General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

When Did Milk Start Getting The Bad Rap?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 16 posts · 597 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
1 February 2004
Last activity
6 February 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
597
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I came from a time when Milk Drinking was considered a Very Good Thing.
    My original milk experience started when milkmen delivered their product
    in glass bottles right to the house & continues to this day.. Though I
    absolutely LOVE a tall cold glass of milk & preferably three or four
    daily as I have for the last half century, I have to wonder whether I'm
    ruining my health or whether "those other people" have it wrong??

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:


    I came from a time when Milk Drinking was considered a Very Good Thing.
    My original milk experience started when milkmen delivered their product
    in glass bottles right to the house & continues to this day.. Though I
    absolutely LOVE a tall cold glass of milk & preferably three or four
    daily as I have for the last half century, I have to wonder whether I'm
    ruining my health or whether "those other people" have it wrong??

    It depends on what your biggest considerations are.

    For example, the anti-milk fanatics notwithstanding, milk is a good
    source of calcium, which many Americans (especially women) don't get
    enough of.

    On the other hand, whole milk is fairly high in saturated fat, which
    is not a good thing for most adults.

    I compromise by drinking 1% milk, which has significantly less fat,
    but all the calcium. (I refuse to drink skim -- I think it tastes
    awful.)

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  3. DW: I agree the non-fat milk looks (purple) & tastes(?) awful, so I
    went from whole to 2% about 20 years ago, then 1% about 10+ years ago,
    where I remain. I wonder how half & half (non/1%) would taste? That
    might be a possibility.

  4. DW: I agree the non-fat milk looks (purple) & tastes(?) awful, so I
    went from whole to 2% about 20 years ago, then 1% about 10+ years ago,
    where I remain. I wonder how half & half (non/1%) would taste? That
    might be a possibility.

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    DW: I agree the non-fat milk looks (purple) & tastes(?) awful, so I
    went from whole to 2% about 20 years ago, then 1% about 10+ years ago,
    where I remain. I wonder how half & half (non/1%) would taste? That
    might be a possibility.

    No harm in it, certainly. I just haven't been interested enough to
    try mixing my own.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  6. Don't forget guys that full cream milk is still only 5% fat, if it were any
    other food that would be labelled low fat.
    Also when you throw out the fat the vitimins go with it.

    20 years ago when milk can in bottles it also wasn't homogenised which
    substantially messes up the fats and makes them more hazardous; remember how
    we used to shake the bottle, if you shop around unhomogenised milk is still
    out there. Even better is non pasturised milk.

    Lastly, everyone is different and function best on different kinds of diets;
    some people thrive as vegetarians while other shrivel and become anaemic.
    The same is true of milk digestion. If it doesn't give you any obvious
    digestive or mucous problems then your probably fine; next time you visit
    the doctor get a standard blood test and check up done to make sure.

    Enjoy -A.

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    DW: I agree the non-fat milk looks (purple) & tastes(?) awful, so I
    went from whole to 2% about 20 years ago, then 1% about 10+ years ago,
    where I remain. I wonder how half & half (non/1%) would taste? That
    might be a possibility.

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 30/01/2004

  7. [email hidden] (David Wright) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I compromise by drinking 1% milk, which has significantly less fat,
    but all the calcium. (I refuse to drink skim -- I think it tastes
    awful.)

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    I very rarely drink milk. When I do, it's non-fat. After eschewing
    the whole & 1% for many years, I've found they taste "gummy" (for lack
    of a better word).

    It's like many foods & beverages -- you get used to a particular taste
    & a different variety tastes weird....

    Michele
    I ENJOY being a cranky [censored].

  8. "Alan Jacques" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Don't forget guys that full cream milk is still only 5% fat, if it were


    any

    Quoted message said:

    other food that would be labelled low fat.
    Also when you throw out the fat the vitimins go with it.

    20 years ago when milk can in bottles it also wasn't homogenised which
    substantially messes up the fats and makes them more hazardous; remember


    how

    Quoted message said:

    we used to shake the bottle, if you shop around unhomogenised milk is


    still

    Quoted message said:

    out there. Even better is non pasturised milk.

    There is some links with homogenised milk and asthma, I read something years
    ago about he rise of asthma in populations since the end of the glass
    bottle.

    Worst part is the amount of time that "fresh milk" now has a useby date - 14
    days in cartons. Theres gotta be more than just homogenisation and
    pasturisation going on to get it to last that long.

    Some areas only get reconstituted milk as well - they reduce the water
    content, then put into tanks for transport, at the other end they add the
    water back and sell the muck as fresh milk.

    Quoted message said:

    Lastly, everyone is different and function best on different kinds of


    diets;

    Quoted message said:

    some people thrive as vegetarians while other shrivel and become anaemic.
    The same is true of milk digestion. If it doesn't give you any obvious
    digestive or mucous problems then your probably fine; next time you visit
    the doctor get a standard blood test and check up done to make sure.

    Enjoy -A.

  9. "Michele" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (David Wright) wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    I compromise by drinking 1% milk, which has significantly less fat,
    but all the calcium. (I refuse to drink skim -- I think it tastes
    awful.)

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    I very rarely drink milk. When I do, it's non-fat. After eschewing
    the whole & 1% for many years, I've found they taste "gummy" (for lack
    of a better word).

    It's like many foods & beverages -- you get used to a particular taste
    & a different variety tastes weird....

    I recently had a mouthful of whole milk, after using 1% and the special skim
    that is just like 15 but non fat.

    The whole milk was THICK and creamy

  10. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: When Did Milk Start Getting The Bad Rap?
    From: "Roger Martin" [email hidden]
    Date: 2/2/04 5:33 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    There is some links with homogenised milk and asthma, I read something years
    ago about he rise of asthma in populations since the end of the glass
    bottle.

    I have a book where an MD is relating his belief that homogenized milk was
    causing children to be sick. It is true that an enzyme that is toxic to humans
    is in milk and when homogenized, the enzyme is not deactivated in the stomach,
    thus poisoning humans.

    There are other books, like "Don't drink your milk", written by concerned MDs,
    that think pasteurization of milk is the problem.
    And do not think that drinking milk will help you with avoiding calcium
    deficiency or osteoporosis. Actually, drinking homogenized, pasteurized milk
    accelerates calcium deficiency and osteoporosis.

    Since pasterurization is the heating of milk to say 150 degrees and holding it
    there for 20 to 30 minutes, ultra-pasteurization is heating the white poison to
    250 degrees for about 0.1 seconds ( how they do that I do not know ). Knowing
    what homogenization and pasteurization does to the white stuff, what does
    ultra-pasteurization do since that stuff does not even have to be refrigerated
    to keep?

    DrC PhD

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    DRCEEPHD said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: When Did Milk Start Getting The Bad Rap?
    From: "Roger Martin" [email hidden]
    Date: 2/2/04 5:33 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    There is some links with homogenised milk and asthma, I read something years
    ago about he rise of asthma in populations since the end of the glass
    bottle.


    Quoted message said:

    I have a book where an MD is relating his belief that homogenized
    milk was causing children to be sick. It is true that an enzyme that
    is toxic to humans is in milk and when homogenized, the enzyme is not
    deactivated in the stomach, thus poisoning humans.

    You have books that say all kinds of stuff. You need better books.

    That "enzyme" story sounds like total nonsense to me. I can't even
    see a mechanism by which it *could* be true.

    Quoted message said:

    There are other books, like "Don't drink your milk", written by
    concerned MDs, that think pasteurization of milk is the problem.

    Yes, we should all be drinking unpasteurized milk and picking up
    various lovely diseases. That sort of thing happens fairly often to
    the "raw milk" crowd. (Oh, not always -- but it's still Russian
    Roulette.)

    Quoted message said:

    And do not think that drinking milk will help you with avoiding
    calcium deficiency or osteoporosis. Actually, drinking homogenized,
    pasteurized milk accelerates calcium deficiency and osteoporosis.

    Oh, *sure* it does. I await evidence.

    Quoted message said:

    Since pasterurization is the heating of milk to say 150 degrees and
    holding it there for 20 to 30 minutes,

    63 degrees C for30 minutes or 71 degrees C for 15 seconds.

    Quoted message said:

    ultra-pasteurization is heating the white poison to 250 degrees for
    about 0.1 seconds ( how they do that I do not know ).

    I'm not surprised you don't know, but since youre characterization of
    the process is wrong, it's not too surprising. One way is to bring
    the milk into contact with steam at 140 degrees C for 1-2 seconds.
    The other method is to drop a thin film of milk through a chamber of
    high-temperature steam, then it's flash-cooled at the bottom.

    You can get the whole source I used for this at

    http://pubs.acs.org/cen/whatstuff/stuff/7945sci2.html

    It took me all of ten seconds to dig this up in google, but "Dr" Cee's
    research skills are remarkably poor.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  12. I'd say that pasturisation is still needed - maybe people forget that
    untreated milk was a common cause of disease back in the 1940s and even upto
    the 50s. I think it was TB that was the main problem - but I'm not sure.
    People who drink fresh milk (straight out of the cow) dont seem to have any
    health problems nowadays - maybe the cows are healthier.

    When they pickup milk at the farms in Australia they take samples from each
    farm and have that tested for known antibiotics - but with de-regulation I
    wonder if a quality control manager would have the balls to dump a million
    litres if he found something rotten after the bad load had been mixed into
    the vats.

  13. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Roger Martin said:

    I'd say that pasturisation is still needed - maybe people forget that
    untreated milk was a common cause of disease back in the 1940s and even upto
    the 50s. I think it was TB that was the main problem - but I'm not sure.
    People who drink fresh milk (straight out of the cow) dont seem to have any
    health problems nowadays - maybe the cows are healthier.

    They probably are somewhat healthier, but drinking raw milk is still
    asking for trouble over the long term, and I remain unocnvinced that
    there is *any* health benefit to it.

    Quoted message said:

    When they pickup milk at the farms in Australia they take samples from each
    farm and have that tested for known antibiotics - but with de-regulation I
    wonder if a quality control manager would have the balls to dump a million
    litres if he found something rotten after the bad load had been mixed into
    the vats.

    In the US, I think the penalties for not dumping it might be severe
    enough to encourage compliance, though I see your point.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  14. Not pastuerized = dangerous
    Pastuerized = dangerous

    "Roger Martin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'd say that pasturisation is still needed - maybe people forget that
    untreated milk was a common cause of disease back in the 1940s and even


    upto

    Quoted message said:

    the 50s. I think it was TB that was the main problem - but I'm not sure.
    People who drink fresh milk (straight out of the cow) dont seem to have


    any

    Quoted message said:

    health problems nowadays - maybe the cows are healthier.

    When they pickup milk at the farms in Australia they take samples from


    each

    Quoted message said:

    farm and have that tested for known antibiotics - but with de-regulation I
    wonder if a quality control manager would have the balls to dump a million
    litres if he found something rotten after the bad load had been mixed into
    the vats.

  15. try www.notmilk.com
    interesting

    David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Roger Martin said:

    I'd say that pasturisation is still needed - maybe people forget that
    untreated milk was a common cause of disease back in the 1940s and even


    upto

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the 50s. I think it was TB that was the main problem - but I'm not sure.
    People who drink fresh milk (straight out of the cow) dont seem to have


    any

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    health problems nowadays - maybe the cows are healthier.

    They probably are somewhat healthier, but drinking raw milk is still
    asking for trouble over the long term, and I remain unocnvinced that
    there is *any* health benefit to it.

    Quoted message said:

    When they pickup milk at the farms in Australia they take samples from


    each

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    farm and have that tested for known antibiotics - but with de-regulation


    I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    wonder if a quality control manager would have the balls to dump a


    million

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    litres if he found something rotten after the bad load had been mixed


    into

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the vats.

    In the US, I think the penalties for not dumping it might be severe
    enough to encourage compliance, though I see your point.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  16. Gymmy Bob <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Not pastuerized = dangerous
    Pastuerized = dangerous

    don't forget the pus level content......

    Quoted message said:

    "Roger Martin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'd say that pasturisation is still needed - maybe people forget that
    untreated milk was a common cause of disease back in the 1940s and even


    upto

    Quoted message said:

    the 50s. I think it was TB that was the main problem - but I'm not sure.
    People who drink fresh milk (straight out of the cow) dont seem to have


    any

    Quoted message said:

    health problems nowadays - maybe the cows are healthier.

    When they pickup milk at the farms in Australia they take samples from


    each

    Quoted message said:

    farm and have that tested for known antibiotics - but with de-regulation


    I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    wonder if a quality control manager would have the balls to dump a


    million

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    litres if he found something rotten after the bad load had been mixed


    into

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the vats.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.