General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

VIOXX increases heart attack risk

Started by Fresh~Horses · · Last activity · 9 posts · 728 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
22 April 2004
Last activity
24 April 2004
Original author
Fresh~Horses
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
728
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. from www.theheart.org ZEE

    "Rofecoxib {VIOXX} should be used with great caution in
    patients with an already elevated risk of heart disease and
    heart attack."

    Apr 21, 2004

    Rofecoxib increases MI risk, latest study published

    Boston, MA - The latest study to show an increased risk of
    acute MI in users of the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (Vioxx®,
    Merck & Co) has been published April 19, 2004 in a rapid
    access issue of Circulation.[1]

    The research, first reported by lead author Dr Daniel
    Solomon (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) at the
    American College of Rheumatology meeting in October 2003,
    showed that those taking rofecoxib for osteoarthritis had a
    24% higher risk of MI than similar patients taking the other
    main COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib (Celebrex®, Pfizer).

    Solomon, an epidemiologist, says: "Coxibs are the most
    common treatment for arthritis, with more than 41 million
    prescriptions filled in the US in 2002. It is important for
    physicians and patients to note that rofecoxib was shown to
    increase the risk of heart attack in this study, and its use
    should be weighed against this potential risk."

    Patients taking celecoxib did not have increased risk of MI
    As previously reported by heartwire, the study followed 54
    475 patients 65 years or older who were treated with a
    coxib, a traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
    (NSAID), or neither. In this study group, patients taking
    either rofecoxib or celecoxib shared similar baseline risk
    factors for MI, such as diabetes, hypertension, and prior
    heart disease. As well as the 24% percent increase in MI
    risk in those taking rofecoxib compared with celecoxib, the
    researchers found that the risk of MI was highest in those
    taking more than 25 mg daily of rofecoxib during the first
    60 days of use. Those patients taking celecoxib did not
    experience an increased risk of MI. They also found that
    rofecoxib, in comparison with NSAIDs such as ibuprofen,
    elevated MI risk by 17% and by 14% compared with patients
    not taking anti-inflammatory medications.

    Adjusted association between coxibs and acute MI

    Exposure/covariate Adjusted odds ratio p

    Exposure (reference group)

    -Rofecoxib (celecoxib)
    1.24 .011

    -Celecoxib (no current use) .93 .13

    -Rofecoxib (no current use)
    2.14 .054

    -Celecoxib (naproxen) .95 .7

    -Rofecoxib (naproxen)
    3.17 .2

    -Celecoxib (ibuprofen) .98 .9

    -Rofecoxib (ibuprofen)
    4.21 .2

    -Celecoxib (other NSAID) .95 .4

    -Rofecoxib (other NSAID)
    5.17 .073

    Covariate

    -Race, white
    6.20 <.001

    -3+ comorbid conditions
    7.42 <.001

    -Diabetes
    8.48 <.001

    -Hypertension
    9.15 <.001

    -Previous MI
    10.56 <.001

    -Angina
    11. 31
    <.001

    -Previous coronary revascularization .78 <.001

    -Congestive heart failure
    12.37 <.001

    -Cerebrovascular accident
    13.07 .014

    -Use of statin
    14.00 .7

    -Use of HRT .88 .02

    -Rheumatoid arthritis
    15.16 .02

    -Previous nonselective NSAID use .97 .3

    Further work needed, but be careful with rofecoxib in those
    at risk Solomon et al say that several biological pathways
    could underlie a potential association between selective COX-
    2 inhibitors and coronary events. For example, in rat models
    of hypertension, celecoxib but not rofecoxib may be
    associated with improvements in endothelial function and
    oxidative stress, they say.

    Rofecoxib should be used with great caution in patients with
    an already elevated risk of heart disease and heart attack.

    Solomon says there are several limitations to the research,
    so "further study is necessary to help the medical community
    determine in which patients the benefits of rofecoxib
    outweigh the potential risks."

    He told heartwirethat Merck & Co has told him it is
    performing several randomized controlled trials in this area
    but that it has not been any more specific. His group is
    also continuing to do further observational work. "We're
    looking in greater detail at, for example, patient subgroups
    and time until events," he noted.

    "In the meanwhile, this information, combined with what we
    have learned through trials such as VIGOR, provide
    physicians with evidence that rofecoxib should be used with
    great caution in patients with an already-elevated risk of
    heart disease and heart attack," he concludes.

    Related links

    16. Rofecoxib increases CV events in arthritis patients with
    high BP [HeartWire > Hypertension; Mar 18, 2004 ]
    17. COX-2 inhibitors: No thrombotic effect but worsening of
    CHF? [HeartWire > News; Dec 16, 2003 ]
    18. Rofecoxib has no effect on endothelial function, CRP in
    patients with CAD [HeartWire > News; Nov 19, 2003 ]
    19. Another analysis shows increased risk of AMI with
    rofecoxib [HeartWire > News; Oct 29, 2003 ]
    20. Experts clash again over safety of COX-2 inhibitors
    [HeartWire > News; Oct 16, 2003 ]
    21. Randomized study suggests rofecoxib increases 24-hour
    mean systolic pressures [HeartWire > News; Jun 2, 2003 ]
    22. No increase in MI risk with COX-2 inhibitors [HeartWire

    Quoted message said:

    News; Feb 28, 2003 ]

    Sources

    23. Solomon DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, et al. Relationship
    between selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and acute
    myocardial infarction in older adults. Circulation 2004
    Apr 19😄OI:
    24.1161/01.CIR.0000127578.21885.3E. Available at:
    circ.ahajournals.orgcirc.ahajournals.org.

    Lisa Nainggolan [email hidden] ©Copyright Conceptis
    Technologies 1999-2003 theheart.org® is a registered
    trademark of Conceptis Technologies Inc

  2. (fresh~horses) said:

    Further work needed, but be careful with rofecoxib in
    those at risk Solomon et al say that several biological
    pathways could underlie a potential association between
    selective COX-2 inhibitors and coronary events. For
    example, in rat models of hypertension, celecoxib but not
    rofecoxib may be associated with improvements in
    endothelial function and oxidative stress, they say.

    Early literature indicated these pathways do not
    discriminate among COX2 inhibitors. Jim, is this statistical
    error and perhaps an attempt at linking COX2 to
    cardiovascular disease as a means for new indications?

    --
    Winning against heart attack and stroke
    sonoscore.comsonoscore.com

  3. [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    from www.theheart.org ZEE

    "Rofecoxib {VIOXX} should be used with great caution in
    patients with an already elevated risk of heart disease
    and heart attack."

    Apr 21, 2004

    Rofecoxib increases MI risk, latest study published

    Sonos said:

    "Early literature indicated these pathways do not
    discriminate among COX2 inhibitors. Jim, is this statistical
    error and perhaps an attempt at linking COX2 to
    cardiovascular disease as a means for new indications?"

    This is what I suspect Sonos. More Pharma Hype: Marketing
    not Science. But I don't have the number crunching abilities
    to back up my cynicism. (The latter a required for my
    profession, the former not.) Would greatly love to hear what
    Jim Chinnis and others better educated than I have to say.

    Please Jim make it so I can understand.

    Fresh Horses Zee

  4. [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in part:

    Quoted message said:

    Sonos said:

    "Early literature indicated these pathways do not
    discriminate among COX2 inhibitors. Jim, is this
    statistical error and perhaps an attempt at linking COX2 to
    cardiovascular disease as a means for new indications?"

    This is what I suspect Sonos. More Pharma Hype: Marketing
    not Science. But I don't have the number crunching
    abilities to back up my cynicism. (The latter a required
    for my profession, the former not.) Would greatly love to
    hear what Jim Chinnis and others better educated than I
    have to say.

    Please Jim make it so I can understand.

    Haha... I'll make a deal: If someone makes the original
    article so i can understand it, I'll make my comments so you
    can understand them...

    I haven't seen the full text, only the description at
    heartinfo.com and the abstract at the AHA site. It's a
    somewhat complex design, with some potential for results
    being caused by effects related to the design. Mostly, this
    is because it is a retrospective rather than prospective
    study. (They started with heart attacks, picked "matched"
    patients who did not have heart attacks during the study
    period, and worked their way backwards to NSAID use.) I
    don't see any problems, however.

    In a retrospective study, I usually look for dose-response
    and duration-response curves that make sense and support the
    finding. In this case, the dose response curve (two levels
    only) supports the finding, but the duration-response curve
    does not: "The adjusted relative risks of AMI associated
    with rofecoxib use of 1 to 30 days (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12
    to 1.75; P=0.005) and 31 to 90 days (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11
    to 1.72; P=0.003) were higher than >90 days (OR, 0.96; 95%
    CI, 0.72 to 1.25; P=0.8) compared with celecoxib use of
    similar duration."

    Bottom line: I take this as weak support for the clinical
    finding that rofecoxib (Vioxx) may confer a higher risk of
    heart attack than celecoxib (Celebrex) in elderly arthritic
    patients. It needs to be examined in a prospective trial.

    I can't comment on the cox2 pathways!

    Sonos asked if this was "an attempt at linking COX2 to
    cardiovascular disease as a means for new indications." It
    doesn't look like it to me. Certainly any potential positive
    effect in the data of celecoxib is small--less than that of
    ibuprofen, for instance.
    --
    Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA

  5. [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    from www.theheart.org ZEE

    "Rofecoxib {VIOXX} should be used with great caution in
    patients with an already elevated risk of heart disease
    and heart attack."

    Apr 21, 2004

    Rofecoxib increases MI risk, latest study published

    Sonos said:

    "Early literature indicated these pathways do not
    discriminate among COX2 inhibitors. Jim, is this
    statistical error and perhaps an attempt at linking COX2
    to cardiovascular disease as a means for new indications?"

    This is what I suspect Sonos. More Pharma Hype: Marketing
    not Science. But I don't have the number crunching
    abilities to back up my cynicism. (The latter a required
    for my profession, the former not.) Would greatly love to
    hear what Jim Chinnis and others better educated than I
    have to say.

    Please Jim make it so I can understand.

    Fresh Horses Zee

    Thanks Jim. I think you (inadvertently, with your "haha"?)
    pointed out a fault with most of these write-ups: they are
    rigged. Sooner or later, the writer pays the rent. Merck
    sponsors the site I took this off. I don't have access to
    the journal or you'd have gotten that.

    Don't be a stranger. Fresh Horses Zee

  6. [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in part:

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in
    message news:<[email hidden]-
    e.com>...

    Quoted message said:

    from www.theheart.org ZEE

    "Rofecoxib {VIOXX} should be used with great caution in
    patients with an already elevated risk of heart disease
    and heart attack."

    Apr 21, 2004

    Rofecoxib increases MI risk, latest study published

    Sonos said:

    "Early literature indicated these pathways do not
    discriminate among COX2 inhibitors. Jim, is this
    statistical error and perhaps an attempt at linking COX2
    to cardiovascular disease as a means for new
    indications?"

    This is what I suspect Sonos. More Pharma Hype: Marketing
    not Science. But I don't have the number crunching
    abilities to back up my cynicism. (The latter a required
    for my profession, the former not.) Would greatly love to
    hear what Jim Chinnis and others better educated than I
    have to say.

    Please Jim make it so I can understand.

    Fresh Horses Zee

    Thanks Jim. I think you (inadvertently, with your "haha"?)
    pointed out a fault with most of these write-ups: they are
    rigged. Sooner or later, the writer pays the rent. Merck
    sponsors the site I took this off. I don't have access to
    the journal or you'd have gotten that.

    Don't be a stranger. Fresh Horses Zee

    I actually only relied on the abstract from the journal.
    --
    Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA

  7. [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    from www.theheart.org ZEE

    "Rofecoxib {VIOXX} should be used with great caution in
    patients with an already elevated risk of heart disease
    and heart attack."

    Apr 21, 2004

    Rofecoxib increases MI risk, latest study published

    Sonos said:

    "Early literature indicated these pathways do not
    discriminate among COX2 inhibitors. Jim, is this
    statistical error and perhaps an attempt at linking COX2
    to cardiovascular disease as a means for new indications?"

    This is what I suspect Sonos. More Pharma Hype: Marketing
    not Science. But I don't have the number crunching
    abilities to back up my cynicism. (The latter a required
    for my profession, the former not.) Would greatly love to
    hear what Jim Chinnis and others better educated than I
    have to say.

    Please Jim make it so I can understand.

    Fresh Horses Zee

    For Jim:

    And your comment re the abstract would change what I have
    said how? : ) I'm ever a cynic. And whether it's medical
    journal abstracts or write ups on pharma sponsored sites, I
    think one does best to remember "caveat emptor". I've been a
    hack too long not to recognize it when I see it.

    We have to stop meeting like this. Where are you? Why aren't
    you on google?

    Zee Fresh Horses formerly mfgjones(at)yahoo.co.uk

  8. [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in part:

    Quoted message said:

    We have to stop meeting like this. Where are you?

    I'm in the phone book.

    Quoted message said:

    Why aren't you on google?

    They haven't agreed to pay me anything yet for my work.

    Quoted message said:

    Zee Fresh Horses formerly mfgjones(at)yahoo.co.uk

    Oh....
    --
    Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA

  9. [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    from www.theheart.org ZEE

    "Rofecoxib {VIOXX} should be used with great caution in
    patients with an already elevated risk of heart disease
    and heart attack."

    Apr 21, 2004

    Rofecoxib increases MI risk, latest study published

    Sonos said:

    "Early literature indicated these pathways do not
    discriminate among COX2 inhibitors. Jim, is this
    statistical error and perhaps an attempt at linking COX2
    to cardiovascular disease as a means for new indications?"

    This is what I suspect Sonos. More Pharma Hype: Marketing
    not Science. But I don't have the number crunching
    abilities to back up my cynicism. (The latter a required
    for my profession, the former not.) Would greatly love to
    hear what Jim Chinnis and others better educated than I
    have to say.

    Please Jim make it so I can understand.

    Fresh Horses Zee

    Jim

    Oh I see what the disconnect is now. I post on google. They
    don't pay me either. But they're free.

    Zee Fresh Horses

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.