Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Wireless Computers on Recumbents?

Started by Elisa Francesca Roselli · · Last activity · 9 posts · 990 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
1 September 2007
Last activity
9 November 2007
Original author
Elisa Francesca Roselli
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
990
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As some may recall, I had a horrible time with a Polar HRM Cycling
    computer setup about a year ago. It was expensive high-end equipment,
    but absolutely refused to work on my beloved Flyzipper, because of his
    non-standard, 20" wheel architecture and extra long reach. In short,
    there was no way the HRM, cadence meter, speed meter and receiver could
    be positioned in such a way as to be in range to exchange data with
    eachother.

    So I sold it on Ebay and was lucky: it fetched almost as much as I paid
    for it.

    But now with the new Scorpion on the horizon, I'm thinking, do wireless
    systems work on _that_ architecture? Has anyone tried? If everything
    works to plan and he and I fall in love and go on long tours all over
    the world together, perhaps I might buy him another Polar or even a
    Garmin. But he's a _lot_ stranger than Flyzipper.

    EFR
    Ile de France

  2. Elisa Francesca Roselli wrote:
    ::
    :: So I sold it on Ebay and was lucky: it fetched almost as much as I
    :: paid for it.
    ::
    :: But now with the new Scorpion on the horizon, I'm thinking, do
    :: wireless systems work on _that_ architecture? Has anyone tried? If
    :: everything works to plan and he and I fall in love and go on long
    :: tours all over the world together, perhaps I might buy him another
    :: Polar or even a Garmin. But he's a _lot_ stranger than Flyzipper.

    Wireless systems always seem to have problems, IME. I have a bike computer
    (wired) and a Garmin that I use on my recumbent.

  3. Roger Zoul said:

    Elisa Francesca Roselli wrote:

    ::
    :: So I sold it on Ebay and was lucky: it fetched almost as much as I
    :: paid for it.
    ::
    :: But now with the new Scorpion on the horizon, I'm thinking, do
    :: wireless systems work on _that_ architecture? Has anyone tried? If
    :: everything works to plan and he and I fall in love and go on long
    :: tours all over the world together, perhaps I might buy him another
    :: Polar or even a Garmin. But he's a _lot_ stranger than Flyzipper.

    Wireless systems always seem to have problems, IME. I have a bike computer
    (wired) and a Garmin that I use on my recumbent.

    I was looking into the wireless systems for my LWB a few months
    back and a couple stores I talked to said they wouldn't work there due
    to the long distances involved. The transmit range is only about 24".
    Couldn't be much more than that or else you'd be picking up signals
    from the guy beside you...

    Keith

  4. Quoted message said:

    As some may recall, I had a horrible time with a Polar HRM Cycling
    computer setup about a year ago. It was expensive high-end equipment,
    but absolutely refused to work on my beloved Flyzipper, because of his
    non-standard, 20" wheel architecture and extra long reach. In short,
    there was no way the HRM, cadence meter, speed meter and receiver could
    be positioned in such a way as to be in range to exchange data with
    eachother.

    So I sold it on Ebay and was lucky: it fetched almost as much as I paid
    for it.

    But now with the new Scorpion on the horizon, I'm thinking, do wireless
    systems work on _that_ architecture? Has anyone tried? If everything
    works to plan and he and I fall in love and go on long tours all over
    the world together, perhaps I might buy him another Polar or even a
    Garmin. But he's a _lot_ stranger than Flyzipper.

    The latest generation of wireless computers use bluetooth technology and
    might do the trick. Much more reliable over distance, because they're not
    just sending an electronic "blip" that gets confused with other sources of
    noise. The model we sell with those features is the Trek ACH Digital, which
    includes heart rate, cadence, altimeter etc. All the cool stuff. No download
    capabilities though. In the US, they run about $180.

    I've been meaning to ask you something unrelated to cycling. Are you native
    French? You write as though your native language is English. Just curious...

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

  5. Mike Jacoubowsky said:

    I've been meaning to ask you something unrelated to cycling. Are you native
    French? You write as though your native language is English. Just curious...

    My native language is English. I was born of Italian parents in New York
    City and lived there until I was 15, then finished my education in
    Geneva, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. I lived in the UK for 13 years
    before moving to France in 1991. I hold US and Italian nationality and
    am bi-lingual in French, although I can also manage in Italian, German,
    and Russian in a pinch.

    Cheers,

    EFR
    Ile de France

  6. Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    As some may recall, I had a horrible time with a Polar HRM Cycling
    computer setup about a year ago. It was expensive high-end equipment,
    but absolutely refused to work on my beloved Flyzipper, because of his
    non-standard, 20" wheel architecture and extra long reach. In short,
    there was no way the HRM, cadence meter, speed meter and receiver could
    be positioned in such a way as to be in range to exchange data with
    eachother.

    So I sold it on Ebay and was lucky: it fetched almost as much as I paid
    for it.

    But now with the new Scorpion on the horizon, I'm thinking, do wireless
    systems work on _that_ architecture? Has anyone tried? If everything
    works to plan and he and I fall in love and go on long tours all over
    the world together, perhaps I might buy him another Polar or even a
    Garmin. But he's a _lot_ stranger than Flyzipper.

    The latest generation of wireless computers use bluetooth technology and
    might do the trick. Much more reliable over distance, because they're
    not just sending an electronic "blip" that gets confused with other
    sources of noise. The model we sell with those features is the Trek ACH
    Digital, which includes heart rate, cadence, altimeter etc. All the cool
    stuff. No download capabilities though. In the US, they run about $180.

    I've been meaning to ask you something unrelated to cycling. Are you
    native French? You write as though your native language is English. Just
    curious...

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    Mike -
    I just ran across this and am impressed, though not surprised, that you
    responded. The (San Francisco) Bay Area is not exactly friendly, IMO,
    towards 'bent cyclists (EasyRacers is, after all, in Watsonville <g>😉
    Your shop is the only non-specialty one I know of in the area that
    doesn't freak when I roll in with my 'bent. (I consider Terry Shaw's shop
    to be more specialized, and he, natch', seems to love working with /any/
    bike). You probably know most of the employees at other bike shops in the
    area, so you likely wouldn't encounter that look of disdain, or utter
    confusion, that I get from Palo Alto Bikes, Mike's Bikes, and all but one
    of the employees at Mountain View's Performance Bikes (actually, he just
    left to start his own gig). Holdover attitude from the "Wheelsmith
    brothers"? Dunno. Doesn't matter, either. But I DO hope you guys keep up
    the same spirit you have had to date. Plz consider stocking (Presta)
    tubes and tires for 406mm wheels.

    Regards,
    Dave

  7. Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    As some may recall, I had a horrible time with a Polar HRM Cycling
    computer setup about a year ago. It was expensive high-end equipment,
    but absolutely refused to work on my beloved Flyzipper, because of his
    non-standard, 20" wheel architecture and extra long reach. In short,
    there was no way the HRM, cadence meter, speed meter and receiver could
    be positioned in such a way as to be in range to exchange data with
    eachother.

    So I sold it on Ebay and was lucky: it fetched almost as much as I paid
    for it.

    But now with the new Scorpion on the horizon, I'm thinking, do wireless
    systems work on _that_ architecture? Has anyone tried? If everything
    works to plan and he and I fall in love and go on long tours all over
    the world together, perhaps I might buy him another Polar or even a
    Garmin. But he's a _lot_ stranger than Flyzipper.

    The latest generation of wireless computers use bluetooth technology and
    might do the trick. Much more reliable over distance, because they're
    not just sending an electronic "blip" that gets confused with other
    sources of noise. The model we sell with those features is the Trek ACH
    Digital, which includes heart rate, cadence, altimeter etc. All the cool
    stuff. No download capabilities though. In the US, they run about $180.

    I've been meaning to ask you something unrelated to cycling. Are you
    native French? You write as though your native language is English. Just
    curious...

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    Mike -
    I just ran across this and am impressed, though not surprised, that you
    responded. The (San Francisco) Bay Area is not exactly friendly, IMO,
    towards 'bent cyclists (EasyRacers is, after all, in Watsonville <g>😉
    Your shop is the only non-specialty one I know of in the area that
    doesn't freak when I roll in with my 'bent. (I consider Terry Shaw's shop
    to be more specialized, and he, natch', seems to love working with /any/
    bike). You probably know most of the employees at other bike shops in the
    area, so you likely wouldn't encounter that look of disdain, or utter
    confusion, that I get from Palo Alto Bikes, Mike's Bikes, and all but one
    of the employees at Mountain View's Performance Bikes (actually, he just
    left to start his own gig). Holdover attitude from the "Wheelsmith
    brothers"? Dunno. Doesn't matter, either. But I DO hope you guys keep up
    the same spirit you have had to date. Plz consider stocking (Presta)
    tubes and tires for 406mm wheels.

    Regards,
    Dave

  8. LeftCoast_Dave said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    As some may recall, I had a horrible time with a Polar HRM Cycling
    computer setup about a year ago. It was expensive high-end equipment,
    but absolutely refused to work on my beloved Flyzipper, because of his
    non-standard, 20" wheel architecture and extra long reach. In short,
    there was no way the HRM, cadence meter, speed meter and receiver could
    be positioned in such a way as to be in range to exchange data with
    eachother.

    So I sold it on Ebay and was lucky: it fetched almost as much as I paid
    for it.

    But now with the new Scorpion on the horizon, I'm thinking, do wireless
    systems work on _that_ architecture? Has anyone tried? If everything
    works to plan and he and I fall in love and go on long tours all over
    the world together, perhaps I might buy him another Polar or even a
    Garmin. But he's a _lot_ stranger than Flyzipper.

    The latest generation of wireless computers use bluetooth technology and
    might do the trick. Much more reliable over distance, because they're
    not just sending an electronic "blip" that gets confused with other
    sources of noise. The model we sell with those features is the Trek ACH
    Digital, which includes heart rate, cadence, altimeter etc. All the cool
    stuff. No download capabilities though. In the US, they run about $180.

    I've been meaning to ask you something unrelated to cycling. Are you
    native French? You write as though your native language is English. Just
    curious...

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    Mike -
    I just ran across this and am impressed, though not surprised, that you
    responded. The (San Francisco) Bay Area is not exactly friendly, IMO,
    towards 'bent cyclists (EasyRacers is, after all, in Watsonville <g>😉
    Your shop is the only non-specialty one I know of in the area that
    doesn't freak when I roll in with my 'bent. (I consider Terry Shaw's shop
    to be more specialized, and he, natch', seems to love working with /any/
    bike). You probably know most of the employees at other bike shops in the
    area, so you likely wouldn't encounter that look of disdain, or utter
    confusion, that I get from Palo Alto Bikes, Mike's Bikes, and all but one
    of the employees at Mountain View's Performance Bikes (actually, he just
    left to start his own gig). Holdover attitude from the "Wheelsmith
    brothers"? Dunno. Doesn't matter, either.

    Maybe they have learned the "Wisdom of Recumbency" from Jobst Brandt:
    <http://yarchive.net/bike/recumbent.html>? 🙁

    Quoted message said:

    But I DO hope you guys keep up the same spirit you have had to date....

    Mike was one of the few Trek dealers that did not reject the R200 out of
    hand because it was a recumbent, and gave it a fair evaluation.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    Tradition is the worst rational for action.

  9. LeftCoast_Dave said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    As some may recall, I had a horrible time with a Polar HRM Cycling
    computer setup about a year ago. It was expensive high-end equipment,
    but absolutely refused to work on my beloved Flyzipper, because of his
    non-standard, 20" wheel architecture and extra long reach. In short,
    there was no way the HRM, cadence meter, speed meter and receiver could
    be positioned in such a way as to be in range to exchange data with
    eachother.

    So I sold it on Ebay and was lucky: it fetched almost as much as I paid
    for it.

    But now with the new Scorpion on the horizon, I'm thinking, do wireless
    systems work on _that_ architecture? Has anyone tried? If everything
    works to plan and he and I fall in love and go on long tours all over
    the world together, perhaps I might buy him another Polar or even a
    Garmin. But he's a _lot_ stranger than Flyzipper.

    The latest generation of wireless computers use bluetooth technology and
    might do the trick. Much more reliable over distance, because they're
    not just sending an electronic "blip" that gets confused with other
    sources of noise. The model we sell with those features is the Trek ACH
    Digital, which includes heart rate, cadence, altimeter etc. All the cool
    stuff. No download capabilities though. In the US, they run about $180.

    I've been meaning to ask you something unrelated to cycling. Are you
    native French? You write as though your native language is English. Just
    curious...

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    Mike -
    I just ran across this and am impressed, though not surprised, that you
    responded. The (San Francisco) Bay Area is not exactly friendly, IMO,
    towards 'bent cyclists (EasyRacers is, after all, in Watsonville <g>😉
    Your shop is the only non-specialty one I know of in the area that
    doesn't freak when I roll in with my 'bent. (I consider Terry Shaw's shop
    to be more specialized, and he, natch', seems to love working with /any/
    bike). You probably know most of the employees at other bike shops in the
    area, so you likely wouldn't encounter that look of disdain, or utter
    confusion, that I get from Palo Alto Bikes, Mike's Bikes, and all but one
    of the employees at Mountain View's Performance Bikes (actually, he just
    left to start his own gig). Holdover attitude from the "Wheelsmith
    brothers"? Dunno. Doesn't matter, either.

    Maybe they have learned the "Wisdom of Recumbency" from Jobst Brandt:
    <http://yarchive.net/bike/recumbent.html>? 🙁

    Quoted message said:

    But I DO hope you guys keep up the same spirit you have had to date....

    Mike was one of the few Trek dealers that did not reject the R200 out of
    hand because it was a recumbent, and gave it a fair evaluation.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    Tradition is the worst rational for action.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.