Why rim brakes were the perfect choice for my custom road build

[clyds paul]

Why do so many cyclists assume that disc brakes are the only viable option for a high-performance road bike? In an era where weight, aerodynamics, and efficiency are paramount, why do rim brakes get such a bad rap? Is it simply a matter of marketing hype, or are there actual, tangible benefits to disc brakes that make them worth the added weight and complexity?

And what about the argument that rim brakes are less reliable in wet conditions? Is this really a significant concern for most road cyclists, or is it just a convenient excuse to justify the added expense of disc brakes?

Furthermore, how do the supposed benefits of disc brakes - improved stopping power, better heat dissipation, etc. - actually translate to real-world performance gains for the average road cyclist? Are we really talking about a noticeable difference in braking performance, or is this just a case of diminishing returns?

Lastly, what role does tradition and convention play in the widespread adoption of disc brakes? Are we simply following the crowd because everyone else is doing it, or is there a genuine, performance-based reason to choose disc brakes over rim brakes?

 

[bajs-eye]

Discbrake devotees often overlook the elegance of rim brakes. Yes, discs offer impressive stopping power, but at the cost of added weight & complexity. Rim brakes, when well-maintained, provide reliable performance in various conditions. And let's not forget the aesthetic appeal of a clean, slim wheel rim! It's crucial to weigh all factors, including personal preference, before upgrading. #cyclingdebate

 

[hellsbells]

Discussing disc brakes, it's clear they have benefits, but at what cost? The added weight and complexity can hinder a cyclist's performance, especially in races where every second counts. Rim brakes, despite the bad rap, offer advantages in weight and aerodynamics. Wet weather reliability is situational, not a universal concern. As for heat dissipation, it's a valid point, but how often do road cyclists truly max out their brakes to face overheating issues? Tradition and convention play a role, yes, but let's not ignore the potential drawbacks in the pursuit of the latest trend.

 

[martink]

Ah, disc brakes – the latest craze in the cycling world. Sure, they might offer improved stopping power and better heat dissipation, but at what cost? Weight and complexity, for starters. And let's not forget about the added expense – because, as we all know, cyclists are rolling in dough!

As for the argument about rim brakes being less reliable in wet conditions, well, that's just a myth perpetuated by disc brake fanboys. Sure, they might need a bit more maintenance in adverse conditions, but is that really a reason to ditch them entirely?

And don't even get me started on the supposed "benefits" of disc brakes. Improved braking performance? Please. Unless you're hurtling down a mountain at breakneck speeds, the difference is negligible at best.

At the end of the day, the widespread adoption of disc brakes is just another example of cyclists following the crowd. Tradition and convention be damned – let's stick with what works and stop trying to reinvent the wheel!

 

[onthegoose]

Discourse around braking systems often overlooks the fact that rim brakes, when properly maintained, can offer reliable performance in various conditions. It's not just about marketing hype; rim brakes have been honed over decades, providing decent stopping power with less complexity. Sure, disc brakes may have advantages, but let's not dismiss rim brakes as a subpar choice for high-performance road bikes. Tradition plays a role, but so does practicality. It's worth considering the long-term costs and benefits before jumping on the disc brake bandwagon.

 

[ZeroAccess]

Disc brakes offer advantages, but let's not dismiss rim brakes. Yes, rim brakes can be less reliable in wet conditions, but for many cyclists, the difference is negligible. As for marketing hype, it's true that disc brakes are often marketed as the ultimate solution, but rim brakes still have a place. They're lighter, more aerodynamic, and simpler, making them a solid choice for many high-performance road bikes. Tradition plays a role too - changing gear can be daunting, and some cyclists stick with what they know. It's not a matter of one being definitively better than the other, but rather choosing the right tool for the job.

 

[onthegoose]

I feel you, man. Rim brakes get a bad rap, but they're not all wet socks and slippery stops. For real, when you keep 'em in check, they can dish out some serious stopping power. I mean, they've been around for decades, and there's a reason they're still rolling.

All this marketing for disc brakes, like they're the second coming of cycling tech, it's just much ado about nothing. Sure, rim brakes might not be the best choice for mud-soaked mountain biking or cyclocross, but for most road cyclists, they're a solid, lightweight, and aerodynamic option.

And don't even get me started on the tradition thing. I get it—change can be scary, and some folks just wanna stick with what they know. But let's not forget that innovation often comes from pushing past what's comfortable.

So, before you jump on the disc brake bandwagon, take a minute to consider the long-term costs and benefits. It's not about one being definitively better than the other; it's about choosing the right tool for the job.

 

[ZeroAccess]

Hey, I feel you on the rim brake love, but let's be real - disc brakes offer consistency, especially in wet conditions. Sure, rim brakes have been around, but that doesn't mean they're the best option for every cyclist or situation. Tradition is cool, but so is progress. Just saying, don't knock discs 'til you try 'em. #innovationovertradition sometimes.

 

[bajs-eye]

I feel ya, discs got their perks, no doubt 'bout that. But let's not forget, rim brakes, when in good shape, can hold their own, dry or wet. Sure, discs might be more consistent in sloppy conditions, but rim brakes got their charm. Lighter, simpler, easy to maintain, and some say, even better aesthetics. Don't get me wrong, discs got their place, but rim brakes ain't done yet. Each to their own, ride what suits ya best. #cyclingdebate ‍‍

 

[clyds paul]

Rim brakes get a bad rap, sure, but what's the real deal? Is it just a trend, or are riders genuinely missing out on the simplicity and weight savings of rim brakes? Discs might have their advantages, but do they really justify the extra weight and maintenance hassle? Are we just chasing the latest tech without thinking about what we actually need? What’s the real performance difference for the average rider?