What do you lot makof this?

"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:3f71eef4$0$33797$65c69314
@mercury.nildram.net:

Quoted message said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Clark is a true quack. I offered her over 1/4 of a million dollars for her
to cure my sister's cancer. Do you know what her response was? Total
silence which is what I expected from her.

r

--
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic."

Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"

Quoted message said:

Subject: What do you lot makof this?
From: "Anth" [email hidden]
Date: 9/24/2003 2:22 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

It was posted and cussed a while back. If it has the word clark in it, the
debunkers start foaming at the mouth.

Jan

Quoted message said:

http://www.drcl*rk.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

That site is chock full of feces, steaming feces at that.

Why did you offer 1/4 million dollars for her to cure your sisters cancer?
I thought in your eyes she's a quack?
Anth

"Rich Andrews" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:3f71eef4$0$33797$65c69314
@mercury.nildram.net:

Quoted message said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Clark is a true quack. I offered her over 1/4 of a million dollars for

her

Quoted message said:

to cure my sister's cancer. Do you know what her response was? Total
silence which is what I expected from her.

r

--
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic."

Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"

In article <[email hidden]>,

Anth said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Sound and fury, signifying nothing about Clark's zapper. Go into the
google archives and look it up; we went over this some time ago.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

I was thinking more on the lines of Rife's work.
Anth

"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Anth said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Sound and fury, signifying nothing about Clark's zapper. Go into the
google archives and look it up; we went over this some time ago.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What do you lot makof this?
From: "Anth" [email hidden]
Date: 9/24/2003 9:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Why did you offer 1/4 million dollars for her to cure your sisters cancer?
I thought in your eyes she's a quack?
Anth

Good question. He probably made the story up he knows his buddies don't give a
damn if their buddies lie.

Quoted message said:

Clark is a true quack. I offered her over 1/4 of a million dollars for
her

Quoted message said:

to cure my sister's cancer. Do you know what her response was? Total
silence which is what I expected from her.

Well in fact, you are correct, as she cares little about money.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What do you lot makof this?
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 9/24/2003 10:52 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

In article <[email hidden]>,

Anth said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Sound and fury, signifying nothing about Clark's zapper. Go into the
google archives and look it up; we went over this some time ago.

Yes. The same lies were told then.

David, of course, tried to belittle the researchers, but I beat him to the
punch and posted their works.

If Quack Barrett posted in favor of it, the debunkers would be praising and
posting it.

Some thing never change.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=jdrew63929%40aol.com+Washington+State+Un
iversity+zapper&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=20020915125558.26621.000
04280%40mb-cl.aol.com&rnum=1

Jan

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What do you lot makof this?
From: "Anth" [email hidden]
Date: 9/24/2003 9:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Why did you offer 1/4 million dollars for her to cure your sisters cancer?
I thought in your eyes she's a quack?
Anth

Good question. He probably made the story up he knows his buddies don't give a
damn if their buddies lie.

Quoted message said:

Clark is a true quack. I offered her over 1/4 of a million dollars for
her

Quoted message said:

to cure my sister's cancer. Do you know what her response was? Total
silence which is what I expected from her.

Well in fact, you are correct, as she cares little about money.

Yet when she sues someone, she sues because that someone cost her
money, not because they said she was a quack.

I believe she was offering free treatment to people with AIDS in her
Tijuana clinic. The $15,000 that had to be paid up front was just to
cover postage.

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What do you lot makof this?
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 9/24/2003 10:52 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

In article <[email hidden]>,

Anth said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Sound and fury, signifying nothing about Clark's zapper. Go into the
google archives and look it up; we went over this some time ago.

Yes. The same lies were told then.

And those lies were debunked, as they will be every time someone tries
to tout the Hulda quackery. Unfortunately, however, the lies told on
behalf of this charlatan seem to be immortal.

Quoted message said:

David, of course, tried to belittle the researchers, but I beat him to the
punch and posted their works.

If Quack Barrett posted in favor of it, the debunkers would be praising and
posting it.

I don't know who or what a "Quack Barrett" is. Is that a word derived
from the old German word "quackbarrat", meaning "one who thinks that
1646 comes after 1830"? Perhaps you mean Dr Stephen Barrett. If Dr
Barrett posted in favour of Hulda's zapper, I would refuse to take the
stage with him in Las Vegas next January. I would assume that he had
gone mad.

Quoted message said:

Some thing never change.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=jdrew63929%40aol.com+Washington+State+Un
iversity+zapper&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d&selm=20020915125558.26621.000
04280%40mb-cl.aol.com&rnum=1

Jan

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What do you lot makof this?
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 9/25/2003 12:10 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What do you lot makof this?
From: "Anth" [email hidden]
Date: 9/24/2003 9:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Why did you offer 1/4 million dollars for her to cure your sisters cancer?
I thought in your eyes she's a quack?
Anth

Good question. He probably made the story up he knows his buddies don't give

a

Quoted message said:

damn if their buddies lie.

Quoted message said:

Clark is a true quack. I offered her over 1/4 of a million dollars for
her
> to cure my sister's cancer. Do you know what her response was? Total
> silence which is what I expected from her.

Well in fact, you are correct, as she cares little about money.

Yet when she sues someone, she sues because that someone cost her
money

That's correct with a added repeated continuos slander.

But speaking of suing, how high is the number of your good buddy Quack Barrett
law sues?? Ah Peter??

Quoted message said:

I believe she was offering free treatment to people with AIDS in her
Tijuana clinic. The $15,000 that had to be paid up front was just to
cover postage.

What you believe and what is true is far and wide.

As a matter of fact when I wrote to her, she was upset that her organization
had grown so much, one would have to go though expense, and red tape to get in
to see her. Not like the good ole days. So she told me what to do at home, on
my own.

So you are blowing smoke and deceiving as usual.

I know her, you don't.

Jan

PS It is noted you had nothing to say about Rich making the story up. Oh well,
most the debunkers do it, and nobody in that dishonest crowd gives a damn. You
can lie to your mother, the pope and everyone here. Sweet.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What do you lot makof this?
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 9/25/2003 12:26 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What do you lot makof this?
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 9/24/2003 10:52 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

In article <[email hidden]>,
Anth <[email hidden]> wrote:
>http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
>Anth

Sound and fury, signifying nothing about Clark's zapper. Go into the
google archives and look it up; we went over this some time ago.

Yes. The same lies were told then.

And those lies were debunked,

No, those lies came from the debunkers.

Quoted message said:

as they will be every time someone tries
to tout the Hulda quackery.

Yes, lies abound and your group doesn't give a damn.

As proven.

Jan

Please post a copy of your offer.
"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Why did you offer 1/4 million dollars for her to cure your sisters cancer?
I thought in your eyes she's a quack?
Anth

"Rich Andrews" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:3f71eef4$0$33797$65c69314
@mercury.nildram.net:

Quoted message said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Clark is a true quack. I offered her over 1/4 of a million dollars for

her

Quoted message said:

to cure my sister's cancer. Do you know what her response was? Total
silence which is what I expected from her.

r

--
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic."

Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"

Anth said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Actually, the leading anti-cancer drug, cisplatin,
was discovered by its effect on a cell culture when
platinum electrodes were used to pass electrical
current through the culture:

http://www.chemheritage.org/EducationalServices/pharm/chemo/readings/cisplat.htm

Platinum was chosen for the experiment because,
as a noble metal, it doesn't react with many
chemicals. In this case, however, a tiny amount
of the platinum did dissolve in the cell culture,
forming cisplatin and some related compounds.

The platinum electrodes used by the UW researchers
completely explain their results -- a well-known
phenomenon having nothing to do with any "Zapper"
frequency.

Interestingly, in the experiment which lead to the
discovery of cisplatin's anti-cancer effect, various
frequencies were being employed to explore
whether there could be any sort of resonance with
the cellular machinery, as described here:

http://chemcases.com/cisplat/cisplat01.htm

But it was the selection of the electrode material,
not the frequency, which was the critical factor
responsible for inhibiting cell division.

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Sound and fury, signifying nothing about Clark's zapper. Go into the
google archives and look it up; we went over this some time ago.

Yes. The same lies were told then.

Are you calling this lies? The leading anti-cancer
drug, cisplatin, was discovered by its effect on a
cell culture when platinum electrodes were used
to pass electrical current through the culture:

http://www.chemheritage.org/EducationalServices/pharm/chemo/readings/cisplat.htm

Platinum was chosen for the experiment because,
as a noble metal, it doesn't react with many
chemicals. In this case, however, a tiny amount
of the platinum did dissolve in the cell culture,
forming cisplatin and some related compounds.

The platinum electrodes used by the UW researchers
completely explain their results -- a well-known
phenomenon having nothing to do with any "Zapper"
frequency.

Interestingly, in the experiment which lead to the
discovery of cisplatin's anti-cancer effect, various
frequencies were being employed to explore
whether there could be any sort of resonance with
the cellular machinery, as described here:

http://chemcases.com/cisplat/cisplat01.htm

But it was the selection of the electrode material,
not the frequency, which was the critical factor
responsible for inhibiting cell division.

I c good point, the metal was the drug that was killing the cells.
Anth

"Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Anth said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Actually, the leading anti-cancer drug, cisplatin,
was discovered by its effect on a cell culture when
platinum electrodes were used to pass electrical
current through the culture:

http://www.chemheritage.org/EducationalServices/pharm/chemo/readings/cisplat.htm

Quoted message said:

Platinum was chosen for the experiment because,
as a noble metal, it doesn't react with many
chemicals. In this case, however, a tiny amount
of the platinum did dissolve in the cell culture,
forming cisplatin and some related compounds.

The platinum electrodes used by the UW researchers
completely explain their results -- a well-known
phenomenon having nothing to do with any "Zapper"
frequency.

Interestingly, in the experiment which lead to the
discovery of cisplatin's anti-cancer effect, various
frequencies were being employed to explore
whether there could be any sort of resonance with
the cellular machinery, as described here:

http://chemcases.com/cisplat/cisplat01.htm

But it was the selection of the electrode material,
not the frequency, which was the critical factor
responsible for inhibiting cell division.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What do you lot makof this?
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 9/25/2003 7:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Are you calling this lies? The leading anti-cancer
drug, cisplatin, was discovered by its effect on a
cell culture when platinum electrodes were used
to pass electrical current through the culture:

hmmmm....I see this guy lived over 100 years ago.....

do you NOT know the difference in a one celled bacteria,,,inhibiting
replication and your friend Clark touting her zapper to kill full grown
flukes???? flukes that only live in SE asia???

the flukes..if they existed..would be many many moons away from replication...

her barbecue lighter is not even in the same universe..

yes..Janny...it is a lie..

Quoted message said:

UW researchers
completely explain their results -- a well-known
phenomenon having nothing to do with any "Zapper"
frequency.

whoa..just found the above statement ...from what YOU posted....hmmm...a
different frequency from the famous Zapper!!!

yet you continue to bleat ...again..try reading the whole thing...

also if possible get some education on one celled organisms..and how fragile
they are..compared to a mature "fluke"...
hawki

In said:

I was thinking more on the lines of Rife's work.

If Rife's microscope is indeed capable of resolving features
smaller than 100 nm with visible light, it's worth hundreds
of billions of dollars to the semiconductor industry alone.

--
| Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
| it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
| for new products or new versions of existing products." |
end

"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:3f725748$0$33798$65c69314
@mercury.nildram.net:

Quoted message said:

Why did you offer 1/4 million dollars for her to cure your sisters

cancer?

Quoted message said:

I thought in your eyes she's a quack?
Anth

She is and I did just to prove the point that she is a quack and she knows
it.

r

Quoted message said:

"Rich Andrews" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:3f71eef4$0$33797$65c69314
@mercury.nildram.net:

Quoted message said:

http://www.drclark.net/news/lairesearch.htm
Anth

Clark is a true quack. I offered her over 1/4 of a million dollars for

her

Quoted message said:

to cure my sister's cancer. Do you know what her response was? Total
silence which is what I expected from her.

r

--
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic."

Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"

--
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic."

Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - ), "Technology and the Future"