"Nick Burns" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:"Isidor Gunsberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:David Ryan <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Isidor Gunsberg wrote:
>
> Unlike Merckx, Armstrong only races flat out on just a few stages. A time trial is
> definitely one of them.
>
> He needs to win a stage in the Pyrenees, since otherwise he faces the prospect of
> winning the TDF, yet without winning a single stage.
According to letour.com:
2003 not ranked o Wore the yellow jersey o 1 stage victory : Stage 4 : JOINVILLE -
SAINT-DIZIER
(the TTT)
Thanks for sharing. I thought that it was rather obvious, and hence, could be left unwritten,
that a win in a Team Time Trial (TTT) stage does not accrue much glory to the Individual
racer. Wins in Individual Time Trials (ITTs) have the greatest prestige, followed by wins in
the major mountain stages, followed by wins in the more glamorous of the sprint (flat)
stages. The key is that while one's team can provide assistance (except in the ITTs), a stage
win manifests a significant level of achievement by the rider who must ultimately make a
substantial individual effort.
Of course, it is expected that on newsgroups one will encounter some nitpicking by the
occasional pedant, although I'm not inclined to stoop to such pedantry myself.
So congratulations: Technically, you are correct.
I actually agree that with regard to the pressure of the GC winner to win a stage, the TTT does
not really satisfy the desire to shoe oneself as the strongest rider.
I do not agree that an ITT is more important than a mountain stage. They are probably equally
prestigious.
The reason why I consider an Individual Time Trial stage win to be more prestigous is that in
the ITT, the winning rider and his main riders are almost always riding for a maximum result--to
ride as fast as possible.
Yet, it is often the case in Mountain stages that one of the top riders, vying for GC, will not
be so concerned about actually winning the stage. Theor main concern is to take time from their
main rivals. It was just a few years ago that Armstrong basically allowed Pantini to win the
stage at the Mt. Ventoux climb, by not sprinting at the end. One gets the sense that the
"Padroni" (in this case, Armstrong), might be inclined to dole out a few favors, by letting
other riders take the glory of the stage win. And Mt. Ventoux is one of the major 3-4 "legendary
" mountain stages.
Also, as one can see from the Pyrenees stages, a rider like Sastre or Simoni is allowed to break,
because they are not deemed to be a threat. Their attack is parried. Such a rider, who is not
really competing for a high place, can afford to burn all his energy on the one stage. Often, he
conserves energy in the prior stage by riding in a trailing grupetto. And the next stage, they
finish back in the pack. So, a rider may win a mountain stage, but yet end up losing 20-30
minutes to the GC leaders, over all three stages.