General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Walking for health

Started by Adrian Tupper · · Last activity · 39 posts · 1,382 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 August 2005
Last activity
8 August 2005
Original author
Adrian Tupper
Posts
39
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,382
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 39
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm sure that a while back there was a figure
    being bandied around that 20 minutes brisk walking
    per day was enough to keep you fit.

    I now read that 10,000 paces per day is what is needed.

    I wondered how much 10,000 paces was and so I counted the
    number of steps from my house to my work. Well, I lost
    count a few times but I guess it was 2,400 and it took almost
    24 minutes. The maths is simple, I walk 100 paces per
    minute.

    Sooooo.... 10,000 paces will take 100 minutes. That's five
    times the old estimate. There really can't be many people
    who walk for 100 minutes per (working) day. Are there?

    --
    Adrian

  2. Bitstring <[email hidden]>, from the wonderful person
    Adrian Tupper <[email hidden]> said

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure that a while back there was a figure
    being bandied around that 20 minutes brisk walking
    per day was enough to keep you fit.

    I now read that 10,000 paces per day is what is needed.

    I wondered how much 10,000 paces was and so I counted the
    number of steps from my house to my work. Well, I lost
    count a few times but I guess it was 2,400 and it took almost
    24 minutes. The maths is simple, I walk 100 paces per
    minute.

    Sooooo.... 10,000 paces will take 100 minutes. That's five
    times the old estimate. There really can't be many people
    who walk for 100 minutes per (working) day. Are there?

    10k paces = 5 miles (Mile - from Latin for thousand (mille), because
    they counted two steps (left, right) to a pace).

    Yes, I walk 5 miles a day (on average). I used to do it around the
    office/factory, now I do it around Shropshire. However medical opinion
    still seems to be that 20 minutes is enough, as long as you get your
    heart rate up. I do my 8km (I'm actually metricated) because I enjoy it.

    --
    GSV Three Minds in a Can
    Contact recommends the use of Firefox; SC recommends it at gunpoint.

  3. Adrian Tupper said:

    I'm sure that a while back there was a figure
    being bandied around that 20 minutes brisk walking
    per day was enough to keep you fit.

    I now read that 10,000 paces per day is what is needed.

    I wondered how much 10,000 paces was and so I counted the
    number of steps from my house to my work. Well, I lost
    count a few times but I guess it was 2,400 and it took almost
    24 minutes. The maths is simple, I walk 100 paces per
    minute.

    Sooooo.... 10,000 paces will take 100 minutes. That's five
    times the old estimate. There really can't be many people
    who walk for 100 minutes per (working) day. Are there?

    Do you have unusually long legs? <g>

    Is that figure for 10000 paces meant to be just "formal" walking, or
    to include all paces taken during the day? I could quite easily
    believe that someone who was generally quite active during the day -
    at work, at home, round the supermarket etc. - could make up 100
    minutes worth of walking in combination with a morning or evening
    stroll.

    I reckon I probably do a good few hundred steps up and down the stairs
    every day with the number of things I forget...

  4. Adrian Tupper said:

    I'm sure that a while back there was a figure
    being bandied around that 20 minutes brisk walking
    per day was enough to keep you fit.

    I now read that 10,000 paces per day is what is needed.

    I wondered how much 10,000 paces was and so I counted the
    number of steps from my house to my work. Well, I lost
    count a few times but I guess it was 2,400 and it took almost
    24 minutes. The maths is simple, I walk 100 paces per
    minute.

    Sooooo.... 10,000 paces will take 100 minutes. That's five
    times the old estimate. There really can't be many people
    who walk for 100 minutes per (working) day. Are there?

    I think the 20 minutes a day is accurate if you're, say, walking to
    work or walking the dog. I believe the 10k paces is for those who walk
    a lot in their work but only from this point in the office/factory to
    that point and back again many times - those who don't walk far enough
    to raise their heart rate.

    Justin.

    --
    Justin C, by the sea.

  5. I noticed that Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    from Jim Millen contained the following:

    Quoted message said:

    Is that figure for 10000 paces meant to be just "formal" walking, or
    to include all paces taken during the day? I could quite easily
    believe that someone who was generally quite active during the day -
    at work, at home, round the supermarket etc. - could make up 100
    minutes worth of walking in combination with a morning or evening
    stroll.

    It's quite easy. You can do 4-6 k without even thinking about it. So
    you just need around 2-3 miles in the evening.

    --
    Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
    It's only Usenet, no one dies.
    My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
    Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/

  6. Adrian Tupper said:

    I wondered how much 10,000 paces was

    A leaflet I saw recently, describing some of these "healthy walks"
    equated 1 mile to 2400 paces. So one pace = about 26 inches (or 67
    cms), obviously a single pace, not the double paces which many of us
    learned when practising micro-navigation in the mist.

    --
    Pete Bland

  7. "Adrian Tupper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure that a while back there was a figure
    being bandied around that 20 minutes brisk walking
    per day was enough to keep you fit.

    I now read that 10,000 paces per day is what is needed.

    Adrian

    Could it be a bit like the advice to eat "5 a day" portions of fruit, veg
    etc.

    --
    M Stewart
    Milton Keynes, UK
    http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm

  8. "Jim Millen" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Is that figure for 10000 paces meant to be just "formal" walking, or
    to include all paces taken during the day? I could quite easily
    believe that someone who was generally quite active during the day -
    at work, at home, round the supermarket etc. - could make up 100
    minutes worth of walking in combination with a morning or evening
    stroll.

    They gave out free pedometers to everyone where I work a while ago but
    most people found they didn't work too well at recording paces if you
    were say walking a few paces backwards and forwards to move things from
    one place to another. You need to be walking along properly for them to
    be accurate. You can rack up a fair number of steps just by sitting
    down and shaking them though. (Or if that's too much like hard work get
    someone to shake it for you).

  9. Following up to Adrian Tupper

    Quoted message said:

    Sooooo.... 10,000 paces will take 100 minutes. That's five
    times the old estimate. There really can't be many people
    who walk for 100 minutes per (working) day. Are there?

    the postman?

    I don't think 20 minutes walking a day will get anyone that fit.
    Running for a hour, maybe.
    --
    Mike Reid
    Walk-eat-UK "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
    Walk-eat-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
    Photos of both "http://www.lawn-mower-man.co.uk"

  10. The Reids said:

    I don't think 20 minutes walking a day will get anyone that fit.

    Not /that/ fit, no, but all things are relative and if you normally only
    walk between the bedroom, bathroom, garage, car, car park, desk, car
    park, car, garage, kitchen, TV, bathroom, bedroom then it's about 15
    minutes more than you're used to, and that'll be a (relatively) good thing.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  11. In message <[email hidden]>, GSV Three Minds in a Can
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    However medical opinion still seems to be that 20 minutes is enough, as
    long as you get your heart rate up.

    I think that's the key issue. I need to walk very fast on the flat to
    have any effect but going up a hill soon gets things moving.

    --
    Goalie of the Century

  12. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Peter

    Clinch) said:
    The Reids said:

    I don't think 20 minutes walking a day will get anyone that fit.

    Not /that/ fit, no, but all things are relative and if you normally
    only walk between the bedroom, bathroom, garage, car, car park, desk,
    car park, car, garage, kitchen, TV, bathroom, bedroom then it's about
    15 minutes more than you're used to, and that'll be a (relatively) good
    thing.

    It'll be a bit good for you in the sense that if you walk for 20
    minutes then you'll be working off excess calories etc; but if you are
    just strolling and don't get your pulse up and your circulation going,
    then it will have no significant benefit to the cardiovascular system. You
    need to do _strenuous_ exercise (enough to leave you a little out of
    breath) for about twenty minutes to get fit in that sense.

    --
    Vince

  13. The Reids said:

    Following up to Adrian Tupper

    Quoted message said:

    Sooooo.... 10,000 paces will take 100 minutes. That's five
    times the old estimate. There really can't be many people
    who walk for 100 minutes per (working) day. Are there?

    the postman?

    Ha! On a rural round no chance, they drive anywhere that is further
    than ten feet! However in a big urban office like mine it is dead easy
    to get the miles in, both inside and out on delivery.

    Quoted message said:


    I don't think 20 minutes walking a day will get anyone that fit.
    Running for a hour, maybe.

    The old advice used to be to do excersise that elevated your heart
    rate for twenty minutes a day so *brisk* walk was OK for that. Running
    for an hour every day will get you bloody fit for running for an hour.
    But you don't need to be *that* fit for it to have health benefits.
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

  14. I noticed that Message-ID: <[email hidden]> from
    AndyP contained the following:

    Quoted message said:

    You can rack up a fair number of steps just by sitting
    down and shaking them though.

    So, wear them on your wrist? ;-)

    --
    Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
    It's only Usenet, no one dies.
    My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
    Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/

  15. Following up to Phil Cook

    Quoted message said:

    Running
    for an hour every day will get you bloody fit for running for an hour.

    It got my not quite bloody fit for running for a hour
    e.g well down the field and never breaking the hour for 10 miles
    (61 minute "P.B."😉 :-(
    --
    Mike Reid
    Walk-eat-UK "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
    Walk-eat-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
    Photos of both "http://www.lawn-mower-man.co.uk"

  16. In message <[email hidden]>, Adrian Tupper
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure that a while back there was a figure
    being bandied around that 20 minutes brisk walking
    per day was enough to keep you fit.

    I now read that 10,000 paces per day is what is needed.

    I wondered how much 10,000 paces was and so I counted the
    number of steps from my house to my work. Well, I lost
    count a few times but I guess it was 2,400 and it took almost
    24 minutes. The maths is simple, I walk 100 paces per
    minute.

    Sooooo.... 10,000 paces will take 100 minutes. That's five
    times the old estimate. There really can't be many people
    who walk for 100 minutes per (working) day. Are there?


    At a yard, or nearly so, per pace, 10,000 paces is 5 to 6 miles. 100
    minutes is not too far off for this.
    --
    Stewart Robert Hinsley

  17. Adrian Tupper said:

    I'm sure that a while back there was a figure
    being bandied around that 20 minutes brisk walking
    per day was enough to keep you fit.

    I now read that 10,000 paces per day is what is needed.

    Treat it the same as any "public health" information coming from the
    government, like that 5 vegetable per day nonsense, and ignore it.

    S.

    --
    Oppose ID cards and the database state - sign the pledge at
    http://www.pledgebank.com/refuse

  18. Stewart Robert Hinsley said:
    Quoted message said:


    At a yard, or nearly so, per pace, 10,000 paces is 5 to 6 miles. 100
    minutes is not too far off for this.

    or in Roger's case, about an hour ;-)

    --
    Oppose ID cards and the database state - sign the pledge at
    http://www.pledgebank.com/refuse

  19. The Reids said:

    Following up to Phil Cook

    Quoted message said:

    Running
    for an hour every day will get you bloody fit for running for an hour.

    It got my not quite bloody fit for running for a hour
    e.g well down the field and never breaking the hour for 10 miles
    (61 minute "P.B."😉 :-(

    Precisely: it got you fit for running for an hour. To get fit for
    running longer distances or running the distance you cover in an hour
    more quickly you have to do other knds of training. Endurance and
    Fartlek. My PB for 10 miles was 23:10.....

    .......on a bike :-)
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

  20. Quoted message said:

    "Adrian Tupper" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure that a while back there was a figure
    being bandied around that 20 minutes brisk walking
    per day was enough to keep you fit.

    I now read that 10,000 paces per day is what is needed.

    I wouldn't be at all surprised if it amounts to much the same thing.
    The 20 minutes a day guideline is a perfectly good one, provided the
    walk is aerobically challenging. To be aerobically challenging you need
    to be slightly puffing rather than strolling along easily. This helps
    to strengthen the cardiovascular (heart and lungs) system and will
    strengthen leg muscles as a sideline. For upper body strength invest in
    a couple of tins of baked beans or similar and use them as weights.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.