General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

What happened to Winter?

Started by Topcounsel · · Last activity · 21 posts · 1,252 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
17 March 2004
Last activity
18 March 2004
Original author
Topcounsel
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,252
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Sheesh. Winter doesn't even officially end until March 20th,
    and here in California's San Gabriel Valley we've been
    having temps in the 90's! I went to the track at lunch
    yesterday, but the 90-degree ambient temperature was
    amplified inside the stadium like a giant sun-bowl to
    probably 100 degrees. I ran two miles, and was absolutely
    drenched. Then they released a coed PE class to walk laps in
    that heat, and the track was swamped with 70-80 kids to
    boot. The very rare case where I bailed on a workout. Today
    is even hotter.

    But it leads to a question: Is there a simple rough
    equivalent for comparing air-oxygen changes due to rises in
    temperature of the air with air-oxygen changes due to rises
    in elevation? Hot air is less dense, and has less oxygen.
    Ditto for air at high elevations.

    What I'm getting at is, can you say, for example, that a 10-
    degree temperature increase is like a 2,000-foot elevation
    increase (or whatever the figures come out to)? (Laying
    aside all the other effects of the heat!)

  2. "TopCounsel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Sheesh. Winter doesn't even officially end until March
    20th, and here in California's San Gabriel Valley we've
    been having temps in the 90's!

    I'll trade you. We are in the middle of a pretty serious
    winter storm here, complete with very high winds and a
    generous dumping of snow.

    cheers,
    --
    David (in Hamilton, ON) www.allfalldown.org "The most
    insecure people are the ones you see, putting other people
    down constantly."

  3. Quoted message said:

    We are in the middle of a pretty serious winter storm here,
    complete with very


    high winds and a generous dumping of snow.

    I was going to blame our winter heat on Global Warming, but
    I guess it isn't very global after all...

  4. TopCounsel said:

    I was going to blame our winter heat on Global Warming,
    but I guess it isn't very global after all...

    actually, global warming leads to weird climate changes all
    over and it doesn't have to mean only heating up. heat here,
    cold there, rain elsewhere ...

    today we had 89F. not as bad as january last year when we
    had 90+ F.

  5. Topcounsel said:

    Sheesh. Winter doesn't even officially end until March
    20th, and here in California's San Gabriel Valley we've
    been having temps in the 90's! I went to the track at lunch
    yesterday, but the 90-degree ambient temperature was
    amplified inside the stadium like a giant sun-bowl to
    probably 100 degrees. I ran two miles, and was absolutely
    drenched.

    Not everywhere. Here in Monarch Beach it was FOG: Almost all
    day, high of 71. Yesterday, I had a track workout with some
    college track runners (I mean blocks and hurdles, not runing
    laps), and it was barely warm enough to run with my shirt
    off. Around here that qualifies as winter.

    Winter in So Cal: when it gets below 68 degrees, the native
    Californians put their winter coats on....

    Lyndon "Speed Kills...It kills those that don't have it!"
    --US Olympic Track Coach Brooks Johnson

  6. TopCounsel said:

    Sheesh. Winter doesn't even officially end until March
    20th, and here in California's San Gabriel Valley we've
    been having temps in the 90's!

    We're finally getting our March snow, although not the
    couple feet dumps that we sometimes get - at least not yet.
    But we're only half way through 🙂

    I felt naked last Thursday - no snowshoes, 1 layer over t-
    shirt, no wind shell - and running in slush. Those
    circumstances resolved by Sunday when I could run (regular)
    on firm snow. Then it snowed a few inches again between
    yesterday and today - which has now covered the re-frozen
    ice, but not enough for traction.

    Quoted message said:


    But it leads to a question: Is there a simple rough
    equivalent for comparing air-oxygen changes due to rises
    in temperature of the air with air-oxygen changes due to
    rises in elevation? Hot air is less dense, and has less
    oxygen. Ditto for air at high elevations.

    What I'm getting at is, can you say, for example, that a
    10-degree temperature increase is like a 2,000-foot
    elevation increase (or whatever the figures come out to)?
    (Laying aside all the other effects of the heat!)

    This might be what you're looking for (density altitude
    calculations from aviation)
    wahiduddin.netcalc da.htm

    with background info here
    wahiduddin.netdensity altitude.htm

    OR a simpler version is about 6.5C/km (approximately
    3.5F/1000ft)
    vortex.plymouth.edulayers.html

    OTOH, I just realized last night that my watch didn't have a
    Feb 29 and it's been indicating one day fast for 2 weeks
    (and I thought it was the Iditarod causing my problems 😉,
    and the above might be wrong or not what you're looking for.

    Dot

    --
    "Success is different things to different people" -Bernd
    Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

  7. Lyndon said:


    Winter in So Cal: when it gets below 68 degrees, the
    native Californians put their winter coats on....

    and Alaskans have long since melted 🙂

    Dot

    --
    "Success is different things to different people" -Bernd
    Heinrich in Racing the Antelope

  8. Quoted message said:

    today we had 89F. not as bad as january last year when we
    had 90+ F.

    When are you Yankee numpties going to catch up with the
    civilised world and use degrees Celsius when discussing
    temperature?

  9. I tan I epi tas said:

    On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:07:38 +0000 (UTC), jobin@REMOVE-DEEZ-

    WORDS.cs.ucr.edu said:

    today we had 89F. not as bad as january last year when we
    had 90+ F.

    When are you Yankee numpties going to catch up with the
    civilised world and use degrees Celsius when discussing
    temperature?

    We fought a bloody war so we wouldn't have to use those
    bloody measures. Remember the red coats getting their ass
    kicked. 😉

    --
    Doug Freese "Caveat Lector" [email hidden]

  10. [email hidden] (TopCounsel) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    We are in the middle of a pretty serious winter storm
    here, complete with very


    high winds and a generous dumping of snow.

    I was going to blame our winter heat on Global Warming,
    but I guess it isn't very global after all...

    The thing a bout global warming that I have not seen anyone
    present is this:

    We are likely in a transition from one relatively stable
    global temperature to another higher global average. In that
    transition there is and will be turbulence. So there will be
    times and places where is will be COLDER than historical
    averages, even as the GLOBAL average temperature rises.

    So if you doubt Global Warming just because you had a colder
    or longer winter, you are really only fooling yourself.

    Now back to your regularly scheduled running program! Ed

  11. On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:20:49 GMT, Doug Freese <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    We fought a bloody war so we wouldn't have to use those
    bloody measures.

    Methinks you fought your War of Independence not for
    purposes of avoiding implementing the Celsius/Metric scales,
    but because you're a deeply fragmented people who are only
    unified in times of an easily identified internal or
    external threat, vis, 'evil' people within or without the
    USofA (in this instance, the beastly Red Indians or the
    decadent Brits).

    Without an enemy to thwack you have nothing against which to
    measure yourselves. You are lost, prone to internal angst,
    like a bully who has no-one to fight. No wonder you
    'encourage' the emerging nations of the world to queue up to
    take a swing at you.

  12. Yep, that 95° heat on Sunday the 7th dashed my 4:20 L.A.
    Marathon goal. I've decided my next marathon will be one in
    the 40°'s, wherever that may take me.

    M.T.

    On 17 Mar 2004 00:14:12 GMT, [email hidden]

    (TopCounsel) said:

    Sheesh. Winter doesn't even officially end until March
    20th, and here in California's San Gabriel Valley we've
    been having temps in the 90's! I went to the track at lunch
    yesterday, but the 90-degree ambient temperature was
    amplified inside the stadium like a giant sun-bowl to
    probably 100 degrees. I ran two miles, and was absolutely
    drenched. Then they released a coed PE class to walk laps
    in that heat, and the track was swamped with 70-80 kids to
    boot. The very rare case where I bailed on a workout. Today
    is even hotter.

    But it leads to a question: Is there a simple rough
    equivalent for comparing air-oxygen changes due to rises in
    temperature of the air with air-oxygen changes due to rises
    in elevation? Hot air is less dense, and has less oxygen.
    Ditto for air at high elevations.

    What I'm getting at is, can you say, for example, that a
    10-degree temperature increase is like a 2,000-foot
    elevation increase (or whatever the figures come out to)?
    (Laying aside all the other effects of the heat!)

  13. I tan I epi tas said:

    Methinks

    You usually get into trouble with this premise, thinking.

    Quoted message said:

    Without an enemy to thwack you have nothing against which
    to measure yourselves. You are lost, prone to internal
    angst, like a bully who has no-one to fight. No wonder you
    'encourage' the emerging nations of the world to queue up
    to take a swing at you.

    Please don't confuse our war mongering A-hole president with
    the general public. Shall I equate you with the current 10
    Downing Street resident Tony Blair?

    --
    Doug Freese "Caveat Lector" [email hidden]

  14. "Doug Freese" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    I tan I epi tas said:

    Methinks

    You usually get into trouble with this premise, thinking.

    Quoted message said:

    Without an enemy to thwack you have nothing against
    which to measure yourselves. You are lost, prone to
    internal angst, like a bully


    who

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    has no-one to fight. No wonder you 'encourage' the
    emerging


    nations

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of the world to queue up to take a swing at you.

    Please don't confuse our war mongering A-hole president
    with the general public.

    Doug, you swapped the order here by mistake. Don't confuse
    some of the a-hole people with the president.

    Shall I equate you with the current 10 Downing

    Quoted message said:

    Street resident Tony Blair?

    --
    Doug Freese "Caveat Lector" [email hidden]

  15. On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:31:26 GMT, Doug Freese <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Shall I equate you with the current 10 Downing Street
    resident Tony Blair?

    Hmm, let me see...

    An attractive, balding, egotist with an eccentric wife, wild
    kids, living a life beyond his means, employed in a job
    that's about to crumble around his ears, driving in
    expensive cars, meeting strange and interesting people,
    responsible for conflicts based on his imaginings and not on
    reality, and with a legion of young female admirers.

    Why Douglas! You have me sussed!

  16. [email hidden] (TopCounsel) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Sheesh. Winter doesn't even officially end until March
    20th, and here in California's San Gabriel Valley we've
    been having temps in the 90's! I went to the track at
    lunch yesterday, but the 90-degree ambient temperature was
    amplified inside the stadium like a giant sun-bowl to
    probably 100 degrees. I ran two miles, and was absolutely
    drenched. Then they released a coed PE class to walk laps
    in that heat, and the track was swamped with 70-80 kids to
    boot. The very rare case where I bailed on a workout.
    Today is even hotter.

    But it leads to a question: Is there a simple rough
    equivalent for comparing air-oxygen changes due to rises
    in temperature of the air with air-oxygen changes due to
    rises in elevation? Hot air is less dense, and has less
    oxygen. Ditto for air at high elevations.

    What I'm getting at is, can you say, for example, that a
    10-degree temperature increase is like a 2,000-foot
    elevation increase (or whatever the figures come out to)?
    (Laying aside all the other effects of the heat!)

    oh shut up. In California there's no such thing as
    "winter." Here in the wonderful state of New York it's
    snowing right now.

  17. "I tan I epi tas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:07:38 +0000 (UTC), jobin@REMOVE-DEEZ-

    WORDS.cs.ucr.edu said:

    today we had 89F. not as bad as january last year when we
    had 90+ F.

    When are you Yankee numpties going to catch up with the
    civilised world and use degrees Celsius when discussing
    temperature?


    I guess we switch to Celsius when pubs switch to liters.
    Traditions die hard.

  18. On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:14:12 UTC, [email hidden] (TopCounsel)

    Quoted message said:

    What I'm getting at is, can you say, for example, that a
    10-degree temperature increase is like a 2,000-foot
    elevation increase (or whatever the figures come out to)?
    (Laying aside all the other effects of the heat!)

    This URL has a table that relates "density altitude" to
    temperature and elevation. Density altitude is altitude
    corrected for temperature and pressure. It is the altitude
    that would have the same atmospheric density on a standard
    day defined as 59 degrees F and barometric pressure of 29.92
    as it does at the altitude and temperature in the table. The
    URL is: csgnetwork.compralttodensalttable.html.

    --
    ___________________________

    Charlie Schwartz

  19. Quoted message said:

    oh shut up.

    Very pleasant. You can't possibly be jealous of our
    "opportunity" to run in winter with temps in the
    triple digits?

    Quoted message said:

    In California there's no such thing as "winter."

    California is a BIG place, remember? It's the size of
    France. We have the Sierra Nevada Mountains, Mt. Shasta, Mt.
    Whitney, Mammoth Mountain, Lake Tahoe, and the lovely climes
    of Death Valley and the Mojave Desert. We got winter,
    alright. Even here where I live in the San Gabriel foothills
    we get freezing mornings from October to February.

    Damn, I just went to the track again within the hour and did
    5600m in 90 degrees. I'm used to getting heat at certain
    times of the year (July, August, September), but not this
    early. It makes me wonder what kind of hell's in store for
    us in the "hotter" months!

    Is it a nearly universal experience that it's about 10
    degrees hotter inside a bowl-shaped track stadium on
    sunny days?

  20. "I tan I epi tas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Doug Freese said:

    We fought a bloody war so we wouldn't have to use those
    bloody measures.

    Methinks you fought your War of Independence not for
    purposes of avoiding implementing the Celsius/Metric
    scales, but because you're a deeply fragmented people who
    are only unified in times of an easily identified internal
    or external threat, vis, 'evil' people within or without
    the USofA (in this instance, the beastly Red Indians or
    the decadent Brits).


    And my history teachers always taught the British fought the
    French & Indian War.

    Enough of the historic revisionism on both sides, how about
    discussing running.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.