I ran a 10K yesterday and started out with sunglasses on. It turned cloudy
within a few minutes and I took the sunglasses off and carried them to get more
of a breeze on my face. At one of the water stations I took a paper cup of
water, had a few swallows and then crushed the cup. A couple minutes later I
thought why am I carrying this cup, everyone pitches them on the sidewalk as
they clean the streets right after the run anyway so I pitched my cup. Then a
few seconds later I thought gee these sunglasses feel funny and I realized I
had held on to the paper cup and threw the sunglasses on the sidewalk.
Brilliant, just brilliant, anyway the sunglasses were one of those $5 jobs from
Wal-Mart and I didn't bother stopping to go back and get them. Truth be known
I suspect the quality of them is almost as good as, if not equal to the ones
people drop ten to twenty times as much for. And it sure is a lot less painful
when one pulls a stunt like I did.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Wal-Mart sunglasses are better
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 1 August 2004
- Last activity
- 2 August 2004
- Original author
- Jtiche
- Posts
- 6
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 371
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
we like the cheapo glasses, too. work great and no prob if you want
to leave them behind.sam & ray
(Jtiche) said:
I ran a 10K yesterday and started out with sunglasses on. It turned cloudy
within a few minutes and I took the sunglasses off and carried them to get more
of a breeze on my face. At one of the water stations I took a paper cup of
water, had a few swallows and then crushed the cup. A couple minutes later I
thought why am I carrying this cup, everyone pitches them on the sidewalk as
they clean the streets right after the run anyway so I pitched my cup. Then a
few seconds later I thought gee these sunglasses feel funny and I realized I
had held on to the paper cup and threw the sunglasses on the sidewalk.
Brilliant, just brilliant, anyway the sunglasses were one of those $5 jobs from
Wal-Mart and I didn't bother stopping to go back and get them. Truth be known
I suspect the quality of them is almost as good as, if not equal to the ones
people drop ten to twenty times as much for. And it sure is a lot less painful
when one pulls a stunt like I did. -
(Jtiche) said:
I ran a 10K yesterday and started out with sunglasses on. It turned
cloudy within a few minutes and I took the sunglasses off and carried
them to get more of a breeze on my face. At one of the water stations
I took a paper cup of water, had a few swallows and then crushed the
cup. A couple minutes later I thought why am I carrying this cup,
everyone pitches them on the sidewalk as they clean the streets right
after the run anyway so I pitched my cup. Then a few seconds later I
thought gee these sunglasses feel funny and I realized I had held on
to the paper cup and threw the sunglasses on the sidewalk. Brilliant,
just brilliant, anyway the sunglasses were one of those $5 jobs from
Wal-Mart and I didn't bother stopping to go back and get them. Truth
be known I suspect the quality of them is almost as good as, if not
equal to the ones people drop ten to twenty times as much for. And it
sure is a lot less painful when one pulls a stunt like I did.Good one. ;-) If you had paid $100+ for your sunglasses, you probably
wouldn't have tossed them and you probably wouldn't need to take them off
in the first place. There is a reason for the price difference. Granted,
most of it is brand name marketing hype. I've tried the cheepos and for
the most part they are worth it. For running I currently wear Bollé.
Normally I wouldn't pay more than $50 for a pair of sunglasses, but these
were on sale for around $35 (list $70). They have very good clarity. Very
easy on your eyes. They are comfortable. I usually am not aware that they
are on my face. They don't cause extra heat. The air flows around and
through them so that there is no heat build up around my eyes. They also
came with a pair of orange colored interchangeable lenses. I use those
for cloudy days or running while the sun is setting. They still are not
worth $70. $35 - definitely. $70 - not.Phil M.
--
If you can empty your own boat
Crossing the river of the world,
No one will oppose you,
No one will seek to harm you. -Chuang Tzu -
There is no doubt that the more expensive name glasses are better frames and
glass.... but who cares! I've had both and I'll take the cheap knockoff
types anyday for $10 and won't cry a bit when I leave them in the
restaurant..... have done that a few times. Also when your $150 glasses
fall off and scrape on the pavement you just want to spit."Jtiche" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
I ran a 10K yesterday and started out with sunglasses on. It turned
cloudyQuoted message said:
within a few minutes and I took the sunglasses off and carried them to get
moreQuoted message said:
of a breeze on my face. At one of the water stations I took a paper cup
ofQuoted message said:
water, had a few swallows and then crushed the cup. A couple minutes
later IQuoted message said:
thought why am I carrying this cup, everyone pitches them on the sidewalk
asQuoted message said:
they clean the streets right after the run anyway so I pitched my cup.
Then aQuoted message said:
few seconds later I thought gee these sunglasses feel funny and I realized
IQuoted message said:
had held on to the paper cup and threw the sunglasses on the sidewalk.
Brilliant, just brilliant, anyway the sunglasses were one of those $5 jobs
fromQuoted message said:
Wal-Mart and I didn't bother stopping to go back and get them. Truth be
knownQuoted message said:
I suspect the quality of them is almost as good as, if not equal to the
onesQuoted message said:
people drop ten to twenty times as much for. And it sure is a lot less
painfulQuoted message said:
when one pulls a stunt like I did.
-
"Sam and Ray - Running Gay!" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Sam & Ray, what is a 'rainbow runner'?
I'm homophobic and I'm afraid that if I go to 'rainbowrunners.org' I'll turn
gay. Couldn't you just *tell* me what it's about without me actually
having to go there?OK, was being a bit silly, but if you're brave enough to reply I'm brave
enough to listen. Why would you want to be seen as a 'gay runner'? Isn't
being a runner enough? What's running got to do with sexuality? And
guys - c'mon. ANYTHING that come from Wal-Mart cannot be considered by any
man of style and refinement. And you're telling me you're gay...? -
Quoted message said:
Sam & Ray, what is a 'rainbow runner'?
Doug Freese and Donovan Rebbechi are. Got it now?
Quoted message said:
I'm homophobic
....and paranoid schizophrenic, bi-polar, multiple personalitys, etc etc etc
Quoted message said:
and I'm afraid that if I go to 'rainbowrunners.org' I'll turn
gay.WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too late for that!
Quoted message said:
OK, was being a bit silly,
See what I mean? No heterosexual man is ever "silly". Funny, hilare, crackups,
and many more colorful terms yes, but never, ever "silly".Quoted message said:
but if you're brave enough to reply I'm brave
enough to listen.Yeah! He'll "listen" with one hand. I thought you needed one hand to "do the
deed" and one to hold the tweezers?Quoted message said:
Why would you want to be seen as a 'gay runner'?
I know, especially when most already do anyway. I believe I'm the only
exception.Quoted message said:
What's running got to do with sexuality?
Now we KNOW he's an english [censored]!
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.