Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:How about a tandem wheel?
Dropout spacing wouldn't work.
Road singles are spaced at 135mm, tandems at either 145 or 160mm.
Road singles are 130 in the rear, mountain bike wheels are 135 rear.
Ya, I flipped a bit over that one - thanks for putting the record straight
Quoted message said:Tandem rear-wheel spacing is all over the map. My (older) tandem has 130
rear spacing, so I use a regular Shimano rear hub -- which I wish I could
get for more than 36 spokes. Some new tandems are still 140.
Well, I thinking of current models, which has pretty much settled out as
160mm (Santana) and 145mm (just about everybody else). Calfee will build to
130mm - but that doesn't help the original poster, as 130mm Calfee's are
running single bike wheels. Who's building to 140mm anymore?
Quoted message said:In the case of tandems, I'd say that wider is better, but there is a
question about how much "better" you need.
The experience base with 145mm wheels is very good. Santana believes 145mm
is junk (I'm paraphrasing, but not by much!) and 160mm is the minimum
required for a "quality" tandem, but I think it's safe to say that's a
minority view.
Quoted message said:This is not clearly the case for single bikes, since the wider the wheel is,
the wider the frame, which can get in the way of your heels, and will
widen the distance between the pedals.
The key difference is tandems often have longer stays than singles, moving
that wide rear wheel away from the stoker's crank - otherwise the same
issues would arise. Our tandem has 17" long chainstays, my single's are an
inch shorter.
The bottom line remains, a tandem wheel is *not* a solution to the original
poster's problem.
Chris Neary
[email hidden]
"Science, freedom, beauty, adventure: what more could
you ask of life? Bicycling combined all the elements I
loved" - Adapted from a quotation by Charles Lindbergh