Jewish mother thing.

    It might be more of a Sagittarian thing.

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    -- Nothing is safe from me.
    Above address is just a spam midden.
    I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

  17. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bob said:

    "Letting" them place themselves in peril? You can "tolerate" most
    sidewalk riders? Your arrogance is showing, Kev. If you really *stop*
    people on the street to "educate" them (something I must say I doubt
    you truly do) it's only a matter of time before you get "educated" on
    the inadvisability of doing so.

    As I originally mentioned, I don't do it in a confrontational manner.
    Essentially, I'm very polite, and I make two points: 1) wrong way riding
    is illegal and 2) wrong way riding is extremely dangerous. I'm not The
    Punisher or anything. I have been ignored, cursed and thanked, but I
    haven't been assaulted.

    --
    fneep

  18. Tom Keats wrote:
    :: In article <[email hidden]>,
    :: [email hidden] writes:
    ::
    ::: Or perhaps it was another one of The Lord's lengthy injunctions,
    ::: taking what should be simple, common sense concepts about riding in
    ::: traffic and attempting unsuccessfully to elevate them to
    ::: Ph.D.-thesis material.
    :: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ::
    :: Yeah, that's pretty much it, except maybe not Ph.D thesis material --
    :: just essay stuff. In chance encounters with riders on the street who
    :: are doin' it wrong, there's just no opportunity to diplomatically
    :: explain to them all the whys 'n wherefors of riding "properly",
    :: unless you actually stop them. Otherwise, there's only enough time
    :: to yell some abbreviated message, which the recipient will take as
    :: being yelled-at, bawled-out 'n criticised. Cycling education can't
    :: be condensed into one sentence.
    ::
    ::: Forgive me, Lord John, for I have sinned!
    ::
    :: Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

    That sure wouldn't be me....when I first started I certainly rode the wrong
    way on the road.

  19. Kevan Smith said:


    As I originally mentioned, I don't do it in a confrontational manner.
    Essentially, I'm very polite, and I make two points: 1) wrong way riding
    is illegal and 2) wrong way riding is extremely dangerous. I'm not The
    Punisher or anything. I have been ignored, cursed and thanked, but I
    haven't been assaulted.

    I didn't say you were confrontational. I said I suspected you were
    possibly exaggerating how often you stop total strangers to lecture
    them and added that you were arrogant to ever do so but I didn't accuse
    you of being confrontational. Recalling your many past posts I don't
    think you have a confrontational bone in your body. ISTR that in some
    of those past posts you mentioned rolling through stop signs. That's
    also illegal and dangerous. Would you welcome a stranger stopping you
    on the street to lecture you about that?

    Regards,
    Bob Hunt

  20. "Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Kevan Smith said:


    As I originally mentioned, I don't do it in a confrontational manner.
    Essentially, I'm very polite, and I make two points: 1) wrong way riding
    is illegal and 2) wrong way riding is extremely dangerous. I'm not The
    Punisher or anything. I have been ignored, cursed and thanked, but I
    haven't been assaulted.

    I didn't say you were confrontational. I said I suspected you were
    possibly exaggerating how often you stop total strangers to lecture
    them and added that you were arrogant to ever do so but I didn't accuse
    you of being confrontational. Recalling your many past posts I don't
    think you have a confrontational bone in your body. ISTR that in some
    of those past posts you mentioned rolling through stop signs. That's
    also illegal and dangerous. Would you welcome a stranger stopping you
    on the street to lecture you about that?

    I freely admit I assess relative degrees of danger. I also, like all of us,
    break "little" laws. In other words, I will go through a stop sign if I
    deem it safe. I will stop if there is traffic. Also, I always stop at
    traffic lights on city roads. I have had one person lecture me about
    running stop signs on my bike. I thanked them.

    However, wrong way cycling is something I deem so dangerous, that I feel
    compelled to make an attempt to correct it. Fortunately, I only see about
    two or three wrong way wilburs a year. You might call it arrogance, but I
    think it helps. Frankly, in the two points I mention, I realize that "it's
    against the law" is the weakest of the two reasons.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.