Professional Cycling · Public discussion

USA Cycling backs Lance!!!!

Started by bobke · · Last activity · 11 posts · 1,415 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Professional Cycling
Published
26 August 2005
Last activity
28 August 2005
Original author
bobke
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,415
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. By JIM VERTUNO
    AP Sports Writer

    Lance Armstrong received strong backing Friday from cycling's domestic governing body, which said accusations against the seven-time Tour de France champion are "completely without credibility."

    "Preposterous is a strong word, but it is warranted in this case," said Gerard Bisceglia, chief executive officer of USA Cycling.

    Armstrong has denied reports in the French media this week that he used a banned blood booster in his first tour victory in 1999. The sports newspaper L'Equipe reported that new tests on six urine samples Armstrong provided during the 1999 tour resulted in positive results for the red blood cell-booster EPO.

    "Lance Armstrong is one of the most tested athletes in the history of sport and he has come up clean every single time," Bisceglia said. "This kind of years-ago testing of a single sample with new technology is completely without credibility."

    "What's worse is that Lance cannot defend himself because there is no mechanism for final resolution," he added.

    Although Armstrong has not said if he'll pursue legal action, Bisceglia said USA Cycling will support him in whatever way he chooses to "denounce these accusations."

    On Thursday, Armstrong lashed out at the French lab that produced the findings.

    "There's a setup here and I'm stuck in the middle of it," Armstrong told The Associated Press. "I absolutely do not trust that laboratory," he said.

  2. Of course they'd back Lance, they backed Tyler when he was first accused. It's the right thing to do until the UCI or ASO come to a conclusion.

  3. hombredesubaru said:

    "There's a setup here and I'm stuck in the middle of it," Armstrong told The Associated Press. "I absolutely do not trust that laboratory," he said.


    [font=Verdana]Is this not the lab, the association and the test that you funded with 'six figures' from your own pocket ?

    [/font]The newspaper and the French lab has now come into question (by Armstrong) over its testing and reporting but its Armstrong own money which has assisted this testing. How can he say the test is poor when it his own money which has funded the testing ? [font=Verdana]Could the question arise that he paid them so he would not come into question ?[/font]

  4. "We are not taking a position as to guilt or innocence." Bisceglia said.

    cyclingnews.comnews.php

    hombredesubaru said:

    By JIM VERTUNO
    AP Sports Writer

    Lance Armstrong received strong backing Friday from cycling's domestic governing body, which said accusations against the seven-time Tour de France champion are "completely without credibility."

    "Preposterous is a strong word, but it is warranted in this case," said Gerard Bisceglia, chief executive officer of USA Cycling.

    Armstrong has denied reports in the French media this week that he used a banned blood booster in his first tour victory in 1999. The sports newspaper L'Equipe reported that new tests on six urine samples Armstrong provided during the 1999 tour resulted in positive results for the red blood cell-booster EPO.

    "Lance Armstrong is one of the most tested athletes in the history of sport and he has come up clean every single time," Bisceglia said. "This kind of years-ago testing of a single sample with new technology is completely without credibility."

    "What's worse is that Lance cannot defend himself because there is no mechanism for final resolution," he added.

    Although Armstrong has not said if he'll pursue legal action, Bisceglia said USA Cycling will support him in whatever way he chooses to "denounce these accusations."

    On Thursday, Armstrong lashed out at the French lab that produced the findings.

    "There's a setup here and I'm stuck in the middle of it," Armstrong told The Associated Press. "I absolutely do not trust that laboratory," he said.

  5. Check out this drivel I just read.
    dowagiacnews.comdnsports3.txt

    I can't believe there are journalists all over writing this [censored] and getting paid for it.

    Much rather read WBT's posts regarding the matter.

  6. Ullefan said:

    Much rather read WBT's posts regarding the matter.

    So now you are going to take your nose out of JU's ass and put it up WBT's. I am sure WBT is going to be fond of that.

  7. thebluetrain said:

    So now you are going to take your nose out of JU's ass and put it up WBT's. I am sure WBT is going to be fond of that.


    You are ridiculously stupid. 😎

  8. Ullefan said:

    You are ridiculously stupid. 😎

    Come on, you can do better than that. You have to resort to plagarism now.

  9. thebluetrain said:

    Come on, you can do better than that. You have to resort to plagarism now.


    You're probably the guy that wrote this drivel - dowagiacnews.comdnsports3.txt

  10. I am sure his mother is backing him as well you can start a thread about that too... 😎 😎

  11. whiteboytrash said:

    [font=Verdana]Is this not the lab, the association and the test that you funded with 'six figures' from your own pocket ?

    [/font]The newspaper and the French lab has now come into question (by Armstrong) over its testing and reporting but its Armstrong own money which has assisted this testing. How can he say the test is poor when it his own money which has funded the testing ? [font=Verdana]Could the question arise that he paid them so he would not come into question ?[/font]

    WBT why do you continue to post dubious lies. His donations went to the UCI and not the WADA lab, the French WADA lab. If you want to read the facts you can go here.

    http://www.eurosport.com/home/pages/v4/l0/s18/sport_lng0_spo18_sto709970.shtml

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.