Quoted message said:I just looked at the inside cover of Herlihy's "The Bicycle" and saw
that the 1896 Waverly Belle's most interesting feature had been
hidden:
http://i10.tinypic.com/8101uuh.jpg
At first I wondered whether those gorgeous brass (?) disks on the rear
spokes were elaborate tie-and-solder fittings or just decorative
buttons.
But they aren't tie-and-solder, and they aren't decorative!
I counted them and found only a dozen disks, not nearly enough to
connect the crossings of what looked like 36 spokes or so.
So I counted the stupid spokes, thinking that maybe there were fewer
spokes than I thought.
Nope--it looked like 36 spokes, but there were still only 12 brass
dinguses when 18 would be needed to tie-and-solder three dozen spokes.
Finally I _looked_ at the damn things.
Have another look yourself.
Hint: count the spokes coming out of any dingus in _all_ directions.
Now do you see how weird that rear wheel is?
Apparently, Herlihy didn't notice how odd the wheel is:
"Waverly Belle, circa 1896, a lady's model by the Indiana Bicycle
Company, with a steel frame and wooden handlebars, fender, and chain
guard. (Pryor Dodge Collection)"
So is that a 24, 36, or 60 spoke rear wheel?
Incidentally, the front radial wheel is normal--as long as you
consider 30 spokes normal.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
Aha! Found it! Here's the mystery hub and spokes again:
http://i10.tinypic.com/8101uuh.jpg
Charles Duryea patented that silly thing in 1891, #459699:
http://patimg2.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=00459699&homeurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO1%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526d%3DPALL%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.htm%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526s1%3D0459699.PN.%2526OS%3DPN%2F0459699%2526RS%3DPN%2F0459699&PageNum=&Rtype=&SectionNum=&idkey=NONE&Input=View+first+page
"The first object I have in view is to provide a wheel of the type
known as 'tangent spokes,' in which the spokes shall not overlap or
cross each other."
http://patimg2.uspto.gov/.piw?docid=US000459699&PageNum=3&IDKey=5078BF5F9B99&HomeUrl=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1%2526Sect2=HITOFF%2526d=PALL%2526p=1%2526u=%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.htm%2526r=1%2526f=G%2526l=50%2526s1=0459699.PN.%2526OS=PN/0459699%2526RS=PN/0459699
So it looks as if Chuck achieved his noble ambition--or at least
suckered the Waverly Belle bike manufacturer into paying to license
his patent for non-crossing tangent spokes.
(Or maybe he owned the Waverly company?)
But I still can't see what the hell the point was. So what if tangent
spokes cross?
The patent includes lots of equally mysterious details about the rim.
Cheers,
Carl Fogel