Professional Cycling · Public discussion

Why is Columbia's new kit so ghey ?

Started by whiteboytrash · · Last activity · 15 posts · 2,657 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Professional Cycling
Published
11 January 2009
Last activity
20 January 2009
Original author
whiteboytrash
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,657
Views / 30 days
6

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. cyclingnews.comphotos.php

    - What's with the skeletal [censored] ?

  2. whiteboytrash said:

    cyclingnews.comphotos.php

    - What's with the skeletal [censored] ?

    It's because Armstrong is so BIG.

  3. Andrija said:

    It's because Armstrong is so BIG.


    These lads look "big" in those tight shorts. White is not best colour to hide the lunchbox. Did Linford Christie design these shorts ?

    yohm.co.uklinford christie personal trainer2.jpg

  4. The "abs" on the jersey look like they were trying to work from the Columbia Sportswear logo as their foundation. Remember that they are increasingly aiming towards an American audience now. We love tacky [censored]. Maybe next we'll get some teams with I Heart NY jersey's or riding in Primal Pink Floyd kits.

  5. Simulated pecks and abs on the boys - fair enough. But on the girls? :eek:

  6. Kate Bates doesn't look like she has missed too many meals since Beijing.

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2009/features/columbia_launch09/12-Women

  7. :eek::eek::eek:...

  8. whiteboytrash said:

    cyclingnews.comphotos.php

    - What's with the skeletal [censored] ?

    Image in Why is Columbia's new kit so ghey ?

    Image in Why is Columbia's new kit so ghey ?

  9. If you stare at them long enough you'll get accustomed to them and it won't seem so bad. Take about 20 minutes and just stare at them, spend equal time on the jerseys and shorts.😄

  10. I for one am not looking forward to the rainy days in the Tour. Blurgh....white....what were they thinking? Wasn't it Style Man who said that wearing white won't show your coolness - it'll show your religion??

    Sadly only the gormless bloke on the left looks embarassed to be wearing the kit...

  11. Eagle of Toledo said:

    Simulated pecks and abs on the boys - fair enough. But on the girls? :eek:

    Are they meant to be abs ? I thought it was a ribcage !!

  12. You're right.

    It does look a bit strange to say the least. But will get used to it.

    Their sky blue kit was much better. Now we look like Saulnier Duval with the yellow. :eek:

  13. earlier CSC jerseys used to have printed on abs as well... last year they were just more stylized into three lines that go across but if you know how the previous jerseys look you can see they are just stylized abs... Columbia stole the design from CSC.

  14. doctorSpoc said:

    earlier CSC jerseys used to have printed on abs as well... last year they were just more stylized into three lines that go across but if you know how the previous jerseys look you can see they are just stylized abs... Columbia stole the design from CSC.


    I have one of those CSC jerseys. It looks a hella lot better than that Columbia [censored] though,

  15. doctorSpoc said:

    earlier CSC jerseys used to have printed on abs as well... last year they were just more stylized into three lines that go across but if you know how the previous jerseys look you can see they are just stylized abs... Columbia stole the design from CSC.

    eeee

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.