General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Why Won't The Doctors Work?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 6 posts · 263 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
25 December 2003
Last activity
26 December 2003
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
263
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I found an article at cancer-prevention.net , & have rewritten & altered
    this part (about doctors) some:

    [Withholding Information and/or Lying To Patients]: The doctor couldn't
    tell his patients, about any alternative or integrative health
    therapies, and stay employed at his cancer clinic.

    [Medical Monopolies & Racketeering]: Insurance regulations would
    preclude such suggestions.  And the doctor could get into trouble by
    recommending non-drug treatments for cancer.

    His advice is controlled by a large medical industry, that makes
    mega-money off expensive cancer-fighting drugs and treatments.  [that
    is, the PHARMA lobby & cancer centers]

    [No Patent, No Profits]: The medical industry doesn't look favorably on
    natural supplements or other cancer treatments, ... as they cannot
    patent (or make as much profit) on them.

    [Bad/Wrong Training, & Bad Products]: Another reason why doctors
    ignore the alternative & integrative treatments for cancer, and why they
    recommend costly and illogical treatments instead -- is human nature.
    They advise and prescribe what they are trained in. It is what they
    know. [due to the PHARMA industry's current influence, power & control,
    over medical schools.]

    You go to them and you get what you ask for -- what they know. And you
    assume they will do, the best they can for you, ... while in fact, they
    just do what the system teaches them, promotes, and allows them to do.

    Bottom line:  Don't expect a doctor working inside the system, to buck
    the system. The risks are too great.

    [Everything the docs have, can be taken away quickly by the medical
    industry.]

    =========

    How can we best disable the medical industry/monopoly, ... & convince
    the doctors to work, to practice integrative medicine?

    Susan, Su_Texas my opinions

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    I found an article at cancer-prevention.net , & have rewritten & altered
    this part (about doctors) some:

    [Withholding Information and/or Lying To Patients]: The doctor couldn't
    tell his patients, about any alternative or integrative health
    therapies, and stay employed at his cancer clinic.

    [Medical Monopolies & Racketeering]: Insurance regulations would
    preclude such suggestions. And the doctor could get into trouble by
    recommending non-drug treatments for cancer.

    His advice is controlled by a large medical industry, that makes
    mega-money off expensive cancer-fighting drugs and treatments. [that
    is, the PHARMA lobby & cancer centers]

    [No Patent, No Profits]: The medical industry doesn't look favorably on
    natural supplements or other cancer treatments, ... as they cannot
    patent (or make as much profit) on them.

    [Bad/Wrong Training, & Bad Products]: Another reason why doctors
    ignore the alternative & integrative treatments for cancer, and why they
    recommend costly and illogical treatments instead -- is human nature.
    They advise and prescribe what they are trained in. It is what they
    know. [due to the PHARMA industry's current influence, power & control,
    over medical schools.]

    You go to them and you get what you ask for -- what they know. And you
    assume they will do, the best they can for you, ... while in fact, they
    just do what the system teaches them, promotes, and allows them to do.

    Bottom line: Don't expect a doctor working inside the system, to buck
    the system. The risks are too great.

    [Everything the docs have, can be taken away quickly by the medical
    industry.]

    PM ----Well, all this only works if alternatives are known to actually do
    anything much for cancer. Prove that, and all will change. So far the
    track record for even the most strongly hyped alternative treatments of
    cancer has been abysmal.

    Peter Moran

  3. Peter wrote:

    PM ----Well, all this only works if alternatives are known to actually
    do anything much for cancer. Prove that, and all will change. So far the
    track record for even the most strongly hyped alternative treatments of
    cancer has been abysmal.
    Peter Moran

    ==========

    There are already many tests (blood, urine, etc., such as those at
    http://www.gsdl.com ), that I feel could dramatically improve medical
    studies & care, IF they were being used. [This testing should become a
    requirement in clinical trials.]

    ------------

    Mineral Levels

    Checking the mineral-levels/etc in the body, can help indicate what is
    wrong, ... & what treatments the docs might order to help correct them.

    [Such as, I've read that high copper levels can indicate high risk of
    mets, spread of cancer. Molybdenum can help bring down the copper, &
    prevent or better control mets.

    High manganese levels can exhibit as Alzheimer's/Parkinson's-type
    symptoms. When you bring this level down, it can help control the
    symptoms, & slow or prevent further damage.

    These tests are simple, as are these treatments. There seems no reason
    not to try them, should the patient request them.

    The alternative is watching a patient suffer to death horribly, because
    they were forced to accept & pay for the standard/govt-approved
    cr*p-care only.

    This is pre-meditated, cold-blooded murder. The fact that it's
    govt-sanctioned, approved & enforced, does Not matter. It's still
    morally reprehensible, wrong.]

    --------------

    Fewer Bad Meds?

    Once these high mineral-levels/etc are tested for & confirmed, then they
    can be treated, ... & not with the just the hit-and-miss
    one-size-fits-all symptom-type pills & poisons.

    --------------

    Lack Of Good Research

    There probably won't be much if any profit$ made on the
    drugs/supplements/etc, which are used to treat mineral imbalances (such
    as copper or manganese), or the amino acid imbalances, ...

    .... so I think the good testing is deliberately Not being used in
    research studies, so that these imbalances won't be identified or
    validated in those studies.

    [The lack of good testing, would seem to make the research study results
    much less valid, less scientific, less valued. ???]

    These tests could also help determine why a treatment or drug, did or
    didn't work for each patient. Or why it killed the patient.

    It's important to have exact information to work with (from good
    testing), ... so that the docs don't keep forcing us to buy & try one
    bad medicine & treatment after another, so they don't keep harming &
    almost killing us, when we're forced to seek medical care.

    Maybe later on, if the researchers could start testing the DNA of their
    subjects (& the doctors test DNA of their patients), ... & comparing
    this with results & reactions to drugs & treatments, ... then that could
    help too.

    ------------

    The Importance Of Good Testing

    In the meantime, if the docs would just check the mineral levels, &
    maybe a few other things (like amino acid balance?) in cancer patients,
    ... & if they would collate this data, ... then this might help a great
    deal in determining exactly what's wrong, & which treatments to use.
    And it could greatly improve cancer & other medical care.

    There's no reason Not to do this (other than the govt controls, which we
    need to get changed).

    It's easy, logical, practical, & the right thing to do.

    Susan, Su_Texas my opinions

  4. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Peter wrote:

    PM ----Well, all this only works if alternatives are known to actually
    do anything much for cancer. Prove that, and all will change. So far the
    track record for even the most strongly hyped alternative treatments of
    cancer has been abysmal.
    Peter Moran

    ==========

    There are already many tests (blood, urine, etc., such as those at
    http://www.gsdl.com ), that I feel could dramatically improve medical
    studies & care, IF they were being used. [This testing should become a
    requirement in clinical trials.]

    ------------

    Mineral Levels

    Checking the mineral-levels/etc in the body, can help indicate what is
    wrong, ... & what treatments the docs might order to help correct them.

    [Such as, I've read that high copper levels can indicate high risk of
    mets, spread of cancer. Molybdenum can help bring down the copper, &
    prevent or better control mets.

    High manganese levels can exhibit as Alzheimer's/Parkinson's-type
    symptoms. When you bring this level down, it can help control the
    symptoms, & slow or prevent further damage.

    These tests are simple, as are these treatments. There seems no reason
    not to try them, should the patient request them.

    The alternative is watching a patient suffer to death horribly, because
    they were forced to accept & pay for the standard/govt-approved
    cr*p-care only.

    This is pre-meditated, cold-blooded murder. The fact that it's
    govt-sanctioned, approved & enforced, does Not matter. It's still
    morally reprehensible, wrong.]

    --------------

    Fewer Bad Meds?

    Once these high mineral-levels/etc are tested for & confirmed, then they
    can be treated, ... & not with the just the hit-and-miss
    one-size-fits-all symptom-type pills & poisons.

    --------------

    Lack Of Good Research

    There probably won't be much if any profit$ made on the
    drugs/supplements/etc, which are used to treat mineral imbalances (such
    as copper or manganese), or the amino acid imbalances, ...

    ... so I think the good testing is deliberately Not being used in
    research studies, so that these imbalances won't be identified or
    validated in those studies.

    [The lack of good testing, would seem to make the research study results
    much less valid, less scientific, less valued. ???]

    These tests could also help determine why a treatment or drug, did or
    didn't work for each patient. Or why it killed the patient.

    It's important to have exact information to work with (from good
    testing), ... so that the docs don't keep forcing us to buy & try one
    bad medicine & treatment after another, so they don't keep harming &
    almost killing us, when we're forced to seek medical care.

    Maybe later on, if the researchers could start testing the DNA of their
    subjects (& the doctors test DNA of their patients), ... & comparing
    this with results & reactions to drugs & treatments, ... then that could
    help too.

    ------------

    The Importance Of Good Testing

    In the meantime, if the docs would just check the mineral levels, &
    maybe a few other things (like amino acid balance?) in cancer patients,
    .. & if they would collate this data, ... then this might help a great
    deal in determining exactly what's wrong, & which treatments to use.
    And it could greatly improve cancer & other medical care.


    What make you think this ground hasn't been gone over again and again? We
    know enough about the nature and causes of cancer to know that correcting a
    simple deficiency of anything is not going to help cure it. Most
    deficiencies in cancer patients e.g. of iron are an effect of the cancer
    rather than having any role in its cause.

    Quoted message said:

    There's no reason Not to do this (other than the govt controls, which we
    need to get changed).

    It's easy, logical, practical, & the right thing to do.

    Susan, Su_Texas my opinions

    Yes, they are opinions, not plausible theory, or even reasonable
    conjectures.. Do you not see that no evidence is being put forwards for
    any of the claims you are quoting?

    Peter Moran.

  5. Hi Peter,

    Maybe the focus shouldn't be so much on a cure, as on better controlling
    the cancer, ... & on improving the quality of care & life for cancer
    patients, for victims of such as sleazy medical system, ... instead of
    just sadistically conning, robbing, & harming us over & over.

    If you say that these tests have already been done & the treatments
    tried, ... then where are the results of the ones done on mineral levels
    & imbalances, on amino acid levels & imbalances, ... & on the results of
    treating these? Somehow, I doubt they've been done.

    Most illness is chronic, such as cancer. There probably won't be any
    cures.

    Since the current medical treatments do Not work & offer NO hope, ...
    then why are patients being force to try them first, to waste so much
    time, effort, & money on them? Why can't we have some choice, in trying
    something we think might work?

    I'm very angry & hurt, that the "modern medical system" seems so
    backwards, ... so morally & mentally retarded, so revoltingly &
    disgustingly awful, painful & horrible, expensive & wasteful, ... has so
    little to offer, & so much of it so extremely harmful.

    We've been super-lied-to & betrayed. There's no reason that so much
    govt money, should keep going into such a failed & harmful system, ...
    which has nothing of value to offer, & which only keeps pushing the
    expensive cr*p-type drugs like antidepressants. None.

    I've worked extremely hard to get & keep the best insurance, & that
    should be worth something.

    I've worked very hard to cooperate with (& survive) the current standard
    cr*p-care for cancer.

    And I do now deserve a chance for the good bloodwork & testing. I do
    deserve a chance to fight this cancer on my own terms, & to win for a
    while. I refuse to let the bad docs, take that away from me.

    I don't deserve to be conned, robbed & harmed, & murdered like this, by
    the won't-work docs & the failed medical system.

    I'm very hopeful, that the American people will get angry & fed-up
    enough, to rip the govt & medical care system apart, to tear it to
    pieces, ... & then put it back together again, so it works.

    Because right now, we've got nothing of value in it.

    Susan, Su_Texas my opinions

  6. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi Peter,

    Maybe the focus shouldn't be so much on a cure, as on better controlling
    the cancer, ... & on improving the quality of care & life for cancer
    patients, for victims of such as sleazy medical system, ... instead of
    just sadistically conning, robbing, & harming us over & over.

    If you say that these tests have already been done & the treatments
    tried, ... then where are the results of the ones done on mineral levels
    & imbalances, on amino acid levels & imbalances, ... & on the results of
    treating these?

    This is old history. People have been trying to influence the course of
    cancer using through mineral supplementation and nutritional means for
    hundreds of years (any reasonable amount of protein in the diet will provide
    all the amino acids).

    Quoted message said:

    Somehow, I doubt they've been done.

    Most illness is chronic, such as cancer. There probably won't be any
    cures.

    Since the current medical treatments do Not work & offer NO hope, ...
    then why are patients being force to try them first, to waste so much
    time, effort, & money on them? Why can't we have some choice, in trying
    something we think might work?

    I'm very angry & hurt, that the "modern medical system" seems so
    backwards, ... so morally & mentally retarded, so revoltingly &
    disgustingly awful, painful & horrible, expensive & wasteful, ... has so
    little to offer, & so much of it so extremely harmful.

    The British National Health Service is as far away from the American health
    system as it is possible to get, but it adheres to exactly the same kinds of
    cancer treatment. You would encounter the same lack of interest (Probably
    more ) in your theories on cancer there.

    Quoted message said:


    We've been super-lied-to & betrayed. There's no reason that so much
    govt money, should keep going into such a failed & harmful system, ...
    which has nothing of value to offer, & which only keeps pushing the
    expensive cr*p-type drugs like antidepressants. None.

    I've worked extremely hard to get & keep the best insurance, & that
    should be worth something.

    I've worked very hard to cooperate with (& survive) the current standard
    cr*p-care for cancer.

    And I do now deserve a chance for the good bloodwork & testing. I do
    deserve a chance to fight this cancer on my own terms, & to win for a
    while. I refuse to let the bad docs, take that away from me.

    I don't deserve to be conned, robbed & harmed, & murdered like this, by
    the won't-work docs & the failed medical system.

    I'm very hopeful, that the American people will get angry & fed-up
    enough, to rip the govt & medical care system apart, to tear it to
    pieces, ... & then put it back together again, so it works.

    Because right now, we've got nothing of value in it.

    Are you feeling better now? Do you have cancer? Tell us about it.

    Peter Moran

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.