Quoted post said:Doug Freyburger said:Worthless Person <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:AUTOPSY REVEALED VERY CLOGGED ARTERIES
Quoted message said:Ah, so the lies start. There was no autopsy.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:THIS IS LIKELY THE RESULT OF
HEAVY AMOUNTS OF FAT INTAKE ON HIS DIET.
Quoted message said:In fact, when he had a heart attack from a virus infection his
comparatively clear arteries helped him recover.
Technically, I don't believe he ever had a heart attack, did he?
Interesting point. The word "heart attack" isn't a good technical
term as it describes several different sorts of heart problems.
Quoted message said:He
did have a viral infection of the heart, which can cause arrythmias
and caused him to pass out at least once, where his colleage revived
him. His heart may actually have stopped.
His heart did stop. Cardiac arrest. It's one of the meanings
that people use for "heart attack" but it does not suggest the
cause.
Quoted message said:But heart attack means
myocardial infarction, which requires the blood supply to the heart to
be cut off, causing muscle damage.
Right. Cardiac arrest caused by a viral infection not myocardial
infarction caused by blockage.
It's fun how folks who lie about stuff like an autopsy also play
word games to make it sound like he had blocked arteries when
there isn't evidence of that.
It was a *very* bad idea for his family to object to an autopsy.
They got to make that choice but it gave extremely bad press
to that low carb movement which was Dr A's quest for most of
his adult life. Refusing an autopsy was putting their values
ahead of his values. Sure, funerals are supposed to be for the
living not for the dead, but an autopsy is not a funeral ...