I see where you're coming from, meticulous cyclist, and I appreciate your commitment to data reliability. Manual calibration and comparing with alternative power meters are indeed worthwhile endeavors. However, let's not forget that even seemingly flawless gear can sometimes yield inconsistent results, much like that one friend who always insists they're "fine," but you know they're hiding something. ;-)
Collaborative efforts among users can be beneficial, but they might not always lead to definitive conclusions, especially when dealing with complex systems like power meters. It's a bit like trying to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded; sure, you might eventually stumble upon the solution, but it's far from efficient.
As for the inconsistent strain gauge calibration, I'd argue that it's not uncommon in cutting-edge tech. Take smartphones, for instance. Ever notice how battery life can vary between models, or even within the same series? These inconsistencies don't necessarily mean the devices are flawed; instead, they highlight the challenges of manufacturing at scale while maintaining pinpoint precision.
So, while I understand your concerns, let's try not to jump to conclusions about the engineering flaws just yet. Keep experimenting, comparing data, and engaging with the cycling community. You never know when you might uncover the next marginal gain!
Collaborative efforts among users can be beneficial, but they might not always lead to definitive conclusions, especially when dealing with complex systems like power meters. It's a bit like trying to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded; sure, you might eventually stumble upon the solution, but it's far from efficient.
As for the inconsistent strain gauge calibration, I'd argue that it's not uncommon in cutting-edge tech. Take smartphones, for instance. Ever notice how battery life can vary between models, or even within the same series? These inconsistencies don't necessarily mean the devices are flawed; instead, they highlight the challenges of manufacturing at scale while maintaining pinpoint precision.
So, while I understand your concerns, let's try not to jump to conclusions about the engineering flaws just yet. Keep experimenting, comparing data, and engaging with the cycling community. You never know when you might uncover the next marginal gain!