UK and Europe · Public discussion

Words fail me.

Started by Dirtylitterboxo · · Last activity · 61 posts · 3,139 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
21 February 2004
Last activity
4 March 2004
Original author
Dirtylitterboxo
Posts
61
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,139
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 61
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Gawnsoft posted ...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:40:59 +0000, Martin Family <[email hidden]> wrote (more
    or less):

    Quoted message said:

    b) trying to go uphill in poor conditions. (Not normally a problem here but then again with the
    [censored] tyres people drive on in poor conditions it accurs more frequently than it need to).

    Err, poor conditions like snow? FWD is much better for going up hills in that sort of poor
    condition than RWD.

    That might be true for berks who can't drive anyway .. but RWD and a competent driver can get up
    more easily using a combination of throttle and brake/handbrake usage, making the rear end work like
    it has an LSD (Limited Slip Differential). This mostly isn't possible on FWD cars, unless their
    handbrake operates the front wheels too.

    --
    Paul

    (8(|) Homer rocks .. 😉

  2. On 21/2/04 10:08 pm, in article
    [email hidden], "Tony Raven"

    Quoted message said:
    Martin Family said:


    For the interested, the back end stepped out on exiting the roundabout. My friend corrected and
    the car span the other way. We ended up sliding sideways into the central reservation facing the
    wrong way and shredded fibreglass all over the place.

    If your friend is going to drive a car like that close to its limits perhaps he should take a skid
    pan course. Sounds like a simple case of inexperienced overcorrecting for the initial slide. A
    common mistake

    He wasn't attempting to drive it near it's limits, just going from A to B. I don't think he realised
    just how low the limits were with a very light car (it was a kit car built on an old 1600 cortina,
    but very lightweight.

    Now far more cautious (as am I) in any kind of adverse conditions.

    ..d

  3. On 22/2/04 3:51 am, in article [email hidden],

    Gawnsoft said:

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:40:59 +0000, Martin Family <[email hidden]> wrote (more
    or less):

    Quoted message said:

    b) trying to go uphill in poor conditions. (Not normally a problem here but then again with the
    [censored] tyres people drive on in poor conditions it accurs more frequently than it need to).

    Err, poor conditions like snow? FWD is much better for going up hills in that sort of poor
    condition than RWD.

    Not in my experience. The weight distribution is wrong so the car just spins rather than gets up and
    goes. Normally in situations where the RWD can and the FWD can't, the FWD can if it reverses up (but
    is then in effect RWD).

    Lots of hills, lots of snow (of various types and grades).

    It's even more fun when you just cycle past them of course.

    ..d

  4. On 22/2/04 9:39 am, in article [email hidden],

    Quoted message said:

    Martin Family posted ...

    Quoted message said:

    For the interested, the back end stepped out on exiting the roundabout. My friend corrected and
    the car span the other way. We ended up sliding

    er .. he OVER corrected ... and didn't have the experience to realise what the road conditions
    entailed and was therefore driving very, very badly.

    More of a combination of road and car. He wouldn't normally take the kit car out in the rain.
    Inexperience, yes. Bad luck, yes. very very bad driving, not IMHO.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    sideways into the central reservation facing the wrong way and shredded fibreglass all over
    the place.

    He sounds like a poor driver who really shouldn't drive such a car on public roads.

    One bad incident from which he learnt a lot. There is nothing like having to rebuild, rub down and
    respray the body of a car to give you time to ponder on the error of ones ways.

    ..d

  5. Martin Family said:


    He wasn't attempting to drive it near it's limits, just going from A to B.

    He was. In fact he drove it past its limits. He just didn't know it and what the limits were but
    that is no excuse - he exceeded them on a public road and that is very bad driving IMHO

    Tony

  6. Martin Family said:


    More of a combination of road and car. He wouldn't normally take the kit car out in the rain.
    Inexperience, yes. Bad luck, yes. very very bad driving, not IMHO.

    Ah so it was the fault of the road and the car. Silly me I should have known. The driver is just
    a passenger being let down by the behaviour of his car. Read just the other day of something
    similar with a BMW that killed a child. It was the wet road and the confusing control pedals at
    fault and not the driver in that case too. He was just unlucky too but not as unlucky as the
    child and her friend,

    Tony

  7. On 22/2/04 9:24 pm, in article [email hidden],

    Tony Raven said:
    Martin Family said:


    More of a combination of road and car. He wouldn't normally take the kit car out in the rain.
    Inexperience, yes. Bad luck, yes. very very bad driving, not IMHO.

    Ah so it was the fault of the road and the car.

    Fault of the driver. I have always said that. It was the particular combination of road and car that
    led to conditions with which he was not experienced and which were unlike others he had encountered,
    ie not expecting the car to handle so poorly in the rain (indeed, I myself was extremely surprised
    that the car slid under the conditions we were in).

    Sometimes things are down to bad luck. It is still however the responsibility of the driver. No one
    can behave in an entirely safe manner. Everything is a percentage game, even cycling. I take
    calculated risks every time I get on my bike. I risk sudden diesel spills on bends, the car behind
    me being driven by a f***wit who isn't looking where they are going, and so on. There is an element
    of luck. Like being hit by a falling tree is bad luck (I have been hit by a falling conker twice
    while cycling. I have had a conker thrown up by a bus tyre fly through the frame of the bicycle at
    great speed as well.) I wouldn't consider his driving at that point to be 'very bad' (as someone who
    was there at the time). Not perfect, obviously, but within the normal range.

    On another occasion recently I was driving along the local ring road. As I came up to the roundabout
    I eased off to gently brake and stop behind the cars waiting. I am quite laid back and do not have a
    heavy right foot so was just braking gently and the car slid, perchance it was a diesel spill on the
    road. Most frightening but because I am somewhat cautious, especially in the wet, I avoided a
    collision by a few tens of centimetres. had I been driving 'normally' (by taking the norm of those
    driving around me) I'd have hit the guy in front. Sometimes things occur which are well outside the
    normal spectrum and not what could reasonably be expected. I expect roads to be a bit slippery in a
    shower which is why I approached the roundabout cautiously (though I am now even more cautious). It
    was however much slippier than one would reasonably expect for a shower.

    Quoted message said:

    Silly me I should have known. The driver is just a passenger being let down by the behaviour of
    his car. Read just the other day of something similar with a BMW that killed a child.

    Not at all similar except that it was on a roundabout. In the case of my friends crash, a roundabout
    that we had driven round under many different conditions before.

    Quoted message said:

    It was the wet road and the confusing control pedals at fault and not the driver in that case too.
    He was just unlucky too but not as unlucky as the child and her friend,

    There is a difference you know. One was a prat showing off in a high powered BMW that left the road.

    The majority of accidents could be avoided by small modifications to driving behaviour. There are a
    very small proportion that are down to 'bad luck' with circumstances that are not reasonably
    forseeable. e.g. sudden emergence of wildlife, other random acts of nature, idiots coming the other
    way and crossing the centre line without warning.

    having driven in slippery conditions for many years, I am well aware of how much technology goes
    into making a tyre stick. I am also aware of how easy they are to unstick.

    ..d

  8. "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Martin Family said:


    He wasn't attempting to drive it near it's limits, just going from A to B.

    He was. In fact he drove it past its limits. He just didn't know it and what the limits were but
    that is no excuse

    Surely to "attempt" is to *consciously* try something. It seems clear in this case, from what
    has been written, that there was no conscious decision on the driver's part. That does not in
    any way excuse the standard of driving though as the limits were passed through ignorance rather
    than design.

    Graeme

  9. A colleague where I used to work in West Lothian used to drive around in winter with a couple of
    bags of cement in his boot to give added traction. He lived at the top of a hill that would often be
    impassable for most vehicles, but his trick gave him just that little extra to get him home.

    Graeme

  10. Quoted message said:

    This mostly isn't possible on FWD cars, unless their handbrake operates the front wheels too.

    This seems to be fairly common on French cars - my Citroen and a friend's Renault both had this.

    --

    Dave Larrington - legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uklegslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
    ===========================================================
    Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
    bhpc.org.ukbhpc.org.uk
    ===========================================================

  11. Tony Raven said:

    If your friend is going to drive a car like that close to its limits perhaps he should take a skid
    pan course.

    You don't have to be trying very hard to get /some/ vehicles to do this. An unladen RWD Transit van
    will go sideways with very little provocation, as I discovered the first time I rented one with a
    diesel engine rather than the weedy petrol jobs which were commonplace in the 80's.

    --

    Dave Larrington - legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uklegslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk
    ===========================================================
    Editor - British Human Power Club Newsletter
    bhpc.org.ukbhpc.org.uk
    ===========================================================

  12. On 23/2/04 11:36 am, in article
    [email hidden], "Dave Larrington"

    Quoted message said:
    Tony Raven said:

    If your friend is going to drive a car like that close to its limits perhaps he should take a
    skid pan course.

    You don't have to be trying very hard to get /some/ vehicles to do this. An unladen RWD Transit
    van will go sideways with very little provocation, as I discovered the first time I rented one
    with a diesel engine rather than the weedy petrol jobs which were commonplace in the 80's.

    Ny toyota hiace combi was very bad for this too. In winter we had about a third of a ton of gravel
    in the back to keep the wheels on the deck.. (yes, that was ten rubble sacks full. and there was
    still space to fit the mountain bike and trailer in the back.)

    ..d

  13. Dave Larrington posted ...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    This mostly isn't possible on FWD cars, unless their handbrake operates the front wheels too.

    This seems to be fairly common on French cars - my Citroen and a friend's Renault both had this.

    MIne did too .. hence my 'get out clause' .. 😉

    None of my other vehicles have/had it though, and one I drive now the handbrake doesn't brake any
    wheels at all .. 😉

    --
    Paul

    (8(|) Homer rocks .. 😉

  14. Quoted message said:

    Despite witnesses at the trial stating the driver was driving like a bat out of hell, and showing
    off with lots of engine revving etc., etc.. it seems the chap killed a 12-year old girl
    unintentionally as he was suffering from...

    "unintentional accelerator syndrome"

    Words fail me (which is unusual)

    He's got off with it.

    See

    < edp24.co.uknewsStory.asp
    =NEWS&ItemId=NOED24+Feb+2004+19%3A01%3A23%3A690 >

    or

    tinyurl.comysv5r

    "Driver cleared over Kristine's death

    February 24, 2004 19:00

    A Norfolk man who was accused of causing the death of a 12-year-old girl by driving dangerously has
    been found not guilty by a jury.

    Shaun Moyse, 24, from Great Yarmouth was cleared of the charge at Norwich Crown Court on Tuesday.

    However, he was convicted of a lesser charge of careless driving after Kristine Errington, also from
    Great Yarmouth, was hit by his car.

    He was fined £1,500 and disqualified from driving for 15 months.

    Kristine had been walking with friends on Acle New Road in Great Yarmouth on 6 June 2003 when she
    was hit by Moyse's red BMW 325i. She suffered serious head injuries and died later in hospital.

    Moyse denied he had been driving aggressively or showing off and told the court he had not been
    in a rush."

    So that's it, £1500 and a 15 month ban. Even though witnesses reported him driving like a "bat out
    of hell" which is the exact quote as reported in local news recently.

    I despair, I really do :-(

    helen s --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam-- to get correct one remove dependency on
    fame & fortune h*$el*$$e**nd***$o$ts***i*$*$m**m$$o*n**s@$*$a$$o**l.c**$*$om$$

  15. [email hidden] (dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    So that's it, £1500 and a 15 month ban. Even though witnesses reported him driving like a "bat out
    of hell" which is the exact quote as reported in local news recently.

    I despair, I really do :-(

    That's depressing. He'll be having a good laugh about that with his mates. It's open season on
    pedestrians, folks.

    --
    Dave...

  16. In message <[email hidden]>

    Gawnsoft said:

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:40:59 +0000, Martin Family <[email hidden]> wrote (more
    or less):

    Quoted message said:

    b) trying to go uphill in poor conditions. (Not normally a problem here but then again with the
    [censored] tyres people drive on in poor conditions it accurs more frequently than it need to).

    Err, poor conditions like snow? FWD is much better for going up hills in that sort of poor
    condition than RWD.

    Ever driven a Hillman Imp or a Beetle?

    G

    Quoted message said:

    Cheers, Euan Gawnsoft: gawnsoft.co.srgawnsoft.co.sr Symbian/Epoc wiki: html.dnsalias.nethtml.dnsalias.net
    Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk) html.dnsalias.netsmalltalk

    --
    Gwyn

  17. In message <[email hidden]>

    Zog The Undeniable said:

    Tony Raven wrote:

    Sorry for th elate reply but

    Quoted message said:

    Amazing that RWD is still loved so much by hairy-chested "motoring journalists" and BMW. It's OK
    for 150bhp+ cars and on bone-dry tarmac, but in any other conditions it's a liability.

    Try driving a RWD car on snow - besides the fact that the power doesn't go in the same direction
    as you're steering, so cornering is terrible - it rapidly becomes evident that the rear wheels
    are constantly trying to overtake the front ones.

    This may be so with front engine rwd but when you have REAR engine rwd as in the HILLMAN IMP
    traction can be superb. Locking the front wheels when braking can be a problem... if you use the
    front brakes...

    Still last week 4wd with *centre and rear* diffs locked in Audi could not get started up an icy
    hill - bugger

    G

    Quoted message said:


    If it's so much better to push than pull, as BMW would have it, why do trains virtually always
    have the locomotive at the front (or at both ends)? Oh, and there are greater coastdown losses
    (hence lower efficiency) because of the drive changing direction through the rear diff.

    FWD isn't just about flatter floors and integrated transaxles, you know.

    nor is rear engine...

    Quoted message said:


    Oops...my bike is RWD - please ignore above post ;-)

    --
    Gwyn

  18. On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:39:54 GMT, Gwyn Oakley <[email hidden]>
    wrote (more or less):

    Quoted message said:

    In message <[email hidden]> Gawnsoft

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:40:59 +0000, Martin Family <[email hidden]> wrote (more
    or less):

    Quoted message said:

    b) trying to go uphill in poor conditions. (Not normally a problem here but then again with the
    [censored] tyres people drive on in poor conditions it accurs more frequently than it need to).

    Err, poor conditions like snow? FWD is much better for going up hills in that sort of poor
    condition than RWD.

    Ever driven a Hillman Imp or a Beetle?

    Neither (been driven /in/ both).

    But I did used to drive a rwd Skoda. (Enormously 'fun' on wet roads)

    Cheers, Euan Gawnsoft: gawnsoft.co.srgawnsoft.co.sr Symbian/Epoc wiki: html.dnsalias.nethtml.dnsalias.net
    Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk) html.dnsalias.netsmalltalk

  19. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Dirtylitterboxo
    He's got off with it.

    So that's it, £1500 and a 15 month ban. Even though witnesses reported him driving like a "bat out of hell" which is the exact quote as reported in local news recently.

    I despair, I really do :-(

    Obviously this pillock's attempt to bolster his ego by driving his big red [censored] extension fast has had some horrific consequences. However, why on earth would you buy performance cars for "their looks"? If looks is all you are interested in then you buy kit cars!

    Anyway, someone as shallow as this preening little [censored] obviously is will have forgotten about this tragedy in about 4 months and be planning to purchase his next car, all the while bragging about how "cool" he was in Court.

    As for the debate about FWD vs. AWD vs. RWD - who gives a turd? Too many "hairy chested motor journalist wannabes" raised and responded to this pointless observation for my liking.

    STICK TO CYCLING PEOPLE 😄

  20. On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 10:02:17 GMT, McBain_v1
    <[email hidden]> wrote (more or less):

    Quoted message said:

    why on earth would you buy performance cars for "their looks"? If looks is all you are interested
    in then you buy kit cars!

    Only if you like the look of big piles of bits lying about your garage / loft / spare room...

    :-)
    Cheers, Euan Gawnsoft: gawnsoft.co.srgawnsoft.co.sr Symbian/Epoc wiki: html.dnsalias.nethtml.dnsalias.net
    Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk) html.dnsalias.netsmalltalk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.