$10,000 to pull an Abdu?
How is this related to the "Is cycling 'dangerous'? subject line.
One thing I'm NOT worried about when I ride is that I'm going to
DELIBERATELY crash. If I was inclined to do that, ANY activity would be
dangerous.
Diving: $10K to do a cutaway INTO the platform.
Running: $10K to do a face plant into the sidewalk.
NASCAR: $10K to hit the wall at 200+mph
Cooking: $10K to plunge my hand into a boiling pot, grab a scalding cookie
tray...........................??????????????
Most of us ride with the intent of avoiding injury, avoiding dangerous
roads, always alert to avoid trouble, even while sprinting.
When I race I don't pay the entry fee to be injured, but if I do crash and
need it, I will get whatever money I need to cover my injuries. It's called
health insurance, and like most insurance, the premiums I pay are based on
the supposition that I have a vested interest in AVOIDING the pain and
suffering of injury.
AND..........IF I DID have $10K to spend for purely cosmetic improvements,
since I am an active cyclist, a new bike would improve my looks a lot more
than a face lift, or tummy tuck or liposuction.
warren <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:A very successful bike racer in his 60's said this to me today as we
discussed the relative dangers of cycling. Some of his friends tell him
that cycling is dangerous, training on roads with cars should be
avoided, as is having optional, but potentially dangerous surgery to
enhance one's life, etc.
On occasion he asks a person how they would feel about getting on a
bike, doing an all out sprint to say, 35mph, and then throwing
themselves over the bars and onto the ground, and would they do it for
$10,000?
No one has yet said they would, yet bike racers pay an entry fee 20-50
times a year with the understanding that exactly this scenario could
occur except they will not get $10,000 for it. So what is the real
danger, and what causes us to draw the line in a different place for
different scenarios?
-WG