Road Cycling · Public discussion

What was Di Luca thinking?

Started by trg · · Last activity · 31 posts · 1,297 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
28 May 2005
Last activity
9 June 2005
Original author
trg
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,297
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. He led Simoni and Rujano just about the whole way up the Finestre. Did he
    think he had a better chance making the podium by taking 3+ minutes off of
    Savoldelli rather than 8 seconds from Rujano? Did he think he could ride
    away from Rujano there? He burned himself out. He could have just ridden on
    the back the whole way like Rujano and saved his strength for the easier
    Sestriere where his excellent finishing skill could have made up the
    difference (especially with bonus seconds at stake.)

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    trg said:

    He led Simoni and Rujano just about the whole way up the Finestre. Did he
    think he had a better chance making the podium by taking 3+ minutes off of
    Savoldelli rather than 8 seconds from Rujano? Did he think he could ride
    away from Rujano there? He burned himself out. He could have just ridden on
    the back the whole way like Rujano and saved his strength for the easier
    Sestriere where his excellent finishing skill could have made up the
    difference (especially with bonus seconds at stake.)

    On the 9% Finestre, the value of having a team present is overrated -
    I'm guessing they averaged about 12 MPH, climbing about 85 feet per
    minute. I suspect that Di Luca did think he could out-climb to the top.
    Being stuck in no man's land on the descent may have cost a few seconds.

    Given how well Rujano has performed on finishing climbs, Di Luca's only
    chance might have been to build a gap on the penultimate climb. Or pray
    for Rujano to puncture on the dirt.

    MrBob

  3. trg said:

    Did he think he could ride away from Rujano there?

    If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    like the Finestre, not Sestriere.

    --
    Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  4. Ewoud Dronkert said:
    trg said:

    Did he think he could ride away from Rujano there?

    If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    like the Finestre, not Sestriere.

    And he's usually a better descender. Shame about the cramp...
    All the best
    Dan Gregory

  5. "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    trg said:

    Did he think he could ride away from Rujano there?

    If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    like the Finestre, not Sestriere.


    I don't agree. Di Luca is suited to steep climbs when they are short, like
    you find in the Classics. Not 18 Km long, though. The steeper and longer the
    climb, the more that would advantage a pure climber like Rujano.

  6. "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message
    de
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    trg said:

    Did he think he could ride away from Rujano there?

    If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    like the Finestre, not Sestriere.


    I don't agree. Di Luca is suited to steep climbs when they are short, like
    you find in the Classics. Not 18 Km long, though. The steeper and longer
    the
    climb, the more that would advantage a pure climber like Rujano.

    I also think he may have shot himself on his foot and played in the hand of
    Savoldelli (by the way, what was Lotto's business in helping Savoldelli?).
    There was a moment when Savoldelli was isolated going up the Finestre. At
    that point Simoni, Rujano and Di Luca were part of a compact group that also
    included Gárate and others. Di Luca's rhythm did not manage to eliminate his
    most direct competitors (Simoni and Rujano) and instead helped Savoldelli to
    reorganize the chase with the drop outs. At the end of the Finester Simoni
    was "virtual" maglia rossa and Savoldelli was losing about 20 secs per
    kilometer. at the beginning of Sestriere it was clear he was not going to
    make it.

    Another strategy for him to get into the podium could have been to suck
    wheel to the top of Sestriere and sprint for the bonus seconds, possibly
    leaving Rujano 4th.

  7. "alex" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message
    de
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 28 May 2005 17:49:34 +0200, trg wrote:
    > Did he think he could ride away from Rujano there?

    If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    like the Finestre, not Sestriere.


    I don't agree. Di Luca is suited to steep climbs when they are short,
    like
    you find in the Classics. Not 18 Km long, though. The steeper and longer
    the
    climb, the more that would advantage a pure climber like Rujano.

    I also think he may have shot himself on his foot and played in the hand
    of Savoldelli (by the way, what was Lotto's business in helping
    Savoldelli?).

    Exactly what you say: business.

    Benjo

  8. "benjo maso" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "alex" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le


    message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    de
    news:[email hidden]...
    > On Sat, 28 May 2005 17:49:34 +0200, trg wrote:
    > > Did he think he could ride away from Rujano there?
    >
    > If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    > like the Finestre, not Sestriere.
    >
    I don't agree. Di Luca is suited to steep climbs when they are short,
    like
    you find in the Classics. Not 18 Km long, though. The steeper and


    longer

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the
    climb, the more that would advantage a pure climber like Rujano.

    I also think he may have shot himself on his foot and played in the hand
    of Savoldelli (by the way, what was Lotto's business in helping
    Savoldelli?).

    Exactly what you say: business.

    Benjo


    Benjo's convinced that Ardila was paid off by Discovery to ride for
    Savoldelli, but his helping Savoldelli up the Finestre was immediately
    repaid in kind when he just sat on Savoldelli's line on the descent, picking
    up 30+ seconds when bridging to Van Huffelto to help him jump from 14 to 11
    in the GC, and nearly into the top 10.

    I think I glimpsed Basso do something similar in the TT yesterday when he
    let himself get overtaken (was it Tiralongo) at the top of the climb so he
    could follow the other guy's line on the descent.

  9. Hey Benjo glad to see you back.
    Hope you didn't waste too much time arguing with that moron D. Spencer
    Hines.
    Bill C

  10. I have to agree with that evaluation. Since "better" is a relative
    term then I would think the more vertical the more danger exists
    against a guy that weighs not much more than 50 kilos.

  11. "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "benjo maso" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "alex" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le


    message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > de
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> On Sat, 28 May 2005 17:49:34 +0200, trg wrote:
    >> > Did he think he could ride away from Rujano there?
    >>
    >> If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    >> like the Finestre, not Sestriere.
    >>
    > I don't agree. Di Luca is suited to steep climbs when they are short,
    > like
    > you find in the Classics. Not 18 Km long, though. The steeper and


    longer

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > the
    > climb, the more that would advantage a pure climber like Rujano.
    >
    >

    I also think he may have shot himself on his foot and played in the
    hand
    of Savoldelli (by the way, what was Lotto's business in helping
    Savoldelli?).

    Exactly what you say: business.

    Benjo


    Benjo's convinced that Ardila was paid off by Discovery to ride for
    Savoldelli, but his helping Savoldelli up the Finestre was immediately
    repaid in kind when he just sat on Savoldelli's line on the descent,
    picking
    up 30+ seconds when bridging to Van Huffelto to help him jump from 14 to
    11
    in the GC, and nearly into the top 10.

    I think I glimpsed Basso do something similar in the TT yesterday when he
    let himself get overtaken (was it Tiralongo) at the top of the climb so he
    could follow the other guy's line on the descent.

    If Ardila wasn't paid off by Salvodelli, he must be the dumbest rider of the
    peloton. Salvoldelli was all alone and losing the Giro. Of course he was
    quite happy to pay anybody willing to help him. After all, pro's are doning
    it all the time. Naturally it happens from time to time that two riders
    enter in a temporary alliance without money changing hands, but that's only
    possible if both parties are profiting more or less equally. Which wasn't
    the case this time: winning the Giro is of course a hundred times more
    important than bringing a teammate from a 14th to an 11th place. Finishing
    11th might be nice for Van Huffel personally, but is quite unimportant for
    the team (no extra coverage, no extra publicy). No rider is going to exhaust
    himself to provide a teammate for such little gain - except when he's paid
    of course.

    Benjo

  12. benjo maso said:

    "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "benjo maso" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "alex" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    >"trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >
    >>"Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le

    message

    Quoted message said:

    >>de
    >>news:[email hidden]...
    >>
    >>>On Sat, 28 May 2005 17:49:34 +0200, trg wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>Did he think he could ride away from Rujano there?
    >>>
    >>>If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    >>>like the Finestre, not Sestriere.
    >>>
    >>
    >>I don't agree. Di Luca is suited to steep climbs when they are short,
    >>like
    >>you find in the Classics. Not 18 Km long, though. The steeper and

    longer

    Quoted message said:

    >>the
    >>climb, the more that would advantage a pure climber like Rujano.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >I also think he may have shot himself on his foot and played in the
    >hand
    >of Savoldelli (by the way, what was Lotto's business in helping
    >Savoldelli?).

    Exactly what you say: business.

    Benjo

    Benjo's convinced that Ardila was paid off by Discovery to ride for
    Savoldelli, but his helping Savoldelli up the Finestre was immediately
    repaid in kind when he just sat on Savoldelli's line on the descent,
    picking
    up 30+ seconds when bridging to Van Huffelto to help him jump from 14 to
    11
    in the GC, and nearly into the top 10.

    I think I glimpsed Basso do something similar in the TT yesterday when he
    let himself get overtaken (was it Tiralongo) at the top of the climb so he
    could follow the other guy's line on the descent.

    If Ardila wasn't paid off by Salvodelli, he must be the dumbest rider of the
    peloton. Salvoldelli was all alone and losing the Giro. Of course he was
    quite happy to pay anybody willing to help him. After all, pro's are doning
    it all the time. Naturally it happens from time to time that two riders
    enter in a temporary alliance without money changing hands, but that's only
    possible if both parties are profiting more or less equally. Which wasn't
    the case this time: winning the Giro is of course a hundred times more
    important than bringing a teammate from a 14th to an 11th place. Finishing
    11th might be nice for Van Huffel personally, but is quite unimportant for
    the team (no extra coverage, no extra publicy). No rider is going to exhaust
    himself to provide a teammate for such little gain - except when he's paid
    of course.

    Benjo

    No extra coverage when you're leading the Gruppo Maglia Rosa up the last
    major offensive of the Giro d'Italia?? I don't think I would have seen
    either of them at all if they were anywhere else. I didn't see Van
    Huffel until he was right in front of Savoldelli.

    -Sonarrat.

  13. trg said:
    Quoted message said:

    If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    like the Finestre, not Sestriere.

    I don't agree. Di Luca is suited to steep climbs when they are short, like
    you find in the Classics. Not 18 Km long, though.

    He is *even* more suited to those, yes. But between the Finestre and
    Sestriere, the Finestre was for him. Look at the earlier stages, too.
    Wherever Simoni and Rujano could make a difference, ie. on the steeper
    parts, Di Luca could usually follow.

    Quoted message said:

    The steeper and longer the
    climb, the more that would advantage a pure climber like Rujano.

    So are you saying Rujano is just a cunning rat then by never coming to
    the front on the long, steep Finestre and dropping everyone on shorter,
    gradual Sestriere? Di Luca/Simoni/Rujano took 2 minutes out of
    Savoldelli on the 15 km long climb of the Finestre, and Rujano gained 30
    sec on Savoldelli in the last 4 km of Sestriere. Same difference.

    --
    Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  14. "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    news: [email hidden]...
    | On Sun, 29 May 2005 00:18:40 +0200, trg wrote:
    | >> If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper climbs
    | >> like the Finestre, not Sestriere.
    | >
    | > I don't agree. Di Luca is suited to steep climbs when they are short,
    like
    | > you find in the Classics. Not 18 Km long, though.
    |
    | He is *even* more suited to those, yes. But between the Finestre and
    | Sestriere, the Finestre was for him. Look at the earlier stages, too.
    | Wherever Simoni and Rujano could make a difference, ie. on the steeper
    | parts, Di Luca could usually follow.
    |
    | > The steeper and longer the
    | > climb, the more that would advantage a pure climber like Rujano.
    |
    | So are you saying Rujano is just a cunning rat then by never coming to
    | the front on the long, steep Finestre and dropping everyone on shorter,
    | gradual Sestriere? Di Luca/Simoni/Rujano took 2 minutes out of
    | Savoldelli on the 15 km long climb of the Finestre, and Rujano gained 30
    | sec on Savoldelli in the last 4 km of Sestriere. Same difference.
    |

    It's not that Rujano was cunning. According to him and his DS, the plan was
    to attack on the Finestre where he'd naturally have more of an advantage.
    But the pace was too high for an attack. So they decided to not pull, save
    his strength let the others do the work, and attack on the last climb.

    Had Di Luca not killed himself on the Finestre, it would have been he who
    was following and conserving energy. In addition, Rujano is a poor descender
    compared to Simoni and Di Luca If Rujano had managed to get away on the
    Finestre, there is a good chance Di Luca could have made up the time on the
    descent, especially if he was with Simoni. As it was, Rujano was able to
    follow Simoni and Di Luca's line since they all crested together, although
    he nearly went off the road on at least one occasion that I saw.

    I'm just saying that with only 8 seconds seperating Di Luca from Rujano, all
    things equal, IMO in a sprint Di Luca was the favorite to arrive first
    across the line and take the 20 seconds bonus, plus possibly a time gap,
    with a good chance even for Simoni to come in second if he contested the
    sprint with Rujano.

    As far as what DiLuca was thinking, maybe he really thought they had a
    chance to take 3 minutes out of Savoldelli? Or maybe he thought that if he
    arrived on the unpaved part of the climb with Rujano, he would have the
    advantage over thr rough stuff and could drop him and then make up more time
    on the descent. (Rujano did struggle more on the goatpath). But anyway, when
    I saw Di Luca doing the heavy lifting, I didn't see how it could work out
    for him. He wasn't gonna drop Rujano there.

  15. "benjo maso" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
    [email hidden]...
    |
    | "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    | news:[email hidden]...
    | > "benjo maso" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
    | > news:[email hidden]...
    | >>
    | >> "alex" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    | >> news:[email hidden]...
    | >> >
    | >> > "trg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    | >> > news:[email hidden]...
    | >> >> "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le
    | > message
    | >> >> de
    | >> >> news:[email hidden]...
    | >> >>> On Sat, 28 May 2005 17:49:34 +0200, trg wrote:
    | >> >>> > Did he think he could ride away from Rujano there?
    | >> >>>
    | >> >>> If anywhere, then there. Di Luca is more suited to the steeper
    climbs
    | >> >>> like the Finestre, not Sestriere.
    | >> >>>
    | >> >> I don't agree. Di Luca is suited to steep climbs when they are
    short,
    | >> >> like
    | >> >> you find in the Classics. Not 18 Km long, though. The steeper and
    | > longer
    | >> >> the
    | >> >> climb, the more that would advantage a pure climber like Rujano.
    | >> >>
    | >> >>
    | >> >
    | >> > I also think he may have shot himself on his foot and played in the
    | >> > hand
    | >> > of Savoldelli (by the way, what was Lotto's business in helping
    | >> > Savoldelli?).
    | >>
    | >> Exactly what you say: business.
    | >>
    | >> Benjo
    | >>
    | >>
    | >>
    | > Benjo's convinced that Ardila was paid off by Discovery to ride for
    | > Savoldelli, but his helping Savoldelli up the Finestre was immediately
    | > repaid in kind when he just sat on Savoldelli's line on the descent,
    | > picking
    | > up 30+ seconds when bridging to Van Huffelto to help him jump from 14 to
    | > 11
    | > in the GC, and nearly into the top 10.
    | >
    | > I think I glimpsed Basso do something similar in the TT yesterday when
    he
    | > let himself get overtaken (was it Tiralongo) at the top of the climb so
    he
    | > could follow the other guy's line on the descent.
    |
    | If Ardila wasn't paid off by Salvodelli, he must be the dumbest rider of
    the
    | peloton. Salvoldelli was all alone and losing the Giro. Of course he was
    | quite happy to pay anybody willing to help him. After all, pro's are
    doning
    | it all the time. Naturally it happens from time to time that two riders
    | enter in a temporary alliance without money changing hands, but that's
    only
    | possible if both parties are profiting more or less equally. Which wasn't
    | the case this time: winning the Giro is of course a hundred times more
    | important than bringing a teammate from a 14th to an 11th place. Finishing
    | 11th might be nice for Van Huffel personally, but is quite unimportant for
    | the team (no extra coverage, no extra publicy). No rider is going to
    exhaust
    | himself to provide a teammate for such little gain - except when he's paid
    | of course.
    |
    | Benjo
    |
    Maybe Ardila managed to get some Euros off of Savoldelli, but if so, it was
    for doing what was in his and his team's interest anyway-
    - a top 10 in GC
    -a n additional 12 Pro Tour Points
    - The Super Team trophy and the money that goes with it.
    Plus, Ardila was the designated leader in the GC, the others were supposed
    to work for him. Here he had a chance to return the favor for Van Huffel.

    It's not like Ardila had to save himself for a later stage.

  16. trg said:

    Maybe Ardila managed to get some Euros off of Savoldelli, but if so, it was
    for doing what was in his and his team's interest anyway-
    - a top 10 in GC
    -a n additional 12 Pro Tour Points
    - The Super Team trophy and the money that goes with it.
    Plus, Ardila was the designated leader in the GC, the others were supposed
    to work for him. Here he had a chance to return the favor for Van Huffel.

    Are you sure you don't have it backwards? Savoldelli was over a
    barrel. He was losing the Giro. He had to start talking in order
    to keep that from happening.

    How fortunate for Lotto that the pocket change stuff you listed
    happened to align with what Savoldelli had huge, huge incentive
    to get them to do.

    As Benjo said, if Ardila doesn't leverage Savoldelli's isolation
    and exposure to the loss of the race lead then he's a dumbass. OK,
    so maybe Benjo didn't say exactly that.

    Bob Schwartz
    [email hidden]

  17. alex said:

    Another strategy for him to get into the podium could have been to suck
    wheel to the top of Sestriere and sprint for the bonus seconds, possibly
    leaving Rujano 4th.

    Di Luca was thinking "I'm not going to cramp on Sestrieres."
    That's what.

  18. Quoted message said:

    Di Luca was thinking "I'm not going to cramp on Sestrieres."

    Telephone interview with Bruyneel today on Sporza's coverage of the last
    stage, and they pointed out (congratulated him on a good decision and
    asked about the logistics) that Discovery/Berry Floor was the only team
    to have three men with spare wheels and drinks distributed along the
    climb. Essentially, Simoni and Di Luca had nothing for 30 km up and over
    the Finestre. Of course, neither did Rujano but he survived.

    --
    Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  19. "Bill C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hey Benjo glad to see you back.
    Hope you didn't waste too much time arguing with that moron D. Spencer
    Hines.

    The last six month not a second :-)And before not more than a few minutes.

    Benjo


  20. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Benjo's convinced that Ardila was paid off by Discovery to ride for
    Savoldelli, but his helping Savoldelli up the Finestre was immediately
    repaid in kind when he just sat on Savoldelli's line on the descent,
    picking
    up 30+ seconds when bridging to Van Huffelto to help him jump from 14 to
    11
    in the GC, and nearly into the top 10.

    I think I glimpsed Basso do something similar in the TT yesterday when he
    let himself get overtaken (was it Tiralongo) at the top of the climb so he
    could follow the other guy's line on the descent.

    If Ardila wasn't paid off by Salvodelli, he must be the dumbest rider of the
    peloton. Salvoldelli was all alone and losing the Giro. Of course he was
    quite happy to pay anybody willing to help him. After all, pro's are doning
    it all the time. Naturally it happens from time to time that two riders
    enter in a temporary alliance without money changing hands, but that's only
    possible if both parties are profiting more or less equally. Which wasn't
    the case this time: winning the Giro is of course a hundred times more
    important than bringing a teammate from a 14th to an 11th place. Finishing
    11th might be nice for Van Huffel personally, but is quite unimportant for
    the team (no extra coverage, no extra publicy). No rider is going to exhaust
    himself to provide a teammate for such little gain - except when he's paid
    of course.

    Benjo

    What about Protour points? Lotto was leading the PT team's ranking
    until Catalunya when Rabobank took the lead. Now they're back on top.
    The team management stated multiple times that one of the objectives is
    to lead as long as possible, hoping to end the year as the best PT
    team.
    (http://www.uciprotour.com/home.asp?1stLevelID=za&level1=6&level2=0&idnews=3020)

    Kenny

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.