Wow! Bing Han Ginseng

"Dave" <[email hidden]> dropped a great steaming turd in
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

The very fact that Quackbuster has attacked Bing Han ginseng to try to
discredit the oldest and most beneficial

So you admit he is a buster of quacks, does that make you a quack?
(Actually no, what makes you a quack is the pushing of quack cures)

Quoted message said:

herb on earth is, although bizarre, a testimonial to its
great healing powers. It is a true threat to the need for many
medications because eradicating diseases eliminates the need to medicate
them. The Quackbuster agenda is not as I once
thought, to protect us, but to allow only the drug companies
to exist and continue to poison us, unchallenged.

No No No,
Quackbusters stop the quacks from poisoning us with contaminated
ginseng.....
Like the stuff you're selling.

Quoted message said:

Mark Thorson, a known Quackbuster, appears to be making a habit of posting
false and/or misleading information without any scientific evidence, for
unknown reasons.

Actually he is posting uncomfortable facts about the toxins found in the
[censored] you're trying to flog, and the reasons?
Possibly one or more of the below:
1, He is a community minded person trying to prevent harm to the community.
2, He is discusted by spamming scumbags who post commercial messages to non
commercial news groups.
3, He enjoys watching you squirm.

Quoted message said:

He has been repeatedly posting an FDA report showing a
bunch of Asian ginseng companies with some unspecified amount of chemicals
used by all ginseng growers in Asia, Canada and America.

Not a bunch, just one company......
Can you guess whose it is?
Come on, say it....

Quoted message said:

While the motivation of Mr. Thorson is unclear to us, the great irony is
that Korean ginseng is eaten by more than a billion people to help rid

their

Quoted message said:

bodies of toxins, including
the many pesticides, hericides and chemical fertilizers used to grow our
fruits and vegetables.

Of course, even if this was true, you should use a brand of non MLMing,
never touched by lowlife Dave, and, most importantly, toxin free ginseng.

--
"The emperor is naked!"
"No he isn't, he's merely endorsing a clothing-optional lifestyle!"

to email me
Please remove "all your clothes"

Doug

In article <[email hidden]>,

Dave said:

The very fact that Quackbuster has attacked Bing Han ginseng to try to
discredit the oldest and most beneficial herb on earth is, although
bizarre,

Although completely understandable, you lying weasel. Your responses,
on the other hand, are skating pretty close to getting back to your
previous spamming behavior. Didn't your ISP warn you about that?
Shall we ask them about it?

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Dave said:

The very fact that Quackbuster has attacked Bing Han ginseng to try to
discredit the oldest and most beneficial herb on earth is, although
bizarre,

Although completely understandable, you lying weasel. Your responses,
on the other hand, are skating pretty close to getting back to your
previous spamming behavior. Didn't your ISP warn you about that?
Shall we ask them about it?

-- David Wright

I'm going postal next time he goes commercial!

Dave said:

The very fact that Quackbuster has attacked Bing Han ginseng to try to
discredit the oldest and most beneficial
herb on earth is, although bizarre, a testimonial to its
great healing powers.

Let's see. The identification of toxins in Bin Han ginseng is a
testimonial to its great healing powers?

Nice spin there.

Personally I would avoid Bin Han ginseng. Too many toxins, too much
marketing hype.

Aloha,

Rich
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance.

Quoted message said:

Dave said:

The very fact that Quackbuster has attacked Bing Han ginseng to try to
discredit the oldest and most beneficial
herb on earth is, although bizarre, a testimonial to its
great healing powers.

Let's see. The identification of toxins in Bin Han ginseng is a
testimonial to its great healing powers?

Nice spin there.

Personally I would avoid Bin Han ginseng. Too many toxins, too much
marketing hype.

Aloha,

Rich

Let's not forget highly over-priced. That stuff is about $150 US Dollars for
30grams...or something like that.

In article said:

Dave said:

The very fact that Quackbuster has attacked Bing Han ginseng to try to
discredit the oldest and most beneficial
herb on earth is, although bizarre, a testimonial to its
great healing powers.

Let's see. The identification of toxins in Bin Han ginseng is a
testimonial to its great healing powers?

Nice spin there.

Personally I would avoid Bin Han ginseng. Too many toxins, too much
marketing hype.

And way, way, way too expensive. That might even be the biggest
scandal of all, the massive overpricing. Equivalent products are
available at one-tenth the cost.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)