General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Vitamin E dangerous?

Started by bc_acadia · · Last activity · 32 posts · 989 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
10 November 2004
Last activity
25 November 2004
Original author
bc_acadia
Posts
32
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
989
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–32 of 32
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. It is important to not 'think in black and white" terms...all or
    nothing...

    An important detail is balance and amounts...

    The moral of the story is too much of most good things will kill
    you....even love...look at Jesus Christ...

    Caesar J. B. Squitti

    [email hidden] (N-H-P) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Further, when looking at the studies with over 3,500 test subjects
    per study group there WERE only 5 studies worth looking at. Two
    were favorable, two were neutral, and only one was negative.
    That one study alone (MRC/BHF HPS 2002), at a dosage of 660 IU's
    day, accounts for the entire 5% negative death rate. Gee, I
    wonder if that study was bogus? Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

    MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of antioxidant vitamin supplementation
    in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled
    trial. Lancet. 2002;360:23-33. [PMID: 12114037].[Medline]
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12114037&dopt=Abstract

    Funny how Lancet interprets their findings differently.

    There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality.Lancet
    says high dosage Vitamin E is safe, but not effective.

    My review of the data was so easy, so correct, and so obvious
    that I sent a Rapid Response Comment to Ann Intern Med
    http://www.annals.org/cgi/eletters/0000605-200501040-00110v1
    entitled: 'Lancet was correct!'

    It should be showing up within a few days. 🙂

    I will also use it as my first health blog to my web site.

  2. On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:42:59 -0800, "William_Noyes"
    <[email hidden]> posted:

    Quoted message said:

    the water solubilized forms would get into the
    blood stream whereas other forms might
    be somewhat more likely to pass all the way thru
    the gut.

    Why? Don't all fats get absorbed, usually?

  3. On 16 Nov 2004 22:11:12 -0800, [email hidden] (Wolfbrother)
    posted:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Therefore I concur, that the meta-analysis combined 19 individual
    studies, eighteen of which showed no statistically significant
    increase in mortality, squeezing out an overall finding of no
    increased risk.

    What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    Quoted message said:

    That is
    nothing new. They have been at war with vits/mins and supplements for
    decades. Sick people = $$$$$$

    If you mean from a bottle, they sell the stuff, so why would they want
    you not to take them?

  4. Dunne E. Dawe said:
    Quoted message said:

    What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    Perhaps, if you were to focus?

    You already replied to this in another post! What is your problem,
    Dim-wit?
    --
    john gohde
    http://blog.naturalhealthperspective.com/

  5. Dunne E. Dawe said:
    Quoted message said:

    What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    Perhaps, if you were to focus?

    You already replied to this in another post! What is your problem,
    Dim-wit?
    --
    john gohde
    http://blog.naturalhealthperspective.com/

  6. Dunne E. Dawe said:
    Quoted message said:

    What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    Perhaps, if you were to focus?

    You already replied to this in another post! What is your problem,
    Dim-wit?
    --
    john gohde
    http://blog.naturalhealthperspective.com/

  7. Dunne E. Dawe <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On 16 Nov 2004 22:11:12 -0800, [email hidden] (Wolfbrother)
    posted:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Therefore I concur, that the meta-analysis combined 19 individual
    studies, eighteen of which showed no statistically significant
    increase in mortality, squeezing out an overall finding of no
    increased risk.

    What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    Quoted message said:

    That is
    nothing new. They have been at war with vits/mins and supplements for
    decades. Sick people = $$$$$$

    If you mean from a bottle, they sell the stuff, so why would they want
    you not to take them?

    Shut the [censored] up already dumb ass. What the hell is wrong with you
    anyway. You think we dont know how stupid you are already? You
    really do not need to demonstrate it over and over and over with every
    response. My god you are just like Markd it is amazing. It is like
    you enjoy displaying your ignorance and naivety to everyone.

  8. On 24 Nov 2004 05:58:27 -0800, [email hidden]
    (N-H-P) posted:

    Quoted message said:
    Dunne E. Dawe said:
    Quoted message said:

    What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    Perhaps, if you were to focus?

    You already replied to this in another post! What is your problem,
    Dim-wit?

    Still nothing substantive?

  9. On 24 Nov 2004 06:05:36 -0800, [email hidden]
    (N-H-P) posted:

    Quoted message said:
    Dunne E. Dawe said:
    Quoted message said:

    What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    Perhaps, if you were to focus?

    You already replied to this in another post! What is your problem,
    Dim-wit?

    Are you in a room full of mirrors instead of windows? You seem to be
    accusing me of your problem. Check your newsfeed.

  10. On 24 Nov 2004 06:08:06 -0800, [email hidden]
    (N-H-P) posted:

    Quoted message said:
    Dunne E. Dawe said:
    Quoted message said:

    What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    Perhaps, if you were to focus?

    You already replied to this in another post! What is your problem,
    Dim-wit?

    And still more. You really have nothing to say, do you.

  11. On 24 Nov 2004 11:46:54 -0800, [email hidden] (Wolfbrother)
    posted:

    Quoted message said:

    Dunne E. Dawe <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On 16 Nov 2004 22:11:12 -0800, [email hidden] (Wolfbrother)
    posted:

    Quoted message said:

    >
    > Therefore I concur, that the meta-analysis combined 19 individual
    > studies, eighteen of which showed no statistically significant
    > increase in mortality, squeezing out an overall finding of no
    > increased risk.

    What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    Quoted message said:

    That is
    nothing new. They have been at war with vits/mins and supplements for
    decades. Sick people = $$$$$$

    If you mean from a bottle, they sell the stuff, so why would they want
    you not to take them?

    Shut the [censored] up already dumb ass.

    Why? Does what I say embarrass you? It seems to have this effect from
    your outbursts here.

    Quoted message said:

    What the hell is wrong with you
    anyway.

    Nothing, I thought. I'm joining in the discussion with some questions
    that upset you horrendously (by your empty, abreactions).

    Quoted message said:

    You think we dont know how stupid you are already?

    "WE"? It is YOU who can't answer my simple questions with anything but
    empty childish insult.

    Quoted message said:

    You
    really do not need to demonstrate it over and over and over with every
    response.

    I ask on-topic questions or make on-topic comments - you respond with
    nothing but childish insult. What are you trying to demonstrate?

    Quoted message said:

    My god you are just like Markd it is amazing.

    Thank you for the huge compliment. (I'm serious!)

    Quoted message said:

    It is like
    you enjoy displaying your ignorance and naivety to everyone.

    Yep, I'm here to learn. You? Where is your on-topic question or
    comment? I've not seen one yet.

  12. Dunne E. Dawe <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On 24 Nov 2004 11:46:54 -0800, [email hidden] (Wolfbrother)
    posted:

    Quoted message said:

    Dunne E. Dawe <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On 16 Nov 2004 22:11:12 -0800, [email hidden] (Wolfbrother)
    posted:

    >>
    >> Therefore I concur, that the meta-analysis combined 19 individual
    >> studies, eighteen of which showed no statistically significant
    >> increase in mortality, squeezing out an overall finding of no
    >> increased risk.
    >
    >
    >What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
    >people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.

    You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...

    >That is
    >nothing new. They have been at war with vits/mins and supplements for
    >decades. Sick people = $$$$$$

    If you mean from a bottle, they sell the stuff, so why would they want
    you not to take them?

    Shut the [censored] up already dumb ass.

    Why? Does what I say embarrass you? It seems to have this effect from
    your outbursts here.

    Because what you say is so unbarably moronic get that?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    What the hell is wrong with you
    anyway.

    Nothing, I thought. I'm joining in the discussion with some questions
    that upset you horrendously (by your empty, abreactions).

    Umm no you are not joining anything. You are just being a dumb [censored]
    and saying such stupid things that I have a hard time beliving you
    could actualy be serious.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You think we dont know how stupid you are already?

    "WE"? It is YOU who can't answer my simple questions with anything but
    empty childish insult.

    Answer what? Your moronic irrelevant questions??? What a joke. It is
    you who refuses to address the significant points I bring up about
    unhealthy modern diets and healthy traditional diets. You do not
    address them because you can not. The facts in there entirety do not
    fit in with your delusional views on nutrition so you have no choice
    but to ignore or make ridiculous comments that you know no one would
    respond to.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    You
    really do not need to demonstrate it over and over and over with every
    response.

    I ask on-topic questions or make on-topic comments - you respond with
    nothing but childish insult. What are you trying to demonstrate?

    I would ask you that question. Like i said as i see it you are just
    demonstrating your stupidity if you are actually serious about what
    you are saying.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    My god you are just like Markd it is amazing.

    Thank you for the huge compliment. (I'm serious!)

    Quoted message said:

    It is like
    you enjoy displaying your ignorance and naivety to everyone.

    Yep, I'm here to learn. You?

    LOL you are not here to learn you are here to continue ignoring the
    whole picture to accept only facts which further justify your
    preconceived biased views about nutrition. You could learn plenty if
    you opened your narrow mind from people like Monty as I have, who you
    also chose to ignore.

    Quoted message said:

    Where is your on-topic question or comment? I've not seen one yet.

    Oh you mean the on topic points about food and diets which you chose
    to ignore because they do not fit into your pathetic version of
    reality?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.