I'm 5'11", 173 lbs currently, trying to get back into racing. 48 yrs. old.
10,000 miles over the last 11 months, lost a lot of weight (went from 205lbs+ to as little as 162 last October). I've been riding all winter and lifting weights (legs) in the gym. Leg press, calf raises (can't do squats, pelvic issues). I've been ramping up my mileage lately (265 miles last week, 230 the previous week) trying to burn fat. But I'm not losing weight.
But looking thinner, more muscular/athletic. I find it astonishing with the kind of rides I'm doing that I could be 10lbs heavier than 4 months ago, but I'm feeling better on the bike, looking fitter/thinner. Could I have really added THAT much muscle in the gym this winter? I'm pushing out 400lbs+ on the leg press (final set, 3 x 10 reps, after 2 earlier sets with lighter weight).
Feeling better on the bike, even on hills, even 10lbs heavier. Go figure. Trying to get out on that razor. Hope to be >165 by May, but at this point, I wonder. I rode 130 miles this weekend and didn't eat that much and didn't lose weight. I'm not sure what difference it makes really. As long as my riding is coming around and I appear to be getting leaner. Go figure.
I do notice that I have an surprising amount of natural upper body musculature. No more curls in the gym. Forget it. Now I understand why Lance was afraid to build that rock wall on his Texas property for the past five years. He didn't want to gain upper body bulk. Looks good in the mirror. Does jack **** for you on the bike however.
I'm seriously considering putting my scale away. What difference does it make? I'll keep doing what I'm doing. I'll tell you one thing: if I feel this good on hills @ 173lbs, I've added quite a bit of power. God help all those other weenies if I DO lose that last 7-8lbs : ). Oh well. I'll ride again today, just like every other day : ).
As long as I have my racing bike and my iPod, who needs a friggin scale?