Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are sort of opposites of one another. But not complete opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most junk foods (which are typically combinations of fat and carbs) and pastry as such, and place some emphasis on less processed foods. I wonder if just giving up junk food and other foods mentioned above is what accounts for much of their success. Just curious.
Ignoramus4424 wrote: :: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are sort of :: opposites of one another. But not complete opposites. :: Specifically, both diets forbid most junk foods (which :: are typically combinations of fat and carbs) and pastry :: as such, and place some emphasis on less processed foods. :: I wonder if just giving up junk food and other foods :: mentioned above is what accounts for much of their :: success. Just curious.
I wonder if just giving up junk food and other foods mentioned above is what accounts for much of their success.
Low-carb junk food and low-fat junk food are both junk, and it's a toss-up as to which is worse.
Even the low-fat advocates recognize that it is important to remove sugar from the diet, even though they can't understand why so-called 'complex' carbs (especially from grain) are just as bad.
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Ignoramus4424 wrote: :: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are sort of :: opposites of one another. But not complete opposites. :: Specifically, both diets forbid most junk foods (which :: are typically combinations of fat and carbs) and pastry :: as such, and place some emphasis on less processed :: foods. I wonder if just giving up junk food and other :: foods mentioned above is what accounts for much of :: their success. Just curious.
Of course it is.
Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ate junk food. However, eating low fat through my body into such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I began eating junk food or would drink because of the depression caused by the extreme crash in blood sugar. High carb is simply bad for you, unless you can swing it and eat nothing but vegetables (fruits cause my blood sugar to skyrocket). Pasta and rice are evil.
Bob in CT wrote: :: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul :: <[email hidden]> wrote: :: ::: Ignoramus4424 wrote: ::::: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are sort ::::: of opposites of one another. But not complete ::::: opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most junk ::::: foods (which are typically combinations of fat and ::::: carbs) and pastry as such, and place some emphasis on ::::: less processed foods. I wonder if just giving up junk ::::: food and other foods mentioned above is what accounts ::::: for much of their success. Just curious. ::: ::: Of course it is. ::: ::: :: :: Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ate :: junk food. However, eating low fat through my body into :: such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I began eating :: junk food or would drink because of the depression caused :: by the extreme crash in blood sugar. High carb is simply :: bad for you, unless you can swing it and eat nothing but :: vegetables (fruits cause my blood sugar to skyrocket). :: Pasta and rice are evil.
You need a diet for a diabetic, period.
The problem with low fat is that it's hard to stick to (imo), but the fact that one quits eating junk food contributes to whatever success anyone has with eating that way. Same for low carb. I don't think the OP as asking which is better, but was generally commenting on the merits of cutting junk foods.
The problem with low fat is that it's hard to stick to (imo), but the fact that one quits eating junk food contributes to whatever success anyone has with eating that way. Same for low carb. I don't think the OP as asking which is better, but was generally commenting on the merits of cutting junk foods.
Because a natural low-carb diet eschews white flour and sugar, two of the principal ingredients in junk-foods, it makes avoiding them a lot more of a default thing. With a low-fat diet, at least the one I used to watch Susan Powter espouse on her infomercials, where she would pick up a box of (may I say this?) [censored] and teach you how to do the fat- calorie math from the "Nutrition information", it pretty much paves the way for junk food consumption.
IMO, with a low carbohydrate diet, the worst ingredients are eliminated and one gets to have their EFAs and eat them too. :-)
CM -- The post you just read, unless otherwise noted, is strictly my opinion and experience. Please interpret accordingly.
Bob in CT wrote: :: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul :: <[email hidden]> wrote: :: ::: Ignoramus4424 wrote: ::::: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are sort ::::: of opposites of one another. But not complete ::::: opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most junk ::::: foods (which are typically combinations of fat and ::::: carbs) and pastry as such, and place some emphasis on ::::: less processed foods. I wonder if just giving up junk ::::: food and other foods mentioned above is what accounts ::::: for much of their success. Just curious. ::: ::: Of course it is. ::: ::: :: :: Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ate :: junk food. However, eating low fat through my body into :: such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I began eating :: junk food or would drink because of the depression :: caused by the extreme crash in blood sugar. High carb is :: simply bad for you, unless you can swing it and eat :: nothing but vegetables (fruits cause my blood sugar to :: skyrocket). Pasta and rice are evil.
You need a diet for a diabetic, period.
The problem with low fat is that it's hard to stick to (imo), but the fact that one quits eating junk food contributes to whatever success anyone has with eating that way. Same for low carb. I don't think the OP as asking which is better, but was generally commenting on the merits of cutting junk foods.
you are correct with respect to the implication of my original post.
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:45:21 GMT, Bob in CT <[email hidden]> wrote: /snip/
Quoted message said:
I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ate junk food. However, eating low fat through my body into such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I began eating junk food or would drink because of the depression caused by the extreme crash in blood sugar.
Low fat could do that. Fat slows absorbtion of whatever carbs you do eat, lessening spikes. Also I think the body can make energy out of fat when needed, which might make the crashes not quite as severe.
Quoted message said:
High carb is simply bad for you, unless you can swing it and eat nothing but vegetables
What do you mean 'swing it'? Is there a high carb vegetarian diet that works for blood sugar control?
Quoted message said:
(fruits cause my blood sugar to skyrocket). Pasta and rice are evil.
Roger Zoul wrote: | Bob in CT wrote: ||| On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul ||| <[email hidden]> wrote: ||| |||| Ignoramus4424 wrote: |||||| Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are sort |||||| of opposites of one another. But not complete |||||| opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most junk |||||| foods (which are typically combinations of fat and |||||| carbs) and pastry as such, and place some emphasis on |||||| less processed foods. I wonder if just giving up junk |||||| food and other foods mentioned above is what accounts |||||| for much of their success. Just curious. |||| |||| Of course it is. |||| |||| ||| ||| Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ate ||| junk food. However, eating low fat through my body into ||| such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I began eating ||| junk food or would drink because of the depression ||| caused by the extreme crash in blood sugar. High carb is ||| simply bad for you, unless you can swing it and eat ||| nothing but vegetables (fruits cause my blood sugar to ||| skyrocket). Pasta and rice are evil. | | You need a diet for a diabetic, period. |
LOL! The diet he just described is what he AMA tells diabetics to eat! Surreal, isn't it?
marengo wrote: :: Roger Zoul wrote: ::: Bob in CT wrote: ::::: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul ::::: <[email hidden]> wrote: ::::: :::::: Ignoramus4424 wrote: :::::::: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are :::::::: sort of opposites of one another. But not complete :::::::: opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most :::::::: junk foods (which are typically combinations of fat :::::::: and carbs) and pastry as such, and place some :::::::: emphasis on less processed foods. I wonder if just :::::::: giving up junk food and other foods mentioned above :::::::: is what accounts for much of their success. Just :::::::: curious. :::::: :::::: Of course it is. :::::: :::::: ::::: ::::: Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ::::: ate junk food. However, eating low fat through my body ::::: into such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I began ::::: eating junk food or would drink because of the ::::: depression caused by the extreme crash in blood sugar. ::::: High carb is simply bad for you, unless you can swing ::::: it and eat nothing but vegetables (fruits cause my ::::: blood sugar to skyrocket). Pasta and rice are evil. ::: ::: You need a diet for a diabetic, period. ::: :: :: LOL! The diet he just described is what he AMA tells :: diabetics to eat! Surreal, isn't it?
Well, surreal is a nice way to put it! I'd say something like criminal! Luckily, we now know better....
marengo wrote: :: Roger Zoul wrote: ::: Bob in CT wrote: ::::: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul ::::: <[email hidden]> wrote: ::::: :::::: Ignoramus4424 wrote: :::::::: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are :::::::: sort of opposites of one another. But not complete :::::::: opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most :::::::: junk foods (which are typically combinations of :::::::: fat and carbs) and pastry as such, and place some :::::::: emphasis on less processed foods. I wonder if just :::::::: giving up junk food and other foods mentioned :::::::: above is what accounts for much of their success. :::::::: Just curious. :::::: :::::: Of course it is. :::::: :::::: ::::: ::::: Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ::::: ate junk food. However, eating low fat through my ::::: body into such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I ::::: began eating junk food or would drink because of the ::::: depression caused by the extreme crash in blood ::::: sugar. High carb is simply bad for you, unless you ::::: can swing it and eat nothing but vegetables (fruits ::::: cause my blood sugar to skyrocket). Pasta and rice ::::: are evil. ::: ::: You need a diet for a diabetic, period. ::: :: :: LOL! The diet he just described is what he AMA tells :: diabetics to eat! Surreal, isn't it?
Well, surreal is a nice way to put it! I'd say something like criminal! Luckily, we now know better....
I am curious, how did ADA come up with their diet recommendation. Was there a solid thought process behind it?
Ignoramus31046 wrote: :: In article <[email hidden]>, :: Roger Zoul wrote: ::: marengo wrote: ::::: Roger Zoul wrote: :::::: Bob in CT wrote: :::::::: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul :::::::: <[email hidden]> wrote: :::::::: ::::::::: Ignoramus4424 wrote: ::::::::::: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are ::::::::::: sort of opposites of one another. But not ::::::::::: complete opposites. Specifically, both diets ::::::::::: forbid most junk foods (which are typically ::::::::::: combinations of fat and carbs) and pastry as ::::::::::: such, and place some emphasis on less processed ::::::::::: foods. I wonder if just giving up junk food and ::::::::::: other foods mentioned above is what accounts for ::::::::::: much of their success. Just curious. ::::::::: ::::::::: Of course it is. ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::: :::::::: Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and :::::::: rarely ate junk food. However, eating low fat :::::::: through my body into such blood sugar spikes and :::::::: crashes that I began eating junk food or would :::::::: drink because of the depression caused by the :::::::: extreme crash in blood sugar. High carb is simply :::::::: bad for you, unless you can swing it and eat :::::::: nothing but vegetables (fruits cause my blood sugar :::::::: to skyrocket). Pasta and rice are evil. :::::: :::::: You need a diet for a diabetic, period. :::::: ::::: ::::: LOL! The diet he just described is what he AMA tells ::::: diabetics to eat! Surreal, isn't it? ::: ::: Well, surreal is a nice way to put it! I'd say something ::: like criminal! Luckily, we now know better.... ::: ::: ::: :: :: I am curious, how did ADA come up with their diet :: recommendation. Was there a solid thought process :: behind it?
By committee....with all members armed with the notion that fat of any kind is bad....
Ignoramus31046 wrote: :: In article <[email hidden]- :: berlin.de>, Roger Zoul wrote: ::: marengo wrote: ::::: Roger Zoul wrote: :::::: Bob in CT wrote: :::::::: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul :::::::: <[email hidden]> wrote: :::::::: ::::::::: Ignoramus4424 wrote: ::::::::::: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are ::::::::::: sort of opposites of one another. But not ::::::::::: complete opposites. Specifically, both diets ::::::::::: forbid most junk foods (which are typically ::::::::::: combinations of fat and carbs) and pastry as ::::::::::: such, and place some emphasis on less processed ::::::::::: foods. I wonder if just giving up junk food and ::::::::::: other foods mentioned above is what accounts ::::::::::: for much of their success. Just curious. ::::::::: ::::::::: Of course it is. ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::: :::::::: Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and :::::::: rarely ate junk food. However, eating low fat :::::::: through my body into such blood sugar spikes and :::::::: crashes that I began eating junk food or would :::::::: drink because of the depression caused by the :::::::: extreme crash in blood sugar. High carb is simply :::::::: bad for you, unless you can swing it and eat :::::::: nothing but vegetables (fruits cause my blood :::::::: sugar to skyrocket). Pasta and rice are evil. :::::: :::::: You need a diet for a diabetic, period. :::::: ::::: ::::: LOL! The diet he just described is what he AMA tells ::::: diabetics to eat! Surreal, isn't it? ::: ::: Well, surreal is a nice way to put it! I'd say ::: something like criminal! Luckily, we now know ::: better.... ::: ::: ::: :: :: I am curious, how did ADA come up with their diet :: recommendation. Was there a solid thought process :: behind it?
By committee....with all members armed with the notion that fat of any kind is bad....
does not sound like a trustworthy organization, to me.
On 20 Apr 2004 15:02:12 GMT, Ignoramus4424 <[email hidden]> posted:
Quoted message said:
Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are sort of opposites of one another. But not complete opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most junk foods (which are typically combinations of fat and carbs) and pastry as such, and place some emphasis on less processed foods. I wonder if just giving up junk food and other foods mentioned above is what accounts for much of their success. Just curious.
i
I suspect this might be quite true. The optimal diet is somewhere in the middle. The fats and carbs contained in the vareid wholefood diet should give you all you need.
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:47:18 GMT, Howard <[email hidden]> posted:
Quoted message said:
Ignoramus4424 said:
I wonder if just giving up junk food and other foods mentioned above is what accounts for much of their success.
Low-carb junk food and low-fat junk food are both junk, and it's a toss-up as to which is worse.
Even the low-fat advocates recognize that it is important to remove sugar from the diet, even though they can't understand why so-called 'complex' carbs (especially from grain) are just as bad.
I suspect this might be quite true. The optimal diet is somewhere in the middle. The fats and carbs
For those who have read the Atkins website or book, that is the ultimate goal of the later phases of the process. Too many people think that the induction (2 week) phase of Atkins *is* the entire diet. But Atkins is a process: not a diet/menu. The later stages, and pre-maintenance phases, include quite a lot of things in a varied wholefood diet.
CM -- The post you just read, unless otherwise noted, is strictly my opinion and experience. Please interpret accordingly.
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:45:21 GMT, Bob in CT <[email hidden]> posted:
Quoted message said:
Roger Zoul said:
Ignoramus4424 wrote: :: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are sort :: of opposites of one another. But not complete :: opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most junk :: foods (which are typically combinations of fat and :: carbs) and pastry as such, and place some emphasis on :: less processed foods. I wonder if just giving up junk :: food and other foods mentioned above is what accounts :: for much of their success. Just curious.
Of course it is.
Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ate junk food. However, eating low fat through my body into such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I began eating junk food or would drink because of the depression caused by the extreme crash in blood sugar. High carb is simply bad for you,
No, bad for YOU! For obvious reasons.
Quoted message said:
unless you can swing it and eat nothing but vegetables (fruits cause my blood sugar to skyrocket). Pasta and rice are evil.
To you. Please live with it and stop trying to extrapolate your therapeutic needs to the rest of the population.
Roger Zoul wrote: | Bob in CT wrote: ||| On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul ||| <[email hidden]> wrote: ||| |||| Ignoramus4424 wrote: |||||| Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are sort |||||| of opposites of one another. But not complete |||||| opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most junk |||||| foods (which are typically combinations of fat and |||||| carbs) and pastry as such, and place some emphasis |||||| on less processed foods. I wonder if just giving up |||||| junk food and other foods mentioned above is what |||||| accounts for much of their success. Just curious. |||| |||| Of course it is. |||| |||| ||| ||| Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ||| ate junk food. However, eating low fat through my body ||| into such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I began ||| eating junk food or would drink because of the ||| depression caused by the extreme crash in blood sugar. ||| High carb is simply bad for you, unless you can swing ||| it and eat nothing but vegetables (fruits cause my ||| blood sugar to skyrocket). Pasta and rice are evil. | | You need a diet for a diabetic, period. |
LOL! The diet he just described is what he AMA tells diabetics to eat! Surreal, isn't it?
marengo wrote: :: Roger Zoul wrote: ::: Bob in CT wrote: ::::: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul ::::: <[email hidden]> wrote: ::::: :::::: Ignoramus4424 wrote: :::::::: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are :::::::: sort of opposites of one another. But not complete :::::::: opposites. Specifically, both diets forbid most :::::::: junk foods (which are typically combinations of :::::::: fat and carbs) and pastry as such, and place some :::::::: emphasis on less processed foods. I wonder if just :::::::: giving up junk food and other foods mentioned :::::::: above is what accounts for much of their success. :::::::: Just curious. :::::: :::::: Of course it is. :::::: :::::: ::::: ::::: Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ::::: ate junk food. However, eating low fat through my ::::: body into such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I ::::: began eating junk food or would drink because of the ::::: depression caused by the extreme crash in blood ::::: sugar. High carb is simply bad for you, unless you ::::: can swing it and eat nothing but vegetables (fruits ::::: cause my blood sugar to skyrocket). Pasta and rice ::::: are evil. ::: ::: You need a diet for a diabetic, period. ::: :: :: LOL! The diet he just described is what he AMA tells :: diabetics to eat! Surreal, isn't it?
Well, surreal is a nice way to put it! I'd say something like criminal! Luckily, we now know better....
On 21 Apr 2004 19:04:32 GMT, Ignoramus31046 <[email hidden]> posted:
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
Roger Zoul said:
marengo wrote: :: Roger Zoul wrote: ::: Bob in CT wrote: ::::: On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:42:14 -0400, Roger Zoul ::::: <[email hidden]> wrote: ::::: :::::: Ignoramus4424 wrote: :::::::: Obviously, low carb diets and low fat diets are :::::::: sort of opposites of one another. But not :::::::: complete opposites. Specifically, both diets :::::::: forbid most junk foods (which are typically :::::::: combinations of fat and carbs) and pastry as :::::::: such, and place some emphasis on less processed :::::::: foods. I wonder if just giving up junk food and :::::::: other foods mentioned above is what accounts for :::::::: much of their success. Just curious. :::::: :::::: Of course it is. :::::: :::::: ::::: ::::: Not really. I ate low fat for a long time and rarely ::::: ate junk food. However, eating low fat through my ::::: body into such blood sugar spikes and crashes that I ::::: began eating junk food or would drink because of the ::::: depression caused by the extreme crash in blood ::::: sugar. High carb is simply bad for you, unless you ::::: can swing it and eat nothing but vegetables (fruits ::::: cause my blood sugar to skyrocket). Pasta and rice ::::: are evil. ::: ::: You need a diet for a diabetic, period. ::: :: :: LOL! The diet he just described is what he AMA tells :: diabetics to eat! Surreal, isn't it?
Well, surreal is a nice way to put it! I'd say something like criminal! Luckily, we now know better....
I am curious, how did ADA come up with their diet recommendation. Was there a solid thought process behind it?
Perhaps confusing the recommended diet for type ones and type twos taking insulin?