General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

What's with the Waterproofs?

Started by Nick Pedley · · Last activity · 31 posts · 1,079 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 August 2005
Last activity
26 August 2005
Original author
Nick Pedley
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,079
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Why are suitable waterproof jackets with good working features so hard to
    find at a reasonable price?

    All I want is one which is breathable, has nice big pockets to put maps and
    cameras into, is long enough to hang below my beltline and doesn't weigh a
    ton. I've been through 6 different stores and the sub £150 range is so
    limited it's unbelievable.
    Where do the likes of Field and Trek go to create their big reviews of
    thousands of jackets, half of them aren't even in the shops?
    You can have a light one with two miniscule pockets, a heavy one which is
    bulletproof, one with big pockets but only hangs down to your belly button,
    one with 7 pockets all angled, velcroed or zipped so you can't open them
    without dislocating your arm. You can have them in ludicrous pink, slime
    green or 'orrible orange but not a decent colour like navy blue or dark red.

    I would also like to be approached by clued up shop staff instead of being
    ignored for 15 minutes and then asked 'You alright there' from the far side
    of the shop, but that's a separate thread in itself...

    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!

    Nick

  2. Nick Pedley said:

    Why are suitable waterproof jackets with good working features so hard to
    find at a reasonable price?

    A good jacket costs money, 'cause it's spending money in the right paces
    that makes it good!

    Quoted message said:

    All I want is

    everything... ;-/

    Quoted message said:

    one which is breathable, has nice big pockets to put maps and
    cameras into, is long enough to hang below my beltline and doesn't weigh a
    ton.

    How about one of these?
    http://store.securehosting.com/stores/sh207371/shophome.php?itemcode=14

    Quoted message said:

    Where do the likes of Field and Trek go to create their big reviews of
    thousands of jackets, half of them aren't even in the shops?

    If they stocked thousands then they'd cost even more.

    Quoted message said:

    You can have a light one with two miniscule pockets, a heavy one which is
    bulletproof, one with big pockets but only hangs down to your belly button,
    one with 7 pockets all angled, velcroed or zipped so you can't open them
    without dislocating your arm. You can have them in ludicrous pink, slime
    green or 'orrible orange but not a decent colour like navy blue or dark red.

    That Rab doesn't look the above problems apply... Track one down and see
    if it fits well. At least it's a start.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, Nick Pedley
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    Why are suitable waterproof jackets with good working features so hard to
    find at a reasonable price?

    I have a Mountain Equipment Dri-Lite plus jacket that appears to fit
    your description. Light, breathable, two large pockets plus a map pocket
    and goes half way down my derriere (size M and I am only 5'7" so on a
    taller person it may not get as far). List price is £80 I think.

    See this page for details (mine is the standard not the Alpine):

    http://www.mountain-equipment.co.uk/waterproofs/drilite-plus.html

    Mine was a second because the ME logo was upside down! Cost me £40 from
    Magic Mountain in Glossop.

    UK stockists:

    http://www.mountain-equipment.co.uk/ukstockists/index.html

    --

    Dominic Sexton

  4. Nick Pedley said:

    All I want is one which is breathable, has nice big pockets to put maps and
    cameras into, is long enough to hang below my beltline and doesn't weigh a
    ton.

    I use a Berghaus PacLite Trek ~£125/439g which fulfills criteria 1,3 &
    4. Whether the pockets are big enough depends upon the size of your
    camera.

    2 x Hand warmer - 18x32
    1 x Waterproof pocket - 15x32

    My Canon PowerShot A70 and Yashica T4 fit in easily enough, but I
    wouldn't want anything bulkier in the jacket.

    Quoted message said:

    Where do the likes of Field and Trek go to create their big reviews of
    thousands of jackets, half of them aren't even in the shops?

    I hate shops for this reason. I buy online and send it back if it's
    not up to spec. It's easily worth the return postage compared with the
    time and money I've wasted over the years looking for stuff that isn't
    in stock in retail stores.

    Quoted message said:

    I would also like to be approached by clued up shop staff

    Get your information from reviews and forums rather than from people
    with an interest in selling stuff.

    Daytona

  5. Daytona said:

    Get your information from reviews and forums rather than from people
    with an interest in selling stuff.

    But people with a genuine interest in customer service can be much
    better than someone on a 'net forum. Compared to the average employee
    at Tiso's I've probably seen far fewer jackets up close and personal on
    a regular basis, for example. A /good/ shop where the staff know what's
    what is IME well worth visiting.

    Furthermore, the standard of review from A.N. Other Poster isn't
    necessarily that great. They have a very singular context, often don't
    have much experience of the numerous alternatives and often have a
    vested interest in justifying the quality of their purchase to
    themselves. That's not to say that such reviews are of no use, but they
    need to have their limitations considered when reading them.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  6. Peter Clinch said:
    Daytona said:

    Get your information from reviews and forums rather than from people
    with an interest in selling stuff.

    But people with a genuine interest in customer service can be much
    better than someone on a 'net forum.

    The problem is the time and effort spent finding someone who can give
    such balanced, impartial information. I find it less time consuming,
    easier and cheaper to get information from a number of internet posts
    and reviews. Increasingly, knowledgable employees are using net forums
    to help customers and potential customers and because the advice is
    published on open forum it is open for discussion.

    Quoted message said:

    Compared to the average employee
    at Tiso's I've probably seen far fewer jackets up close and personal on
    a regular basis, for example.

    Sure but they're not impartial, which renders their advice suspect.

    Quoted message said:

    Furthermore, the standard of review from A.N. Other Poster isn't
    necessarily that great.

    But it quickly allows you to get a consensus of opinion which, along
    with reviews, allows you to draw up a shortlist.

    Daytona

  7. Daytona said:

    The problem is the time and effort spent finding someone who can give
    such balanced, impartial information.

    But of course the search is something that only needs to be done once.

    Quoted message said:

    I find it less time consuming,
    easier and cheaper to get information from a number of internet posts
    and reviews.

    Less time consuming collating a number of different sources of variable
    reliability than one of well known reliability? Sorry, that just
    doesn't make any sense.

    Quoted message said:

    Sure but they're not impartial, which renders their advice suspect.

    /Nobody/ is impartial, as everyone will make subjective judgements.
    Good reviewers, and good shop staff, are as impartial as they can be.
    And good staff know that repeat business is the key to business, and
    they don't get that by selling you rubbish.

    Quoted message said:

    But it quickly allows you to get a consensus of opinion which, along
    with reviews, allows you to draw up a shortlist.

    For certain values of "quickly", but if the bulk of the opinion isn't
    worth much then having more of it isn't really an asset. Most people
    are very bad equipment reviewers, is the bottom line. For example, if
    you read OutdoorsMagic's guidelines on reviews then most stuff should be
    3 star ("most products should fit this grade"😉, yet if you look through
    the lists there is a disproportionate amount of 4 and 5 star reviews
    with very few 3s in there. Something wrong with that picture.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  8. Peter Clinch said:
    Daytona said:

    The problem is the time and effort spent finding someone who can give
    such balanced, impartial information.

    But of course the search is something that only needs to be done once.

    Quoted message said:

    I find it less time consuming,
    easier and cheaper to get information from a number of internet posts
    and reviews.

    Less time consuming collating a number of different sources of variable
    reliability than one of well known reliability? Sorry, that just
    doesn't make any sense.

    Travel time - I don't have a good source in my local or county town/s.
    I place a review by someone in TGO above that of a shop assistant and
    a single post from an unknown poster.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sure but they're not impartial, which renders their advice suspect.

    /Nobody/ is impartial, as everyone will make subjective judgements.

    Nothing stops them from making the basis of their finding clear.

    Quoted message said:

    Good reviewers, and good shop staff, are as impartial as they can be.
    And good staff know that repeat business is the key to business, and
    they don't get that by selling you rubbish.

    Quoted message said:

    But it quickly allows you to get a consensus of opinion which, along
    with reviews, allows you to draw up a shortlist.

    For certain values of "quickly", but if the bulk of the opinion isn't
    worth much then having more of it isn't really an asset. Most people
    are very bad equipment reviewers, is the bottom line. For example, if
    you read OutdoorsMagic's guidelines on reviews then most stuff should be
    3 star ("most products should fit this grade"😉, yet if you look through
    the lists there is a disproportionate amount of 4 and 5 star reviews
    with very few 3s in there. Something wrong with that picture.

    It's all about the weight you give to various sources. Giving greater
    weight to what's written rather than a number of stars is sensible.

    Daytona

  9. Nick Pedley said:

    Why are suitable waterproof jackets with good working features so hard to
    find at a reasonable price?

    All I want is one which is breathable, has nice big pockets to put maps and
    cameras into, is long enough to hang below my beltline and doesn't weigh a
    ton. I've been through 6 different stores and the sub £150 range is so
    limited it's unbelievable.
    Where do the likes of Field and Trek go to create their big reviews of
    thousands of jackets, half of them aren't even in the shops?
    You can have a light one with two miniscule pockets, a heavy one which is
    bulletproof, one with big pockets but only hangs down to your belly button,
    one with 7 pockets all angled, velcroed or zipped so you can't open them
    without dislocating your arm. You can have them in ludicrous pink, slime
    green or 'orrible orange but not a decent colour like navy blue or dark red.

    I would also like to be approached by clued up shop staff instead of being
    ignored for 15 minutes and then asked 'You alright there' from the far side
    of the shop, but that's a separate thread in itself...

    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!

    Nick

    I like buying jackets at sales.

    As a result, I now have 4 jackets that will last at least 10 more years.
    All were bought at bargain discount. My Spreyway cost £90, but the
    retail was £180 - coz the firm had a fire and it had a bit of smoke
    smelling from it - but no damage at all.

    Another Goretex jacket cost £40 quid coz it was a salesman's sample.

    I just couldn't bare thinking about paying £150+ for a jacket.

    Jhimmy

  10. Nick Pedley said:

    Why are suitable waterproof jackets with good working features so hard to
    find at a reasonable price?

    I would seriously consider the Paramo range, especially the Alta II jacket.
    This stuff is - by a long way - the best stuff to wear in a torrential
    downpour.

    --
    Andy Howell
    Birmingham, UK

    To mail simply put back the dots ...

  11. Daytona said:

    Travel time - I don't have a good source in my local or county town/s.

    But you probably don't have a major hillwalking venue there either.
    There's no shortage of opportunities to purchase and try equipment
    nearer to your use areas. I've sent a lot of custom Braemar Mountain's
    way over the years, but I don't drive 65 miles any time I want anything.

    Quoted message said:

    I place a review by someone in TGO above that of a shop assistant and
    a single post from an unknown poster.

    As do I in Chris's case, because I think he's very good at reviewing.
    But it's still from his perspective rather than mine. I prefer walking
    in Tracksters, he doesn't. Both of us are right for our own cases.
    Who's right in someone else's?

    Quoted message said:

    Nothing stops them from making the basis of their finding clear.

    Then it's a shame so many people are so bad at it. And the same goes
    for someone in a shop too. They typically use equipment as well as
    selling it, of course.

    Quoted message said:

    It's all about the weight you give to various sources. Giving greater
    weight to what's written rather than a number of stars is sensible.

    But the stars are informed by what's written, and what's written is that
    rather more than 50% is much better than average.

    I'm not saying your methods are bad, just that they aren't a clearly
    superior method with all the aces. For example, if you only try on
    stuff that gets posted to you and it fits /okay/, you won't send it back
    and will never find if another product fits you much *better*.
    For myself, I use a mixture of sources, and I wouldn't like to rule any
    of them out.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  12. Nick Pedley said:

    Why are suitable waterproof jackets with good working features so hard to
    find at a reasonable price?

    All I want is one which is breathable, has nice big pockets to put maps and
    cameras into, is long enough to hang below my beltline and doesn't weigh a
    ton. I've been through 6 different stores and the sub £150 range is so
    limited it's unbelievable.
    Where do the likes of Field and Trek go to create their big reviews of
    thousands of jackets, half of them aren't even in the shops?
    You can have a light one with two miniscule pockets, a heavy one which is
    bulletproof, one with big pockets but only hangs down to your belly button,
    one with 7 pockets all angled, velcroed or zipped so you can't open them
    without dislocating your arm. You can have them in ludicrous pink, slime
    green or 'orrible orange but not a decent colour like navy blue or dark red.

    Here's a Berghaus Paclite (very nice jacket) reduced to £127.49. Check
    Google for reviews.

    http://www.gear-zone.co.uk/eshop/Berghaus-Paclite-Jacket.html

    Quoted message said:


    I would also like to be approached by clued up shop staff instead of being
    ignored for 15 minutes and then asked 'You alright there' from the far side
    of the shop, but that's a separate thread in itself...

    Amen to that... start the thread: I'm sure we've all experienced it
    over and over again... 🙂

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    "The most important job is not to be governor, or first lady in my case."
    g.w.AT [guessthisbit].com

  13. Nick Pedley said:

    Why are suitable waterproof jackets with good working features so hard to
    find at a reasonable price?

    All I want is one which is breathable, has nice big pockets to put maps and
    cameras into, is long enough to hang below my beltline and doesn't weigh a

    Incidentally, try hanging your camera from the waistband (or other
    convenient strap) of your rucksack. If it's in your pocket it can't be
    particularly big, and there are lots of padded cases around. That way
    it's immediately available - I've not had a problem with mine using it
    that way for well over a decade.

    Good luck 🙂

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    "The future will be better tomorrow."
    g.w.AT [guessthisbit].com

  14. Peter Clinch said:
    Daytona said:

    The problem is the time and effort spent finding someone who can give
    such balanced, impartial information.

    But of course the search is something that only needs to be done once.

    What if there isn't such a shop locally? There isn't one where I live,
    and I suspect there won't be one where most people live, unless they
    live in a very large city.

    I've learned to rely on myself for these things, as well as the
    opinions of people online and in magazines who I've come to trust over
    time. People just dipping in, on the other hand, take pot luck.

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    //SigChanger V2.1.0 - Variable signatures

  15. On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:00:02 GMT, Jhimmy <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I just couldn't bare thinking about paying £150+ for a jacket.

    What a pity!
    ;-)

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    "Will the highways on the internet become more few?."
    g.w.AT [guessthisbit].com

  16. On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:54:12 GMT, Andy Howell
    <andy.howellNOSPAM@ecotrendDOTorgDOTuk> wrote:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    I would seriously consider the Paramo range, especially the Alta II jacket.
    This stuff is - by a long way - the best stuff to wear in a torrential
    downpour.

    <fx: gasp!...>

    <Trots away at break-neck pace to avoid firefight...>

    Best wishes,
    --
    ,,
    (**)PeeWiglet~~
    / \ / \ pee AT [guessthisbit].co.uk

    "You cannot be President of the United States if you don't have faith.
    Remember Lincoln, going to his knees in time of trial and the Civil War
    and all that stuff. You can't be. And we are blessed. So don't feel sorry
    for -- don't cry for me, Argentina."
    g.w.AT [guessthisbit].c

  17. Peewiglet said:

    Here's a Berghaus Paclite (very nice jacket) reduced to £127.49. Check
    Google for reviews.

    http://www.gear-zone.co.uk/eshop/Berghaus-Paclite-Jacket.html

    Too short though ? Hence my suggestion of the longer Trek variant.

    Press and user reviews on the Berghaus website
    <URL:http://www.berghaus.com/the_gear/show_products.asp?product_hierarchy_id=24&prod_hierarchy_lev1=24&prod_hierarchy_lev2=24&prod_hierarchy_lev4=none&submit1=--+Display+Products+-->
    also on TGO once you register (free)
    <URL:http://www.tgomagazine.co.uk/>

    Daytona

  18. On 20/8/05 19:02, in article [email hidden],

    Peewiglet said:

    Amen to that... start the thread: I'm sure we've all experienced it
    over and over again... 🙂

    In general, I find that good walking shop staff are pretty good. Special
    mention to Field and Trek in Maiden Lane, Covent Garden, to the Manager of
    Snow and Rock in Birmingham and to the ever wonderful Stewart Cunningham in
    Betwys-y-Coed.

    Only yesterday I found myself buying an Osprey Atmos pack and having a
    rather delightful hour long conversation with the manager about packs,
    appropriate pack sizes for different types of walks, the joys of the Malvern
    Hills and Snowdonia and much more besides.

    I suppose, though, this might be why other customers are left on their own
    for so long !!!

    --
    Andy Howell
    Birmingham, UK

    To mail simply put back the dots ...

  19. On 20/8/05 19:06, in article [email hidden],

    Peewiglet said:

    I've learned to rely on myself for these things, as well as the
    opinions of people online and in magazines who I've come to trust over
    time. People just dipping in, on the other hand, take pot luck.

    Good points these. Even in a relatively big place like Birmingham there is
    not a great choice in terms of walking shops. (I got quite excited last year
    when Field & Trek took over the YHA shop but it is now closing down). I, for
    one, would rather make up my own mind after reading on-line comments from
    real users than listening to some Saturday assistant pretending to be a
    walker ...

    --
    Andy Howell
    Birmingham, UK

    To mail simply put back the dots ...

  20. On 20/8/05 19:09, in article [email hidden],

    Peewiglet said:

    <Trots away at break-neck pace to avoid firefight...>

    One now faces a terrible problem. I really don't think that there is any
    other Paramo gear that I need! This kind of renders walking shopping
    redundant!

    Mind you - and thinking about the onset of winter - these gaiters are
    beginning to look a bit grubby. Surely Paramo ones are better?

    --
    Andy Howell
    Birmingham, UK

    To mail simply put back the dots ...

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.