So, if we’re talking about what makes someone truly inspiring in cycling, we gotta ask: is it just about the wins or the grind, or is it also about how they handle their mess? If a cyclist’s got talent but leaves a trail of chaos, can we really call that inspiring? What does that say about our standards? Are we cool with celebrating the highs without acknowledging the lows? Where’s the line between resilience and just being a hot mess?
