Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Wheelbuilder's advice needed

Started by Ivar Hesselager · · Last activity · 7 posts · 427 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
19 May 2004
Last activity
20 May 2004
Original author
Ivar Hesselager
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
427
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My newbuild backwheel on my sparkling new bike has the pulling spokes going
    from the inside of the flange. Is this OK - or did the mechanic simply do a
    poor job building the wheel?
    I bought Ultegera hubs and Mavic CPX 33 rims with 36 spokes. I went into
    great detail to get a bike with all the selected parts that will suit my
    longer randonneur rides - but I forgot to be specific about how I wanted the
    wheel built.

    I have always considered it a basic rule to have the pulling spokes on the
    outside. Pulling spokes do the hardest job, and I think they should benefit
    from the greater angle in the dishing of the wheel, that lies on the outside
    of the flange. And the pulling spokes also should benefit from the larger
    contact area with the flange that is on the outside of the flange.

    The result of having the pulling spokes on the inside is a much sharper bend
    where the pulling spoke crosses the staying spoke in the 3X lacing. I
    have mingled a bit with wheelbuilding in my younger days, and the way I
    undertand the mechanism of the spokes, the greater tension between the
    crossing spokes, will make my wheel a lot more flexible in the lateral
    direction than I need it - and it will be too flexible ind the sideways
    direction. It will also create a greater risc of broken spokes, I expect.
    (So far I have only had one longer 100 km ride on the shiny new bike, and I
    can't say that the flexible wheel actually bothered me. But I am concerned
    that it will - under differant circumstances.

    I am an wheel builder amateur, and I like to respect the professionals. So
    before I go back to the shop to complain of their incompetence, I could use
    some global expert wheelbuilder's advice! Could there be a good reason for
    placing the pulling spokes on the inside of the flange?

    And if there is a fairly good reason for doing it, (making me refrain form
    complaining) wouldn't it be even better for me to rebuild the wheel, the way
    I think it shold be: Less flexible and with pulling spokes on the outside?
    (I have taken "long distance comfort" into consideration by choosing a 25 mm
    tire on the back wheel.)

    Also the mechanic has put plain 2 mm spokes on the wheels - I didn't specify
    what kind of spokes I wanted, but I exepcted that buttet spokes 2,0/1,8
    would be a standard spoke for a bike in the 2,600 Euro class.

    Should the butted spokes be considered not only lighter but also better than
    plain spokes? I rarely see plain spokes on the better bikes - and I would
    not think that my 190 pounds(86 kg) calls for heavy duty spokes.

    So if I rebuild the wheel, wouldn't it make sense to put in the butted
    spokes?
    I would certainly appreciate some wheelbuilder expert advice.

    Kindly
    Ivar of Denmark

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Ivar Hesselager said:

    My newbuild backwheel on my sparkling new bike has the pulling spokes going
    from the inside of the flange. Is this OK - or did the mechanic simply do a
    poor job building the wheel?

    It doesn't matter enough to change anything. If the wheel is straight,
    tight, and properly stress-relieved it will work fine.

  3. Ivar Hesselager said:

    My newbuild backwheel on my sparkling new bike has the pulling spokes
    going from the inside of the flange. Is this OK - or did the mechanic
    simply do a poor job building the wheel? I bought Ultegera hubs and
    Mavic CPX 33 rims with 36 spokes. I went into great detail to get a bike
    with all the selected parts that will suit my longer randonneur rides -
    but I forgot to be specific about how I wanted the wheel built.
    I have always considered it a basic rule to have the pulling spokes on
    the outside. Pulling spokes do the hardest job, and I think they should
    benefit from the greater angle in the dishing of the wheel, that lies on
    the outside of the flange. And the pulling spokes also should benefit
    from the larger contact area with the flange that is on the outside of
    the flange.
    The result of having the pulling spokes on the inside is a much sharper
    bend where the pulling spoke crosses the staying spoke in the 3X lacing.
    I have mingled a bit with wheelbuilding in my younger days, and the way
    I undertand the mechanism of the spokes, the greater tension between the
    crossing spokes, will make my wheel a lot more flexible in the lateral
    direction than I need it - and it will be too flexible ind the sideways
    direction. It will also create a greater risc of broken spokes, I
    expect. (So far I have only had one longer 100 km ride on the shiny new
    bike, and I can't say that the flexible wheel actually bothered me. But
    I am concerned that it will - under differant circumstances.
    I am an wheel builder amateur, and I like to respect the professionals.
    So before I go back to the shop to complain of their incompetence, I
    could use some global expert wheelbuilder's advice! Could there be a
    good reason for placing the pulling spokes on the inside of the flange?
    And if there is a fairly good reason for doing it, (making me refrain
    form complaining) wouldn't it be even better for me to rebuild the
    wheel, the way I think it shold be: Less flexible and with pulling
    spokes on the outside? (I have taken "long distance comfort" into
    consideration by choosing a 25 mm tire on the back wheel.)
    Also the mechanic has put plain 2 mm spokes on the wheels - I didn't
    specify what kind of spokes I wanted, but I exepcted that buttet spokes
    2,0/1,8 would be a standard spoke for a bike in the 2,600 Euro class.
    Should the butted spokes be considered not only lighter but also better
    than plain spokes? I rarely see plain spokes on the better bikes - and I
    would not think that my 190 pounds(86 kg) calls for heavy duty spokes.
    So if I rebuild the wheel, wouldn't it make sense to put in the butted
    spokes? I would certainly appreciate some wheelbuilder expert advice.
    Kindly Ivar of Denmark

    The spoking pattern used is fine. I would rather have double butted
    spokes to. If you rebuild to use double butted spokes, stay with the
    existing pattern to prevent damage to the hub. I don't understand some
    of your terminology about " much sharper bends". Spoke tension balance
    for all spokes on the same side of the rear wheel is important. Spoke
    alignment and stress relieving is also very important.

    --

  4. Ivar Hesselager said:

    My newbuild backwheel on my sparkling new bike has the pulling
    spokes going from the inside of the flange. Is this OK - or did the
    mechanic simply do a poor job building the wheel?

    Doesn't matter, or at least not enough to worry about. I've been
    building wheels for 25 years with the pulling spokes head-out or
    elbows-in, whichever you prefer to call it. Never a problem with it.

    Quoted message said:

    Should the butted spokes be considered not only lighter but also
    better than plain spokes? I rarely see plain spokes on the better
    bikes - and I would not think that my 190 pounds(86 kg) calls for
    heavy duty spokes.

    Butted spokes make for a more durable wheel and lower likelihood of
    spoke breakage. IMHO a nearly US $3000 bike ought to come with butted
    spokes.

  5. Hesselager said:

    My newbuild backwheel on my sparkling new bike has the pulling spokes going
    from the inside of the flange.

    Not sure how it is in Danish, but in English the term "pulling spokes"
    is out of favor, since, actually, _all_ of the spokes pull.

    Assuming you're speaking of the spokes that point counterclockwise as
    they leave the rim, when viewed from the right side, the preferred term
    is "trailing spokes" (as opposed to the "leading spokes" that point in
    the direction of rotation.

    Quoted message said:

    Is this OK - or did the mechanic simply do a
    poor job building the wheel?

    This is the generally preferred way to build a wheel for use with
    derailer gearing. A majority of good wheel builders do it this way,
    though a sizable minority of other good wheel builders do it the other way.

    Basically, it doesn't matter in 99.999% of cases, and says nothing about
    the quality of the wheel building job.

    I address this issue in more detail at:

    http://sheldonbrown.com/wheelbuild.html#side

    Quoted message said:

    Also the mechanic has put plain 2 mm spokes on the wheels - I didn't specify
    what kind of spokes I wanted, but I exepcted that buttet spokes 2,0/1,8
    would be a standard spoke for a bike in the 2,600 Euro class.

    I would agree, butted spokes would have been better, they're not that
    much more expensive.

    Quoted message said:

    Should the butted spokes be considered not only lighter but also better than
    plain spokes?

    That's correct.

    I rarely see plain spokes on the better bikes - and I would

    Quoted message said:

    not think that my 190 pounds(86 kg) calls for heavy duty spokes.

    Butted spokes _are_ heavy-duty spokes. Straight gauge spokes are just
    cheaper, and slightly easier to build with.

    Quoted message said:

    So if I rebuild the wheel, wouldn't it make sense to put in the butted
    spokes?

    Yes, but I wouldn't think there was any cause to rebuild it on the basis
    of the information you've supplied.

    Sheldon "But...But..." Brown
    +-----------------------------------------------+
    | I saw a man pursuing the horizon; |
    | Round and round they sped. |
    | I was disturbed at this; |
    | I accosted the man. |
    | |
    | "It is futile," I said, |
    | "You can never--" |
    | |
    | "You lie," he cried, |
    | And ran on. |
    | --Stephen Crane |
    +-----------------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

  6. ivar-<< My newbuild backwheel on my sparkling new bike has the pulling spokes
    going
    from the inside of the flange. Is this OK - or did the mechanic simply do a
    poor job building the wheel? >><BR><BR>

    It really makes little difference as long as the wheel was built well. I have
    built wheels both ways and it really doesn't matter-

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  7. Thank you for the expert advice - I am much relieved.
    I have my english vocabulary - and my basic knowledge - on the subject of
    wheelbuilding from Robert Wright: "Building Bicycle Wheels" some twenty
    years ago. In spite of the unclear terminology you read me right - and I
    will remember to compliment the mechanic for the fine wheel he build for
    me - exept for the choise of spokes.
    Thank you Comrades of the Wheel!
    Ivar

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.