General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Whole Grain Proliferation

Started by Noway2 · · Last activity · 39 posts · 1,025 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 January 2006
Last activity
23 February 2006
Original author
Noway2
Posts
39
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,025
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 39
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I was reading the latest bit of junk mail from Consumer Reports (health
    edition) that arrived in the mail today and I was surprised to see that
    the headline article was about eliminating the so called "bad"
    carbohydrates from your diet to loose weight. The article refered to
    "bad" carbohydrates as sugar, white flour, potatoes, etc and listed
    good carbohydrates as those coming from fruits, vegetables, and
    legumes. What caught my attention though was the inclusion of "Whole
    Grains" in the good carbohydrates list. Upon reading this, it occured
    to me that I have been seeing this term pop up almost everywhere
    recently, including in the grocery store. Now I admit that I have been
    hearing it for some time, but it really seems that almost every bit of
    junk (that I don't buy anymore) now claims to have "whole grains" in it
    and I realized that this has become the new buzz word that is going to
    be used to justify what goes in people mouths as being good for them
    and why waist lines will continue to expand.

    What I was wondering is if anyone else has noticed this too and if so,
    what your thoughts are?

    One other thing that I am curious about, I have noticed that I pay a
    lot more attention to what other people are puting in their grocery
    carts and noticing how much sugar laden junk they are buying. I am
    also curious if anyone else has found themselves becoming more aware of
    what others are buying since going LC?

  2. "Noway2" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I was reading the latest bit of junk mail from Consumer Reports (health
    edition) that arrived in the mail today and I was surprised to see that
    the headline article was about eliminating the so called "bad"
    carbohydrates from your diet to loose weight. The article refered to
    "bad" carbohydrates as sugar, white flour, potatoes, etc and listed
    good carbohydrates as those coming from fruits, vegetables, and
    legumes. What caught my attention though was the inclusion of "Whole
    Grains" in the good carbohydrates list. Upon reading this, it occured
    to me that I have been seeing this term pop up almost everywhere
    recently, including in the grocery store. Now I admit that I have been
    hearing it for some time, but it really seems that almost every bit of
    junk (that I don't buy anymore) now claims to have "whole grains" in it
    and I realized that this has become the new buzz word that is going to
    be used to justify what goes in people mouths as being good for them
    and why waist lines will continue to expand.

    What I was wondering is if anyone else has noticed this too and if so,
    what your thoughts are?

    One other thing that I am curious about, I have noticed that I pay a
    lot more attention to what other people are puting in their grocery
    carts and noticing how much sugar laden junk they are buying. I am
    also curious if anyone else has found themselves becoming more aware of
    what others are buying since going LC?


    I have had similar thoughts about the "whole grain" craze. It is in
    sugar-filled breakfast cereals now, according to the box, therefore making
    those cereals ok to feed our kids. Because, after all, the only politically
    correct low carb diet is one that allows "good carbs" - anybody else is a
    fanatic and a carb nazi 🙂.

    And yes, when I see a mother with a cart full of boxes of mixes, cereals,
    and processed food, plus the stacks of microwave food-wanna-be's in plastic
    trays, plus the obligatory bags of chips and candy...and maybe a head of
    iceburg lettuce as a token bow to vegetables - and then I see her pay double
    than what I paid for a cart full of veggies, meats and dairy - I do take
    notice. My mother fed me the same way as some of those moms in the stores
    feed their kids - except of course now the foods are better because they
    have "whole grains" 🙂.
    --
    Sherry
    364/296/195 (4/3/05)
    http://lowcarb.owly.net

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I have had similar thoughts about the "whole grain" craze. It is in
    sugar-filled breakfast cereals now, according to the box, therefore making
    those cereals ok to feed our kids. Because, after all, the only politically
    correct low carb diet is one that allows "good carbs" - anybody else is a
    fanatic and a carb nazi 🙂.

    I think it has to do with the new food pyramid and it's emphasis on
    whole grains.

    Quoted message said:

    And yes, when I see a mother with a cart full of boxes of mixes, cereals,
    and processed food, plus the stacks of microwave food-wanna-be's in plastic
    trays, plus the obligatory bags of chips and candy...and maybe a head of
    iceburg lettuce as a token bow to vegetables - and then I see her pay double
    than what I paid for a cart full of veggies, meats and dairy - I do take
    notice.

    I, too, take notice of what other people buy, but I TRY not to judge too
    much, if only to keep any judgmental looks off my face. It's hard not
    to do so, though, once you've seen the light.

    --
    Saffire
    205/134/125
    Atkins since 6/14/03
    Progress photo: http://photos.yahoo.com/saffire333

    *** This post originated in alt.support.diet.low-carb -- its appearance
    in any other forum is deceptive and unauthorized. ***

  4. Noway2 wrote:
    || I was reading the latest bit of junk mail from Consumer Reports
    || (health edition) that arrived in the mail today and I was surprised
    || to see that the headline article was about eliminating the so called
    || "bad" carbohydrates from your diet to loose weight. The article
    || refered to "bad" carbohydrates as sugar, white flour, potatoes, etc
    || and listed good carbohydrates as those coming from fruits,
    || vegetables, and legumes. What caught my attention though was the
    || inclusion of "Whole Grains" in the good carbohydrates list. Upon
    || reading this, it occured to me that I have been seeing this term pop
    || up almost everywhere recently, including in the grocery store. Now I
    || admit that I have been hearing it for some time, but it really seems
    || that almost every bit of junk (that I don't buy anymore) now claims
    || to have "whole grains" in it and I realized that this has become the
    || new buzz word that is going to be used to justify what goes in
    || people mouths as being good for them and why waist lines will
    || continue to expand.
    ||
    || What I was wondering is if anyone else has noticed this too and if
    || so, what your thoughts are?
    ||
    || One other thing that I am curious about, I have noticed that I pay a
    || lot more attention to what other people are puting in their grocery
    || carts and noticing how much sugar laden junk they are buying. I am
    || also curious if anyone else has found themselves becoming more aware
    || of what others are buying since going LC?

    My sister recently started eating a "macrobiotic" diet which is based almost
    entirely on whole grains, especially brown rice. It worries me because she
    is heavily medicated for diabetes and high triglycerides; I can see this
    diet only worsening her medical conditions. She's very excited because
    she's lost a few pounds in the past couple of weeks -- and to be fair I
    guess any kind of weight loss for someone who is obese is a positive step.
    But in the long run I'm afraid that she's in for even more health problems
    down the road. Untils she told me about that diet a few days ago I had no
    idea what it entailed. Since then I've done a bit of research and don't
    like what I've found. Does anyone have any thoughts on, or experience with
    this?

    --
    Peter
    Website: http://member.cox.net/pmarengo

  5. Noway2 said:

    I was reading the latest bit of junk mail from Consumer Reports (health
    edition) that arrived in the mail today and I was surprised to see that
    the headline article was about eliminating the so called "bad"
    carbohydrates from your diet to loose weight. The article refered to
    "bad" carbohydrates as sugar, white flour, potatoes, etc and listed
    good carbohydrates as those coming from fruits, vegetables, and
    legumes. What caught my attention though was the inclusion of "Whole
    Grains" in the good carbohydrates list. Upon reading this, it occured
    to me that I have been seeing this term pop up almost everywhere
    recently, including in the grocery store. Now I admit that I have been
    hearing it for some time, but it really seems that almost every bit of
    junk (that I don't buy anymore) now claims to have "whole grains" in it
    and I realized that this has become the new buzz word that is going to
    be used to justify what goes in people mouths as being good for them
    and why waist lines will continue to expand.

    What I was wondering is if anyone else has noticed this too and if so,
    what your thoughts are?

    One other thing that I am curious about, I have noticed that I pay a
    lot more attention to what other people are puting in their grocery
    carts and noticing how much sugar laden junk they are buying. I am
    also curious if anyone else has found themselves becoming more aware of
    what others are buying since going LC?

    http://www.nutritiondata.com/facts-B00001-01c20P8.html

    Trix cereal (Whole Grain) by General Mills has the following information.

    Serving Size 30 Grams

    Fat 1 gram
    Protein 1 gram
    Total Carbohydrate 27 gram
    Fiber 1 gram
    Sugars 13 gram
    Cholesterol 0 mg.
    Sodium 194 mg

    So, now they attempt to make a cereal nearly half sugar by weight
    "healthy" because there are almost as many grams of whole grain
    carbohydrates as there are grams of sugar.

    Business is in business to make money.

    They will tend to do whatever it takes to make money. And make it sound
    as good as possible, and as free of the money issue as possible.

    Unfortunately, it is a formula that seems to have worked in the past and
    will work reasonably well into the future.

    Remember the signs of "Zero Cholesterol" on many of the vegetables......
    Remember the labels of "Low Fat" and "Zero Fat" on fattening foods
    (carbs and sugars).
    Remember the "Low Carb" signs on meats.

    Remember.....

    and

    THINK

    --
    1) Eat Till SATISFIED, Not STUFFED... Atkins repeated 9 times in the book
    2) Exercise: It's Non-Negotiable..... Chapter 22 title, Atkins book
    3) Don't Diet Without Supplimental Nutrients... Chapter 23 title, Atkins
    book
    4) A sensible eating plan, and follow it. (Atkins, Self Made or Other)

  6. Marengo said:

    My sister recently started eating a "macrobiotic" diet which is based almost
    entirely on whole grains, especially brown rice. It worries me because she
    is heavily medicated for diabetes and high triglycerides; I can see this
    diet only worsening her medical conditions. She's very excited because
    she's lost a few pounds in the past couple of weeks -- and to be fair I
    guess any kind of weight loss for someone who is obese is a positive step.
    But in the long run I'm afraid that she's in for even more health problems
    down the road. Untils she told me about that diet a few days ago I had no
    idea what it entailed. Since then I've done a bit of research and don't
    like what I've found. Does anyone have any thoughts on, or experience with
    this?

    My SIL lost over a hundred pounds on a low-fat diet with a lot of
    exercise over the course of a year. She recently had twins and has a
    few pounds to lose again, but *nothing* like what she had before. She
    is *not* diabetic though.

    Weight-loss can greatly improve diabetes in the long run, so if the
    diet works for her, it may be a good thing. If she loses a huge amount
    of weight and the diabetes isn't very progressed, she may not even be
    diabetic anymore.

    I would expect that it would *not* work for her because of the diabetes
    though. Because her bg and insulin levels are gonna be high, which
    causes the ravenous kind of hunger, it will probably be difficult to
    stick to this diet unless she has incredible willpower.

    I think that when you're diabetic, the *first* priority is keeping your
    bg controlled. Weight loss or other dietary considerations ought to
    come *after* that. If she eats to her meter, she'll probably be fine.
    And she'll likely discover she has to limit even the "good carbs" of
    brown rice significantly.

  7. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Marengo said:

    My sister recently started eating a "macrobiotic" diet which is based
    almost
    entirely on whole grains, especially brown rice. It worries me because
    she
    is heavily medicated for diabetes and high triglycerides; I can see this
    diet only worsening her medical conditions. She's very excited because
    she's lost a few pounds in the past couple of weeks -- and to be fair I
    guess any kind of weight loss for someone who is obese is a positive
    step.
    But in the long run I'm afraid that she's in for even more health
    problems
    down the road. Untils she told me about that diet a few days ago I had
    no
    idea what it entailed. Since then I've done a bit of research and don't
    like what I've found. Does anyone have any thoughts on, or experience
    with
    this?

    My SIL lost over a hundred pounds on a low-fat diet with a lot of
    exercise over the course of a year. She recently had twins and has a
    few pounds to lose again, but *nothing* like what she had before. She
    is *not* diabetic though.

    Weight-loss can greatly improve diabetes in the long run, so if the
    diet works for her, it may be a good thing. If she loses a huge amount
    of weight and the diabetes isn't very progressed, she may not even be
    diabetic anymore.

    What do you mean by "...she may not even be diabetic anymore."?

    Quoted message said:


    I would expect that it would *not* work for her because of the diabetes
    though. Because her bg and insulin levels are gonna be high, which
    causes the ravenous kind of hunger, it will probably be difficult to
    stick to this diet unless she has incredible willpower.

    I think that when you're diabetic, the *first* priority is keeping your
    bg controlled. Weight loss or other dietary considerations ought to
    come *after* that. If she eats to her meter, she'll probably be fine.
    And she'll likely discover she has to limit even the "good carbs" of
    brown rice significantly.

  8. "Marengo" <[email hidden]> wrote in

    Quoted message said:

    down the road. Untils she told me about that diet a few days ago I had no
    idea what it entailed. Since then I've done a bit of research and don't
    like what I've found. Does anyone have any thoughts on, or experience
    with this?

    The feed soy and grains to livestock to fatten them up.

    Nuff said!

  9. Roger Zoul said:


    What do you mean by "...she may not even be diabetic anymore."?

    That was very poor wording on my part.

    What I meant was... she might maintain normal blood glucose without a
    strict low-carb diet or meds after weight loss. Hence she wouldn't
    "have diabetes" according to the medical definition.

    I did *not* mean she'd be truly non-diabetic, like my husband, whose bg
    is 90 after eating a quarter of a chocolate cake with icing.

  10. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Roger Zoul said:


    What do you mean by "...she may not even be diabetic anymore."?

    That was very poor wording on my part.

    What I meant was... she might maintain normal blood glucose without a
    strict low-carb diet or meds after weight loss. Hence she wouldn't
    "have diabetes" according to the medical definition.

    I did *not* mean she'd be truly non-diabetic, like my husband, whose bg
    is 90 after eating a quarter of a chocolate cake with icing.

    That's what I thought you meant! Thanks for clearing it up, though.

  11. Quoted message said:

    Business is in business to make money.

    They will tend to do whatever it takes to make money. And make it sound
    as good as possible, and as free of the money issue as possible.

    Unfortunately, it is a formula that seems to have worked in the past and
    will work reasonably well into the future.

    Somebody mentioned recently in another post how if you mention the
    words "low carb" that you get looks like you just said you were
    possessed or something. I really think part of the reason is that the
    mass public is suffering from a drug addiction. They're all sugar
    junkies. Saying you follow a low carb lifestyle and that it works is
    almost like threatening to take away their fix.

    Quoted message said:

    Trix cereal (Whole Grain) by General Mills has the following information.

    Serving Size 30 Grams

    Fat 1 gram
    Protein 1 gram
    Total Carbohydrate 27 gram
    Fiber 1 gram
    Sugars 13 gram
    Cholesterol 0 mg.
    Sodium 194 mg

    Whole Gains? Where? Seems to me like if it were a "whole grain"
    product it would have a hell of a lot more fiber and other nutrients in
    it. Looks to me like they are throwing in a little bit of bran or some
    other [censored] and claiming the product is a source of "whole grains".

    One other thing. I am probably missing something here and maybe
    someone could explain it as its been a while since I last had a
    chemistry course. I always thought that a gram was a unit of mass
    (often times mis-used as a measure of weight). How can a serving size
    of 30 grams have 43.194 grams of material.

  12. DB said:

    "Marengo" <[email hidden]> wrote in

    Quoted message said:

    down the road. Untils she told me about that diet a few days ago I had no
    idea what it entailed. Since then I've done a bit of research and don't
    like what I've found. Does anyone have any thoughts on, or experience
    with this?

    The feed soy and grains to livestock to fatten them up.

    Nuff said!

    They feed "Natural" "Whole Grains" to livestock to fatten them up.

    Don't forget the "Matural" and "Whole Grain" hype, whenever possible.

    :-)

    --
    1) Eat Till SATISFIED, Not STUFFED... Atkins repeated 9 times in the book
    2) Exercise: It's Non-Negotiable..... Chapter 22 title, Atkins book
    3) Don't Diet Without Supplimental Nutrients... Chapter 23 title, Atkins
    book
    4) A sensible eating plan, and follow it. (Atkins, Self Made or Other)

  13. Noway2 wrote:
    ::: Business is in business to make money.
    :::
    ::: They will tend to do whatever it takes to make money. And make it
    ::: sound as good as possible, and as free of the money issue as
    ::: possible.
    :::
    ::: Unfortunately, it is a formula that seems to have worked in the
    ::: past and will work reasonably well into the future.
    ::
    :: Somebody mentioned recently in another post how if you mention the
    :: words "low carb" that you get looks like you just said you were
    :: possessed or something. I really think part of the reason is that
    :: the mass public is suffering from a drug addiction. They're all
    :: sugar junkies. Saying you follow a low carb lifestyle and that it
    :: works is almost like threatening to take away their fix.
    ::
    ::: Trix cereal (Whole Grain) by General Mills has the following
    ::: information.
    :::
    ::: Serving Size 30 Grams
    :::
    ::: Fat 1 gram
    ::: Protein 1 gram
    ::: Total Carbohydrate 27 gram
    ::: Fiber 1 gram
    ::: Sugars 13 gram
    ::: Cholesterol 0 mg.
    ::: Sodium 194 mg
    ::
    :: Whole Gains? Where? Seems to me like if it were a "whole grain"
    :: product it would have a hell of a lot more fiber and other nutrients
    :: in it. Looks to me like they are throwing in a little bit of bran
    :: or some other [censored] and claiming the product is a source of "whole
    :: grains".
    ::
    :: One other thing. I am probably missing something here and maybe
    :: someone could explain it as its been a while since I last had a
    :: chemistry course. I always thought that a gram was a unit of mass
    :: (often times mis-used as a measure of weight). How can a serving
    :: size of 30 grams have 43.194 grams of material.

    Try 29.194 w/ rounding to get your answer. You can't recount fiber and
    sugars twice when the appear indented like that.

    You're absolutely right about the "whole grain" thing, though...complete
    marketing BS.

  14. Doh!

    I am not going to mention that I am an engineer.....
    Though my wife says that I can't add. Obviously she is correct 🙂

  15. very funny norway2, take away their fix, HAHA!!! Good one!

  16. At the height of the low-carb atkins "craze", the mainstream, the carb
    industry, the USDA, etc. saw their products, especially grains, take a
    big hit in the market place and they had to do something big quick.
    Their response was to kick out a bunch of junk science comparing [censored]
    whole grain food to [censored] refined grain foods and then to praise the
    comparably slightly better value of whole grain over refined grain.
    Then they market the hell out of whole grains.

    The new pyramid was introduced with the repeated mantra of whole grains
    and all other marketting follows the lead.

    It was a desperate strategy to save their market niche and still be
    able to sell their $2 a bushel grain for hundreds of dollars as RTE
    cereals and whole grain bread and other highly processed manufactured
    grain products. Unfortunately, it works and has fooled many people into
    buying [censored] food grain products.

    TC

    Noway2 said:

    I was reading the latest bit of junk mail from Consumer Reports (health
    edition) that arrived in the mail today and I was surprised to see that
    the headline article was about eliminating the so called "bad"
    carbohydrates from your diet to loose weight. The article refered to
    "bad" carbohydrates as sugar, white flour, potatoes, etc and listed
    good carbohydrates as those coming from fruits, vegetables, and
    legumes. What caught my attention though was the inclusion of "Whole
    Grains" in the good carbohydrates list. Upon reading this, it occured
    to me that I have been seeing this term pop up almost everywhere
    recently, including in the grocery store. Now I admit that I have been
    hearing it for some time, but it really seems that almost every bit of
    junk (that I don't buy anymore) now claims to have "whole grains" in it
    and I realized that this has become the new buzz word that is going to
    be used to justify what goes in people mouths as being good for them
    and why waist lines will continue to expand.

    What I was wondering is if anyone else has noticed this too and if so,
    what your thoughts are?

    One other thing that I am curious about, I have noticed that I pay a
    lot more attention to what other people are puting in their grocery
    carts and noticing how much sugar laden junk they are buying. I am
    also curious if anyone else has found themselves becoming more aware of
    what others are buying since going LC?

  17. Noway2 said:


    What caught my attention though was the inclusion of "Whole
    Grains" in the good carbohydrates list. Upon reading this, it occured
    to me that I have been seeing this term pop up almost everywhere
    recently, including in the grocery store.

    What I was wondering is if anyone else has noticed this too and if so,
    what your thoughts are?

    I'm dubious when I see a whole grain claim. The reason is I
    know why the switch away from whole grain happened in the
    first place - spoilage. Whole grain spoils rapidly. Grind the
    grain today, knead it into bread today. Rise until tomorrow,
    bake the bread tomorrow. That's it for whole grains, a couple
    of days.

    Very often if you read the label whole grain is one of the
    ingredients, not the only source of grain. It's like whole grain
    is being used as a spice and then hawked on the label.

    And what's so great about eating grass anyways? I know,
    not much of a queston to ask on a low carb newsgroup.
    Preachin to the choir and all.

    Quoted message said:

    One other thing that I am curious about, I have noticed that I pay a
    lot more attention to what other people are puting in their grocery
    carts and noticing how much sugar laden junk they are buying. I am
    also curious if anyone else has found themselves becoming more aware of
    what others are buying since going LC?

    I've always noticed what people have in their carts. I want to
    see if there's something in there I don't recognize to have new
    stuff to try out.

  18. Noway2 said:

    I was reading the latest bit of junk mail from Consumer Reports (health
    edition) that arrived in the mail today and I was surprised to see that
    the headline article was about eliminating the so called "bad"
    carbohydrates from your diet to loose weight. The article refered to
    "bad" carbohydrates as sugar, white flour, potatoes, etc and listed
    good carbohydrates as those coming from fruits, vegetables, and
    legumes. What caught my attention though was the inclusion of "Whole
    Grains" in the good carbohydrates list. Upon reading this, it occured
    to me that I have been seeing this term pop up almost everywhere
    recently, including in the grocery store. Now I admit that I have been
    hearing it for some time, but it really seems that almost every bit of
    junk (that I don't buy anymore) now claims to have "whole grains" in it
    and I realized that this has become the new buzz word that is going to
    be used to justify what goes in people mouths as being good for them
    and why waist lines will continue to expand.

    What I was wondering is if anyone else has noticed this too and if so,
    what your thoughts are?

    One other thing that I am curious about, I have noticed that I pay a
    lot more attention to what other people are puting in their grocery
    carts and noticing how much sugar laden junk they are buying. I am
    also curious if anyone else has found themselves becoming more aware of
    what others are buying since going LC?

    http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/news/ng.asp?n=65471-wgc-whole-grains-whole-grain-stamp

    Industry develops whole grain 'action plan'

    By Lorraine Heller

    1/30/2006 - A whole grain 'action plan,' which aims to make whole
    grains more wide spread, was recently developed by healthy eating
    executives together with marketing, regulatory and food technology
    executives from 40 leading US food manufacturers.

    The representatives met at a conference earlier this month, held in
    Orlando and organized by the nation's Whole Grains Council (WGC) and
    Oldways, a Boston-based food issues think tank.

    The action plan, which aims to help consumers get more whole grains
    into their everyday meals, includes initiatives such as an information
    exchange for schools and whole grain food companies, to enable schools
    to provide tasty, affordable whole grain options.

    The plan also involves providing consumers with menus that include
    'out of the box,' 'heat and eat' and 'quick cooking,' options,
    allowing them to learn about whole grain foods that match their
    lifestyle.

    "Consumers understand the health benefits of eating whole grains, and
    the buying trends of 2005 have proven this with broad increases across
    all categories. It's clear that people want to eat healthier, but are
    looking for help to reach their goals," said Oldways president and
    WGC founder Dun Gifford.

    Indeed, since the publication last year of new Dietary Guidelines for
    Americans, which recommend the consumption of at least three servings
    of whole grains a day, sales and production of whole grain products
    have increased steadily.

    For example, according to the WGC, sales of whole grain pasta have
    increased by 20 percent last year, while sales of whole grain bread
    rose 18 percent.

    But finding whole grain products remains a key problem, says the
    council.

    "Consumers know whole grains are healthy, that they probably should
    eat them, and they probably would, but they go into grocery stores and
    can't spot them," Cynthia Harriman, the WGC's director of food and
    nutrition strategies recently told FoodNavigator-USA.

    "Manufacturers are also allowed to list the amount of whole grains in
    their products, but the problem is that this doesn't mean anything to
    the average consumer. Most people don't know if 2g whole grain is
    beneficial or not," she said.

    As a result, the WGC last year introduced an eye-catching whole grain
    stamp, which is currently used on around 600 products.

    Sponsors of the recent conference included General Mills, Panera Bread,
    Quaker Oats and Uncle Ben's.

    "We've had good science but all of that does nothing until we have good
    implementation," said speaker Dr Eric Hentges, executive director of
    the USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.

    The conference concluded that although whole grains are showing up in
    "unexpected locations," such as in fast food restaurants, schools
    and military commissaries, "only a continued emphasis on new and
    innovative education programs will persuade consumers that whole grains
    are readily available in markets and simple to incorporate into
    everyday meal planning."

    ***

    TC

  19. [email hidden] wrote:
    ::
    http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/news/ng.asp?n=65471-wgc-whole-grains-whole-grain-stamp
    ::
    :: Industry develops whole grain 'action plan'

    Yep. Gotta have a plan to bring in those $$$$. Yep.

    ::
    :: By Lorraine Heller
    ::
    :: 1/30/2006 - A whole grain 'action plan,' which aims to make whole
    :: grains more wide spread, was recently developed by healthy eating
    :: executives together with marketing, regulatory and food technology
    :: executives from 40 leading US food manufacturers.

    Right. Healthy eating execs, marketing, and execs from the 40 leadning US
    food makers. Right. $$$$

    ::
    ::
    :: The representatives met at a conference earlier this month, held in
    :: Orlando and organized by the nation's Whole Grains Council (WGC) and
    :: Oldways, a Boston-based food issues think tank.

    A "food issues" think tank? The WGC? I bet they think about what to do
    with all that money.

    ::
    :: The action plan, which aims to help consumers get more whole grains
    :: into their everyday meals, includes initiatives such as an
    :: information exchange for schools and whole grain food companies, to
    :: enable schools to provide tasty, affordable whole grain options.

    Yep, Addictive [censored] from the vending machines.

    ::
    :: The plan also involves providing consumers with menus that include
    :: 'out of the box,' 'heat and eat' and 'quick cooking,' options,
    :: allowing them to learn about whole grain foods that match their
    :: lifestyle.

    Right. Business as usual, bucko.

    ::
    :: "Consumers understand the health benefits of eating whole grains,

    Effective marketing..

    and
    :: the buying trends of 2005 have proven this with broad increases
    :: across all categories. It's clear that people want to eat healthier,
    :: but are looking for help to reach their goals," said Oldways
    :: president and
    :: WGC founder Dun Gifford.

    I'm sure you all will be more than happy to help. After all, Your Help =
    $$$$.

    ::
    :: Indeed, since the publication last year of new Dietary Guidelines for
    :: Americans, which recommend the consumption of at least three servings
    :: of whole grains a day, sales and production of whole grain products
    :: have increased steadily.

    Y'all finally moved back toward the black after the hit due to Atkins and
    LC, huh?

    ::
    :: For example, according to the WGC, sales of whole grain pasta have
    :: increased by 20 percent last year, while sales of whole grain bread
    :: rose 18 percent.
    ::
    :: But finding whole grain products remains a key problem, says the
    :: council.

    Really? I see that [censored] all the time...

    ::
    :: "Consumers know whole grains are healthy,

    They know, or they were told?

    :: that they probably should
    :: eat them,

    Yeah, they know they were probably lied to. This [censored] changes everyday,
    anyway.

    :: and they probably would, but they go into grocery stores
    :: and can't spot them,"

    They must really be stupid, huh?

    Cynthia Harriman, the WGC's director of food
    :: and nutrition strategies recently told FoodNavigator-USA.
    ::
    :: "Manufacturers are also allowed to list the amount of whole grains in
    :: their products, but the problem is that this doesn't mean anything to
    :: the average consumer. Most people don't know if 2g whole grain is
    :: beneficial or not," she said.

    Exactly. But more is better, right?

    ::
    :: As a result, the WGC last year introduced an eye-catching whole grain
    :: stamp, which is currently used on around 600 products.

    Right. Marketing at its finest!

    ::
    :: Sponsors of the recent conference included General Mills, Panera
    :: Bread, Quaker Oats and Uncle Ben's.

    Yep. Some of the main losers from the low-carb craze....

    ::
    :: "We've had good science but all of that does nothing until we have
    :: good implementation," said speaker Dr Eric Hentges, executive
    :: director of the USDA's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.

    You don't need good science to make money. You need good
    marketing....eye-cataching whole grain stamps and blessing from some
    on-high. almighty US Authority..

    ::
    :: The conference concluded that although whole grains are showing up in
    :: "unexpected locations," such as in fast food restaurants, schools
    :: and military commissaries,

    Right. The same place the other [censored] showed up.

    "only a continued emphasis on new and
    :: innovative education programs will persuade consumers that whole
    :: grains are readily available in markets and simple to incorporate
    :: into everyday meal planning."

    Yeh...everything will now say "whole grain" on the label in an eye-catching
    way, so it will indeed be impossible to miss the [censored]. Y'all will see to it
    since $$$$ is your reward.

  20. My husband does not low-carb, so I buy whole grains as part of my
    regular grocery shopping. Whole grains are: wheat berries, cracked
    wheat, oat groats, barley, cornmeal, brown rice, etc.

    Trix is not a whole grain. Trix is primarily sugar. And frankly,
    buying sugar in 5 lbs bags is *way* cheaper than Trix.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.