rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Weird reflection

Started by Mikefule · · Last activity · 16 posts · 418 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
12 August 2007
Last activity
13 August 2007
Original author
Mikefule
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
418
Views / 30 days
1

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A few days ago on the Bacon Slicer, I was riding along the tarmac road
    that passes the front of the football stadium (City Ground, Nottingham
    Forest).

    The offices and reception suite etc. all face the river, and this part
    of the building has glass all the way down to the ground. It is dark
    in the building, so the windows act as a giant mirror. The building is
    to my right, and the sun is low to my left.

    My wheel is throwing an elongated shadow, and the "top" of the shadow
    almost exactly reaches the bottom of the window.

    The shadow is spinning. The reflection is spinning in the opposite
    direction.

    "Beyond" that is the reflection of my actual wheel which is spinning in
    the "right direction".

    The combined effect is that I can see three things spinning: the
    shadow, the reflection of the shadow and the reflection of the wheel.
    Each appears to be touching the next one in the sequence, and the
    middle one (the reflection of the shadow) is spinning the "wrong way".
    It looks a bit like I'm riding a three wheel stack. (Triverticycle?)

    Above the reflection of my own wheel, of course, is a reflection of me.
    Handsome brute.😉

    --
    Mikefule

    I once had a bad experience with a bigot. Now I hate them all - even
    the ones I haven't met.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  2. I love things like this! They remind me how delightful the universe can
    be. Life is full of such beauty, all we need to do is get out of our
    heads long enough to notice. 😄

    --
    idiorythmic
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    idiorythmic's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12653
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  3. someone should make a 3 wheeled 36'er giraffe that would be so amazing!

    --
    Ducttape

    *Coker Fund:*I have it and it's awesome!!!!!!!!

    'BUY MY SHIRTS' (http://www.zazzle.com/Ducttapesunicycle/products)
    'WATCH MY VIDEOS'
    (http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=DucttapesUnicycle)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ducttape's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12006
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  4. Ducttape said:

    someone should make a 3 wheeled 36'er giraffe that would be so amazing!

    I've always imagined a giraffe-coker... but three wheels.... good luck
    to whoever rides it!

    --
    jamessd

    My videos:
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=mtnedg1YS8c
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=UTD3Tq-N4vU
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rofwXXixjNQ
    Add me: [email hidden]
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    jamessd's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/15102
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  5. how about a coker wheel on top and then two 20" wheels?

    --
    zfreak220

    KH fund: $368.71/$440-ish:$71.29 left-august 25th

    Unicaw89 said:

    Special thanks to Jesus, cause he gives me pimpsauce in a can that I
    spread around to the world!


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    zfreak220's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/11948
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  6. zfreak220 said:

    how about a coker wheel on top and then two 20" wheels?

    Hmmm.... that would get pretty tricky to balance I'd think.... maybe
    two 20" wheels on top of a 36" but the other way around would be
    wierd....

    --
    Ducttape

    *Coker Fund:*I have it and it's awesome!!!!!!!!

    'BUY MY SHIRTS' (http://www.zazzle.com/Ducttapesunicycle/products)
    'WATCH MY VIDEOS'
    (http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=DucttapesUnicycle)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ducttape's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12006
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  7. Ducttape said:

    Hmmm.... that would get pretty tricky to balance I'd think.... maybe two
    20" wheels on top of a 36" but the other way around would be wierd....

    either way it would be a wierd ratio and be kinda funky to ride.
    Mikefule:
    that sounds really cool... you shoud get a video camera and fim it then
    put it on this thread.

    --
    oneisenough

    Plaeze x-cuze mi spelin' (If its wrong):p
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    oneisenough's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14061
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  8. so does tha mean you still go the same speed as if you were on a 20"?

    --
    jamessd

    My videos:
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=mtnedg1YS8c
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=UTD3Tq-N4vU
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rofwXXixjNQ
    Add me: [email hidden]
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    jamessd's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/15102
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  9. Yeah, the 36" on top would be fast because it would be the one you'd be
    pedalling. With the 20" wheels on top, you'd pedal the 20" wheel, so
    it wouldn't be fast like a coker.

    --
    Joseppi

    'Team Freestyle' (http://silentaftermath.com/)

    'Team Roadshow' (http://teamroadshow.com/)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Joseppi's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14145
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  10. Never mind the combination of wheel sizes, the only one that matters is
    the actual wheel you are pedaling. That action translates the movement
    of your feet into movement of the tyre.

    Every contact between there and the ground - whether it is 3 wheels or
    20 wheels, all the same size or every one different - simply transmits
    the movement of the tyre on a 1:1 basis. That is nothing lost, nothing
    gained. Wheels of different sizes will spin at different rpm, but the
    distance travelled and speed of travel are unrelated to how many rpm
    the wheel is doing. They are solely related to how many inches of
    tarmac the tyre covers. A small wheel spinning fast, or a large wheel
    spinning slowly, same result.

    --
    Mikefule

    I once had a bad experience with a bigot. Now I hate them all - even
    the ones I haven't met.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  11. Mikefule said:

    Never mind the combination of wheel sizes, the only one that matters is
    the actual wheel you are pedaling. That action translates the movement
    of your feet into movement of the tyre.

    Every contact between there and the ground - whether it is 3 wheels or
    20 wheels, all the same size or every one different - simply transmits
    the movement of the tyre on a 1:1 basis. That is nothing lost, nothing
    gained. Wheels of different sizes will spin at different rpm, but the
    distance travelled and speed of travel are unrelated to how many rpm
    the wheel is doing. They are solely related to how many inches of
    tarmac the tyre covers. A small wheel spinning fast, or a large wheel
    spinning slowly, same result.

    same result in distance covered, but not really same result.....
    try riding a geared 24" uni then a coker, THEN tell everyone thats its
    the same:p

    what i would like to see is a coker wheel over a 20" wheel(two wheels)

    --
    hobo_chuck

    '😕' (http://www.lost.eu/53187)its not easy being
    gold!'😕' (http://www.lost.eu/53187)
    THE BEST WAY TO SUPPORT OUR TROOPS IS TO BRING THEM HOME.
    -if you can read this, you're not the president-
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    hobo_chuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14113
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  12. hobo_chuck said:

    same result in distance covered, but not really same result.....
    try riding a geared 24" uni then a coker, THEN tell everyone thats its
    the same:p

    what i would like to see is a coker wheel over a 20" wheel(two wheels)

    Fundamentally different principle. The thing with a "stack" of wheels
    is that all of the transmission of movement is by tyre to tyre contact.
    This can never result in one tyre moving further than another in the
    same stack. Put a bigger wheel in the stack and it turns more slowly;
    put a smaller wheel in the stack and it turns more quickly. But in
    both cases, the "tread distance" covered is identical. The same amount
    of tyre tread is put on the road in a given time, and the distance
    civered isa the same.

    With a hub geared uni, the sun and planet gears convert a given number
    of revolutions at the centre to a different number of revolutions of
    the wheel.

    Similarly, with a chain driven bicycle or giraffe, the gearing acts at
    the hub. The same number of links of chain passes the big cog and the
    little cog, so the same "chain distance" is covered. However, by
    affecting the number of rpm at the hub, the speed of the vehicle is
    affected because the speed of the vehicle is the rpm multiplied by the
    circumference of the wheel.

    --
    Mikefule

    I once had a bad experience with a bigot. Now I hate them all - even
    the ones I haven't met.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  13. what im saying is that pedaling at the same rate on a coker or a geared
    24" you go the same speed(or the stupid idea of a stack of wheels).
    the large/small wheels act as gears to speed/slow the RPM of the wheels
    rotating below,with a 36"wheel on top and a 24"wheel on bottom it is
    geared to 36" with a ratio of 1:1.5.
    (notice that the numbers i used are the same as a standard GUni)
    the stack of wheels act as gears.

    Is it not harder to ride the 24" GUni than the 36" standard coker?

    --
    hobo_chuck

    '😕' (http://www.lost.eu/53187)its not easy being
    gold!'😕' (http://www.lost.eu/53187)
    THE BEST WAY TO SUPPORT OUR TROOPS IS TO BRING THEM HOME.
    -if you can read this, you're not the president-
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    hobo_chuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14113
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  14. hobo_chuck said:

    what im saying is that pedaling at the same rate on a coker or a geared
    24" you go the same speed(or the stupid idea of a stack of wheels).
    the large/small wheels act as gears to speed/slow the RPM of the wheels
    rotating below,with a 36"wheel on top and a 24"wheel on bottom it is
    geared to 36" with a ratio of 1:1.5.
    (notice that the numbers i used are the same as a standard GUni)
    the stack of wheels act as gears.

    Is it not harder to ride the 24" GUni than the 36" standard coker?

    You are apparently missing the point. You are confusing an increase in
    the speed of rotation with an increase in the speed of movement.

    The stack of wheeels idea is not stupid. There are plenty of people
    who ride them. One wheel above another is sometimes referred to as a
    diverticycle. You pedal backwards to go forwards. On a three stack,
    you pedal forwards to go forwards, but the middle wheel contrarotates.

    It is possible to use different sized wheels in a stack. If you pedal
    a big wheel and it turns a small wheel, then the small wheel will turn
    faster. In this limited sense, it is "gearing". If you pedal a small
    wheel and it turns a big one, the big one will turn more slowly.
    Again, in a limited sense, it is gearing.

    There would of course be handling and balance issues, as well as weight
    and extra friction, but they are not relevant to the point in
    question.

    The important point is that in a stack of wheels, the movement is
    transmitted from one wheel to another by direct contact between the
    tyre treads. There is no magnification of the movement of the tyre
    treads. Ultimately, it is the movement of the tyre tread that dictates
    your road speed.

    Let's take a simple 1:2 ratio. Let's say an 18" wheel stacked with a
    36 inch wheel. (Both sizes are available, so it's not a daft
    example.)

    The 18" wheel has a circumference of 2 x Pi x radius, or Pi x
    diameter.

    Diameter = 18 inches. Circumference is 18 x Pi = 56.52 inches
    (treating Pi as 3.14.)

    So, in one revolution of the 18 inch wheel, a point on the tyre (or the
    contact patch with the road/the next wheel) moves 56.52 inches.

    The 36" wheel has a circumference of 36 x Pi inches = 113.04 inches.

    A moment's reflection will show you that 113.04 is twice as much as
    56.52. So in one revolution, the 36" wheel travels twice as far as the
    18" wheel.

    However, if the wheels are stacked, the number of rpm is "geared".
    Pedal the 18 inch wheel and the 36 will turn half as fast. Pedal the
    36 inch wheel and the 18 will turn twice as fast.

    So, pedal the 18" wheel and in one revolution the tread turns 56.52
    inches. It turns the 36" wheel half a revolution. The tread moves
    half of 113.04" = 56.52 inches.

    Conversely, if you pedal the 36" wheel, in one revolution, the tread
    turns 113.04". The 18" wheel turns twice as fast, and the tread moves
    2 x 56.52" which is exactly the same.

    So in the sense of translating movement of your feet into movement
    along the road, the stack makes no difference to your speed. In a
    complex stack, you could have several different sized wheels all
    spinning at different rpm, but the net effect would be completely
    neutral, and you would be travelling at the same speed as if the wheel
    you were pedalling were in direct contact with the road. (Ignoring
    friction, weight and balance issues.)

    Now, considering the geared uni, what happens is that you turn the
    pedals one revolution, and the wheel turns more than one revolution.
    For simplicity, call it 1.5, but other ratios are technically feasible.
    Something fundamentally different is happening here.

    You could only achieve this effect with a "stack" by having side by
    side wheels with different diameters on a common axle somewhere in the
    stack. Now that would be silly.

    Here is a link to a photo of a three-stack unicycle.

    http://www.costlowcorp.com/images/personal/three_wheel.jpg

    --
    Mikefule

    I once had a bad experience with a bigot. Now I hate them all - even
    the ones I haven't met.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  15. Mikefule said:


    You could only achieve this effect with a "stack" by having side by
    side wheels with different diameters on a common axle somewhere in the
    stack. Now that would be silly.

    Silly? -Awesome!-

    Someone out there must have made one, surely?

    Phil

    --
    phil

    "Cattle Prods solve most of life's little problems."
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    phil's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/915
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  16. Mikefule said:

    You are apparently missing the point. You are confusing an increase in
    the speed of rotation with an increase in the speed of movement.

    actually, no, im not.

    you go the same speed as you would with a 36" uni with the weird stack,
    but it is the 24" wheel that is actually touching the ground, rotating
    1.5 revs for every pedal rotation.
    im just saying that the stack of wheels works exactly the same as a
    gear system.(not the one used in a GUni, but it has the same result)

    and, no, i am not saying a stack is a stupid idea, ive even
    successfully ridden a 2 wheel uni(have to pedal backwards, haha)just
    that a multi-wheel coker is overkill.....

    EDIT:i just fully read your last post, and it is completely pointless
    in my openion, and not at all relevant to what i was saying. A 2 year
    old could have figured that stuff out.(in their sleep, i saw a 3 year
    old solve a rubiks cube in under a minute once.)

    --
    hobo_chuck

    '😕' (http://www.lost.eu/53187)its not easy being
    gold!'😕' (http://www.lost.eu/53187)
    THE BEST WAY TO SUPPORT OUR TROOPS IS TO BRING THEM HOME.
    -if you can read this, you're not the president-
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    hobo_chuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14113
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/63381

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.