Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Virtual ride movie

Started by Pete Rissler · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,316 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
25 February 2003
Last activity
1 March 2003
Original author
Pete Rissler
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,316
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi all,

    I've put up a draft virtual movie of one of the rides in the Reno, NV area. It's the last link on
    the page. I had a few problems with my computer, it crashed a short way into the ride. I figure it
    would take around 30 hours to render the full ride. Also its way too fast, I had to cut down on the
    frame rate to 7.5 fps, so the movie is a little choppy. Enough excuses, the movie is 37 secs. long.
    This is no substitute for the real thing or for the excellent videos that have been posted here,
    it's just something different. There are some other stuff on the page that I've been working on.

    web1.greatbasin.netpeavine challenge map page.htm

    --
    Pete Rissler web1.greatbasin.net~rissler

  2. "Pete Rissler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi all,

    I've put up a draft virtual movie of one of the rides in the Reno, NV


    area.

    Quoted message said:

    It's the last link on the page. I had a few problems with my computer, it crashed a short way into
    the ride. I figure it would take around 30 hours


    to

    Quoted message said:

    render the full ride. Also its way too fast, I had to cut down on the


    frame

    Quoted message said:

    rate to 7.5 fps, so the movie is a little choppy. Enough excuses, the


    movie

    Quoted message said:

    is 37 secs. long. This is no substitute for the real thing or for the excellent videos that have
    been posted here, it's just something


    different.

    Quoted message said:

    There are some other stuff on the page that I've been working on.

    web1.greatbasin.netpeavine challenge map page.htm

    --
    Pete Rissler web1.greatbasin.net~rissler

    Cool. I liked it.

    darsh

  3. "Darsh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:GXP6a.237393$tq4.5807@sccrnsc01...

    Quoted message said:


    Cool. I liked it.

    You probably liked it because the 'terrain' looks like what you have been 'riding' on the last few
    months. ;^)

    Mike- I liked it too.

  4. Quoted message said:

    Cool. I liked it.

    darsh

    Thanks, I'm thinking of putting in a few trees, maybe a fence line. Just some significant features.
    I think in this case less is more.

    --
    Pete Rissler web1.greatbasin.net~rissler

  5. Pete Rissler said:

    Hi all,

    I've put up a draft virtual movie of one of the rides in the Reno, NV area. It's the last link on
    the page. I had a few problems with my computer, it crashed a short way into the ride. I figure
    it would take around 30 hours to render the full ride. Also its way too fast, I had to cut down
    on the frame rate to 7.5 fps, so the movie is a little choppy. Enough excuses, the movie is 37
    secs. long. This is no substitute for the real thing or for the excellent videos that have been
    posted here, it's just something different. There are some other stuff on the page that I've been
    working on.

    web1.greatbasin.netpeavine challenge map page.htm

    --
    Pete Rissler web1.greatbasin.net~rissler

    Pretty cool. The only thing I thought was wierd was that it seemed like you were always looking
    straight ahead, whereas when riding, if you go down a dip, you look up a bit to compensate. So going
    through dips it seemed like I wasn't looking far enough down the trail. my $.02

    What did you you for the terrain data?

  6. Quoted message said:

    Pretty cool. The only thing I thought was wierd was that it seemed like you were always looking
    straight ahead, whereas when riding, if you go down a dip, you look up a bit to compensate. So
    going through dips it seemed like I wasn't looking far enough down the trail. my $.02

    What did you you for the terrain data?

    Sorry for the late post. I was doing a Google groups search on another subject when I noticed that
    there were a few massages that I did not see on my ISP's news server. I then searched for my
    "virtual ride movie" and found a couple of posts that never made it to my news server. This probably
    explains why I sometime see replies to messages I never see posted.

    You're right, the software only lets me set one angle looking forward which I set to -10 degrees ,
    so it's slightly looking down. To sorta compensate I set the height above ground to 3.5 meters. I do
    have the option to allow the image to roll when turning which I had turned off for the movie. I'll
    need to play with this a little more. I'll add a few trees, a couple of buildings and some
    fencelines in the next version. I'm learning this GIS (ArcView) software package and I find I learn
    better if I'm doing something I'm interested in instead of just following along in the manual.

    The terrain data was from a USGS 10 meter Digital Elevation Model.
    --
    Pete Rissler web1.greatbasin.net~rissler

  7. Pete Rissler said:
    Quoted message said:

    Pretty cool. The only thing I thought was wierd was that it seemed like you were always looking
    straight ahead, whereas when riding, if you go down a dip, you look up a bit to compensate. So
    going through dips it seemed like I wasn't looking far enough down the trail. my $.02

    What did you you for the terrain data?

    Sorry for the late post. I was doing a Google groups search on another subject when I noticed that
    there were a few massages that I did not see on my ISP's news server. I then searched for my
    "virtual ride movie" and found a couple of posts that never made it to my news server. This
    probably explains why I sometime see replies to messages I never see posted.

    You're right, the software only lets me set one angle looking forward which I set to -10 degrees
    , so it's slightly looking down. To sorta compensate I set the height above ground to 3.5
    meters. I do have the option to allow the image to roll when turning which I had turned off for
    the movie. I'll need to play with this a little more. I'll add a few trees, a couple of
    buildings and some fencelines in the next version. I'm learning this GIS (ArcView) software
    package and I find I learn better if I'm doing something I'm interested in instead of just
    following along in the manual.

    The terrain data was from a USGS 10 meter Digital Elevation Model. -- Pete Rissler
    web1.greatbasin.net~rissler

    You actually get paid for this stuff? They hiring :-)

    -Bruce

  8. Quoted message said:

    You actually get paid for this stuff? They hiring :-)

    -Bruce

    I'm a fishery biologist by trade and do use GIS for work, mostly fish distributions and hydrologic
    modelling. It would be nice to get paid for making MTB maps but I enjoy playing around with this
    stuff in my spare time.

    Pete

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.