UK and Europe · Public discussion

Wheelchairs prompt safety fears

Started by Colin Blackburn · · Last activity · 8 posts · 390 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
22 March 2005
Last activity
26 March 2005
Original author
Colin Blackburn
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
390
Views / 30 days
4

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This may be of interest to cyclists as some people seem happy to link
    the two sets of users, despite the legal differences in pavement use.
    I've not quoted the whole article.

    From:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4371431.stm

    [...]
    Allen Jones, chairman of the Wheelchair Users' Group, said the same
    concerns could apply to cyclists.

    He told the Times newspaper: "Will they now regulate cyclists who travel
    much faster and often on the pavements?

    "Just as there are good and bad cyclists, there are good and bad users
    of powered wheelchairs."
    [...]

    Also, some of the feedback responses at the bottom of the page seem to
    be typically anti-cyclist.

    Colin

  2. Quoted message said:

    Also, some of the feedback responses at the bottom of the page seem to
    be typically anti-cyclist.

    Sent off a reply vaguely like this:

    Some people have missed the point Allen Jones was making. The regulation
    of cyclists was an example to show how ridiculous regulation of wheelchairs
    would be.

    8mph on road is an annoyance, not a danger. In the event of an accident it
    is the wheelchair user that gets injured. As for comments about unsafe
    overtaking, how hard is it to safely overtake something 3 feet wide
    travelling at a max of 8mph?

    As for being uninsured, if they can afford these things they can afford to
    pay for your scratched bumper out of their own pocket.

  3. "Mark Thompson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Also, some of the feedback responses at the bottom of the page seem to
    be typically anti-cyclist.

    Sent off a reply vaguely like this:

    Some people have missed the point Allen Jones was making. The regulation
    of cyclists was an example to show how ridiculous regulation of
    wheelchairs
    would be.

    8mph on road is an annoyance, not a danger. In the event of an accident
    it
    is the wheelchair user that gets injured. As for comments about unsafe
    overtaking, how hard is it to safely overtake something 3 feet wide
    travelling at a max of 8mph?

    As for being uninsured, if they can afford these things they can afford to
    pay for your scratched bumper out of their own pocket.

    However they may not be able to pay for the medical fees, lost wages, etc
    when they break someones ankle whist driving them on the pavement.

    Russ 'wheelchair user'

  4. On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:45:14 +0000 someone who may be Colin
    Blackburn <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4371431.stm

    "Just as there are good and bad cyclists, there are good and bad users
    of powered wheelchairs."

    The sign on the back of the one that is often parked outside the pub
    by our office. "Driven by an ex-Royal Marine with attitude".

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E
    I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government
    prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000.

  5. "Russ" <[email hidden]>typed

    Quoted message said:

    However they may not be able to pay for the medical fees, lost wages, etc
    when they break someones ankle whist driving them on the pavement.

    or knock someone off his ladder, injuring rather more than one joint.

    --
    Helen D. Vecht: [email hidden]
    Edgware.

  6. On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:14:45 GMT, Helen Deborah Vecht
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    or knock someone off his ladder, injuring rather more than one joint.

    If he's Dutch, anyway.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

  7. you know? said:
    Quoted message said:

    or knock someone off his ladder, injuring rather more than one joint.

    If he's Dutch, anyway.

    Sign seen this afternoon in Newmarket -- "Half Price Pot Sale!"

    It also said the location of the sale was "Kitchens & Things", but they
    show no sign of supplying anything in the pot line that wasn't made from
    clay....

    On the positive side: this afternoon's showers over East Anglia managed
    to avoid Newmarket, so I could cycle there for the Saturday shopping.

    Even more positive: leg speed is at 100 rpm, unusual for March.

    Mike

  8. On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:11:51 +0000, Mike Causer
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    leg speed is at 100 rpm, unusual for March.

    Never mind, you'll get back up to speed soon (said the man who likes
    to keep above 105rpm all year round)

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.