Road Cycling · Public discussion

What is a Spammer?

Started by Edward Dolan · · Last activity · 8 posts · 214 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 October 2006
Last activity
17 October 2006
Original author
Edward Dolan
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
214
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Spammers are perhaps the most innocuous of all Usenet pests. They mostly
    post their messages in original posts and so they are very easy to ignore.
    Such spammers never bother me in the slightest.

    However, there are occasionally spammers who will insert their messages into
    various on-going threads. This is indeed very annoying and brings out the
    rage in everyone. Ed Gin (Johnny NoCom) of ARBR was such a spammer, but I
    think when you do this you are more of a troll than a spammer.

    The best thing you can do with a spammer is NEVER, I repeat NEVER, respond -
    period. Most will quickly go away never to be heard from again. However,
    there are some spammers who seem to hang around forever. But you soon
    recognize who they are and then it becomes extremely easy to ignore them.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

  2. Edward Dolan said:

    Spammers are perhaps the most innocuous of all Usenet pests. They mostly
    post their messages in original posts and so they are very easy to ignore.
    Such spammers never bother me in the slightest.

    However, there are occasionally spammers who will insert their messages into
    various on-going threads. This is indeed very annoying and brings out the
    rage in everyone. Ed Gin (Johnny NoCom) of ARBR was such a spammer, but I
    think when you do this you are more of a troll than a spammer.

    The best thing you can do with a spammer is NEVER, I repeat NEVER, respond -
    period. Most will quickly go away never to be heard from again. However,
    there are some spammers who seem to hang around forever. But you soon
    recognize who they are and then it becomes extremely easy to ignore them.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

    spamming is defined by the anti-spam bots.

    Thats why you don't see any "enlarge your penis" posts on usenet -
    because the bots make it too laborious for them to spam.

    AI and anti-spam is a serious industry mate. By definition, if a post
    gets through onto usenet its NOT SPAM.

    Get it?

  3. Quoted message said:
    Edward Dolan said:

    Spammers are perhaps the most innocuous of all Usenet pests. They mostly
    post their messages in original posts and so they are very easy to ignore.
    Such spammers never bother me in the slightest.

    However, there are occasionally spammers who will insert their messages into
    various on-going threads. This is indeed very annoying and brings out the
    rage in everyone. Ed Gin (Johnny NoCom) of ARBR was such a spammer, but I
    think when you do this you are more of a troll than a spammer.

    The best thing you can do with a spammer is NEVER, I repeat NEVER, respond -
    period. Most will quickly go away never to be heard from again. However,
    there are some spammers who seem to hang around forever. But you soon
    recognize who they are and then it becomes extremely easy to ignore them.

    Regards,

    Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
    aka
    Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

    spamming is defined by the anti-spam bots.

    Thats why you don't see any "enlarge your penis" posts on usenet -
    because the bots make it too laborious for them to spam.

    AI and anti-spam is a serious industry mate. By definition, if a post
    gets through onto usenet its NOT SPAM.

    Get it?

    Would you consider this post that made it to Usenet spam:
    <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/msg/b9b24ce5b94dcf93?dmode=source>?

    Admittedly, such messages are rare on Usenet compared to email.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Here, not there.

  4. "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Edward Dolan wrote:


    snip

    It's for undoing muts.

    Ken. ;-)

  5. Kenneth Clements said:

    "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Edward Dolan wrote:


    snip

    It's for undoing muts.

    Ken. ;-)

    Had to thimk about that one for a bit...mice, but a bit difficult for
    this Yamkee to catch at first.

    Dan

  6. "Dan B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Kenneth Clements said:

    "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    [email hidden] wrote:
    > Edward Dolan wrote:
    snip

    It's for undoing muts.

    Ken. ;-)

    Had to thimk about that one for a bit...mice, but a bit difficult for
    this Yamkee to catch at first.

    Dan


    Produced sonethimg of a nemtal wremch did it?

  7. Resound said:

    "Dan B." <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Kenneth Clements wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's for undoing muts.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Had to thimk about that one for a bit...mice, but a bit difficult for
    this Yamkee to catch at first.

    Quoted message said:

    Produced sonethimg of a nemtal wremch did it?

    <applause>

    Theo

  8. Resound said:

    "Dan B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Kenneth Clements said:

    "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > [email hidden] wrote:
    >> Edward Dolan wrote:
    >snip

    It's for undoing muts.

    Ken. ;-)

    Had to thimk about that one for a bit...mice, but a bit difficult for
    this Yamkee to catch at first.

    Dan


    Produced sonethimg of a nemtal wremch did it?

    *groan*

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.