General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Vitamin & Supplement Brands

Started by Damaeus · · Last activity · 10 posts · 429 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 June 2004
Last activity
6 June 2004
Original author
Damaeus
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
429
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I know this is probably a question asked trillions of times, but is there
    any way to know which brands of vitamins and supplements are truly what
    they say they are? I know that I should look for "natural" supplements,
    but how does one know whether the item they're buying is really what's
    contained in the capsule or gelcap?

    For example, how do I know that the capsule from a Kelp bottle is really
    kelp and not lawn clippings from some guy's front yard?

    What brand do you trust? Do you trust the items you find at Wal-Mart, or
    do you order online? What about products shipped from overseas? I've
    heard that the vitamin and supplement industry isn't very heavily regluated
    by the FDA, so what's the harm in ordering products from, say, India?

    Thanks,
    Damaeus

  2. Quoted message said:

    heard that the vitamin and supplement industry isn't very heavily regluated
    by the FDA
    Damus

    That's a plus. The FDA and government in general is the worse thing of all time
    for safe medicine and health care.

    Quoted message said:

    so what's the harm in ordering products from, say, India?
    Damus

    Damus, if that is the sort of day to day "logic" you apply to critical health
    decisions...I think you should order herbs from say India, Bangladesh.

  3. "Damaeus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I know this is probably a question asked trillions of times, but is there
    any way to know which brands of vitamins and supplements are truly what
    they say they are?

    No.

    Quoted message said:

    I know that I should look for "natural" supplements,

    Why? They are all chemcials.

    Quoted message said:

    but how does one know whether the item they're buying is really what's
    contained in the capsule or gelcap?

    One does not know what is in that tablet or capsule. Several years ago
    testing was done on bottles of ephedra compounds, and found that the potency
    of each tablet/capsule ranged from 0% to 400% of the posted strength.
    Imagine if you took four of the higher potency ones. People died.

    Many of the FDA warnings and recall alerts are based on 'foreign' substances
    being in these products. Recently, they found that some of the herbal
    viagara products contained the real deal. Imagine buying something to avoid
    a medication that you know you should not take, but get it anyway.

    There are other compelling reasons, but, I hope by now you get the point.

    Quoted message said:

    For example, how do I know that the capsule from a Kelp bottle is really
    kelp and not lawn clippings from some guy's front yard?

    Good question. I can assure you that they are not my lawn clippings. Beyond
    that, no guarantees. BTW, if you find a company willing to bottle lawn
    clippings, let me know. They can buy mine (which should be healthy, since I
    give my lawn supplements,...errr....fertilizer....).

    Quoted message said:

    What brand do you trust? Do you trust the items you find at Wal-Mart, or
    do you order online? What about products shipped from overseas?

    Risky, dude, risky.

    I've

    Quoted message said:

    heard that the vitamin and supplement industry isn't very heavily


    regluated

    Quoted message said:

    by the FDA, so what's the harm in ordering products from, say, India?

    Good question. However,the fact that they are not more closely regulated isa
    travesty. If something is sold as beneficial to nes body, then it should be
    regulated just like a pharmaceutical. The fact that ephedra was not
    regulated resulted in hundreds of deaths and thousands of reported adverse
    events. The supplement industry is fighting a law which would merely require
    that they report all adverse event reports to the FDA. This is utterly
    scandalous.

    Quoted message said:


    Thanks,
    Damaeus

  4. "Damaeus" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I know this is probably a question asked trillions of times, but is there
    any way to know which brands of vitamins and supplements are truly what
    they say they are? I know that I should look for "natural" supplements,
    but how does one know whether the item they're buying is really what's
    contained in the capsule or gelcap?

    You would know that the seller was truly interested in the safery and needs
    of the consumer if they stuck to the following rules, among others..
    Unfortunately they are more usually trying to "keep up with the Jones's" by
    outdoing whatever other people are doing in the market.

    1. The product would not have any unneeded herbal content. No herbs are
    known to be safe or useful for long term use in the healthy and it merely
    allows the seller to charge more.

    2. They should not contain unneeded or possibly harmful levels of minerals.
    Iron is a definite no no in the non-anaemic. Selenium is dangerous if taken
    in amounts not much more than normal requiremnets, and should probably only
    be needed in geographical areas of selenium deficiency associated with a
    higher incidence of some cancers (e,g, NZ).. Sodium and potassium are
    completely unnecessary, but may have to be present in vitamin salts. Too
    little is known to justify other minerals such as zinc, or suggest what dose
    may be appropriate in a population within which most or even all are not
    going to be deficient..

    3. They should be marked "NOT FOR CHILDREN". Adult preparations are
    dangerous in children and you should be teaching your kids to eat better,
    not rely on pills.

    4. Megavitamin usage has not been reliably shown to be safe and effective
    for any condition, despite the elapse of thirty years of study. Benefits
    for added vitamins in studies are inconsistent, and those that are seen are
    from modest additional intake, especially if from the diet. So a simple
    multivitamin with about normal requirements and at most a little selenium
    might be beneficial. I would expect most brands made in the USA by major
    firms, even if cheap, would probably suffice.

    And ask those who say they are selling "natural vitamins" where they really
    get their vitamins from. You may have to take more synthetic vitamin E
    than of the natural isomer to get the same effect, but the evidence also
    suggests you will do even better getting it from food.

    Since big pharmaceutical companies make the vitamins that the public has
    been consuming in such monumental amounts, who on earth can you trust in
    this matter?

    DISCLAIMER I.don't hold myself out to be any ultimate authority on vitamins,
    but suspect I have looked at more of the relevant evidence than most of
    those promoting them..

    Peter Moran

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Damaeus said:

    I know this is probably a question asked trillions of times, but is there
    any way to know which brands of vitamins and supplements are truly what
    they say they are? I know that I should look for "natural" supplements,
    but how does one know whether the item they're buying is really what's
    contained in the capsule or gelcap?

    For example, how do I know that the capsule from a Kelp bottle is really
    kelp and not lawn clippings from some guy's front yard?

    What brand do you trust? Do you trust the items you find at Wal-Mart, or
    do you order online? What about products shipped from overseas? I've
    heard that the vitamin and supplement industry isn't very heavily regluated
    by the FDA, so what's the harm in ordering products from, say, India?

    It's fairly rare to find assays of various supplements. I've seen
    them in Consumer Reports a few times. There's also an outfit called
    ConsumerLab that does tests of various supplements and reports the
    ones that pass (but not the ones that fail, which is unfortunate).

    Based on what I've seen in Consumer Reports, you're usually pretty
    safe going to Costco and buying their house brand (Kirkland, and don't
    ask me where that name comes from). Beyond that, I really don't know
    what to suggest.

    OK, that's not quite true -- I would strongly suggest that you ignore
    Spammin' Dave Wickware, who is a public nuisance, remarkably ignorant,
    a major-league spammer, and far from impartial (since he's all set to
    try to sell you stuff). Oh, and forget about taking algae, be it
    Super Blue Green or any other kind -- it's a really dismal source of
    nutrients.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  6. I believe consumerslab DOES tell which brands of vitamins/supplements/et
    al pass, pass conditionally or fail their testing. However, it looks
    like a paid subscription to their complete reports is necessary for all
    this information. They do offer limited but free information at their
    web site though.

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:

    I believe consumerslab DOES tell which brands of vitamins/supplements/et
    al pass, pass conditionally or fail their testing. However, it looks
    like a paid subscription to their complete reports is necessary for all
    this information. They do offer limited but free information at their
    web site though.

    Yes, I believe the publically-available (for free) info doesn't tell
    you which products failed the tests, and you have to subscribe to get
    all the info.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  8. Vitamin Power's supplements are all certified. They are manufactured
    to USP standards for dietary supplements. They have been in business
    since 1975. You can get 20% OFF and free shipping on orders over
    $27.99 at http://www.kostlessvitamins.com

    [email hidden] wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I believe consumerslab DOES tell which brands of vitamins/supplements/et
    al pass, pass conditionally or fail their testing. However, it looks
    like a paid subscription to their complete reports is necessary for all
    this information. They do offer limited but free information at their
    web site though.

  9. You don't know what your talking about on some of this, Peter.
    My comments are mixed in below.
    <snip>

    "Peter Moran" <[email hidden]> > You would know that the seller was
    truly interested in the safery and needs

    Quoted message said:

    of the consumer if they stuck to the following rules, among others..
    Unfortunately they are more usually trying to "keep up with the Jones's"


    by

    Quoted message said:

    outdoing whatever other people are doing in the market.

    1. The product would not have any unneeded herbal content. No herbs are
    known to be safe or useful for long term use in the healthy and it merely
    allows the seller to charge more.

    I agree that a most vitamin supplement should not have herbs.
    And most don't and even when they do the doses of the herbs are tiny.
    Anyway all supplements aren't just vitamins and herbals, to frame the
    discussion
    in such a manner betrays a hostile attitude.

    Quoted message said:


    2. They should not contain unneeded or possibly harmful levels of


    minerals.

    Quoted message said:

    Iron is a definite no no in the non-anaemic. Yes.
    Selenium is dangerous if taken
    in amounts not much more than normal requiremnets, and should probably


    only

    Quoted message said:

    be needed in geographical areas of selenium deficiency associated with a
    higher incidence of some cancers (e,g, NZ)..

    Animals studies indicate otherwise. And 200 mcg supplementation
    doses are considered safe for adults. In some area of mainland China
    people get rather large doses of Se from their locally based
    diets without adverse events.

    Quoted message said:

    Sodium and potassium are
    completely unnecessary, but may have to be present in vitamin salts.

    In the case of Na, it a case of simple reporting on the label. Anyway,
    some people try to restrict their Na. And K is limited by regulation here
    in the States to 99 mgs for OTC preparations.

    Quoted message said:

    Too
    little is known to justify other minerals such as zinc, or suggest what


    dose

    Quoted message said:

    may be appropriate in a population within which most or even all are not
    going to be deficient..

    Many will be short on zinc. ACE inhibitors cause excessive excretion
    of Zn. Higher levels of Zn reduce Cd uptake which is a very good thing.

    Quoted message said:


    3. They should be marked "NOT FOR CHILDREN". Adult preparations are
    dangerous in children and you should be teaching your kids to eat better,
    not rely on pills.

    This comment is pure horse feathers. Just look at a label and it will say
    something llike the following: "Suggested Use: As dietary
    supplement use One (1) softgel in adults..........."
    People know to adjust doses down to lower levels for kids.

    Further,in modern lifestyles in which people are in doors far too
    many (perhaps most) are short on vitamin D. With this vitamin, adult doses
    are
    too low for optimal health even in infants and more so in adults..

    Infants and small children
    might get a little too much preformed vitamin A but only slightly
    from an adult dose sized tablet.
    Most people are aware that small children and infants
    have different needs. Such authoritarian thinking
    results in having bathroom heaters bearing labels advising buyers
    not to use heater in the bathroom.

    More comments below.

    Quoted message said:


    4. Megavitamin usage has not been reliably shown to be safe and effective
    for any condition, despite the elapse of thirty years of study.

    Your eyes are closed or a best looking in the review mirror.
    You pulled the 30 year number out of your hat; if you are
    focused on Linus Pauling that was longer ago .....try 35 to 40 years.
    Nor was he the first.

    Inositol is quite effective in preventing panic attacks, and treating
    various OCD disorders.

    Vitamin E helps slow the onset diabetic complications.

    Niacin is used to lower cholesterol.

    Vitamin D and K can be used in the treatment of osteoporosis.
    to help slow or even halt its progression. And I mean 10X of the AIs.
    Not the tiny amounts found in most supplements.

    Vitamin D supplement at 2000 IU (not a typo) in infants prevents
    type 1 diabetes in kids and young adults.

    Coenzyme Q can be used to slow the onset of drug toxicity. It modestly
    reduce blood pressure and improve cardiac function.

    High dose folic acid helps women genetically prone to bearing neural
    tube defectives not to have a repeat experience.

    Combined high dose vitamin E and niacinamide slow the progression
    of type 1 diabetes.

    Modest doses of b6 (5x of RDA) and Mg lower the odds of kidneys stones.

    Many elderly are B-12 short, folic acid status impaired and getting
    suboptimal levels of Mg. Some of this is due to meds and some is
    due to impaired digestion and absorption. Not all of this is due
    to poor diet choices.

    Andropausal farts and their post-menopausal buddies
    will wring their hands and say 'lets study it more before
    we act' which is cowardly nonsense.On many of these
    things it time to go mainstream and sort it out later.

    Cowardly attitudes like yours have resulted in an inadequate
    folic acid program which has added too little folic acid.
    Result the reduction in NTD births was only 30% not the
    possible 70% the research indicated as possible.
    Vitamin fortification is just vitamin supplementation of the sly.

    Quoted message said:

    Benefits
    for added vitamins in studies are inconsistent, and those that are seen


    are

    Quoted message said:

    from modest additional intake, especially if from the diet. So a simple
    multivitamin with about normal requirements and at most a little selenium
    might be beneficial. I would expect most brands made in the USA by major
    firms, even if cheap, would probably suffice.

    And ask those who say they are selling "natural vitamins" where they


    really

    Quoted message said:

    get their vitamins from. You may have to take more synthetic vitamin E
    than of the natural isomer to get the same effect, but the evidence also
    suggests you will do even better getting it from food.

    Dietary levels are likely too low to help slow the onset of diabetic
    neuropathy.
    The evidence that food sources are absorbed better aren't surprising as
    solublized forms of E have been available since at least the early
    70's and the caution to take with the most fatty of meal of the day
    goes back to at least the 60's. And anyway the reseach you refer to
    if you refer to the latest research by Maret Tauber (think I got the name
    right)
    doesn't compare vitamin E from food (as I recall) rather it
    compares E fortified cereal to a vitamin E capsule source as I recall.
    And the E capsules used in the study weren't solublized.

    Quoted message said:


    Since big pharmaceutical companies make the vitamins that the public has
    been consuming in such monumental amounts, who on earth can you trust in
    this matter?

    DISCLAIMER I.don't hold myself out to be any ultimate authority on


    vitamins,

    Quoted message said:

    but suspect I have looked at more of the relevant evidence than most of
    those promoting them..

    You don't show signs of it. IMO

    Quoted message said:


    Peter Moran

    Lets see if Peter goes silent.......as Mark de Toad
    (of sci.med.nutrition) often has.........................
    ...................William A. Noyes

  10. "tuxedoMan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Vitamin Power's supplements are all certified. They are manufactured
    to USP standards for dietary supplements. They have been in business
    since 1975. You can get 20% OFF and free shipping on orders over
    $27.99 at http://www.IAMADINGBATSPAMMER.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.