Quoted message said:Yep there are lots of people doping. Let's find them and deal with
them in an open, honest, verifiable system of due process. If that was
done then I would have very little problem with a lifetime ban for a
2nd offense.
One of the problems with this is that the most sophisticated of the
dopers will aways be ahead of the testing, and the richest teams and
riders will be able to spend for those new methods.
The rich get richer, we still have no guarantee anything is clean and
fair, and riders not attached to the big program teams fell they need
to dope to compete, but get busted because theyu don't have the
resources.
That works for you all?
Name me a sport that's cleaner, or gone after dopers harder? Then
prove it.
Bill C
Ironically, the best way (in my opinion) to expose and deal with the issue
of doping is to make the penalties for first-time offense and/or confession
*less* severe, and then go for the guilotine on the second offense. The
worst thing about the silly paperwork the riders had to sign was that it
dramatically intensified the desire to hide and not admit the problem
exists.
But I do agree with Wiggins that Bruyneel was guilty of something, just not
sure exactly what, when he hired Basso. I'd feel differently about it if
Bruyneel had stood on a soapbox and proclaimed everything that was wrong
about the current situation and why he felt teams should abandon the code of
ethics and create something workable. But to pretend that what he was doing
(by hiring Basso) was within the established framework was a bit of a
stretch.
Of course, if the risk to a team (in hiring someone who might be dirty) was
made severe enough, it shouldn't be a problem.
--Mike Jacoubowsky
Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReaction.com
Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA
"Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Bill C said:On Jul 31, 11:50 am, samson <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:>http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2007/tour07/?
> id=/riders/2007/interviews/tour_wiggins_post07
Quoted message said:> As many others are beginning to say, the Olympic champion also feels
> that a disproportionate amount of the pressure is put on riders to be
> whiter than white, while teams and their managers don't have the same
> concerns. He singles out one particular team for specific criticism:
> "I
> think the team managers have to take responsibility for this as well
> because they're willing to pay these guys who are under suspicion and
> have been involved in previous years in doping scandals. Ivan Basso,
> last year got thrown off the Tour is disgrace - [Discovery Channel's
> Johan] Brunyeel this year goes and signs him on a million Euro
> contract.
Quoted message said:> "The hypocrisy in that is unbelievable," Wiggins stated. "These guys
> are
> running some of the biggest professional cycling teams in the sport.
> What's their motivation within the sport if they are willing to sign
> someone who they knew was under investigation of who had been thrown
> out
> of the Tour the previous year. Not every team manager thinks that way
> but it seems that there is a minority out there who aren't willing to
> play by the rules - including the team managers."
Quoted message said:Yep, good idea. Everyone who has even been rumored to have ever, even
known someone who has doped, or been on a team where someone doped
should be unemployable. That means we need a couple hundred new pros,
of course they can't come from any teams with links to pro teams who
have ever been linked to doping, or from teams who have ever had a
rider who was caught doping as a pro, or anyone under suspicion of
doping as an amateur.
Bill C- Hide quoted text -
Quoted message said:- Show quoted text -
Sinkewitz fired after confession
Face it Bill, Smoke equals fire.
You cannot defend this sport they have let you down- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yep there are lots of people doping. Let's find them and deal with
them in an open, honest, verifiable system of due process. If that was
done then I would have very little problem with a lifetime ban for a
2nd offense.
One of the problems with this is that the most sophisticated of the
dopers will aways be ahead of the testing, and the richest teams and
riders will be able to spend for those new methods.
The rich get richer, we still have no guarantee anything is clean and
fair, and riders not attached to the big program teams fell they need
to dope to compete, but get busted because theyu don't have the
resources.
That works for you all?
Name me a sport that's cleaner, or gone after dopers harder? Then
prove it.
Bill C