I don't know what you people did in this newsgroup, but it looks like a
whole litter of hackers and trolls is about to descend here. From what
I read on hacker central, the most notorious troll ever to hit a
newsgroup (troll no. 69) is coming out of retirement just because he
asked a legitimate question here and got roasted by some jokers. If I
were you people, I would issue a statement of apology in the newsgroup
or this place will be extinct, like the other Usenet newsgroups they
have wiped out.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
what the hell did you guys do?
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 30 October 2005
- Last activity
- 31 October 2005
- Original author
- Gene Long
- Posts
- 11
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 392
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Gene Long said:
I don't know what you people did in this newsgroup, but it looks like a
whole litter of hackers and trolls is about to descend here. From what
I read on hacker central, the most notorious troll ever to hit a
newsgroup (troll no. 69) is coming out of retirement just because he
asked a legitimate question here and got roasted by some jokers. If I
were you people, I would issue a statement of apology in the newsgroup
or this place will be extinct, like the other Usenet newsgroups they
have wiped out.I'm sorry you have such a pathetic life.
Is that sufficient?Rich
-
Gene Long said:
I don't know what you people did in this newsgroup, but it looks like a
whole litter of hackers and trolls is about to descend here. From what
I read on hacker central, the most notorious troll ever to hit a
newsgroup (troll no. 69) is coming out of retirement just because he
asked a legitimate question here and got roasted by some jokers. If I
were you people, I would issue a statement of apology in the newsgroup
or this place will be extinct, like the other Usenet newsgroups they
have wiped out.You're missing something. Usenet itself is dead; it just doesn't seem to
know it yet.I wonder what the average age of usenet contributers is -- 50?
--
David L. Johnson
__o | Enron's slogan: Respect, Communication, Integrity, and
_`\(,_ | Excellence.
(_)/ (_) | -
David L. Johnson said:
You're missing something. Usenet itself is dead; it just doesn't seem to
know it yet.I bet usenet has more users today then at anytime in the past. While
it's true that there are now alternatives, it's also true that more
people then ever have access to the web.Quoted message said:
I wonder what the average age of usenet contributers is -- 50?
By this logic, AARP is dead too.
Rich (< 50)
-
The worst troll in Usenet probably was S*rgar Ard*c. But he's been gone
perhaps ten years. As for wrecking a newsgroup, it takes two to tango.
All you have to do is ignore the OT posts and any post of those who
play that game, even the 10-20% of their posts that might be about what
this group is for. -
David L. Johnson said:
You're missing something. Usenet itself is dead; it just doesn't seem to
know it yet.I wonder what the average age of usenet contributers is -- 50?
Probably. I'm 24, but I'm the only person I know of who uses usenet.
Most people are using web-based forums.
Personally, I welcome this sort of migration. Usenet may yet revert to
being a smaller, more civilized place, like I hear it once was.-Luigi
-
David L. Johnson said:
You're missing something. Usenet itself is dead; it just doesn't seem to
know it yet.To paraphrase Frank Zappa: usenet isn't dead, it just smells funny.
--
John ([email hidden])
-
Luigi de Guzman said:
David L. Johnson said:
You're missing something. Usenet itself is dead; it just doesn't seem to
know it yet.I wonder what the average age of usenet contributers is -- 50?
Probably. I'm 24, but I'm the only person I know of who uses usenet.
Most people are using web-based forums.
I don't understand the appeal of web-based forums. They're slow, clunky,
have extremely limited text editors and are in general just plain
annoying. I'll take usenet any day.--
John ([email hidden])
-
In article <[email hidden]>,
John Thompson said:
Luigi de Guzman said:
David L. Johnson said:
You're missing something. Usenet itself is dead; it just doesn't seem to
know it yet.I wonder what the average age of usenet contributers is -- 50?
Probably. I'm 24, but I'm the only person I know of who uses usenet.
Most people are using web-based forums.
I don't understand the appeal of web-based forums. They're slow, clunky,
have extremely limited text editors and are in general just plain
annoying. I'll take usenet any day.Those who do not understand <foo> are condemned to reinvent it poorly
over HTTP.
Usenet isn't the first victim, and probably won't be the last.dave
--
Dave Vandervies [email hidden]
I don't think anyone in this thread (except possibly you) has lost his cool.
Most comp.lang.c regulars can compose a fierce and searing flame on occasion,
without becoming unduly heated in the process. --Richard Heathfield in CLC -
John Thompson <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:Quoted message said:
David L. Johnson said:
You're missing something. Usenet itself is dead; it just doesn't seem to
know it yet.To paraphrase Frank Zappa: usenet isn't dead, it just smells funny.
XD
--
---
END OF LINE. -
John Thompson said:
I don't understand the appeal of web-based forums. They're slow, clunky,
have extremely limited text editors and are in general just plain
annoying. I'll take usenet any day.The appeal? On the server side, it's easy to get 'em going.
On the user side: cute HTML formatting, graphical smileys, more cute HTML
tricks, oh, and most kids don't know any better.-L
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.