rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

why is hallow stuff stronger?!?!?!

Started by total uni · · Last activity · 24 posts · 821 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
20 December 2004
Last activity
21 December 2004
Original author
total uni
Posts
24
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
821
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–24 of 24
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. thnx for the reiteration gilby. i'm not an engineer but i think i got i
    the first time, but seems that others didn't so i tried to
    paraphrase(albeit poorly) for them

    --
    markf - movie nerd

    stuck in iowa and unemployed.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    markf's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8102
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/36977

  2. I really like Gilby's explanation. Being as I still have yet to get a
    chance at going to an engineering school, I've always understood things
    that hollow works because you increase the diameter of the tube in
    proportion to the drop in strength from losing the center of the tubing.
    The larger the diameter, the larger the distance that the material is
    from the center of the axis on which force is transmitted. This means
    that the same amount of force is spread over a larger area, allowing for
    a lessened need for material to absorb that force. Correct me if I'm
    wrong, but isn't it true that the larger the tubing on a bike frame, the
    thinner the walls (assuming the same application of the frame).

    The new Koxx cranks are solid aluminum, I think.

    Not everything is hollow, but that can just be due to limitations of
    manufacture. Look at some versions of the Steve Howard frames. If there
    were such thing as a bit that could precisely drill the length of one of
    his frames, I'm sure he would use it. Also, it is notable how on his
    frames the edges of the legs are always far more substantial than the
    centers. This is a 2D version of making something hollow.

    --
    gerblefranklin - Trials Unicyclist

    http://gallery.unicyclist.com/Trials-Muni

    "Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by
    understanding."-Albert Einstein
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    gerblefranklin's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4295
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/36977

  3. Hollow materials are used because of a weight issue, not a strength
    issue. You can get sufficient (not necessarily equal) strength out of a
    much lighter design; i.e. hollow instead of solid.

    --
    toddw9 - you win, you always do!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    toddw9's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4466
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/36977

  4. gerblefranklin said:

    *I really like Gilby's explanation. Being as I still have yet to get a
    chance at going to an engineering school*

    If you do go in to engineering in college you'll learn all about this in
    your engineering statics course, probably during your junior year. Or
    you could get ahold of an engineering statics textbook from the library
    and try to make sense of the math and the concepts on your own.

    And yes, Steve Howard is making a bit of a I beam style structure to
    give the fork legs some extra strength while keeping the weight down.
    It's the 2D equivalent of a hollow tube.

    --
    john_childs - Guinness Mojo

    john_childs (at) hotmail (dot) com
    Gallery: '' (http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/john_childs)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    john_childs's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/36977

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.