US marines for 911 truth ...

Go an slap this Marine... maybe he slaps you back, maybe for 8
minutes,
like the fist-fight in THEY LIVE (Carpenter)... it took 8 minutes
beating each other to pulp
until they guy was willing to put on the glasses THAT ALLOWED HIM TO
SEE.

Here is yet another proof of FAKE TV
http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2007/08/faked-cnn-wtc-impact-video.html

No planes, thats right, no planes.

You can swear, you can threaten violence, you can get mad as hell....

http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2007/08/faked-cnn-wtc-impact-video.html

Quoted message said:

Off Topic, but hot topic ...

http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/marines-for-911-truth-war-economics...

You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
911,
claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.

http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/marines-for-911-truth-war-economics...

And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
explains
this astonishing FACT:http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/2007/07/review-911-tv-fakery.html

Happy sweating it ;-)

You have a right to your opinion so please continue to spew your drug
addled nonsense.

Quoted message said:

Off Topic, but hot topic ...

http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/marines-for-911-truth-war-economics...

You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
911,
claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.

http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/marines-for-911-truth-war-economics...

And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
explains
this astonishing FACT:http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/2007/07/review-911-tv-fakery.html

Happy sweating it ;-)

I watched it live on TV from a country far far away.

It didn't happen like you, I, or anyone else, were led
to believe in my mind. There are too many unaddupables.

George W knows a lot more than he will ever tell,
and even I'm not really that interested in conspiricy
theory.

There is a stink of rotten fish around it as far as
US GovCo go.

Ever see a large building professionally demolished? They set the
charges at the base of the supporting infrastructure. On detonation,
there is a large explosion at the base, and the whole thing comes
tumbling down to street level.

I didn't even read the Marine thing. Too scatterbrained.

On 9/11, it all came tumbling down. Then they cordoned everything
off (with Juliani's help) so that no independent verification of
the evidence could be done. As a result neither a coherent
conspiracy theory nor acceptance of the gov't position is possible
for those that do not drown in bias of one sort or another.

In watching something like "Loose Change", one shouldn't worry
about conspiracy theories. Just note indisputable facts like
the size of the steel girders, the fact that the towers were
-engineered- to withstand plane impact, etc.

There's no way that the planes, hitting the upper stories of the
towers could cause them to *totally* destruct and tumble to street
level given the video. Demolition maybe 20 min. after plane
impact is the only viable explanation I can find.

But, if you don't wanna believe that, there's -always- Bldg.
#7 ...

It's funny, funny times, folks. Watch very carefully to see
what they do next (and presumably prior to the 2008 US election).

AQ

"Look out, kid,
they keep it all hid!"
-from "Subterranean Homesick Blues", "Country Bob"
(from Hibbing) who passed on around 1964 or so. :-)

Quoted message said:

Off Topic, but hot topic ...

http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/marines-for-911-truth-war-economics.html

You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
911,
claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.

http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/marines-for-911-truth-war-economics.html

And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
explains
this astonishing FACT:
http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/2007/07/review-911-tv-fakery.html

Happy sweating it ;-)

"Janithor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

x-no-archive: yes
Yeah right, and how much was he paid for his little bit part in this whole
farce? Every thinking person knows 9/11 was engineered by the Freemasons,
the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, Mossad, the Pentagon, and Britney
Spears. Please, don't be a chump like the rest of the sheeple out there.

Beware of Britney. She is much smarter than people think! That's why she is
so effective behind the scenes. If you don't believe me, just take a look at
her Web site on semiconductor physics: http://britneyspears.ac/index.html

--
Nom dePlume, Ph.D.
Why, yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist.

Guide to Medications for Mental Illness:
http://www.mentalmeds.org

=====

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models

Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be demolished
anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the plane and the
building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.

To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie O'Donnell to
the building and use her for a target.

--
The hand of God may well be all around us, but it is not, nor can it be,
the task of science to dust for fingerprints.

- Robert Dorit

"Nom dePlume" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Janithor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

x-no-archive: yes
Yeah right, and how much was he paid for his little bit part in this
whole farce? Every thinking person knows 9/11 was engineered by the
Freemasons, the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, Mossad, the Pentagon, and
Britney Spears. Please, don't be a chump like the rest of the sheeple
out there.

Beware of Britney. She is much smarter than people think! That's why she
is so effective behind the scenes. If you don't believe me, just take a
look at her Web site on semiconductor physics:
http://britneyspears.ac/index.html

Yes indeed, Britney runs the illuminati.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

CyberDroog said:

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into the
WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models

Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be demolished
anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the plane and the
building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.

To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie O'Donnell
to the building and use her for a target.

Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
O'Donnell is another matter.

Ivan Marsh said:

CyberDroog said:

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick <[email hidden]>
wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into the
WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models

Quoted message said:

Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be demolished
anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the plane and the
building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.

Quoted message said:

To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie O'Donnell
to the building and use her for a target.

Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
O'Donnell is another matter.

I used to like Rosie a lot, I could never understand why she was so
unpopular in the survey I did... but, I'm not a such a big fan
anymore...
I think she was too tough on Bill Clinton...

-"Jordy"

jordy said:

Ivan Marsh said:

CyberDroog said:

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick <[email hidden]>
wrote:

Quoted message said:

>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>models

Quoted message said:

Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.

Quoted message said:

To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.

Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
O'Donnell is another matter.

I used to like Rosie a lot, I could never understand why she was so
unpopular in the survey I did... but, I'm not a such a big fan
anymore...
I think she was too tough on Bill Clinton...

She's one of those people that got the idea that their little bit of fame
means that no one will ever want them to just STFU. Being adjacent to
Madonna does not make you Madonna... and Madonna had the good sense to
keep her mouth shut most of the time.

Just like Sinéad O'Connor... Hey you stupid, bald [censored], guess what, you
are NOT Bono.

....So a young rock star goes to rock star heaven and finds St. Peter
waiting for him.

blah, blah, blah...

....and St. Peter says "No, that's God... he's just pretending to be Bono."

Ivan Marsh <[email hidden]> wrote in news:pan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666
@you.now:

Quoted message said:

CyberDroog said:

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into the
WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models

Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be demolished
anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the plane and the
building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.

To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie O'Donnell
to the building and use her for a target.

Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
O'Donnell is another matter.

I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct response
to my long post on this thread, particularly from the original poster.

--
Yes, THE John Henry

THE John Henry said:

Ivan Marsh <[email hidden]> wrote in news:pan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666
@you.now:

Quoted message said:

CyberDroog said:

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into the
>WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models

Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be demolished
anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the plane and the
building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.

To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie O'Donnell
to the building and use her for a target.

Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
O'Donnell is another matter.

I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct response
to my long post on this thread, particularly from the original poster.

I think you can assume that says something about your post.

Ivan Marsh said:

Just like Sinéad O'Connor... Hey you stupid, bald [censored], guess what, you
are NOT Bono.

I don't know much about her, but it was brave of her to rip up the
picture of the pope
on SNL back in 1992... I always wondered though why she didn't rip it
into more pieces...

-"Jordy"

jordy said:

Ivan Marsh said:

Just like Sinéad O'Connor... Hey you stupid, bald [censored], guess what,
you are NOT Bono.

I don't know much about her, but it was brave of her to rip up the
picture of the pope on SNL back in 1992... I always wondered though why
she didn't rip it into more pieces...

Brave maybe... stupid, without question, career over.

Much like KD Lang criticizing the beef industry. Not that I think there's
anything wrong with criticizing the beef industry (or anything else for
that matter) but when the majority of your audience are a bunch of red
neck wanna' be cowboys insulting cowboys is a bad idea. I guess she's
lucky she still had he lesbian audience or she might have disappeared
completely.

Ivan Marsh said:

THE John Henry said:

Ivan Marsh <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:pan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
>>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>models
>
> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>
> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.

Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
O'Donnell is another matter.

I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the original
poster.

I think you can assume that says something about your post.

'swonds! I'm mortally felled.

Polly wanna' cracker?

Ivan Marsh <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

THE John Henry said:

Ivan Marsh <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:pan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot
>>do anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>models
>
> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>
> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.

Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
O'Donnell is another matter.

I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the
original poster.

I think you can assume that says something about your post.

I do. I assume that it says my post was either irrefutable in general,
or the OP couldn't think of a single point to criticize in it, even
though I completely disagreed with him.

--
Yes, THE John Henry

THE John Henry said:

Ivan Marsh <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

THE John Henry said:

Ivan Marsh <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:pan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick
>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot
>>>do anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>>models
>>
>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
>> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
>> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>
>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
>> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.
>
> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
> O'Donnell is another matter.

I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the
original poster.

I think you can assume that says something about your post.

I do. I assume that it says my post was either irrefutable in general,
or the OP couldn't think of a single point to criticize in it, even
though I completely disagreed with him.

Do you keep your ego in the spare bedroom?

Ivan Marsh said:

THE John Henry said:

Ivan Marsh <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:04:41 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:
> Ivan Marsh <[email hidden]> wrote in
> news:pan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:
>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick
>>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>>> the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot
>>>> do anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>>> models
>>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
>>> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
>>> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>>
>>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
>>> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.
>> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
>> O'Donnell is another matter.
> I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
> response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the
> original poster.
I think you can assume that says something about your post.

I do. I assume that it says my post was either irrefutable in general,
or the OP couldn't think of a single point to criticize in it, even
though I completely disagreed with him.

Do you keep your ego in the spare bedroom?

I can predict what joke comes up when Cain gets around to reading this.

--
NiGHTS/Nightcrawler [mWo]
Fear Is The Mindkiller

"just a curtain jerking jobber here in RSPWland" -Lord Gow
"a laughably [censored] [censored]" -The Teacher
"pretty pathetic" -rwa2play
"a sarcastic douchebag" -Cain
"NiGHTS is gay!!!" -Corey