I've gotten back on my Trek 790 after a l-o-n-g break from cycling, a result of 50 extra pounds gained over a decade of desk work. Anyhow, I dropped 30 pounds and have started cycling again.
A new bike is in the works, and I've been visiting bike shops, LBS, REI, Performance and "concept stores."
Today, I told a salesman at a Trek shop that I was interested in a Pilot 2.1 spa, but wanted to ride one before I committed to buying.
He said that would be a problem, 'cause they wouldn't order a bike for me to try.
"Well," I asked, "how am I supposed to know if I'm going to like the way it rides before I drop $1,500? How can I tell what the ride is like?"
The salesman replied that he's tell me to lower the tire pressure on a Pilot 2.1 non-spa to approximate the feel of the suspension.
Needless to say, I spoke with the manager, who said he's see about getting me a ride during a factory tour, when a rep brings a bunch of bikes around.
But really, c'mon. Who the hell buys an expensive bike sight unseen? Every thread I've read on buying a bike advises to ride the bikes under consideration.
This strikes me as a key flaw in the entire market; I ain't buying if I can't go for a test ride. Car dealers keep inventory on the lot; maybe bike manufacturers need to subsidize dealers to do the same.
But I was just astounded by the nonchalant attitude of the salesman, his assumption that some half-assed tire tweak would suffice.
So far, I'm less than impressed with the bike shopping experience.
Am I missing something here?