limerickman said:I didn't see any comments from Vino about tactics, I have to say.
The only comment I read was that he was in the TDF to support JU for overall GC.
Vino has been feeling his oats lately:
"Jan [Ullrich], Andreas [Klöden] and I are all towards the top of the general classification and we have managed to show Armstrong on Saturday that we could attack him from all sides. Until now, we had never had the opportunity to start the Tour together and it’s a considerable advantage. I personally never thought that Armstrong was unbeatable."
“The instructions are very clear: the team will work for whoever turns out to be the strongest of the three of us… We know that, with two or even three of us, we can pool our resources to endanger Armstrong,”
"The only team which could make me leave T-Mobile is Discovery Channel. I’ll certainly be making a choice between those two,” (This comment in particular troubles me, in that it suggests that an offer has been made and that Vino is considering it. Even if true, it seems like a slap in the face to T-Mobile to make this admission in the midst of a Tour battle. If it's not true, then Vino is counting his chickens a bit too early (one of them leads him in the GC now, in fact. 😉 )
Vino has made other comments recently in which he's been a little dismissive of Disco's tactics, along the lines of "I won't ride that way; I only know how to attack, etc." In context, the implication is that Disco's methods are worthy of disdain as opposed to his risk-taking style. As I have said, while I applaud cyclists like Vino who have taken risks and made the Tour more exciting, and while I think the traditional romantic notion of the "go for it all" cyclist is an appealing one, in the end the guy standing at the top of the podium on the last day usually looks pretty good, even if he's cold and calculating in his process to get there.