Pete Biggs said:Ben C said:Brandt claims loose spokes break indirectly because, being loose, they
are inclined to miss out on "stress-relief". But the whole
stress-relief story is pretty fishy in the first place.
I would think stress relieveing was a fishy idea too, except I've never had
a broken spoke since I've been doing it. It's been long enough for me to
believe that it might really be helping.
I think it probably can help, just not necessarily for the reasons
Brandt says it does.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Others say (plausibly enough) very loose spokes flex more which is why
they break, although Brandt denies this.
But anyway uneven tension doesn't mean any spokes are _that_ loose.
As for tight spokes, they don't break.
*That is not true*. I've had several tight spokes break (before I learnt
about good wheel building and stress relieving). A tight spokes reduces in
tension when it is loaded at the bottom of the wheel.
So do all spokes.
Quoted message said:(Prove this by
plucking the spoke and listening to the tone when weight is on the bike).
The constantly changing tension as the bike is ridden causes fatigue.
You always have this loading/unloading cycle. If the average tension in
this cycle is high, then you might get a fatigue failure.
So other things being equal, tighter spokes might be more at risk of
fatigue failure.
But I think the main contributor to dangerously high tension is the
leverage you get from a poorly supported elbow. If the elbow isn't close
enough to flush with the hub flange, the stress can be high enough there
to cause problems even if the spoke tension on the main part of the
spoke is quite low.
If the elbow is close to the flange, the tension there should be safely
low enough even if the spoke itself is so tight as to be causing
rim-cracking problems (i.e. far too tight).
Quoted message said:However, I agree that spoke tension doesn't have to extremely even for a
wheel to be reliable. That said, you still might as well get it as even as
you can manage within reason.
Certainly, even if for nothing more than sort of aesthetic reasons.