Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Waterford seatpost

Started by Steve Braun · · Last activity · 11 posts · 1,043 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
23 April 2003
Last activity
25 April 2003
Original author
Steve Braun
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,043
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Has anyone tried using a 27.2mm seatpost in a Waterford frame that was designed for 27.4mm
    seatposts? Did you need a shim make this combination work?

    Thanks

    Steve Braun Tucson

  2. sjbraun-<< Has anyone tried using a 27.2mm seatpost in a Waterford frame that was designed for
    27.4mm seatposts? Did you need a shim make this combination work?

    No shim for .2mm afaik...use a 27.4, don't use a 27.2mm-

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  3. Steve: Would strongly encourage you to look for a 27.4; they come up on Ebay occasionally. I know
    Thomsom makes/made one. In the mean time you may be able to make do with an aluminum soda can shim
    (Hey, it worked for Greg Lemond in that most famous of TDF finishes!). Why they ever went 27.4 we'll
    never know, but apparently they thought better of it eventually. Good luck.

    [email hidden] (Steve Braun) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone tried using a 27.2mm seatpost in a Waterford frame that was designed for 27.4mm
    seatposts? Did you need a shim make this combination work?

    Thanks

    Steve Braun Tucson

  4. Waterford advertises seat posts on their website. If the page is up-to-date...

    waterfordbikes.comasframe.htm

    Trevor

    "Steve Braun" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone tried using a 27.2mm seatpost in a Waterford frame that was designed for 27.4mm
    seatposts? Did you need a shim make this combination work?

    Thanks

    Steve Braun Tucson

  5. Quoted message said:

    "Steve Braun" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone tried using a 27.2mm seatpost in a Waterford frame that was designed for 27.4mm
    seatposts? Did you need a shim make this combination work?

    "Trevor Taylor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Waterford advertises seat posts on their website. If the page is up-to-date...
    waterfordbikes.comasframe.htm

    Many LBS [like us!] stock various brands of 27.4 as well.

    (And I agree with the crowd that you should get the right size and not shim
    it.)
    --
    Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April 1971

  6. Mike said:

    Why they ever went 27.4 we'll never know, but apparently they thought better of it eventually.

    They used a thinner-walled 853 seatmast. It's plenty strong and saves a little bit of weight. Their
    frames now use a
    27.2 post, but even during the days of the 27.4 post on the 1200 and 2200 frames, they would build
    for 27.2 upon request.

    Todd Kuzma Heron Bicycles Tullio's Big Dog Cyclery LaSalle, IL 815-223-1776
    heronbicycles.comheronbicycles.com tullios.comtullios.com

  7. "Todd Kuzma" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mike said:

    Why they ever went 27.4 we'll never know, but apparently they thought better of it eventually.

    They used a thinner-walled 853 seatmast. It's plenty strong and saves a little bit of weight.
    Their frames now use a
    27.2 post, but even during the days of the 27.4 post on the 1200 and 2200 frames, they would build
    for 27.2 upon request.


    Does this mean that Waterford is now using a "heavier" seat tube to accomodate 27.2 seat post?

  8. bfd said:
    Todd Kuzma said:
    Mike said:

    Why they ever went 27.4 we'll never know, but apparently they thought better of it eventually.


    They used a thinner-walled 853 seatmast. It's plenty strong and saves a little bit of weight.
    Their frames now use a
    27.2 post, but even during the days of the 27.4 post on the 1200 and 2200 frames, they would build
    for 27.2 upon request.


    Does this mean that Waterford is now using a "heavier" seat tube to accomodate 27.2 seat post?

    That's my guess. The advantage of saving a small amount weight was likely outweighed by the
    advantage of using a more conventional seatpost size.

    Todd Kuzma Heron Bicycles Tullio's Big Dog Cyclery LaSalle, IL 815-223-1776
    heronbicycles.comheronbicycles.com tullios.comtullios.com

  9. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Mike said:

    Why they ever went 27.4 we'll never know, but apparently they thought better of it eventually.

    Quoted message said:

    "Todd Kuzma" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    They used a thinner-walled 853 seatmast. It's plenty strong and saves a little bit of weight.
    Their frames now use a
    27.2 post, but even during the days of the 27.4 post on the 1200 and 2200 frames, they would
    build for 27.2 upon request.

    "bfd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does this mean that Waterford is now using a "heavier" seat tube to accomodate 27.2 seat post?

    "Heavier"? "Standard"? It's all semantics isn't it? For a hundred years or so, a 28.6 outer diamter
    with a 25.4 post was "standard". Among Reynolds and similar frames, 27.2 seatposts have been the
    'standard" gauge for some forty plus years. Tangential to the concurrent discussion about
    "improvements", Waterford's designers were able to shave a few grams with impunity by going to 27.4
    seatposts. Here, we thought that was reasonable. But apparently there was a crowd of whiners such
    that Waterford relented.

    I recall the first time I saw a 27.4 - a BobJackson Lugano time trial bike - and thinking that was a
    clever way to drop a tad of metal. But I was young and impressionable.

    --
    Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April 1971

  10. A local frame builder states that (in his opinion) seatposts used standard 28.6 mm seat tubes
    *should* be 27.4 mm. His contention is that the seat tube wall thickness is typically .6 mm at the
    top- do the math (28.6 - 1.2 = 27.4), and the seat post *should be* 27.4 mm.

    Why aren't they on most bikes built with standard steel tubing? Because (according to this guy) most
    builders are sloppy and overheat the seat cluster, distorting the metal. They end up only reaming
    the tube to 27.2 to avoid thin spots in the distorted lug/tube.

    His seat tubes always take a 27.4 mm post. In fact, you have to already have a 27.4 mm seatpost or
    buy one from him, because he really hates people cranking down the pinch bolt to make a 27.2 work.

  11. Will a vacuum pump allow me to pump up my tires with a vacuum? That ought to be lighter than
    hydrogen and eliminate the fire hazard.

    Are there any vacuum frame pumps made?

    cya Bob Denton Gulf Stream International Delray Beach, Florida www.sinkthestink.com Manufacturers of
    Sink the Stink

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.